Polyphonic Spree

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Wow, these guys sound great! It's like what I've been wanting to hear for a while now. With 25 band members, they can't be making much money, though.

Scaredy Cat, Friday, 25 July 2003 13:44 (twenty-two years ago)

That's what I've been thinking for a while. The rider alone!

I stand by me 'Primal Scream for the Mike Curb Congregation set' assessment. More entertaining one-trick-pony than Godspeed, tho.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Friday, 25 July 2003 13:47 (twenty-two years ago)

I got the album the other day. Sorry, but I wasn't impressed. Flaming Lips minus sonicpissingaroundness.

Johnney B (Johnney B), Friday, 25 July 2003 13:50 (twenty-two years ago)

I thought more like Flaming Lips +. Had all the sonic pissingaroundness, but it was happy instead of sort of bittersweet or whatever. I love the Flaming Lips, too.

Not sure how their music would be a "one trick pony", Ned. The 25 members might seem like a gimmick. Are they a hippy commune or something?

This reminds me, Starlight Mints had 7 members on the last album?? The new one sounds so much more intricate with only 4.

Scaredy Cat, Friday, 25 July 2003 14:07 (twenty-two years ago)

The album we got had a live CD and a Virgin sampler Cd strapped to it... all for $10.

Scaredy Cat, Friday, 25 July 2003 14:08 (twenty-two years ago)

They're fucking awful; it beats me how, with the aforementioned 25+ members and multiple exciting unconventional instruments they STILL only sound like a 57th-rate Flaming Lips. And they're so evangelical about spreading their "joy"... it's reminiscent of being in a church with a load of happy-clappy lunatic Jesus freaks. Truly horrible.

The Lex (The Lex), Friday, 25 July 2003 14:11 (twenty-two years ago)

Ha, ha. Well, so far, I don't know what's more surprising to me, their incredible sound or the incredible reaction of ILM thus far. I seriously would've expected everyone to like this A LOT had they heard it. Ah well.

Scaredy Cat, Friday, 25 July 2003 14:13 (twenty-two years ago)

Well, people like all kinds of *shit*. Just look at the other threads. Jaysus!

We've never been able to agree on a single band! I think New Order came the closest.

King Kobra (King Kobra), Friday, 25 July 2003 14:45 (twenty-two years ago)

I saw them a couple of months ago and had to say that it was one hell of an experience to see so many people on stage. I love their music too. Sure, it's catchy feel good shit, sure it's got some of that Flaming Lips thing, but I'd rather listen to that than the latest Radiohead any day. The bigness of the record is only amplified live by the size of the band. I think the financial realities of touring a band that big is one of the reasons they signed with Hollywood Records - a Disney company - recently. Begs the question as to how long before the Spree is soundtracking a Disney summer cartoon?

dekone, Friday, 25 July 2003 14:55 (twenty-two years ago)

They're signed with a Disney a company? That is SO SO apposite.

The Lex (The Lex), Friday, 25 July 2003 14:56 (twenty-two years ago)

I'd take them over Flaming Lips, at least: there's a lot less pretense in it, and something about that simplicity -- they're like the AM-70s Jonestown Cult Sunshine Choir, full stop -- makes it a lot more likeable. There doesn't seem to be that much there to get excited about, though -- but I haven't heard more than a few tracks, so maybe there's something lurking.

I only just learned yesterday that it's the dude from Tripping Daisy!!! Eww.

nabisco (nabisco), Friday, 25 July 2003 15:02 (twenty-two years ago)

Hollywood : Disney — same label the Butthole Surfers are on.

Scaredy Cat, Friday, 25 July 2003 15:02 (twenty-two years ago)

they're the only band i can't blame for signing to such a huge label. you know they've all gotta either be starving or living off of tim's "i got a girl" royalties. i completely love them and am syked to hear the new album. quite frankly, i think they blow the flaming lips away. the lips are way overrated and i think their sonic noodling is aimless and goofy. it's like they've got some good ideas, but can rarely ever develop them well. the spree on the other hand, don't try nearly as hard as the lips do, because they recognize that they're just a super-happy chamber pop band. to me, i see more comparisons with spiritualized than with the lips. it's as if jason pierce was pulled out of his drug misery by god himself straight into heaven. and in response, all he can do is smile and cry (and write better (beach-boysish) songs). plus the fact that tripping daisy broke up due to the guitarist OD-ing on heroine gives DeLaughter's reassuring lyrics more impact. i almost got to see them in july, but they cancelled and i was devastated. i hope they stop by here on their next tour.

