MBV Loveless: Overrated?

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
So for the first time in ages I'm listening to Isn't Anything and I'm constantly reminded of how much better this album is, compared to Loveless. Not necessarily to say that Loveless is overrated exactly, but more that Isn't Anything is sooo underrated. What say? Isn't Anything or Loveless? I vote the former (obv)

ken taylrr, Wednesday, 14 April 2004 17:35 (twenty-two years ago)

I'm tempted to say yes. This isn't to say "it sucks," but rather that I personally don't think it's aged that well. Still rocks, though.

Alex in NYC (vassifer), Wednesday, 14 April 2004 17:46 (twenty-two years ago)

Isn't Anything? is more obvious. Make of that what you will.

noodle vague (noodle vague), Wednesday, 14 April 2004 17:47 (twenty-two years ago)

I hope his doesn't degenerate into "Loveless roolz, Isn't Anything suxxx"-type fanboy sparring. Anyway, Loveless is still better to my ears but Isn't Anything is still a stone-cold (I love using that phrase!) classic.

latebloomer (latebloomer), Wednesday, 14 April 2004 17:53 (twenty-two years ago)

just for clarification, when i put the (obv) at the end of my post, it was meant to state my position on which album i liked better, as opposed to me making a universal claim that all should obviously find IA better than Loveless

ken taylrr (ken taylrr), Wednesday, 14 April 2004 17:55 (twenty-two years ago)

Taking sides: Isn't Anything Vs. Loveless

Loveless: Classic or Not That Classic

TS: Isn't Anything vs. Loveless

Archive search good! < / Hetfield >

Ned Raggett (Ned), Wednesday, 14 April 2004 17:58 (twenty-two years ago)


This thread has been locked by an administrator

You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.