Pansy Division: classic or dud?

Message Bookmarked

Bookmark Removed

I say Classic, all the way!

― mooooo, Friday, 16 April 2004 14:00 (twenty-two years ago)

i say gay, all the way!

― cutty (mcutt), Friday, 16 April 2004 14:01 (twenty-two years ago)

Why is the sky blue? Why is water wet?
Why did Judas rat the Romans while Jesus slept?

― ddb, Friday, 16 April 2004 14:38 (twenty-two years ago)

both classic and dud. Classic for earlier fun stuff like "groovy underwear" and "rock 'n' roll queer bar." Dud because they (inevitably?) painted themselves into a corner and (unfortunately) decided their music should have a more overt message.

But mostly classic for hanging in there so long and having the cajones to put on the show they do in some not-so-friendly locations.

I saw them recently. They're still good. And they have nice vocal harmonies.

― chëshy f cät, Friday, 16 April 2004 15:11 (twenty-two years ago)

They put on a better show then Chicks on Speed and Peaches, thats for sure.
And they got a song called bemoaning the mullet so of course they are all right.

― Mr Noodles (Mr Noodles), Friday, 23 April 2004 10:24 (twenty-two years ago)

They're a mixed bag. Sometimes the over-the-top in-your-face gayness gimmick inspired some nice songs but they were rarely as funny as they were trying to be. I did always liked their choice of covers, partly because they tended to be more sincere.

The new album Total Entertainment is very very very good, though.

― Kevin Erickson, Friday, 23 April 2004 10:36 (twenty-two years ago)

You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.