Felcher (Felcher), Friday, 25 July 2003 15:04 (twenty-two years ago)

The album doesn't stand on its own - you need to see them live.

The highlight of Glastonbury, no question.

russ t, Friday, 25 July 2003 15:39 (twenty-two years ago)

Are you guys talking about the brand new album? I haven't heard anything older. But the brand new album definitely does not need to be seen live to be appreciated. I very much dislike live shows for the most part.

Scaredy Cat, Friday, 25 July 2003 16:01 (twenty-two years ago)

They're even worse live, because you have to stand in the middle of a crowd of people waving their hands like they've been brainwashed, and it's REALLY like a happy-clappy church.

The Lex (The Lex), Friday, 25 July 2003 16:05 (twenty-two years ago)

Not as good as Flaming Lips or Mercury Rev.

Bogus shitty 36 minute outro piece, but the rest of the LP is pretty good. I saw them live earlier in the month and Tim is a lovely guy. Really nice.

Calz (Calz), Friday, 25 July 2003 17:48 (twenty-two years ago)

i want them to take me in.

NOW

reo fordecor, Friday, 25 July 2003 19:07 (twenty-two years ago)

LEX, are you a stiff or what?


they're so uplifting. i can't listen to them without throwing my hands in the air and singing along. it's such breezy music, makes me want to be a tree.

reo fordecor, Friday, 25 July 2003 19:14 (twenty-two years ago)

I only heard the remix on that "bang" cover cd, and it sux0r3d, but it may have been a shitty remix. is their album worth picking up if i see it really cheap?

Pashmina (Pashmina), Friday, 25 July 2003 19:16 (twenty-two years ago)

Worth listening to out of simple intrigue, and does paint smiles on faces nationwide, but beyond one listen the novelty wears off, which the Flaming Lips have overcome.

David Allen, Friday, 25 July 2003 20:08 (twenty-two years ago)

Even well over a year after I got the album I still veer between thinking they're great and thinkign they're shit.

Nick Southall (Nick Southall), Friday, 25 July 2003 21:53 (twenty-two years ago)

According to AMG they inspired the Beach Boys!

Curt1s St3ph3ns, Friday, 25 July 2003 21:58 (twenty-two years ago)

This reminds me, I hate Radiohead.

Scaredy cat (Natola), Friday, 25 July 2003 22:01 (twenty-two years ago)

they're so uplifting. i can't listen to them without throwing my hands in the air and singing along. it's such breezy music, makes me want to be a tree.

They're so fucking totalitarian about it too. It is like a cult. And the worst thing is people acting like this, this music which makes you happy lark, is some sort of novel concept, or at least one worthy of particular note.

The Lex (The Lex), Friday, 25 July 2003 22:26 (twenty-two years ago)

Um, maybe they're just trying to make happy music, Mr. Killjoy reader-into-things.

Scaredy cat (Natola), Friday, 25 July 2003 22:27 (twenty-two years ago)

It's not reading things into things, it's just a really self-evident observation. There is no aesthetic sense in which they're NOT like a cult... and the stuff they peddle is so gloopy and contrived. There's a complete lack of emotional depth; I prefer music which actually makes me happy, rather than makes me act like I'm happy. Which it doesn't. Er, not sure where that sentence was really headed.

The Lex (The Lex), Friday, 25 July 2003 23:44 (twenty-two years ago)

You're definitely reading into the idea that they believe music as a lark is some sort of novel concept.

Scaredy cat (Natola), Friday, 25 July 2003 23:58 (twenty-two years ago)

...And perhaps they just noticed that most music isn't happy. It's mostly about struggles and love problems, unfulfilled desires, etc.

Scaredy cat (Natola), Saturday, 26 July 2003 00:06 (twenty-two years ago)

hey lex, fuck you!!

reo fordecor, Saturday, 26 July 2003 00:10 (twenty-two years ago)

He's a negative nilly. Won't stand for happiness, dammit.

Scaredy cat (Natola), Saturday, 26 July 2003 00:11 (twenty-two years ago)

...And perhaps they just noticed that most music isn't happy. It's mostly about struggles and love problems, unfulfilled desires, etc.

This is just wrong, and proves my point that the Polyphonic Spree peddle "happiness" to miserable indie kids who wouldn't know, or have time for, real happiness if it bit them in the ass. I think they do genuinely believe that their making blissed-out-euphoric-unadulterated-happiness music is novel, but they're wrong. And I like my happiness to be real, thanks.

