Uk or Us: which country gave the biggest contribution to contemporary music?

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Quite a senseless question, I admit it... besides it might reek of xenophobia. And given that very few of us are likely to share the same opinion it might even lead to a furious discussion in which we'll insult each other... gosh, what have I done?

By the way, my opinion is that the US are far superior... they gave us jazz, Bob Dylan, the Flamin' Groovies (you probably don't care...), the Pixies... and I'm just listing a few favourites.

Oh, England was pretty good too... the Beatles, the Rolling Stones, quite a few punk acts... who knows?

Simone

Simona Oltolina, Friday, 26 January 2001 01:00 (twenty-three years ago) link

Scotland was not too bad either... That's the bit in the UK above England for all you lovely US people! ;)
  • Lonnie Donegan!!!! (influential to a lot of US and UK peeps, including the Beatles!!!)
  • Alex Harvey!!!
  • That bloke from The Sweet!!!!
  • Nazareth!!!! (apparently the lead singer was very influential on US metal vocal styles, including that of Axl Rose and David Coverdale!!!)
  • Early Simple Minds!!!!! (1979-1982ish)
  • The Jesus & Mary Chain, and loads of Greater Glasgow guitary bands like BMX Bandits, Soup Dragons, etc. (apparently rather influential on US alternative folks liek Sonic Youth, etc)
  • Loads of ace ravey bands like The Time Frequency, QFX, and in particular Q-Tex, featuring one Scott Brown, who is massively influential on the Euro hardcore scene having kick-started "Happy" Gabber and "bouncy" techno, (a precursor of a lot of todays "eurotrance"!!!) and speedcore (gabber + heavy metal guitars!!!)
  • Loads of not-too-smug house/techno folks like Slam, Limbo, etc. (the former introduced the world to Daft Punk!!!!

It looks like Scotland's jolly good at delivering undergound sounds that influence underground scene elsewhere whilst delivering overground turgid slop like Del Amitri, Deacon Blue, Danny Wilson, etc., to keep the Scottish media happy, and keep the pressure of the underground!!!!!!!

Wot about you folks down South, BTW?!?!??! I'm sure there's a lot you can be proud of down there... (eg Jungle, Garage, hardcore, etc.)

Old Fart!!!!!!!

Old Fart!!!, Friday, 26 January 2001 01:00 (twenty-three years ago) link

What about Australia. Anywhere that can produce both AC/DC and the Go- Betweens has got to be worth a look in.

alex thomson, Friday, 26 January 2001 01:00 (twenty-three years ago) link

I was quite happy to agree with the Scottish fella - until he actually did his list. Where was Deacon Blue?

Obviously the US is more influential - the UK has rarely invented anything new. We are much better at taking stuf and tooling it in to finely honed, quirky shite. Which may then feed back and influence US bands - but nowhere near as much as coming up with the basic stuff in the first place.

Oh - don't forget the Carribean.

Pete, Friday, 26 January 2001 01:00 (twenty-three years ago) link

>Where was Deacon Blue?

Er... Right there at the end?!?!? (Next to Del Amitri?!??!)

Old Fart!!!!!!

Old Fart!!!, Friday, 26 January 2001 01:00 (twenty-three years ago) link

That debate usually ends in blood. But it's always fun to watch US Anglophiles twist everything into absurd convolutions, trying to paint a picture of British contributions to rock being even half as important as American ones.

However, the UK has the upper hand for bands bragging about being the world's best (do they still do that ? I stopped reading British mags about 10 years ago).

Patrick, Friday, 26 January 2001 01:00 (twenty-three years ago) link

Obviously the US as far as historical contributions go: jazz, country, blues, rock, pop, house, techno and hip-hop are an unbeatable hand, and it's made the running in artistic development terms in all but pop and the dance musics. The UK has mutated these and other musics in very interesting ways on occasion, but it's not originated anything.

In terms of 'contemporary' meaning what's happening now it's the US too. The big thing about the second half of the 90s was the US rediscovering an ability to produce awesome pop singles and mix things up genre-wise. American pop music is better now than it's ever been, is my hunch. British pop music has garage and not much else.

Indie is slightly less moribund in the States possibly.

Europe is still better at producing electronic music, though not by as great a distance as everyone seems to think.

In terms of listeners' attitudes to music though I'd take the UK by a mile.

This is a really hoary old a.m.a. debate, I recall.

Tom, Friday, 26 January 2001 01:00 (twenty-three years ago) link

How are listeners' attitudes better in the UK, Tom ? I'm genuinely curious here, not trying to start a ruckus, I swear ! I don't know much about English listeners, but one impression I get (and which might be highly mistaken) is that there are a lot of music fans there who love British indie and wimp-pop (Belle & Sebastian, The Smiths...) AND US soul/R&B and, like, nothing in between. Or UK wimp- pop and super-technoid stuff and nothing in between. That always strikes me as odd - though probably not much more strange than some US listeners' tendencies to listen mainly to tepid, obscure indie- rock and in-your-face hip-hop (bring on the stereotypes, dude !)

