― Sick Nouthall (Nick Southall), Tuesday, 27 April 2004 11:55 (twenty-two years ago)
or versus http://shop.sennheiserusa.com/retail2002/images/catalog/hd500_normal.jpg ?
And whither http://shop.sennheiserusa.com/retail2002/images/catalog/PMX60_normal.jpg ?
― Andrew Farrell (afarrell), Tuesday, 27 April 2004 12:00 (twenty-two years ago)
― Andrew Farrell (afarrell), Tuesday, 27 April 2004 12:01 (twenty-two years ago)
Closed back ones mean that no opne arou8nd you can hear the music, and you can't hear anythign except the msuic. Open back ones let in external noise, and also 'bleed' sound into the air around them. Closed backs have a solid external shell - open backs have vents or such.
― Sick Nouthall (Nick Southall), Tuesday, 27 April 2004 12:07 (twenty-two years ago)
http://www.jigsaw24.com/Pics/prodpics/G507AEA.jpgClosed back.
― Sick Nouthall (Nick Southall), Tuesday, 27 April 2004 12:14 (twenty-two years ago)
but am tempted by these - http://www.exhibo.it/Sennheiser/consumer/images/grandi/PX200.jpg
which are almost the same, only closed back.
― Sick Nouthall (Nick Southall), Tuesday, 27 April 2004 12:18 (twenty-two years ago)
I'd probably feel a bit self conscious rocking closed-back headphones outside, the pair I have are ugly-as-sin-collapsable-with-all-the-padding-worn-off-and-dangling-around-the-edges ones.
― Mil, Tuesday, 27 April 2004 12:20 (twenty-two years ago)
― N. (nickdastoor), Tuesday, 27 April 2004 12:25 (twenty-two years ago)
― Sick Nouthall (Nick Southall), Tuesday, 27 April 2004 12:29 (twenty-two years ago)
― N. (nickdastoor), Tuesday, 27 April 2004 12:29 (twenty-two years ago)
― Sick Nouthall (Nick Southall), Tuesday, 27 April 2004 12:31 (twenty-two years ago)
― N. (nickdastoor), Tuesday, 27 April 2004 12:32 (twenty-two years ago)
I'm not sure I've ever used really top-class closed-back headphones, so my opinions are skewed. The Stax Lambda electrostatics remain the best I've ever heard.
― Michael Jones (MichaelJ), Tuesday, 27 April 2004 12:35 (twenty-two years ago)
x-post.
I have open backed ones at home, Sennheisers again, can't remember which model but they were about £60 two years ago, which is as much as I'd spend on headphones for indoors at the moment (don't use them enough to justify more).
― Sick Nouthall (Nick Southall), Tuesday, 27 April 2004 12:36 (twenty-two years ago)
http://shop.sennheiserusa.com/retail2002/images/catalog/HD600_zoom.jpg
― Evanston Wade (EWW), Tuesday, 27 April 2004 12:36 (twenty-two years ago)
― N. (nickdastoor), Tuesday, 27 April 2004 12:39 (twenty-two years ago)
― Sick Nouthall (Nick Southall), Tuesday, 27 April 2004 12:44 (twenty-two years ago)
― hmmm (hmmm), Tuesday, 27 April 2004 13:32 (twenty-two years ago)
I wish they let you try on headphones before purchasing though, my current pair aren't the coolest.
― Ronan (Ronan), Tuesday, 27 April 2004 13:38 (twenty-two years ago)
I'm constantly tempted by Grados though...the bass is just too good.
― mmmsalt (Graeme), Tuesday, 27 April 2004 13:45 (twenty-two years ago)
― Nate (Nate), Tuesday, 27 April 2004 23:37 (twenty-two years ago)
― de, Wednesday, 28 April 2004 00:01 (twenty-two years ago)
― Debito (Debito), Wednesday, 28 April 2004 00:02 (twenty-two years ago)
― Orbit (Orbit), Wednesday, 28 April 2004 00:03 (twenty-two years ago)
or is there much better headphones? I had a pair of Sony MDR900 which I liked, is there something better than them?
― A Nairn (moretap), Tuesday, 2 November 2004 23:05 (twenty-one years ago)
Check out head-fi.org. I think you have to register (free) to search, but it's well worth it for the reviews. I have not read a single positive thing on Bose headphones there (out of hundreds of posts).
― Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Tuesday, 2 November 2004 23:15 (twenty-one years ago)
― Alba (Alba), Tuesday, 2 November 2004 23:28 (twenty-one years ago)
― A Nairn (moretap), Wednesday, 3 November 2004 03:07 (twenty-one years ago)
give me massive sennheisers over white ipod treble machines anyday.