The Lex (The Lex), Saturday, 26 July 2003 00:23 (twenty-two years ago)

They dress alike.

That's about as deep as the cult thing goes. Everything, so far as I know, is done with a wink and a nod.

miloauckerman (miloauckerman), Saturday, 26 July 2003 00:26 (twenty-two years ago)

Exactly, milo, wink and nod was my take on it. Old Lex here seems to be blissfully unaware that most music is really about problems. That's why it's popular, because people can relate and commiserate.

Scaredy cat (Natola), Saturday, 26 July 2003 00:33 (twenty-two years ago)

most music is really about problems. That's why it's popular, because people can relate and commiserate.

Most music is about some sort of emotion, which is why people relate to it. A good proportion of music is about problems, yes, but you're overlooking the, ooh, gazillion songs written about positive emotions pre-Polyphonic Spree. I mean... most music makes people happy! That's, like, the point of most of it.

The Lex (The Lex), Saturday, 26 July 2003 00:42 (twenty-two years ago)

MOST are about problems. Think about it. There are some happy songs out there, for sure, but more often they are happy-sounding songs about problems.

Speaking of problems, what's your problem, exactly? You act like they're singing about Jesus or something. Their lyrics are pretty damn vague, man, so for you to be making these blanket statements about the "indie kids" who listen to it and to also project feelings onto their enjoyment of it... well, you're just retarded.

Scaredy cat (Natola), Saturday, 26 July 2003 00:54 (twenty-two years ago)

Three random examples, completely off the top of my head: Crazy In Love, Summertime, Elgar's Cello Concerto. To claim that 'most' songs are about problems is really, really strange.

I have no particular problem; I just think they're a shockingly bad band. As you said, vague lyrics: what's there to be happy about? They're not singing about anything meaningful, or anything full stop. The music's a mess. Where's the happiness?

And yeah, it all has that creepy and slightly uncomfortable feeling that music can tend towards when it *is* about Jesus.

The Lex (The Lex), Saturday, 26 July 2003 01:03 (twenty-two years ago)

It would kill you to flip over your cds one at a time and start going through the songs one at a time and start lookin' for all those happy songs... it's a "really, really strange" notion to you because you obviously never thought about it. Probably the reason happy-sounding songs freak you out.

Vague? Yes, vague, like topics you are familiar with but not senseless... Ok, first song is about sunshine. Next song I can remember is about "a love like this will keep us warm"... other songs are scenic like "Summertime Rolls" by Jane's Addiction.

Mess? No, the music's highly orchestrated.

You've never heard this album, have you? Yes, that's becoming apparant. My guess is a fraction of a song or two and a pic of them in robes was enough for you. Perhaps you were molested as a choirboy?

Scaredy cat (Natola), Saturday, 26 July 2003 01:11 (twenty-two years ago)

It wouldn't kill me, but it might kill my CDs, as they're in rather precarious piles around the room at the moment. By "really, really strange" I didn't mean strange as in "novel notion 'd never previously considered", I meant strange as in "peculiar and utterly wrong-headed". Like, dance music is specifically about problems, then? Classical and jazz music is 'about' anything at all?

As I said before, I'm amazed that something which *is* so highly orchestrated is such a mess. There's no subtlety or complexity or anything... it's just a load of instruments bunged into the mix, tuned to a major key and left to fester.

I've listened to half the album, once, and endured a Polyphonic Spree gig, which is quite enough thanks. And I'm one of the very few people who had a Catholic upbringing without being molested, so while not ideal it was hardly traumatic.

I'm going to bed now.

The Lex (The Lex), Saturday, 26 July 2003 01:21 (twenty-two years ago)

And yeah, it all has that creepy and slightly uncomfortable feeling that music can tend towards when it *is* about Jesus.

