― Enrique (Enrique), Wednesday, 21 January 2004 09:32 (twenty-two years ago)
― sym (shmuel), Wednesday, 21 January 2004 09:39 (twenty-two years ago)
― sym (shmuel), Wednesday, 21 January 2004 09:40 (twenty-two years ago)
― Tuomas (Tuomas), Wednesday, 21 January 2004 09:42 (twenty-two years ago)
― Enrique (Enrique), Wednesday, 21 January 2004 09:48 (twenty-two years ago)
You'd be surprised.
― sym (shmuel), Wednesday, 21 January 2004 09:49 (twenty-two years ago)
― Enrique (Enrique), Wednesday, 21 January 2004 09:52 (twenty-two years ago)
― sym (shmuel), Wednesday, 21 January 2004 09:54 (twenty-two years ago)
backpacker/undie sound is stereotypically marked by dark, murky, lo-fi production, abstract/spacey/jokey/'idm-influenced' (oh god) beats, over-convoluted, 'clever,' paranoid, doesn't-scan-properly-and-isn't-funny lyrics, you can't really dance to it, it attempts little or not engagement with the outside world (because ideologically, undie rap = opposed to the mainstream and everything in it. aspects of the mainstream that undie rap seems to dislike include fun, success, intelligibility, and leaving the house.)
this may all be a gross exaggeration of course but there you go, it's the stereotype, and i don't think it's too hard to understand why some people think this music is shit and that, further, why people who liking it might in some way like it because it sets itself in opposition to everything else in hip hop, in which case, how can they really be hip hop fans, etc. btw i like mf doom.
― pete b. (pete b.), Wednesday, 21 January 2004 10:02 (twenty-two years ago)
oh, god, no! NO!!!
― el sabor de gene (yournullfame), Wednesday, 21 January 2004 10:10 (twenty-two years ago)
- fucking with the rapping at the expense of flow, by eg. cramming more words in than the rapper can actually handle; cramming more words in than ANY rapper could actually handle; ostentatious vocabulary demonstrations; too-complicated 'battle' metaphors that remind you of when a smart kid at school (maybe you!) would wait a second or two too long thinking of a 'snappy' comeback rather than just saying 'fuck off'. The MCs I like best are the kind that make it sound easy until you actually try.
- fucking with the beats at the expense of groove by eg. making them absurdly harsh; filling the track up with experimental noises. Now hard beats and weird noises are also a major reason to adore hip-hop so this is a particularly grey area but harshness and weirdness appeals most when it's balanced against something, like eg danceability (or even head-noddability). There's a tension and thrill to "how fucked-up can we make this track and it still be a banger?" which there isn't to "how fucked-up can we make this track?"
- at the other extreme, making beats that rely too strictly on a received idea of what 'hip-hop' beats are - see Fritz's realness thread. Crate-digging tastefulness is a bore.
― Tico Tico (Tico Tico), Wednesday, 21 January 2004 10:14 (twenty-two years ago)
― Enrique (Enrique), Wednesday, 21 January 2004 10:26 (twenty-two years ago)
― Tico Tico (Tico Tico), Wednesday, 21 January 2004 10:30 (twenty-two years ago)
― Enrique (Enrique), Wednesday, 21 January 2004 10:32 (twenty-two years ago)
― Tico Tico (Tico Tico), Wednesday, 21 January 2004 10:35 (twenty-two years ago)
It's been a long time, we shouldna left you etc, etc
― Enrique (Enrique), Wednesday, 21 January 2004 10:37 (twenty-two years ago)
― pete b. (pete b.), Wednesday, 21 January 2004 10:38 (twenty-two years ago)
― Enrique (Enrique), Wednesday, 21 January 2004 10:40 (twenty-two years ago)
― pete b. (pete b.), Wednesday, 21 January 2004 10:46 (twenty-two years ago)
I would say it was both.
