bullshit review

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
As a huge fan of the Detroit Cobras, I read this hilarious review and was pretty appalled/amused. Who's this moron?

Perhaps some of you agree, I dunno. Might as well trash the first couple Rolling Stones LPs while you're at it, then. The logic herein escapes me.


Detroit Cobras
Life, Love and Leaving
[Sympathy for the Record Industry]
Rating: 4.3

When I pay for a Dee-troit Cobra, I expect a huge black snake coiled in a pool of grease with a shiny, metallic cowl, skin made from recalled Firestone tires, and fangs dripping with venomous gasoline. I want it to hiss like a demon and grind like a faulty axle. I do not want some Ronnie Spector imitation fronting an oldies band.

Regrouped after a four-year hiatus, this retro-soul act does its share of playing out in the Motor City scene. They're getting the band together and playing soul music, which is a Blues Brothers/Commitments type story you've gotta love, if not listen to. So here are some questions you might ask yourself: do you listen to the Commitments instead of Wilson Pickett? Do you think the Black Crowes' take on "Hard to Handle" surpasses Otis Redding's version? If so, you might enjoy Life, Love and Leaving. After all, bassist Eddie Hawrsch (aka Eddie Harsch-- whoever wrote the insert also misspelled Otis Redding's name) is the keyboard player from the Black Crowes.

The Detroit Cobras should continue providing live music for their local scene. That is a noble endeavor. Rachel Nagy is a fine belter whose bluesy growl and soul hiccups no doubt get a bar jumping. Yet to slap this disc into the player thinking it's the real thing, you'd just be kidding yourself. True, the Cobras have delved deeper into the soul catalog than most cover bands, coming up with competent versions of Ike & Tina Turner's "Can't Miss Nothing," Ottis (aka Otis) Redding's "Shout Bama Lama" and other obscurities. However, the soul routine is mere homage, without any original heat. Nagy hits all the right notes, but never makes these songs real. It's rote nostalgia. Maybe that catch in her voice on "Cry On" (written by Ronnie Mack of "He's So Fine" fame) isn't affected, but for the most part, the singing:soul ratio is only slightly better than Cher's version of "Shoop Shoop Song (It's in His Kiss)" or Tracey Ullman's take on "They Don't Know."

Nagy is the story because the band isn't. They're a smooth, tight band that never speaks as a single beast. They're fine backing musicians, but no smoke rises. This is often billed as punk music, but the Cobras veer closer to sounding like a good wedding band. Perhaps this is the result of an energy-sapping studio session, but the accompaniment could use some grit, some weird distortion-- anything to make it more interesting.

Their best moment comes with the opener, "Hey Sah-Lo-Ney--" the closest thing Mickey Lee Lane ever had to a hit-- incorrectly listed here as "Hey Sailor." A snakecharmer's call-and-response over a barnstorming boogie, this one song is the bright moment of a weak offering. Soon after, it becomes a corny affair, full of Chiffons-esque sha-la-la's and Ronnie Specter Whoa-ho-ho's and little fire.

The Detroit Cobras don't anger me. Maybe that's because they're in no way famous. Give them a gold record for this kind of pale imitation, and perhaps I'd get upset. Maybe their saving grace is that they don't go for obvious hits, as you might remember Michael Bolton used to do. It's really unfair to compare this earnest bar band with hacks like Cher and Bolton. (Come to think of it, I haven't heard Michael Bolton in a while! Life is getting better!) Of course, no one's really doing the old soul trip these days. Old psychedelia, old heavy metal, retro-techno, it's all going on again and again. But the closest thing you get to the Supremes during this arc of predictability are the state-of-the-art Destiny's Child.

The recently departed Make-Up did this music (and destroyed it) right. It's a little sad that all we have going in old soul recycling are these poor rockers trying to do it correctly, and so, of course, doing it wrong. They mean no harm, and they sincerely love their betters. They're just worse. This CD doesn't get played again unless I find a mix tape segue that's crying for "Hey Sailor" or whatever it's called. There are lots of snakes out there; this one doesn't have enough venom.

-Dan Kilian

ham on rye (ham on rye), Wednesday, 30 July 2003 22:17 (twenty-two years ago)

Live they come off as exactly that-- a shitty wedding band.