Which would be part of the point, I suspect. I'm not the biggest fan of the album, and I haven't seen the band in ages (back when you could still join the choir around here), but the crazy-preacher-man-cult thing shouldn't be taken at face value.

miloauckerman (miloauckerman), Saturday, 26 July 2003 01:27 (twenty-two years ago)

Actually Lex Tim is really just a super happy guy who grew up listening to big dumb AM pop like the Association & this is just his over the top approximation of that.Believe me when i say there is little or no connection to any organized religion with these guys.Mostly they just like to drink,toke, screw and party like every other band in the world.Of course with 22 of them on the same bus it makes privacy a real problem.And i'm a 42 year old cynic not an indie kid who wouldn't know happiness if it bit him in the ass.Sure it's all a bit silly but Tim really believes in happiness and a joyful life as a concept.No peddling he really is happy and wants you to be also.This music snob has decided to go with it.But yeah i recognize it is essentially childrens music to the power of 10.But remember alot of people thought the Ramones were really stupid & simple when they came out & now they are considered to be genius.Sometimes shallow simplicity is just easier to go wheeeeee!!! to than a deeper message.Maybe you just need more wheeeeee! moments in your life.

evan chronister (evan chronister), Saturday, 26 July 2003 01:27 (twenty-two years ago)

'k, fuck sleep... I'm having to bitch out Jelena Dokic fans on another board at the same time.

Tim really believes in happiness and a joyful life as a concept.No peddling he really is happy and wants you to be also.

Maaaaan. We're not at Woodstock any more, and don't need to be either.

Sometimes shallow simplicity is just easier to go wheeeeee!!! to than a deeper message.Maybe you just need more wheeeeee! moments in your life.

This is perfectly true... it might come down to everyone getting their shallow simplicity kicks from different places, but I do believe that there are people out there who won't accept shallow simplicity kicks unless they have indie cred attached; personally, I prefer PROPER pop music, and dance music you can actually dance to. Like 'Sandstorm' by Darude.

The Lex (The Lex), Saturday, 26 July 2003 01:34 (twenty-two years ago)

Ha, this is going to be fun. Dance music doesn't have many lyrics, but, yeah, plenty of it is about problems-- "struggles and love problems, unfulfilled desires, etc", like I said.

Jazz singers sing about problems quite frequently; Billie Holiday, Ella Fitzgerald.

Then, we have the whole genre of Blues. Country. Even Doo Wop and all that pre-Beatles "happy" music is about problems.

Classical music is mean and moody; there's plenty of happy classical, but plenty of chaos and anger, too.

Then, if we start talking pop music and rock music, which is really the category we should probably be talking about, since that's the category of music they play and this is why I said "...and perhaps they just noticed that most music isn't happy. It's mostly about struggles and love problems, unfulfilled desires, etc. " (Funny how we got so far off track, huh?) Well, then, shit, you're fucked if you try to claim most of that is not about "struggle, love problems, unfulfilled desires, etc."

I have a hand you can talk to when you wake up in the morning. G'night.

Scaredy cat (Natola), Saturday, 26 July 2003 01:34 (twenty-two years ago)

Nothing you've just posted proves your point at all. Yeah, plenty of dance music is about problems blah. Yeah, jazz singers frequently sing about life's sorrows. Yeah, there's plenty of chaos and anger in classical music. And? You seem to be suggesting that this is some sort of blanket rule for "most" music.

I'm sorry, I cannot talk to someone who says things like "classical music is mean and moody". Yeah, like Ode To Joy.

Sweet dreams.

The Lex (The Lex), Saturday, 26 July 2003 01:39 (twenty-two years ago)

Maaaaan. We're not at Woodstock any more, and don't need to be either.

How is that a criticism of the band? It's not that they don't do 'happy' well, it's that you don't like 'happy.'

Criticism based solely on what you hoped to hear (genre- or mood-wise) is self-defeating. Go put on something that's not happy, since that's your problem with the PS.

miloauckerman (miloauckerman), Saturday, 26 July 2003 01:43 (twenty-two years ago)

I'm sorry, I cannot talk to someone who says things like "classical music is mean and moody". Yeah, like Ode To Joy.

Yeah, I'm sorry, but I can not talk to someone who takes half of a sentence out of context to "win". Lamer than a one-legged man with osteoporosis, mah friend! Here's the rest of the sentence for you: "Classical music is mean and moody; there's plenty of happy classical, but plenty of chaos and anger, too. "

Scaredy Cat, Saturday, 26 July 2003 01:50 (twenty-two years ago)

How is that a criticism of the band? It's not that they don't do 'happy' well, it's that you don't like 'happy.'

Yeah, I was wondering what bands he likes and if he puts them through the same analysis. "Ach! I hate all that heavy metal and punk shit! They try too hard to be angry. What are they so angry about?"

