By the way, my opinion is that the US are far superior... they gave us jazz, Bob Dylan, the Flamin' Groovies (you probably don't care...), the Pixies... and I'm just listing a few favourites.
Oh, England was pretty good too... the Beatles, the Rolling Stones, quite a few punk acts... who knows?
Simone
― Simona Oltolina, Friday, 26 January 2001 01:00 (twenty-three years ago) link
It looks like Scotland's jolly good at delivering undergound sounds that influence underground scene elsewhere whilst delivering overground turgid slop like Del Amitri, Deacon Blue, Danny Wilson, etc., to keep the Scottish media happy, and keep the pressure of the underground!!!!!!!
Wot about you folks down South, BTW?!?!??! I'm sure there's a lot you can be proud of down there... (eg Jungle, Garage, hardcore, etc.)
Old Fart!!!!!!!
― Old Fart!!!, Friday, 26 January 2001 01:00 (twenty-three years ago) link
― alex thomson, Friday, 26 January 2001 01:00 (twenty-three years ago) link
Obviously the US is more influential - the UK has rarely invented anything new. We are much better at taking stuf and tooling it in to finely honed, quirky shite. Which may then feed back and influence US bands - but nowhere near as much as coming up with the basic stuff in the first place.
Oh - don't forget the Carribean.
― Pete, Friday, 26 January 2001 01:00 (twenty-three years ago) link
Er... Right there at the end?!?!? (Next to Del Amitri?!??!)
Old Fart!!!!!!
However, the UK has the upper hand for bands bragging about being the world's best (do they still do that ? I stopped reading British mags about 10 years ago).
― Patrick, Friday, 26 January 2001 01:00 (twenty-three years ago) link
In terms of 'contemporary' meaning what's happening now it's the US too. The big thing about the second half of the 90s was the US rediscovering an ability to produce awesome pop singles and mix things up genre-wise. American pop music is better now than it's ever been, is my hunch. British pop music has garage and not much else.
Indie is slightly less moribund in the States possibly.
Europe is still better at producing electronic music, though not by as great a distance as everyone seems to think.
In terms of listeners' attitudes to music though I'd take the UK by a mile.
This is a really hoary old a.m.a. debate, I recall.
― Tom, Friday, 26 January 2001 01:00 (twenty-three years ago) link
― eric s gregory, Friday, 26 January 2001 01:00 (twenty-three years ago) link
― Sterling Clover, Friday, 26 January 2001 01:00 (twenty-three years ago) link
― JM, Friday, 26 January 2001 01:00 (twenty-three years ago) link
― Kerry Keane, Saturday, 27 January 2001 01:00 (twenty-three years ago) link
And the stupid twat who said Australia deserves to be shot. Like all Australians.
― Phil Paterson, Saturday, 27 January 2001 01:00 (twenty-three years ago) link
Secondly, Patrick the only person I know who seems to specialise in wimpy British indie pop *and* technoid US R&B is Tom. The only r&b/soul/hip hop that other wimpy Brits seem to like are groups like Jurrasic 5, Angie Stone, Deltron 3000, Jill Scott, etc. Perhaps Freaky Trigger is skewing your perceptions.
― Tim, Saturday, 27 January 2001 01:00 (twenty-three years ago) link
But the UK top 40 is indeed open to a way larger variety of music. In the US by now, the only types of music in the pop charts are schlock ballads, r&b/hip hop and very tepid guitar-rock of the Goo Goo Dolls kind. Plus the occasional country song that never makes it past # 30.
― Patrick, Sunday, 28 January 2001 01:00 (twenty-three years ago) link
― Phil Paterson, Sunday, 28 January 2001 01:00 (twenty-three years ago) link
Crikey, if your memories of UK pop end at the absolute nadir of 80s pop, then perhaps it's no surprise that you think the US is better!!!! There's been tons of stuff happening since then, inccluding the whole rave thingy, which, given the way the techno/house scenes were at in the US in 1988, we can safely claim to have co-invented with the rest of Europe!!!! There are tons of ace hardcore tracks from 1991-1992 that saturated the UK charts, before jungle, garage, gabber, etc. And note the number of much more up- tempo and intricate US R&B stuff these days that appear to have UK Garage influenced beats!!! Craig David's even appearing on one or two US R&B records these days!!!
