So what effect will excessive hype have on grime in 2004?
will decent underground MCs actually get albums released or will complete unknowns get signed?
will every MC/artist be forced to go US hip hop?
will cutting edge UK producers like Wiley, Target, Wonder and Terror Danjah get their time? or will US beatmakers clean up?
will grime as an underground/pirate phenomenon collapse or continue in the spotlight?
have the lessons from mid '90s d&b and '99-01 UKG been learnt?
― martin (martin), Tuesday, 25 May 2004 13:36 (twenty-two years ago)
― Chris Ott (Chris Ott), Tuesday, 25 May 2004 13:43 (twenty-two years ago)
― Jason J, Tuesday, 25 May 2004 13:50 (twenty-two years ago)
none of the majors are going near whole crews at the moment. it's solo mcs only. marketing wise it's easier to convey one person's personality over several, crews cost loads to support and often carry some less strong lyricists. that's not my justification, merely an analysis of why they dont sign crews.
on the positive side no one from grime has managed to pick a fight with the british tabloid media, the way so solid did, which is a good start.
― martin (martin), Tuesday, 25 May 2004 16:31 (twenty-two years ago)
― strongo hulkington (dubplatestyle), Tuesday, 25 May 2004 16:37 (twenty-two years ago)
― strongo hulkington (dubplatestyle), Tuesday, 25 May 2004 16:38 (twenty-two years ago)
― Alex in SF (Alex in SF), Tuesday, 25 May 2004 16:41 (twenty-two years ago)
― strongo hulkington (dubplatestyle), Tuesday, 25 May 2004 16:42 (twenty-two years ago)
― noodle vague (noodle vague), Tuesday, 25 May 2004 19:15 (twenty-two years ago)
i was talking more about the UK. grime's developed under the noses of most Brits/Londoners without them realising. now that the general music media think the genre's worthy of attention (garage was "dead" 5 minutes ago...) i'm curious to how people think things are going to evolve.
from this point at late may '04 the mainstream grime charge seems likely to be lead by Wiley's second single, Dizzee's second LP, Doogz, Kano and some one-off singles from Terror Danjah.
― martin (martin), Tuesday, 25 May 2004 23:04 (twenty-two years ago)
― JoB (JoB), Tuesday, 25 May 2004 23:18 (twenty-two years ago)
― dieblucasdie (dieblucasdie), Wednesday, 26 May 2004 00:15 (twenty-two years ago)
I can't see it going big in the UK because it'll never appeal to scotland, the north or wales. It's almost got more chance of breaking the US, but realistically only as a production style. Americans just cannot take british rappers seriously...
― Jacob (Jacob), Wednesday, 26 May 2004 04:40 (twenty-two years ago)
A working knowledge of Casio FM synthesis and Apple GRIMEULATOR(TM) technology are an explicit must.
― cs appleby (cs appleby), Wednesday, 26 May 2004 07:38 (twenty-two years ago)
Yeah but c'mon, it's still a minority pursuit...
That was what Chris said in the first reply, and I daresay both of you are completely right. The few Americans on here or wherever that *can* take it seriously are representative of no demographic to speak of. For my part, I live in Cardiff and there's I think one shop that sells grime white labels, and two or three MCs tops.
― DJ Mencap (DJ Mencap), Wednesday, 26 May 2004 07:56 (twenty-two years ago)
I'm not sure that the idea that grime hasn't reached the provinces. There's fewer big crews and the pirates aren't so prevalant outside London but I know of producers operating in Bristol, Cardiff, Leicester, Manchester etc and I guess there's far more besides. The fact they're not getting records on the racks in London shops doesn't mean they're not there.
― Jason J, Wednesday, 26 May 2004 08:02 (twenty-two years ago)
I think a lot might hinge on whether Showtime disappoints - there could well be a lot of 'emperor's new clothes' bollocks in the media if it does. The next Wiley single and any Lady Sovereign releases could also be key.
― Matt DC (Matt DC), Wednesday, 26 May 2004 08:20 (twenty-two years ago)
I think Dizzee has signaled the start of something bigger for uk acts in the us. And hopefully all the uk hype will serve to the benefit and not the detriment of the scene. I think the female mcs, espcially Lady Sovereign, have got the potential to blow up in the uk (at the end of the day it is pop music) and possibly have a decent crack at the us.