Patrick, Friday, 26 January 2001 01:00 (twenty-three years ago) link

what a stupid motherfucking query....not only does it beg xenophobic attitudinizing, it ultimately works to prove beyond a shadow of a doubt what a weak & small-minded set of "collector-mentality" losers you lot are....who gives a shit!??? (tho it's the US...we've got more black folk).

eric s gregory, Friday, 26 January 2001 01:00 (twenty-three years ago) link

While the US produced jazz, blues, et. cet, none of those forms would have turned into pop music proper without the UK. Somehow, the forms are born out of the race divide, and can't ever bridge that divide until they go through the UK and back again. Also, the UK pop charts tend to be more interesting than the US charts, almost always.

Sterling Clover, Friday, 26 January 2001 01:00 (twenty-three years ago) link

The proper answer involves neither the US or the UK, but rather AFRICA.

JM, Friday, 26 January 2001 01:00 (twenty-three years ago) link

A digression, of course, but if we're strictly talking listeners' attitudes to music here, I'd have to give the award to Japan.

Kerry Keane, Saturday, 27 January 2001 01:00 (twenty-three years ago) link

America is so overrated. I'll say UK to piss everyone off :-)

And the stupid twat who said Australia deserves to be shot. Like all Australians.

Phil Paterson, Saturday, 27 January 2001 01:00 (twenty-three years ago) link

Firstly, I resent being told I should be shot.

Secondly, Patrick the only person I know who seems to specialise in wimpy British indie pop *and* technoid US R&B is Tom. The only r&b/soul/hip hop that other wimpy Brits seem to like are groups like Jurrasic 5, Angie Stone, Deltron 3000, Jill Scott, etc. Perhaps Freaky Trigger is skewing your perceptions.

Tim, Saturday, 27 January 2001 01:00 (twenty-three years ago) link

I don't know how much things have changed since I last paid attention to the UK charts, but I remember them being full of novelty stuff like "The Chicken Song" by Spitting Image, 30 year-old songs being featured in Levis ads, Smiths songs entering at # 13 and vanishing the next week, bands like Wet Wet Wet and Curiosity Killed The Cat...

But the UK top 40 is indeed open to a way larger variety of music. In the US by now, the only types of music in the pop charts are schlock ballads, r&b/hip hop and very tepid guitar-rock of the Goo Goo Dolls kind. Plus the occasional country song that never makes it past # 30.

Patrick, Sunday, 28 January 2001 01:00 (twenty-three years ago) link

I resent living on the same planet as Australians, but that's life, lad.

Phil Paterson, Sunday, 28 January 2001 01:00 (twenty-three years ago) link

>I don't know how much things have changed since I last paid >attention to the UK charts, but I remember them being full of >novelty stuff like "The Chicken Song" by Spitting Image, 30 year- >old songs being featured in Levis ads, Smiths songs entering at ># 13 and vanishing the next week, bands like Wet Wet Wet and >Curiosity Killed The Cat...

Crikey, if your memories of UK pop end at the absolute nadir of 80s pop, then perhaps it's no surprise that you think the US is better!!!! There's been tons of stuff happening since then, inccluding the whole rave thingy, which, given the way the techno/house scenes were at in the US in 1988, we can safely claim to have co-invented with the rest of Europe!!!! There are tons of ace hardcore tracks from 1991-1992 that saturated the UK charts, before jungle, garage, gabber, etc. And note the number of much more up- tempo and intricate US R&B stuff these days that appear to have UK Garage influenced beats!!! Craig David's even appearing on one or two US R&B records these days!!!

The point made by some other dude about UK/Europe being very good at re-selling US stuff back to them is pretty valid, but I would argue that usually by the time it's back on US soil, it's been warped out of all recognition!!!! US folks might have invented the house/techo/garage axis, but even by the early 90s, the European equivalent had absolutely flip all to do with the sound pioneered in the US... Compare "Acid Trax" with Kick Like a Mule's "The Bouncer" (a UK top 10 hit!!!), or T99's "Anastasia" (ditto) with "Strings of Life"- they're obviously completely different!!!!!! No wonder Derrick May has subsequently disowned the UK/Europe rave sound...

Going back even further, the 60s "British Invasion" was mainly composed of "blues/beat" groups who didn't actually sound very "bluesy" (in the original sense) at all!!!

And as for the impression that all UK folks are into "soft" hip-hop like Jurassic 5, etc... That should read "UK music journalists"!!! Actually, the more in-your-face stuff is actually very popular in the UK, as evidenced by the recent Wu Tang top 10 in the UK.. Even an early NWA interview in the Melody Maker finds Ice Cube talking about coming to the UK to tour, and that knows that "they're into rugged hip-hop and [...] they don't like no soft shit." And there's also the opening of Public Enemy's "It Takes a Nation of Millions...", recorded live in... the London Hammersmith Odeon!!! Most of the journalist-led coverage of hip-hop however, tends to be based around examples of the genre that tend to settle better with the more rock- based sensibilities of the older journos in the big name rags, but even then, there much more coverage of the not-so "old skool" stuff in most mags these days...

