Trane's Ascension

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
I honestly thought i was a seasoned jazz listener, someone with an open mind. This is certainly some of the most challenging music i have ever heard. What do other people think about this music? Did it take you long to come to terms with it? Just sounds like a cacophony of noise, but i really want to understand it; trane was an amazing musician.

Jimmy Parker, Friday, 12 September 2003 19:52 (twenty-two years ago)

this is actually much more structured and blues-y compared to some later european free jazz. this record (as many of the later coltrane stuff) is very directly tied to his spirituality and the sense that music provides some kind of transcendent power. as for the recording itself it is a great ensemble effort. if you listen a bit more closely (and check out the liner notes, not sure what format of the recording you have but the cd reissue has great notes) you will realize that there is a standard rotation of solos throughout the piece. despite sounding chaotic there are some underlying structural and tonal themes that play throughout...

marcg (marcg), Friday, 12 September 2003 20:48 (twenty-two years ago)

it never really screamed freaky to me. i mean, sure, it's pretty out, but like marcg says, listen to the european cats and this sounds very tame. check out Brotzmann's "Machine Gun", Alan Silva, even Sun Ra.

JasonD (JasonD), Friday, 12 September 2003 22:36 (twenty-two years ago)

well-intentioned as such comments are, i don't think it's all that instructive to tell people who know other coltrane that what they find chaotic is tame compared to other euro free stuff. as a former bebop head, it took me almost a full year to appreciate even "Love Supreme" - it can be really hard to get your feet wet in that stuff when you've never really listened to it before.

i reccomend listening to it a couple of times and trying to hear communication between the players (echoed phrases, moments of bizarre synergy, dynamic shifts instigated by one or two players) and if you're still not digging it, take a break for a few days and let it all sink in.

Dave M. (rotten03), Saturday, 13 September 2003 02:07 (twenty-two years ago)

taking a break with this record is good advice; make experiences with it special. some people can listen to 'ascension' all day long, but this is a record I've listened to less than 20 times in 10 years, and each time it leaves a deeper mark.

Also, though this is the most prolonged statement, the other records pave the way. Get those too! 'Meditations' is a good gateway between 'Love Supreme' and 'Ascension'.

I can tell from your post that you already love it, c'mon...

jl (Jon L), Saturday, 13 September 2003 02:43 (twenty-two years ago)

I like dave M's comment here bcz, in the couple of times I've heard the record, I am not getting as much from it as with 'machine gun' or 'magic city' (the latter, which I've only heard once but really enjoyed it and look forward to hearing it again, the former abt 20-25 times but i got it straight away). But in those records you have ppl who have played with ra for years and rehearsed with him and in 'machine gun' everyone is committed to free playing.

Whereas with coltrane there's something pretty confused about it: my guess is that coltrane had never left hard bop (I don't know that for a fact but its just something abt his palying that is not that satisfying at times, I'm just trying to speculate here) and then he bought players who played in that to play with ppl playing free and that tension makes for unique records; I haven't quite got my head around some of that (though i really enjoy 'live in japan' set).

Julio Desouza (jdesouza), Saturday, 13 September 2003 09:24 (twenty-two years ago)

eleven months pass...
revive cuz this record pwns
(I just listened for the first time in a few months)

AaronHz (AaronHz), Friday, 3 September 2004 08:31 (twenty-one years ago)

its like he was alreasy a great surfer and had chose the big waves (mcoy et al) and got the kudos and now decided he wanted to have a go at choppy swirling bad current rip shit but he was still a big guy on a big board.

gaz (gaz), Friday, 3 September 2004 08:42 (twenty-one years ago)

does anyone have the record where he does all the other songs from "the sound of music"???

bob snoom, Friday, 3 September 2004 09:13 (twenty-one years ago)

i remember first time i listened to it. it just blew my mind. never thought a thing like that could be called music. there is not a big distance Ascension and merzbow/japanese 90s noise. however, dont listen to it stoned, its a helluva trip.

karl76, Friday, 3 September 2004 14:30 (twenty-one years ago)

mmmm Coltrane...

martin (martin), Friday, 3 September 2004 14:33 (twenty-one years ago)

I don't find "Ascension" nearly as extreme as most of you. Sometimes, I find it an easier listen that "A Love Supreme", I don't know, maybe it's the shorter track lengths (on "Ascension").