I'm not sure that the new wiley video will go any way to remove the preconceptions about the 'seriousness' of uk mcs though!
― myke boomnoise (myke boomnoise), Wednesday, 26 May 2004 08:26 (twenty-two years ago)
― Jacob (Jacob), Wednesday, 26 May 2004 08:37 (twenty-two years ago)
― myke boomnoise (myke boomnoise), Wednesday, 26 May 2004 10:28 (twenty-two years ago)
― Dom Passantino (Dom Passantino), Wednesday, 26 May 2004 10:31 (twenty-two years ago)
― Debito (Debito), Wednesday, 26 May 2004 10:46 (twenty-two years ago)
― Matt DC (Matt DC), Wednesday, 26 May 2004 10:50 (twenty-two years ago)
I guess you can claim a relationship, maybe casual, between interest in the music, it's popularization resulting in it's commercialization, or if i would dare to predict in grime: its sanitization. if that makes sense??!
― myke boomnoise (myke boomnoise), Wednesday, 26 May 2004 11:10 (twenty-two years ago)
In the brief garage/2-step pop period in, what, 99/00, the actual pop landscape seemed to shift towards it. Can you really see anything happening in the charts at the moment that suggests a grime movement? Rascal will be the lowest selling Mercury winner since Talvin Singh. The spike on his album sales after winning it were dreadful. Something like... #23?
― Dom Passantino (Dom Passantino), Wednesday, 26 May 2004 11:33 (twenty-two years ago)
Hasn't the grimey, nasty garage been around for quite a while though? Sort of the flip-side of the pop 2-step thing 99/00? Sure it's developed a lot recently and gained exposure.. but i kinda feel it's like saying "well jungle had some overground success.. will there be a drill n bass pop hit?"
fuck.. my keyboard has changed layout on me..
― don (don), Wednesday, 26 May 2004 11:57 (twenty-two years ago)
― don (don), Wednesday, 26 May 2004 11:58 (twenty-two years ago)
― ambrose (ambrose), Wednesday, 26 May 2004 12:42 (twenty-two years ago)
― Jason J, Wednesday, 26 May 2004 12:52 (twenty-two years ago)
So with reference to all the hype are people getting precious about grime? or are you happy it's getting the exposure it is. And why?
― myke boomnoise (myke boomnoise), Wednesday, 26 May 2004 15:15 (twenty-two years ago)
i just heard talk of a very catchy Danny Weed produced, Roll Deep track. could this be the single you're looking for?
>So with reference to all the hype are people getting precious >about grime? or are you happy it's getting the exposure it is. >And why?
question otm!
― martin (martin), Wednesday, 26 May 2004 16:48 (twenty-two years ago)
me too. gutted :(
― tylero (tylero), Wednesday, 26 May 2004 17:31 (twenty-two years ago)
Seriously, what about Donae'o? Not really "grime" per se, but I was thinking he had a great deal of UK Top 40 crossover potential.
― @d@ml (nordicskilla), Wednesday, 26 May 2004 17:37 (twenty-two years ago)
I think grime will stay as a fairly underground thing, as i say, i don't have a problem with mainstream acceptance, but at the same time i don't think that envelope-pushing music gets that sort of acceptance. Which is fine.
I'd love to be wrong though.
― don (don), Wednesday, 26 May 2004 17:39 (twenty-two years ago)
― prima fassy (mwah), Wednesday, 26 May 2004 17:46 (twenty-two years ago)
― thesplooge (thesplooge), Wednesday, 26 May 2004 18:08 (twenty-two years ago)
So, who knows if it'll happen, but he's in a position where he could cross over if one of his tracks caught fire.