David Allen, Wednesday, 30 July 2003 22:48 (twenty-two years ago)

Sure they do.

ham on rye (ham on rye), Thursday, 31 July 2003 00:12 (twenty-two years ago)

if they sound like michael bolton then they must be fantastic.

keith (keithmcl), Thursday, 31 July 2003 00:13 (twenty-two years ago)

ham on rye perhaps you should tells us why your opinion differs.

strongo hulkington (dubplatestyle), Thursday, 31 July 2003 00:15 (twenty-two years ago)

it is sad that this guy does not bring up the dirtbombs in this review. cuz like nobody else is doing the retro-soul covers thing EXCEPT MICK FUCKING COLLINS, especially in Detroit.

They might not be the greatest live band but Hey Sailor and Shout Bama-Lama have more fire than 90& of the canon garage shit in the Nuggets box. They deserve classic status for those two recordings alone.

Mike Taylor (mjt), Thursday, 31 July 2003 00:21 (twenty-two years ago)

hey sailor is a totally fab track but i haven't heard the rest

electric sound of jim (electricsound), Thursday, 31 July 2003 00:24 (twenty-two years ago)

They might not be the greatest live band but Hey Sailor and Shout Bama-Lama have more fire than 90& of the canon garage shit in the
Nuggets box. They deserve classic status for those two recordings alone.


i have never heard the detroit cobras but i don't believe the above statement so much that it's scary.

monks&sonicslove, Thursday, 31 July 2003 00:28 (twenty-two years ago)

woo! smash the canon!

strongo hulkington (dubplatestyle), Thursday, 31 July 2003 00:29 (twenty-two years ago)

woo! send me my beer.

Mike Taylor (mjt), Thursday, 31 July 2003 00:30 (twenty-two years ago)

woo! nuggets is canon?

electric sound of jim (electricsound), Thursday, 31 July 2003 00:31 (twenty-two years ago)

no, detroit is canon.

moultyfan, Thursday, 31 July 2003 00:34 (twenty-two years ago)

jim do you live on mars?

mike, get real.

strongo hulkington (dubplatestyle), Thursday, 31 July 2003 00:34 (twenty-two years ago)

when did the first mitch ryder album come out? in another couple of years they should have it down.

paulrevereisgod, Thursday, 31 July 2003 00:39 (twenty-two years ago)

I'lll take the bait. The comparison with the Make-Up is just silly, and is exactly where this reviewer fails to "get it." Putting aside the fact that the Make-up are unspeakably dire, both bands are/were trying to do very different things, and to say that the DCs fail where the Make-Up succeed is like saying the Cramps fail where the B-52s succeed. Yes, they are drawing from the same (or, anyways, a similar) well, but they're doing very different things with the water.

A better point of comparison would be with the aforementioned Cramps. The primary role of both the DCs and the Cramps is as archaeologists. (And damn if the reviewer isn't selling the DCs short in this regard. Ike and Tina? Try Nathanial Mayer!) Yes, they are a "cover band," but their covers are far from obvious, are taken from actually quite disparate sources, and are brought together into a coherent whole to create a new way of hearing all of these songs (and lets not forget that we wouldn't even be hearing many of these songs in the first place if not for them). The Cramps helped create an alternate history of "punk" by drawing from a lot of obscure or not-so-obvious earlier genres, and I think the DCs are sort of trying to do the same thing...

That said, the DCs are nowhere as good as the Cramps because they don't really transcend their role as archaeologists. This is perhaps the reviewer's main point: they lack any real defining character. And, unfortunately, he's right. But they're a far cry from a wedding band...

flightsatdusk (flightsatdusk), Thursday, 31 July 2003 00:44 (twenty-two years ago)

He probably just wants 'em to sound more like the Mitch Ryder's Detroit lp, which probably WOULD be an improvement.

Mr. Diamond (diamond), Thursday, 31 July 2003 00:46 (twenty-two years ago)

Flight is OTM.