Old Fart!!!!!!!!!!!

Old Fart!!, Sunday, 28 January 2001 01:00 (twenty-three years ago) link

Well, since much of Britain's rock journalist fraternity are or were sad indie boys, my point remains valid, methinks.

Tim, Monday, 29 January 2001 01:00 (twenty-three years ago) link

As the "stupid twat" whp first brought Australia up, I should perhaps mention that I'm from London.

alex thomson, Monday, 29 January 2001 01:00 (twenty-three years ago) link

I'd avoid the main question, but address the idea that jazz, blues etc. had to go through the UK to become proper pop. It's got a lot of truth to it, but mainly in the period from the Stones to Led Zeppelin. This kind of "authentic" southern Blues and R&B wasn't as popular in the states, but I'd just point out that pretty much all the songs that the Beatles covered had been big hits. Chuck Berry, Little Richard, Fats Domino etc. were doing fine here (not financially perhaps), although British collectors did keep them alive through some lean years. Since the early 70s anyway, R&B has done fine without going through that filter, and in fact a lot of the black music that's popular here never really sells well there. And jazz never has been proper pop, since the 40s, when the UK didn't figure at all. The thing about the charts is true, I had a book of UK charts, and the differences were fascinating, but I think a lot of this has to do with the smaller scale. I do regret that we don't get the little flash in the pan groups (OK, Shampoo and Daphne & Celeste were both on film soundtracks, but got no airplay and less press), I guess our equivalent would be the annual summer booty anthem; Whoop there it is, Daisy Duks, Tha Dip, Back that Azz up, Who Let the Dogs Out (booty soca, that's some kind of twist anyway).

Pound for pound the UK's contributions are incredible, but the US is an 8,000 ton gorilla. I think our indy bands are largely influenced by UK acts but at the chart level it's at an all time low. Europe, particularly Germany, has now entered the mix in a way that it really never has before (sure, Kraftwerk, Italian disco, Laura Branigan), so things might get slightly more interesting.

Betty Cooper-American!, Thursday, 1 February 2001 01:00 (twenty-three years ago) link

one year passes...
The worst of the two. I hate contemporary music.

Anna Rose, Friday, 24 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-one years ago) link

four years pass...
It looks like Scotland's jolly good at delivering undergound sounds that influence underground scene elsewhere whilst delivering overground turgid slop like Del Amitri, Deacon Blue, Danny Wilson, etc., to keep the Scottish media happy, and keep the pressure of the underground

You forgot Runrig.

Brigadier Lethbridge-Pfunkboy (Kerr), Friday, 20 October 2006 19:35 (seventeen years ago) link

UK wins. Now lock thread.

Geir Hongro (GeirHong), Friday, 20 October 2006 20:15 (seventeen years ago) link

You don't like contemporary music from the USA then geir?

Brigadier Lethbridge-Pfunkboy (Kerr), Friday, 20 October 2006 20:21 (seventeen years ago) link

In a perfect world, the answer would be New Zealand. Stupid xenophobic music press. >:(

GLC (ZakAce), Saturday, 21 October 2006 20:37 (seventeen years ago) link

The UK have been responsible for some stunning refinements and innovations, but the US created the framework of popular music.

Which country is responsible for the third biggest contribution, I wonder?

chap who would dare to welcome our new stingray masters (chap), Saturday, 21 October 2006 20:43 (seventeen years ago) link

Taking into account more than just the 20th century and beyond, the winner is probably either Germany, Italy or maybe Greece.

Geir Hongro (GeirHong), Saturday, 21 October 2006 21:03 (seventeen years ago) link

Best thread ever.

James Herbert Dip (noodle vague), Saturday, 21 October 2006 21:11 (seventeen years ago) link

Which country gave the most interesting contribution to ILM?

1. Every other country in the world
210. England
211. USA
212. Norway

Sadly, he will be the next Alexis Petridish. (Dom Passantino), Saturday, 21 October 2006 21:13 (seventeen years ago) link

the winner is probably either Germany, Italy or maybe Greece.

Yeah, I'll agree with Germany, if only for Scooter and Rammstein.

chap who would dare to welcome our new stingray masters (chap), Saturday, 21 October 2006 21:35 (seventeen years ago) link

Germany can keep Scooter.

Brigadier Lethbridge-Pfunkboy (Kerr), Sunday, 22 October 2006 13:55 (seventeen years ago) link

It's talent vs. taste, innit?

Dr. Alicia D. Titsovich (sexyDancer), Sunday, 22 October 2006 14:12 (seventeen years ago) link


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.