Music Reviews That Upset Your Stomach

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Top this one from a Mars Volta concert review in an LA weekly:

"Set-piece songs flicker in and out of focus amid acres of semi-improvisation and repeated visits to a backs-turned, stop-start precipice. Rodriguez’s jittery Tourette’s outbursts betray his jazz-vs.-Hendrix internal dialogue, laying a craggy path for Zavala’s jeans-too-tight warbling lament. Through his Astaire-on-uppers shimmy and Plantesque feral yelp, Zavala opens a portal between Rodriguez’s cinematic ambitions and the back rows, his inadvertent porno posing and bizarre bunny-hop aerobics eliciting smiles from this sellout crowd."

I'm think I'm going to be sick.....

jolly roger, Thursday, 27 May 2004 20:21 (twenty-two years ago)

why? It didn't mention mucus or semen or vomit!

hstencil (hstencil), Thursday, 27 May 2004 20:24 (twenty-two years ago)

OMG he didn't say "it was good, I liked it" or "7 out of 10" OMG!

Matos W.K. (M Matos), Thursday, 27 May 2004 20:25 (twenty-two years ago)

haha that's not real, is it?

geeta (geeta), Thursday, 27 May 2004 20:26 (twenty-two years ago)

Up to this point, Mick Jagger's solo career has been an incidental affair, something that has surfaced in the interludes between Rolling Stones albums and tours. His previous releases - 1985's She's the Boss, 1987's Primitive Cool and 1993's Wandering Spirit - were earnest, respectable efforts that offered their fair share of pleasures but did not establish a distinct or significant new musical identity for Jagger apart from the Stones. Goddess in the Doorway finds Jagger taking a giant step - not away from the shadow of the Stones but beyond what that understandably history-bound band has been able to achieve on record in recent times.
In terms of consistency, craftsmanship and musical experimentation, Goddess in the Doorway surpasses all his solo work and any Rolling Stones album since Some Girls. It does so by returning to the dance beats, big grooves and modern edge that have characterized the Stones' best work. The key to all the Stones' classics - from "Satisfaction" and "Brown Sugar" to "Miss You" and "Start Me Up" - is that they are built from the rhythm up: Goddess in the Doorway, which was almost entirely constructed around Jagger's rhythm guitar, is a return to that modus operandi.

Jagger has poured his heart into this album. The strongest songs - "Don't Call Me Up," "Brand New Set of Rules," "Hide Away" and "Everybody Getting High" - are also the most candidly personal. In the past, he has slipped into personae - the Street Fighting Man, Jumpin' Jack Flash, the Man of Wealth and Taste - but he lets his guard down to an unprecedented degree on Goddess; the beautiful ballads draw on feelings of loneliness, vulnerability, spiritual yearning and, as always, life with the ladies.

These gains in maturity have taken no toll on Jagger's inner rock & roller. The Street Fighting Man can still swagger at the top of his - or anybody else's - game. Goddess in the Doorway resembles the Stones' best albums in that it's a varied yet cohesive collection of ballads, hard rockers and one country song. But on his own, he is free to cast off the blues-rock anchor that both defines and (at times) confines the Stones. Jagger heads into edgy, danceable modern-rock territory with the throbbing electronic groove of "Gun" and the snarling, whip-crack assault of "Everybody Getting High."

Making the most of this opportunity to stretch himself, Jagger has recruited some outstanding guests, many of them younger artists whom he directly influenced. Rob Thomas of Matchbox Twenty collaborates on the pop-y, melodic opening track, "Visions of Paradise," which boasts a soaring chorus. Lenny Kravitz produces and co-writes "God Gave Me Everything," a driving, riff-propelled rocker that evokes the punkish stomp of the early Stones.

On "Hide Away," one of my favorite tracks, Wyclef Jean helps burnish a subtle reggae- and hip-hop-inflected groove. Employing some of his most moving and nuanced vocal phrasing, he confides, "I'm gonna fly away/And no one's gonna find me." The lyrics portray a guy who's got it all - fame, fortune and the means to indulge any materialistic and hedonistic impulse he might divine - but is wise enough in his late middle age to know there's something more out there.

"Joy," a rocking, gospel-tinged collaboration with Bono of U2 - and featuring an indelible guitar hook from Pete Townshend - offers a revealing glimpse of what Jagger is seeking: "I looked up to the heavens/And a light is on my face/I never never never/Thought I'd find a state of grace." The mark of U2 is overt on "Joy," but the band's influence subtly courses through the rest of the album; like Bono and company in the last decade, Jagger (along with producers Marti Frederiksen and Matt Clifford) has adapted modern rhythms and contemporary production techniques to his own naturalistic rock & roll ends.

"Everybody Getting High," featuring Aerosmith's Joe Perry, and "Lucky Day" are fierce, biting rockers. No one struts or wags a tongue as sharply as Jagger, and "Everybody Getting High," in particular, stands out as a blistering, arena-ready, hard-rock singalong. The absurdist lyrics find Jagger poking fun at scenes from his celebrity life: "My dress designers, they wanna doll me up in blue/Mmm-hmm pretty/Next fall collection, they're gonna show it in the zoo." The tight blues shuffle "Lucky Day" is highlighted by some brief but fiery harmonica playing from Jagger. Like a good blues workout, it leaves you hungry for more, and this masterful use of tension and restraint is part of what makes Goddess in the Doorway so beguiling.

