Outkast album, the ultimate?

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
My prediction is this thread reaches 100 replies and by the end people are talking about waffles and potato salad. But I hope not.

Anyway, I think Aquemini was the apex for this band. Stankonia was a step back as far as production was concerned (I preferred the more 'southern' sound of theirs), and the latest album goes from pretty good (Speakerboxx) to sucktastic (Love Below).

uh, Monday, 26 April 2004 22:08 (twenty-two years ago)

I love Speakerboxx/The Love Below.

I just wanted to get that off my chest.

noodle vague (noodle vague), Monday, 26 April 2004 22:11 (twenty-two years ago)

Aquemini's too damn mllow. S/TLB is their best 'cause there's just so damn much of it.

Stankonia: "a step back as far as production is concerned"??????? Even "Gasoline Dreams"???

Mr. Snrub (Mr. Snrub), Monday, 26 April 2004 22:11 (twenty-two years ago)

Aquemini's too damn mllow

That's a compliment in my book.

oops (Oops), Monday, 26 April 2004 22:14 (twenty-two years ago)

nothing personal, uh, but if it gets 100 posts it'll probably be of the "we've covered this x1000" variety.

Matos W.K. (M Matos), Monday, 26 April 2004 22:17 (twenty-two years ago)

"Red Velvet", "I'll Call Before I Come" and "Miss Jackson" are all really solid beats. Stankonia is better produced than Southerplayalistic and ATLiens.

ATLiens is my vote overall, best balance of lyrical ability and solid beats. Also, I find it the only Outkast album that kept a singular tone. It's just way more focused than anything else they ever made.

Rollie Pemberton (Rollie Pemberton), Monday, 26 April 2004 22:21 (twenty-two years ago)

consistent album tone: c/d? I'm for it and against it in equal measure.

Matos W.K. (M Matos), Monday, 26 April 2004 22:24 (twenty-two years ago)

I'm in favour of wild moodswings. But I think that might say more about me than whether it's a Good Thing or not.

noodle vague (noodle vague), Monday, 26 April 2004 22:25 (twenty-two years ago)

I think it's interesting that albums used to be prized for being eclectic and now, more frequently (that I see, at least), they're prized for having an even tone. I don't have anything against either approach, I just find it notable. (quick-shot theories: modern life more hectic, increase of outside stimuli creating need for comfort-zone listening--haha, David Toop to thread)

Matos W.K. (M Matos), Monday, 26 April 2004 22:26 (twenty-two years ago)

The preference for focus might be related to a rise in Classicist approaches to pop taking over from Romanticist ones.

noodle vague (noodle vague), Monday, 26 April 2004 22:29 (twenty-two years ago)

I like short albums with an even tone generally. Most really eclectic albums suck would be my reasoning though.

Alex in SF (Alex in SF), Monday, 26 April 2004 22:30 (twenty-two years ago)

Thing is, I love small, neat, perfectly crafted with no rough edges art. But I also love huge, sprawling, throw everything together and see what kinds of sense it makes art. They both have their own charms.

noodle vague (noodle vague), Monday, 26 April 2004 22:33 (twenty-two years ago)

No, not even Gasoline Dreams. That song is awesome.

uh, Monday, 26 April 2004 22:35 (twenty-two years ago)

I like Southern's production better than Stankonia. The raw (sometimes even live) beats really gave it an organic sound.

Stankonia bordered on clubby at times, which I didn't like. But I do enjoy the album nonetheless.

uh, Monday, 26 April 2004 22:36 (twenty-two years ago)

t.finney wrote some intersting stuff on eclecticism below...

eclecticism - c/d s/d

weasel diesel (K1l14n), Monday, 26 April 2004 22:47 (twenty-two years ago)

69 Love Songs is a poor example of successful eclecticism to me.

Alex in SF (Alex in SF), Monday, 26 April 2004 22:49 (twenty-two years ago)

I can guess at what you mean Alex: from my perspective the problem with what i'm arguing in that thread is that my favourite tracks on 69 Love Songs all seem to fall into a stylistically quite similar middle ground, such that while (to my ears) Merritt gets away with the eclecticism present, it wasn't really a necessary move.