Mike Taylor (mjt), Thursday, 31 July 2003 00:46 (twenty-two years ago)

aw piss off, y'all, or we'll send Rachel to come kick your ass

http://www.osric.com/~jeremy/pics/fourth_street_fair/fsf4.jpg

Kingfish (Kingfish), Thursday, 31 July 2003 00:51 (twenty-two years ago)

Wow, has this idgit ever seen them live? Heard them live? They put on a hell of a show - and seeing what state Ms. Nagy is in is what makes it a gamble. When she is ON, damn, this girl is ON!

The only complaint that I have about them is that ALL they do are covers. But you know - they do covers DAMN well. And as far as a comparison to the MAKE-UP - that's just ridiculous, in my opinion...

nerdtech, Thursday, 31 July 2003 01:06 (twenty-two years ago)

that guy singing looks tough

keith (keithmcl), Thursday, 31 July 2003 02:08 (twenty-two years ago)

does anyone honestly think there's anything special about girls with "husky" voices and sleeve tattoos singing rockabilly/garage rock/the blues anymore?

strongo hulkington (dubplatestyle), Thursday, 31 July 2003 02:10 (twenty-two years ago)

does anyone honestly think there's anything special about [type of person] with [type of voice] and [physical attribute] singing [some random musical style] anymore?

electric sound of jim (electricsound), Thursday, 31 July 2003 02:15 (twenty-two years ago)

(sorry to keep picking on you but that was sub-strongo at best)

electric sound of jim (electricsound), Thursday, 31 July 2003 02:16 (twenty-two years ago)

anyway to answer strong...maybe...

gaz (gaz), Thursday, 31 July 2003 02:20 (twenty-two years ago)

"brought together into a coherent whole"

problem being that the coherent whole isn't that great, and funnelling some 'obscure soul gems' into the same garage punk jello mold is a retreat away from the material, not a jump into it. that said; I like them okay, but how are you people raving over 'shout bama lama' when 'he did it' is so much better?

I liked the make-up okay, too. 'here comes the judge' is great.

g--ff c-nn-n (gcannon), Thursday, 31 July 2003 03:09 (twenty-two years ago)

g--ff c-nn-n -- despite your singling me out, I agree with you. Except for the whole liking the Make-Up thing.

Jess -- Sleeve tattoos? Did you not see the picture?

flightsatdusk (flightsatdusk), Thursday, 31 July 2003 03:50 (twenty-two years ago)

When I pay for a Dee-troit Cobra, I expect a huge black snake coiled in a pool of grease with a shiny, metallic cowl, skin made from recalled Firestone tires, and fangs dripping with venomous gasoline.

This is like the ugliest first line ever for a review. And I bet you all that the writer took two hours to come up with it, too. It's just so overwrought.


Christine 'Green Leafy Dragon' Indigo (cindigo), Thursday, 31 July 2003 04:00 (twenty-two years ago)

i didn't know grease wore cowls!

Tracer Hand (tracerhand), Thursday, 31 July 2003 04:58 (twenty-two years ago)

And he didn't just happen to make the obvious Detroit = Motor City reference, he rolled layed down and rolled around in it, savoring every shitty angle of it.

David Allen, Thursday, 31 July 2003 05:01 (twenty-two years ago)

Detroit is Sin City now! that's gonna save the place! I demand gambling metaphors posthaste!

Mr. Diamond (diamond), Thursday, 31 July 2003 05:59 (twenty-two years ago)

The first and last sentences make splendid bookends for the review in fact: "There are lots of snakes out there; this one doesn't have enough venom."

I can just imagine old Dan leaning back at his desk once he'd typed that and lighting a cigarette, in an almost post-coital manner.

DJ Mencap (DJ Mencap), Thursday, 31 July 2003 11:34 (twenty-two years ago)

lemme rephrase: ..."a retreat away from being all that good." I have no idea what 'diving into the material' means, or why it's advisable. but yeah, jello mold.

g--ff c-nn-n (gcannon), Thursday, 31 July 2003 15:25 (twenty-two years ago)

is anyone really going to "slap this disc into the player" thinking that they're getting something on a par with otis redding or aretha franklin? i think that with bands of this ilk (dirtbombs aside) everyone knows exactly what to expect. if anything, the detroit cobras irritate me less than a lot of new garage rock - strong interpretations are preferable to lame rewrites.

lauren (laurenp), Thursday, 31 July 2003 16:02 (twenty-two years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.