If I want a seriously heavy Coltrane trip, I listen to "Interstellar Space".

(re: Karl's Ascension/Merzbow comment, I "wrote" a noise track whose sounds were entirely sampled from a drum solo on "Interstellar Space"!)

Barry Bruner (Barry Bruner), Friday, 3 September 2004 14:43 (twenty-one years ago)

free jazz/mezbow, japnoize comparisons annoy me -- even though merzbow has released a free jazz tribute record which i've never heard.

Julio Desouza (jdesouza), Friday, 3 September 2004 14:46 (twenty-one years ago)

"door open at 8am" ???? that's great!!! very interstellar in it's aspect yet you can still picture masami absentmindedly fudging with the "high speed dubbing" button on his tape deck. kinda lofi sun ra interstellar, i guess.

bob snoom, Friday, 3 September 2004 15:11 (twenty-one years ago)

Sometimes, I find it an easier listen that "A Love Supreme", I don't know, maybe it's the shorter track lengths (on "Ascension").

What?

taking a break with this record is good advice; make experiences with it special. some people can listen to 'ascension' all day long, but this is a record I've listened to less than 20 times in 10 years, and each time it leaves a deeper mark.

I agree with this statement. When I first got the album, I found it hard to make it through the song. A few months later I was in a record store where it was playing and it completely bowled me over. I played it the other night for the first time in years, and once again was amazed by it. It does seem more structured now, and not as completely formless as it struck me when I first heard it. But I think it's because I didn't force myself to listen to it in order to try and understand it that it impresses me each time I do decide to listen to it.

Vic Funk, Friday, 3 September 2004 15:11 (twenty-one years ago)

Er, sorry, I don't know why I wrote that. I had just woken. Anyway, ignore that sentence.

Barry Bruner (Barry Bruner), Friday, 3 September 2004 15:18 (twenty-one years ago)

I've always thought "Ascension" a bit overrated. The structure's too predictable & repetitive (tenor solo/freakout/trumpet solo/freakout/etc.), Trane only gets to solo for like, five minutes, tops, and it's just too hard to hear what's going on during those ensemble parts. I find seven horns, all playing more-or-less whatever they want simultaneously, to be just TOO MUCH to get a sonic grip on - Free Jazz and Machine Gun and New York Eye And Ear Control did just fine with only four horns.

(Incidentally, Interstellar Space is possibly my favourite document of recorded sound EVER!)

Myonga Von Bontee (Myonga Von Bontee), Friday, 3 September 2004 15:39 (twenty-one years ago)

one month passes...
Being that is has the Jones/Tyner rhythm section, Ascension is bound to swing pretty hard, and it does! In one sense it's a lot easier to "get" than much European improv or strictly free playing that came afterwards -- there is something of a theme to it, the players trade solos, the playing is passionate and soulful (add scare quotes if you must), and Tyner's karate-chop chord slabs tie it to Coltrane's other less out-there stuff from the same general period. From a different angle, however, it's much tougher to "get" than the stuff that came after it -- often for the same reasons. Different listeners who are used to the way-way-way abstract Euro stuff or the more formally/technically free-and-fucked-up stuff might find it a bit tame. Julio's comments above are a perfect example of this particular aspect of the record's difficulty. I personally like this about it -- a snide side of me revels in the fact that people who like free jazz for the noise'n'thrills but can't get with trad jazz find Ascension unsatisfying (hey, their loss!) -- it's a "fuck-you" to add to the list of other, perhaps more intended, "fuck-you"s of the record, one that only became apparent with time and context.

Clarke B. (Clarke B.), Monday, 4 October 2004 23:40 (twenty-one years ago)

nine months pass...
The group sessions sound a lot like the most unhinged of New Orleans funeral corteges; this is hardly unrooted music (in the sense of tradition).

TS: Edition I vs. Edition II?

Rickey Wright (Rrrickey), Friday, 29 July 2005 08:34 (twenty years ago)

Possibly Edition I, which is slightly untidier but which does include a judge's summing up of a drum solo from Elvin at the end. On Edition II he doesn't solo at all, and I wonder how the group dynamic would have altered if Rashied Ali had been added as second drummer, as was originally planned (Ali withdrew after throwing a hissy fit because he wanted to be the sole drummer on the record).