― danny boy, Wednesday, 3 November 2004 11:43 (twenty-one years ago)
― Baaderonixx ménage ses forces dans l'attente du Grand Soir (baaderonixx), Thursday, 17 November 2005 11:05 (twenty years ago)
Reason being, my Sony EX-71s died earlier this year (despite sounding good, the build quality is not up to much), so I made a modest upgrade and bought some Shure e2cs. These are less bass-heavy than the Sonys, but sound fantastic (great detail and very transparent) and provide a *lot* of isolation from external noise so are good for outdoor/commuting wear. Only proviso is that I found them tremendously uncomfortable with the supplied earbuds and had to shell out for the silicone buds (like the EX-71s had). They cost about £65 so at the bottom end of yr range I guess.
On the Bose issue, a mate has the noise-cancellers linked to by A Nairn above and to my non-audiophile ears they sound incredible. Pretty expensive, and a lot less portable than the Shures, but sound-quality is fantastic. There seem to be a lot of Bose haterz out there though, so worth a try first I'd say.
― Bill A (Bill A), Thursday, 17 November 2005 11:34 (twenty years ago)
― aldo_cowpat (aldo_cowpat), Thursday, 17 November 2005 11:55 (twenty years ago)
― Baaderonixx ménage ses forces dans l'attente du Grand Soir (baaderonixx), Thursday, 17 November 2005 13:51 (twenty years ago)
― Sick Mouthy (Nick Southall), Friday, 10 March 2006 16:45 (twenty years ago)
http://www.goodcans.com/HeadphoneReviews/porta.htm
(give the Koss time to wear in... I love my KSC-35's to the point I've had them fixed (twice, free under lifetime guarantee) and when they stop making/fixing them I'll finally get some Grados (and a replacement for my iPod, preferably something that actually has real bass).
― fandango (fandango), Friday, 10 March 2006 17:01 (twenty years ago)
― Mark (MarkR), Friday, 10 March 2006 17:44 (twenty years ago)
― Sick Mouthy (Nick Southall), Saturday, 11 March 2006 10:43 (twenty years ago)
Those are almost the best earphones for jogging:the best one's are the ones who look like open-back headphones, but with a snail-like twist arounf the ears - no-falling-during-jogging-guarentied!
― sam the man, Saturday, 11 March 2006 11:14 (twenty years ago)
― sam the man, Saturday, 11 March 2006 11:15 (twenty years ago)
― Sick Mouthy (Nick Southall), Tuesday, 14 March 2006 19:28 (twenty years ago)
― Mark (MarkR), Tuesday, 14 March 2006 19:51 (twenty years ago)
― Sick Mouthy (Nick Southall), Tuesday, 14 March 2006 19:59 (twenty years ago)
― Nigel (Nigel), Tuesday, 14 March 2006 20:12 (twenty years ago)
http://www.headphone.com/guide/by-application/exercising/akg-k-26-p.php
― Mark (MarkR), Tuesday, 14 March 2006 20:48 (twenty years ago)
http://www.levi.cz/images_k/GVA5121.jpg
― Sick Mouthy (Nick Southall), Tuesday, 14 March 2006 21:02 (twenty years ago)
― Sick Mouthy (Nick Southall), Saturday, 18 March 2006 15:44 (twenty years ago)
― gritty sanskrit (sanskrit), Saturday, 18 March 2006 16:53 (twenty years ago)
― Michael Jones (MichaelJ), Saturday, 18 March 2006 17:35 (twenty years ago)
my super-recommended headphone setup:1. PortaPros for walkin' around. (i also have some ksc-75s for when i'm going somewhere where i want to be able to stow my headphones in my pocket.) They are amazingly dynamic and fun headphones for most rock/pop/hiphop/whatever music. (The senns are better for solo piano/voice and orchestral imho.) The absolute best deal in headphones.
2. Grado SR-80s for home use. (The $100 sr-80s are the best new purchase you can make for headphones at that pricepoint. Like WAAAY better than any equivalent Sonys or Senns. Fantastic value.) I recently upgraded to the Grado HF-1s, but given the price increase it's not really worth it for most people. Similarly, don't bother getting a headphone amp if you mostly listen to mp3s.
3. If you need headphones for long journeys with good soundproofing (nb: not airplanes), the Sennheiser 280s offer about as much isolation as you can get with cans, but really need an amp to sound good... Otherwise go for canalphones, if you can handle them.
― sean gramophone (Sean M), Saturday, 18 March 2006 17:51 (twenty years ago)