The Unicorns vs. the Stills

Message Bookmarked

Bookmark Removed

i'm putting my money on the Unicorns...

http://prefixmag.com/features.php?p=0&t=interview&f=TheUnicorns%20Interview%20Part1

PM: OK, back to Hot Hot Heat. Do those guys get tons of girls or what? Aren't they the big shots in Canada now?
T: [At the band's request, the answer to this question will remain unpublished. Just know that it included the following topics: hot dog meat, crack and the merch man's penis.]

DS (manager): Let's get into the Stills. Then we can really get into it.

ND: We got to save that for Pitchfork. Ah, might as well start now.

JT: Fuck the Stills!

PM: So that's the band you guys hate?
T: JT: They used to be in a ska band. Think about it.

DS (manager): Undercovering the Stills.

ND: They used to be in a ska band called the Undercovers.

JT: To all you people that thought they were cool, they were in a ska band.

ND: They were a ska band.
http://www.gazette.uwo.ca/1999/December/3/Arts_and_Entertainment3.htm

― davey, Thursday, 22 January 2004 19:46 (twenty-two years ago)

Not having heard the Unicorns, can only vote Stills. Doves used to be Sub Sub, and the Notwist guys have several genres covered, so a ska life before an album I dig doesn't color my enjoyment. Plus, ska = the Beat, the Specials, Madness, etc. - when did that become hip to dis, as a genre?

― Chris Hill (Chris Hill), Thursday, 22 January 2004 20:25 (twenty-two years ago)

I pick the Unicorns, and I'm betting they don't really give a shit.

― Luigi Vampa (Horace Mann), Thursday, 22 January 2004 20:28 (twenty-two years ago)

You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.