I do think Outkast are a good example of how eclecticism can succeed and how it can fail: as long as Big Boi was on hand I don't think there was much of a danger of Andre going "too far", for the very reason that Big Boi always feels much more grounded: "The Way You Move" abounds in melted butter soul signifiers but is obviously *not* melted butter soul. Andre on his own can't ground himself.

Tim Finney (Tim Finney), Tuesday, 27 April 2004 00:12 (twenty-two years ago)

i was listening to some rap song the other night and an mc uttered the lines "we the outkast of rap"

jdfi;, Tuesday, 27 April 2004 00:18 (twenty-two years ago)

Tim OTM.

For me, Aquemini is just the most consistent and interesting. It was drawing on more influences than ATLiens or Southernplaya, but it felt a lot more solid than Stankonia. That said, BOB is prolly their best single... it was like drumnbasshousegospelrawkhop or some shit.
Obv. Speakerboxx > Love Below as well.

djdee2005, Tuesday, 27 April 2004 00:19 (twenty-two years ago)

I agree that both artists suffered without the other.

The problem with the Love Below is that while Andre has the ability to play many instruments and come up with some decent ideas, he doesn't always have the means to pull them off. Like if you're going to write a crooner type R&B song, you need to be able to sing.

And then some of the songs just seem half-developed as if they were recorded studio jams or something. "Hey Ya" is a good song because it just works, it fires on all cylinders, but some of the other crap on there just sucks.

Speakerboxx, though, is a letdown for Big Boi. Some incredible tracks on there, yes, but a lot of it loses steam.

uh, Tuesday, 27 April 2004 00:23 (twenty-two years ago)

Andre can sing fine! He just can't write more than 3-4 great songs.

djdee2005, Tuesday, 27 April 2004 00:24 (twenty-two years ago)

Nah, he can't sing. he's nasal as all hell. He brays.

It doesn't matter on songs like "Hey Ya", which are just fun anthems that don't require great singing, but that Earth Wind and Fire-ish song he did was just a complete joke because his voice fell short. And the sad thing is, I think it would have been a good song if he could have sung it.

Now, I will admit most of the material, as you said, falls flat because he couldn't write much in the way of good music.

I'll admit I was disappointed as well to see him completely ditch rap on his album, especially since he provides such a nice counterpoint to Big Boi...but I would have forgiven it had he written a decent album.

uh, Tuesday, 27 April 2004 00:31 (twenty-two years ago)

I think I understand The Love Below hate, but I doubt I'll ever agree with it.

Anthony Miccio (Anthony Miccio), Tuesday, 27 April 2004 00:33 (twenty-two years ago)

I love: Spread, Hey Ya (although I need a good 3 years w/out hearing it bfore I listen to it volunatarily again), Love in War, Roses, My Favorite Things, Happy Valentines Day, and Dracula's Wedding is pretty cool too.

The rest is just so DULL.

I kinda like the idea of the off-setting, uncomfortable ending of "A Day in the Life..." although I don't enjoy listening to it.

djdee2005, Tuesday, 27 April 2004 00:39 (twenty-two years ago)

Obv. this has been discussed a million times before but I never contributed to it, so I figured i'd add my thoughts.

Nix "Roses" from the list of songs I enjoy. It kinda sucks.

djdee2005, Tuesday, 27 April 2004 00:41 (twenty-two years ago)

I'm currently under the impression that there is no one less sick of "Hey Ya" on this planet than me. I LIKE the fact that I can rely on it to play at least once every time I take a walk.

Anthony Miccio (Anthony Miccio), Tuesday, 27 April 2004 00:43 (twenty-two years ago)

I like about three of the songs. I HATE "Roses", and that makes me sad, because I'm such a huge Andre/Outkast fan.