In Grove's Dictionary Max Harrison refers to Ascension as "a deeply troubled record," and it's clearly a prayer for something which can't quite be obtained or reached - compare the absolute assurance of Ayler's parallel work of the time, playing like a man whose prayer has been answered.

My major problem with Ascension is, as I've noted elsewhere, Coltrane - he constantly tugs back towards the Red Garland days, harmonically and rhythmically, doesn't quite manage to break loose, like someone who's enthusiastic about the New Thing but is perhaps a bit too Old really to dive into it with complete commitment. The conflict is further complicated by the inclusion of Freddie Hubbard and McCoy Tyner as, effectively, straight men - when Hubbard begins his solo the rhythm section immediately and instinctively sildes back into 4/4 modal mode and we are suddenly in the middle of an average 1965 Blue Note recording session. Tyner makes a manful attempt at being more oblique than his norm - the displaced tone clusters in his solo suggest recent absorption in Paul Bley's work - but never quite convinces as a free player, and his personal discomfort in the free zone has been extensively noted, not least by Tyner himself.

Archie Shepp manages a reasonable compromise in his solo feature, which is pretty much Ben Webster on a spaceship in Watts; but 25-year-old Pharaoh Sanders is the man of the match, snarling in the ensembles of supplication, barely hiding his impatience to get out front, and when his tenor finally erupts it is like a fist in the face - and there is an audible pause of uncertainty from both Tyner and Garrison as if they're not at all sure how to deal with this abrupt outbreak. It could be said, though, that Marion Brown and John Tchicai's altos are the most troubled and uncertain voices on display here - both seem not quite with us, as if they were ghosting for Dolphy.

The seesaw ensembles are soberly and solemnly constructed on a firm modal basis; there isn't the damn-you get-it-done-yesterday explosiveness of Machine Gun, the programmatic chaos of Haden's "Circus '68/'69" or the partly deprogrammed tumult of Westbrook's "Conflict" - though all of those three had obvious political subtexts. Ascension forgoes the political entirely in favour of the spiritual - so in modern terms it is comparatively quite for a "free jazz" record, but in structural and politico-aesthetic terms considerably less "free" than the subsequent Alice/Rashied small group work. Interstellar Space is maybe the only time when Coltrane managed to shake the modal monkey off his back, and that probably because there were no extraneous elements to disturb the direct interaction between his tenor and Ali's drums.

Marcello Carlin (nostudium), Friday, 29 July 2005 09:03 (twenty years ago)

sp: comparatively quiet for a "free jazz" record.

Marcello Carlin (nostudium), Friday, 29 July 2005 09:07 (twenty years ago)

I meant "group sections." Drunk.

Rickey Wright (Rrrickey), Friday, 29 July 2005 20:57 (twenty years ago)

Coltrane practiced relentlessly before the Ascension sessions, producing a storm brewing deep within his mind.

Rob Uptight. (Rob Uptight.), Friday, 29 July 2005 21:09 (twenty years ago)

eleven months pass...
I have a question about Edition II. I was able to find a list of the solos in their order for Edition I, but none for Edition II. Does anyone the order? Is it the same as the Edition I order?

Ivan Gallardo (Ivan), Saturday, 8 July 2006 19:47 (nineteen years ago)

There's no Jones solo and Tchicai and Shepp are in reverse order. Edition II solos:

Coltrane
Johnson
Sanders
Hubbard
Tchicai
Shepp
Brown
Tyner

LRJP! (LRJP!), Saturday, 8 July 2006 20:17 (nineteen years ago)

Bitchin'. Thank you much.

Ivan Gallardo (Ivan), Saturday, 8 July 2006 21:14 (nineteen years ago)

one year passes...

hmm i'm trying to find out who plays what on this, i know the order of players but can't really pick up on the differences in tone yet

i think i'd need something like Johnson solo @ 10:00, Sanders @ 18:00 minutes

yeah...

rizzx, Saturday, 17 May 2008 16:38 (eighteen years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.