― Lukas (lukas), Wednesday, 26 May 2004 18:16 (twenty-two years ago)
― thesplooge (thesplooge), Wednesday, 26 May 2004 18:18 (twenty-two years ago)
― don (don), Wednesday, 26 May 2004 18:19 (twenty-two years ago)
― thesplooge (thesplooge), Wednesday, 26 May 2004 18:21 (twenty-two years ago)
― myke boomnoise (myke boomnoise), Wednesday, 26 May 2004 18:25 (twenty-two years ago)
― don (don), Wednesday, 26 May 2004 18:29 (twenty-two years ago)
― thesplooge (thesplooge), Wednesday, 26 May 2004 18:37 (twenty-two years ago)
― @d@ml (nordicskilla), Wednesday, 26 May 2004 18:38 (twenty-two years ago)
― Jason J, Wednesday, 26 May 2004 18:42 (twenty-two years ago)
Comparing grime's chart success to pop-2-step's is somewhat fallacious I think; the charting 2-step was a lot more poptastic than any grime has been, and there was a sufficient possibility that a large portion of its audience could buy it without realising that it was '2-step' rather than 'that song about flowers' etc. I can't imagine someone buying a grime album or single without being vaguely aware of grime's existence as a separate genre.
And Jamelia and grime aren't as far away from eachother as you might think - see her work with JD for example.
The most important thing for grime I think is for some middleground to be established between dodgy mixtapes and actual major-label signings. The problem at the moment is that artists and tracks currently have the choice of either not getting released properly or being snapped up by majors and slept-on and/or buffed up 'n' watered down. Where are the Locked Ons and Pure Grooves of grime - labels from within the scene that can put out comps and releases with proper (even international!) distribution.
― Tim Finney (Tim Finney), Thursday, 27 May 2004 05:15 (twenty-two years ago)
― martin (martin), Thursday, 27 May 2004 09:03 (twenty-two years ago)
re: grimes success. i was thinking why dont more labels sign people up, and it seems to be that grime, in its present state, just isnt a recordable type of music. the only formats that it makes sense are in a live context (radio/raves) or mixtapes, which are just simulacra of the former. the tracks that get released are something slightly different, and although they come out pretty well, they are kinda something else to what i associate with grime viz. people chatting over about a million different tunes in 10 mins (and all the tunes bootlegs of other ones), rewinds, mashed up mixing etc. that jujst isnt a 12"/cd/lp formatable type affair. so commercially it wont work for that reason - its true nature cant be sold on plastic (?! bit pompous, but still)
― ambrose (ambrose), Thursday, 27 May 2004 09:10 (twenty-two years ago)
― ambrose (ambrose), Thursday, 27 May 2004 09:12 (twenty-two years ago)
― Tim Finney (Tim Finney), Thursday, 27 May 2004 10:33 (twenty-two years ago)
― Dave Stelfox (Dave Stelfox), Thursday, 27 May 2004 10:46 (twenty-two years ago)
― mark e (mark e), Thursday, 27 May 2004 12:16 (twenty-two years ago)
― Jason J, Thursday, 27 May 2004 12:37 (twenty-two years ago)
― Jason J, Thursday, 27 May 2004 12:38 (twenty-two years ago)
― mark e (mark e), Thursday, 27 May 2004 12:57 (twenty-two years ago)
― Graeme (Graeme), Thursday, 27 May 2004 14:35 (twenty-two years ago)
― cozen (Cozen), Thursday, 27 May 2004 17:24 (twenty-two years ago)
― martin (martin), Thursday, 27 May 2004 20:50 (twenty-two years ago)
― tinman, Thursday, 27 May 2004 23:56 (twenty-two years ago)
72 results found:
― DAEREST V1CE MAGAZINE!!!!! (ex machina), Friday, 17 June 2005 20:43 (twenty-one years ago)
― troll, Monday, 5 December 2005 13:40 (twenty years ago)
― Yawn (Wintermute), Monday, 5 December 2005 13:48 (twenty years ago)
― titchyschneider (titchyschneider), Wednesday, 29 March 2006 11:10 (twenty years ago)
I've had it with these motherfucking snakes on this motherfucking plane.
― Dom Passantino, Friday, 14 March 2008 14:51 (eighteen years ago)
wtf is grime.
― The Brainwasher, Friday, 14 March 2008 14:52 (eighteen years ago)
"kano's next to blow this year... trust."
rofl. 'being next to blow' = 'being next to become totally shit'.
― titchyschneiderMk2, Friday, 14 March 2008 15:01 (eighteen years ago)