Valentines Day is almost good.....the beat is kind of neat, but what he does over it isn't.

It seems more like a pastiche of ideas (the album, that is) than anything that was fully developed to me. I'm wondering if he rushed it out.

On "Hey Ya", I do still enjoy that one.

uh, Tuesday, 27 April 2004 00:44 (twenty-two years ago)

Every song is so coherent thematically that I find the off-hand musical elements interesting. He's playing around with different forms but the lyrics give each song a specific purpose. He's not going for perfected craft, he's going experimental (not in the sense that these songs are actually revolutionary - though some kind of are, but they're personal experiments)

Anthony Miccio (Anthony Miccio), Tuesday, 27 April 2004 00:48 (twenty-two years ago)

Well, again, this all comes down to personal taste, but the thing with experiments is that they can oftentimes be hit or miss. In my mind, he missed more than he hit.

It's obvious he has some degree of musical talent but he didn't seem to have the ability to harness it at all. One can "experiment" and still give it a direction, a purpose. King Crimson were the kings of noodling in the 70s but generally kept their music coherent, and even they fell victim to some big flops in the process. (but LIZARD RULES, YOU NERDS!)

uh, Tuesday, 27 April 2004 00:53 (twenty-two years ago)

So, anyway: waffles and potato saled - what do we think?

Stewart Osborne (Stewart Osborne), Tuesday, 27 April 2004 08:43 (twenty-two years ago)

"Speakerboxx/TheLoveBelow"

Both albums are too long. Each has a great album in there. But great otherwise. That's it.

mark grout (mark grout), Tuesday, 27 April 2004 08:46 (twenty-two years ago)

"...albums used to be prized for being eclectic and now, more frequently (that I see, at least), they're prized for having an even tone. I don't have anything against either approach, I just find it notable. (quick-shot theories: modern life more hectic, increase of outside stimuli creating need for comfort-zone listening--haha, David Toop to thread)

-- Matos W.K."

I think it's that CD albums are so LONG that eclecticism can get tiring -- unless it's serving some higher concept like 69 Love Songs.

Not That Chuck, Tuesday, 27 April 2004 12:43 (twenty-two years ago)

eight months pass...
Dammit, Outkast. Fucking hell.

Riot Gear! (Gear!), Sunday, 9 January 2005 05:19 (twenty-one years ago)

seriously, I like having revelations, but not this kind usually.

Riot Gear! (Gear!), Sunday, 9 January 2005 05:23 (twenty-one years ago)

????????

chaki in charge (chaki), Sunday, 9 January 2005 05:29 (twenty-one years ago)

how much could I get on ebay for a limited edition Stankonia CD?

Riot Gear! (Gear!), Sunday, 9 January 2005 05:31 (twenty-one years ago)

$.01

contribute, Sunday, 9 January 2005 06:29 (twenty-one years ago)

fuck

Riot Gear! (Gear!), Sunday, 9 January 2005 11:42 (twenty-one years ago)

atliens used to be my favourite of their for the consistent tone, but now i think consistent tone means SAMEY as fuck. theres not a bad song on there, and i like the way it almsot conceptually sticks to that same downbeat, fatigued tone for virtually every single song, but 3/4 of the way through it begins to drag on a little too much.

i think the first album is the best, lyrically. its also their hardest sounding, and both sound equal to the other as rappers.

ppp, Sunday, 9 January 2005 12:02 (twenty-one years ago)

they never topped ATLiens

Rizz (Rizz), Sunday, 9 January 2005 12:27 (twenty-one years ago)

as rappers, the first one is the one to beat. their meter, rhythm, and tag-teaming was better than ever.

ppp, Sunday, 9 January 2005 12:33 (twenty-one years ago)

DON'T EVERYBODY LOVE THE SMELL OF GASOLINE

Stevem On X (blueski), Sunday, 9 January 2005 17:53 (twenty-one years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.