The point made by some other dude about UK/Europe being very good at re-selling US stuff back to them is pretty valid, but I would argue that usually by the time it's back on US soil, it's been warped out of all recognition!!!! US folks might have invented the house/techo/garage axis, but even by the early 90s, the European equivalent had absolutely flip all to do with the sound pioneered in the US... Compare "Acid Trax" with Kick Like a Mule's "The Bouncer" (a UK top 10 hit!!!), or T99's "Anastasia" (ditto) with "Strings of Life"- they're obviously completely different!!!!!! No wonder Derrick May has subsequently disowned the UK/Europe rave sound...
Going back even further, the 60s "British Invasion" was mainly composed of "blues/beat" groups who didn't actually sound very "bluesy" (in the original sense) at all!!!
And as for the impression that all UK folks are into "soft" hip-hop like Jurassic 5, etc... That should read "UK music journalists"!!! Actually, the more in-your-face stuff is actually very popular in the UK, as evidenced by the recent Wu Tang top 10 in the UK.. Even an early NWA interview in the Melody Maker finds Ice Cube talking about coming to the UK to tour, and that knows that "they're into rugged hip-hop and [...] they don't like no soft shit." And there's also the opening of Public Enemy's "It Takes a Nation of Millions...", recorded live in... the London Hammersmith Odeon!!! Most of the journalist-led coverage of hip-hop however, tends to be based around examples of the genre that tend to settle better with the more rock- based sensibilities of the older journos in the big name rags, but even then, there much more coverage of the not-so "old skool" stuff in most mags these days...
Old Fart!!!!!!!!!!!
― Old Fart!!, Sunday, 28 January 2001 01:00 (twenty-three years ago) link
― Tim, Monday, 29 January 2001 01:00 (twenty-three years ago) link
― alex thomson, Monday, 29 January 2001 01:00 (twenty-three years ago) link
Pound for pound the UK's contributions are incredible, but the US is an 8,000 ton gorilla. I think our indy bands are largely influenced by UK acts but at the chart level it's at an all time low. Europe, particularly Germany, has now entered the mix in a way that it really never has before (sure, Kraftwerk, Italian disco, Laura Branigan), so things might get slightly more interesting.
― Betty Cooper-American!, Thursday, 1 February 2001 01:00 (twenty-three years ago) link
― Anna Rose, Friday, 24 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-one years ago) link
You forgot Runrig.
― Brigadier Lethbridge-Pfunkboy (Kerr), Friday, 20 October 2006 19:35 (seventeen years ago) link
― Geir Hongro (GeirHong), Friday, 20 October 2006 20:15 (seventeen years ago) link
― Brigadier Lethbridge-Pfunkboy (Kerr), Friday, 20 October 2006 20:21 (seventeen years ago) link
― GLC (ZakAce), Saturday, 21 October 2006 20:37 (seventeen years ago) link
Which country is responsible for the third biggest contribution, I wonder?
― chap who would dare to welcome our new stingray masters (chap), Saturday, 21 October 2006 20:43 (seventeen years ago) link
― Geir Hongro (GeirHong), Saturday, 21 October 2006 21:03 (seventeen years ago) link
― James Herbert Dip (noodle vague), Saturday, 21 October 2006 21:11 (seventeen years ago) link
1. Every other country in the world210. England211. USA212. Norway
― Sadly, he will be the next Alexis Petridish. (Dom Passantino), Saturday, 21 October 2006 21:13 (seventeen years ago) link
Yeah, I'll agree with Germany, if only for Scooter and Rammstein.
― chap who would dare to welcome our new stingray masters (chap), Saturday, 21 October 2006 21:35 (seventeen years ago) link
― Brigadier Lethbridge-Pfunkboy (Kerr), Sunday, 22 October 2006 13:55 (seventeen years ago) link
― Dr. Alicia D. Titsovich (sexyDancer), Sunday, 22 October 2006 14:12 (seventeen years ago) link