Scaredy cat, Saturday, 26 July 2003 01:54 (twenty-two years ago)

lex, you have all these invented problems with the spree, then you name check darude as good dance music when it's universally known as an unmitigated piece of groovebox-preset crap that fifty other artists already made fifty different times fifteen years ago, thus invalidating your argument. c'mon - you don't like the spree and that's that. you've bitched about their 'cult' status, which as someone said above is limited to the robes (aside: when they did an instore at the shop where i work one of my coworkers was convinced they were all zonked on acid) and you've likened the crowd to "happy-clappy lunatic Jesus freaks" - gee, ever been to a club where one of these darude-esque crap trance dj's are playing? is there really a difference between the crowd there and your average spree crowd? at least the spree are getting some sort of emotion out of their crowds instead of the usual rockshow cool distance. the point is that you simply don't like them and are most definitely reading into the situation things that just aren't there. it's deceptive but simple: fun music, happy people. nothing more. it just takes a listener who can put aside the cynicism and irony for a minute and take it at face value. another point: just cause you don't like it doesn't mean it isn't good...

heywood jablomi (heywood), Saturday, 26 July 2003 04:50 (twenty-two years ago)

How is that a criticism of the band? It's not that they don't do 'happy' well, it's that you don't like 'happy.'

That wasn't a criticism of 'happy', that was a criticism of 'hippy'. The reason I dislike the PS is BECAUSE I like happy music, and thus object to a band who use it as a gimmicky selling point, as if the concept of happy music is vaguely radical or even semi-interesting, and who then turn out to be as shit as the PS are.

I didn't namecheck Darude as 'good dance music', I namechecked it as shallow simplistic fun. It has everything which PS worshippers claim the PS do, but doesn't pretend to be anything other than preset groovebox mindlessness and therefore doesn't get the ridiculous adulation which the PS do.

another point: just cause you don't like it doesn't mean it isn't good...

I think this might have serious ramifications for the whole business of music criticism... but that'd be another argument entirely.

The Lex (The Lex), Saturday, 26 July 2003 10:08 (twenty-two years ago)

Do the Polyphonic Spree "pretend to be anything other than" simple dumb happy music? They're not using it as a gimmicky selling point except in the way that GYBE! are using moody&atmospheric as a gimmicky selling point, or Justin Timberlake is using 'pop music with falsetto and good production' as a gimmicky selling point.

I'm pretty sure there's an interview somewhere with Tim DeLaughter where he explains that they wear the robes because normally, when he goes to shows, he keeps getting distracted by things like the guitarist's really cool shoes and he wanted to minimise that as much as possible. Which is something I can get behind.

I think the PS are pretty fantastic, although more so live than on record - just little things, like the album mix of 'soldier girl' being too slow, but it means I don't get the same joy-on - and I like happy music in general, so it's not that they're the one shining ironic light in my bitter and twisted indie heart. (I also dislike hippy-type music, and the Southern Preacher schtick in Lift to Experience's stuff irritates me: so if that's all there is to PS, I've obviously been deluding myself all my life about my tastes.)

cis (cis), Saturday, 26 July 2003 11:41 (twenty-two years ago)

...they wear the robes because normally, when he goes to shows, he keeps getting distracted by things like the guitarist's really cool shoes and he wanted to minimise that as much as possible.

This sounds just as disingenuous as Sinead saying she shaved her head because she didn't like the way people focused on women's hairstyles.

nickn (nickn), Saturday, 26 July 2003 20:14 (twenty-two years ago)

ten months pass...
http://hollywoodrecords.go.com/polyphonicspree/questfortherest/

just got sent the above link by my flatmate - lovely strange Save The Polyphonic Spree game with four new tracks ("Together We're Heavy", "Suitcase Calling", "Ensure Your REservation" and "Hold Me Now") accompanying each level. Business as usual, then, but still lush.

CharlieNo4 (Charlie), Friday, 4 June 2004 15:06 (twenty-two years ago)

haha, that game was fun but I hate the vocal stuff in the music!

HAMBURGER NEURON GROUP (ex machina), Friday, 4 June 2004 15:16 (twenty-two years ago)

nine months pass...
Not a single Pazz and Jop voter had "Hold Me Now" on their 2004 singles list.

Tim Ellison (Tim Ellison), Saturday, 26 March 2005 19:15 (twenty-one years ago)

Bad for those voters. Polyphonic Spree are certainly brilliant, and exactly what music needs in the mid 00s.

Geir Hongro (GeirHong), Saturday, 26 March 2005 22:53 (twenty-one years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.