― Matt DC (Matt DC), Wednesday, 21 January 2004 10:47 (twenty-two years ago)
― pete b. (pete b.), Wednesday, 21 January 2004 10:49 (twenty-two years ago)
― Tico Tico (Tico Tico), Wednesday, 21 January 2004 10:49 (twenty-two years ago)
Anyway, for the record,
Boney M >>>>>> that Mark Ronson record
― Enrique (Enrique), Wednesday, 21 January 2004 10:50 (twenty-two years ago)
― nate detritus (natedetritus), Wednesday, 21 January 2004 12:53 (twenty-two years ago)
― Matthew Perpetua (Matthew Perpetua), Wednesday, 21 January 2004 12:59 (twenty-two years ago)
― nate detritus (natedetritus), Wednesday, 21 January 2004 13:02 (twenty-two years ago)
― Stringent (Stringent), Wednesday, 21 January 2004 13:06 (twenty-two years ago)
I mean christ, at least pretend to know something about it before dismissing it
("but those lyrics are lame!" blah blah blah.)
― nate detritus (natedetritus), Wednesday, 21 January 2004 13:16 (twenty-two years ago)
― mzui, Wednesday, 21 January 2004 13:42 (twenty-two years ago)
― Matthew Perpetua (Matthew Perpetua), Wednesday, 21 January 2004 13:44 (twenty-two years ago)
― Dave Stelfox (Dave Stelfox), Wednesday, 21 January 2004 13:47 (twenty-two years ago)
― Matthew Perpetua (Matthew Perpetua), Wednesday, 21 January 2004 13:49 (twenty-two years ago)
― mzui, Wednesday, 21 January 2004 13:51 (twenty-two years ago)
― Dave Stelfox (Dave Stelfox), Wednesday, 21 January 2004 13:52 (twenty-two years ago)
― andrew s, Wednesday, 21 January 2004 13:55 (twenty-two years ago)
There are good undie rappers, obviously, like the guys from Dilated Peoples, but they fall into the trap of thinking that "old school is everything" and having nothing else to say but "I'm the best MC". Luckily there are some undie rappers who are both good rappers/lyricists and have good imaginative beats, like Divine Styler. Can't think of anyone else right now, but there must be others...
― Tuomas (Tuomas), Wednesday, 21 January 2004 13:56 (twenty-two years ago)
― Dave Stelfox (Dave Stelfox), Wednesday, 21 January 2004 13:58 (twenty-two years ago)
i) I'm British so I'm de facto outside the realm of realness on this one.
ii) I'm white and middle class and often absolutely motionless - liking Lil Jon does not make me any cooler, it just makes me more likely to argue with my co-workers when they slag off rap.
I don't think the audience make-up is irrelevant though, with any group or scene there's a feedback between what they're doing and the audience they find and there's always the risk of stagnation on that basis.
x-post I also don't believe there's only one good way of rapping, in fact I like a lot of 'bad' rapping, but shouty enthusiasm will always do it for me whereas tongue-twisters won't.
― Tico Tico (Tico Tico), Wednesday, 21 January 2004 14:00 (twenty-two years ago)
― Matthew Perpetua (Matthew Perpetua), Wednesday, 21 January 2004 14:00 (twenty-two years ago)
Overall, I think Tico Tico really nails it.
― Matthew Perpetua (Matthew Perpetua), Wednesday, 21 January 2004 14:03 (twenty-two years ago)
― pete b. (pete b.), Wednesday, 21 January 2004 14:08 (twenty-two years ago)
― Rockist Scientist, Wednesday, 21 January 2004 14:13 (twenty-two years ago)
― Jordan (Jordan), Wednesday, 21 January 2004 14:20 (twenty-two years ago)
― nickalicious (nickalicious), Wednesday, 21 January 2004 14:50 (twenty-two years ago)
― Dom Passantino (Dom Passantino), Wednesday, 21 January 2004 14:56 (twenty-two years ago)
I have a backpack. Contents: phone, wallet, novel, keys, minidisc, ie really need smaller bag. Why 'undie'?
― Enrique (Enrique), Wednesday, 21 January 2004 14:58 (twenty-two years ago)
― o. nate (onate), Wednesday, 21 January 2004 15:05 (twenty-two years ago)
― Tico Tico (Tico Tico), Wednesday, 21 January 2004 15:08 (twenty-two years ago)
― Tico Tico (Tico Tico), Wednesday, 21 January 2004 15:09 (twenty-two years ago)
― Tracer Hand (tracerhand), Wednesday, 21 January 2004 15:12 (twenty-two years ago)
― David Allen (David Allen), Wednesday, 21 January 2004 15:15 (twenty-two years ago)
Wu Tang is almost there. Using Ennio Morricone samples and rapping about Kung Fu (and being awesome at it) is probably as close as Ill ever get.
― David Allen (David Allen), Wednesday, 21 January 2004 15:17 (twenty-two years ago)
I'm not so sure about that. I've heard Fall songs that would outdo plenty of backpacker tracks in that category.
― o. nate (onate), Wednesday, 21 January 2004 15:21 (twenty-two years ago)
― Dom Passantino (Dom Passantino), Wednesday, 21 January 2004 15:26 (twenty-two years ago)
So you're looking for the exact same thing in every genre of music and judge each genre on the exact same criteria?
― Colin Beckett (Colin Beckett), Wednesday, 21 January 2004 15:43 (twenty-two years ago)
― o. nate (onate), Wednesday, 21 January 2004 15:54 (twenty-two years ago)
― Tico Tico (Tico Tico), Wednesday, 21 January 2004 15:58 (twenty-two years ago)
― Colin Beckett (Colin Beckett), Wednesday, 21 January 2004 16:01 (twenty-two years ago)
― Dave Stelfox (Dave Stelfox), Wednesday, 21 January 2004 16:02 (twenty-two years ago)
― nickalicious (nickalicious), Wednesday, 21 January 2004 16:04 (twenty-two years ago)
I'm not sure that's a fair observation but it's certainly my perception and I'm put off* by that kind of purism.
(*At least I am now: it reminds me very much of the kind of 'pure pop' talk I/we used to come out with to defend our beloved indie in the mid-80s when indie was still an outlying branch of pop rather than a genre in its own right with its own centre... but that's enough about indie.)
― Tim (Tim), Wednesday, 21 January 2004 16:04 (twenty-two years ago)
x-post
― nickalicious (nickalicious), Wednesday, 21 January 2004 16:05 (twenty-two years ago)
― Tico Tico (Tico Tico), Wednesday, 21 January 2004 16:08 (twenty-two years ago)
― Dave Stelfox (Dave Stelfox), Wednesday, 21 January 2004 16:11 (twenty-two years ago)
― o. nate (onate), Wednesday, 21 January 2004 16:14 (twenty-two years ago)
― Tim (Tim), Wednesday, 21 January 2004 16:16 (twenty-two years ago)
― Dave Stelfox (Dave Stelfox), Wednesday, 21 January 2004 16:18 (twenty-two years ago)
― Tico Tico (Tico Tico), Wednesday, 21 January 2004 16:20 (twenty-two years ago)
― Dave Stelfox (Dave Stelfox), Wednesday, 21 January 2004 16:29 (twenty-two years ago)
― Dave Stelfox (Dave Stelfox), Wednesday, 21 January 2004 16:31 (twenty-two years ago)
― cloverlandthug, Wednesday, 21 January 2004 16:59 (twenty-two years ago)
― cloverlandthug, Wednesday, 21 January 2004 17:00 (twenty-two years ago)
― Dave Stelfox (Dave Stelfox), Wednesday, 21 January 2004 17:19 (twenty-two years ago)
― Jordan (Jordan), Wednesday, 21 January 2004 17:21 (twenty-two years ago)
is it time for a critical reappraisal of 'backpacker' shit yet?????
every ilm thread with word 'backpacker' in the title is terrible btw
― Lamp, Tuesday, 23 August 2011 05:00 (fourteen years ago)
fun. crusher. plus.
― the wheelie king (wk), Tuesday, 23 August 2011 06:48 (fourteen years ago)
Tried By 12! What ever happened to East Flatbush Project?
― the wheelie king (wk), Tuesday, 23 August 2011 07:04 (fourteen years ago)
I'm scared to read what I wrote on this thread. I don't know if Tanya Morgan is backpacker, but I liked their last album.
― o. nate, Tuesday, 23 August 2011 19:07 (fourteen years ago)
holy shit this thread is about the fall
― gay socialists smoking mushrooms with their illegal gardeners (a hoy hoy), Tuesday, 23 August 2011 19:51 (fourteen years ago)