It may seem a truism, but it's worth noting that he is - along with John Lennon, Van Morrison, Bob Dylan and Bono - one of the great male rock voices of this age. And he is in exceptional form on Goddess in the Doorway. If anything, Jagger's voice is rounder and warmer than ever, and he brings a new richness of phrasing to the heartbroken, confessional "Don't Call Me Up" and the extraordinary closing tracks, "Too Far Gone" and "Brand New Set of Rules."

After all of the excursions undertaken on Goddess in the Doorway, Jagger brings it all back home with these last two numbers, which are musically rich and lyrically reflective ballads in the grand tradition of such Stones pillars as "Wild Horses" and "Moonlight Mile." Jagger offers unabashedly human, vulnerable sentiments on "Brand New Set of Rules" (which features daughters Elizabeth and Georgia May on background vocals): "I will be kind, won't be so cruel/I will be sweet, I will be true/. . . I got a brand-new set of rules I got to learn."

It is a clear-eyed and inspired Mick Jagger who crafted Goddess in the Doorway, an insuperably strong record that in time may well reveal itself to be a classic. World, meet Mick Jagger, solo artist.

Gear! (Gear!), Thursday, 27 May 2004 20:26 (twenty-two years ago)

any poor shlub who gets assigned to write about "mick jagger, the solo artist" receives my deepest sympathies

geeta (geeta), Thursday, 27 May 2004 20:28 (twenty-two years ago)

haha Jann Wenner assigned his own damn self on this one.

Gear! (Gear!), Thursday, 27 May 2004 20:29 (twenty-two years ago)

XPOST

I'm all for creative writing, but "inadvertant porno posing"....come on!

And yes, this is a review from The LA Weekly.

jolly roger, Thursday, 27 May 2004 20:30 (twenty-two years ago)

I'm with matos that the first review in itself wasn't badly written -- god knows if mars volta deserve it, but why not? i'd write about Dream that way, maybe! as for the second the problem again wasn't the writing, which wasn't bad at all, but rather the subject matter.
damn rockists all y'all.

Sterling Clover (s_clover), Thursday, 27 May 2004 20:32 (twenty-two years ago)

rockists have weak stomachs?

hstencil (hstencil), Thursday, 27 May 2004 20:33 (twenty-two years ago)

actually, strike that, i'd never accuse Dream of "inadvertant porno posing". But the Mars Volta? Why not?

Sterling Clover (s_clover), Thursday, 27 May 2004 20:34 (twenty-two years ago)

"Set-piece songs flicker in and out of focus amid acres of semi-improvisation and repeated visits to a backs-turned, stop-start precipice. Rodriguez’s jittery Tourette’s outbursts betray his jazz-vs.-Hendrix internal dialogue, laying a craggy path for Zavala’s jeans-too-tight warbling lament. Through his Astaire-on-uppers shimmy and Plantesque feral yelp, Zavala opens a portal between Rodriguez’s cinematic ambitions and the back rows, his inadvertent porno posing and bizarre bunny-hop aerobics eliciting smiles from this sellout crowd."

Needs more hyphens!

wetmink (wetmink), Thursday, 27 May 2004 20:34 (twenty-two years ago)

I'm sorry but "jittery Tourette’s outbursts betray his jazz-vs.-Hendrix internal dialogue, laying a craggy path for Zavala’s jeans-too-tight warbling lament" sounds like he got stoned and read "Howl" before whipping up this review....

....which is fair enough, I suppose, but it still churned the insides a bit....

jolly roger, Thursday, 27 May 2004 20:40 (twenty-two years ago)

I generally disdain overuse of hyphens. Surefire sign of bad, neologistic writing.

Rubberband Man (Rubberband Man), Thursday, 27 May 2004 21:03 (twenty-two years ago)

Through his Astaire-on-uppers shimmy

I don't believe Fred Astaire ever shimmied in his life.

Alex in NYC (vassifer), Thursday, 27 May 2004 21:16 (twenty-two years ago)

Tool
Lateralus
[Volcano]
Rating: 1.9
Eric Partridge's Dictionary of the Underworld (1998 NTC/Contemporary Publishing), a lexicon of 19th Century street slang, defines the idiom "pitch the fork" as "to tell a pitiful tale." The term appeared printed in 1863 in Story of a Lancashire Thief:

"Brummagem Joe, a cove ["fellow" or "dude," if you will] as could patter or pitch the fork with anyone."

At last, the secret motivation of my schtick and the etymology behind our name can be revealed. These reviews have been less critique than loquacious concept reviews by an entertaining tramp. So you'd think an 80-minute opus by Tool would be right up our alley. You'd be wrong.

Undertow, Tool's 1993 debut LP, took studio skill and over-trained chops to metal with aplomb. It was Rush Sabbath. As emotional, melodic metal goes (the cultural impact of which will be left to the reader), it opened doors for bands like the Deftones, and to some degree, Limp Bizkit. However, Tool have always possessed a latent understanding of absurdity and comedy; their videos look like Tim Burton stop-motion, goth Primus.

But with popularity and praise, Tool's shadowy tongue-in-cheek turned into the simple biting of tongues. Ænema spiced their sound with electronics and industry, as was the trend at the time. Now, with the early new century demanding "opuses," Tool follows suit. The problem is, Tool defines "opus" as taking their "defining element" (wanking sludge) and stretching it out to the maximum digital capacity of a compact disc.

Dictionary of the Underworld also offers several definitions for "tool," including: "a small boy used to creep through windows," "to steal from women's pockets," and "to loaf, to idle, to do nothing in particular." All of which oddly strike the nail on the head in relation to Lateralus.

And now, the obligatory pitching of the fork.

* * *

My Summer Vacation, by Crispin Fubert, Ms. Higgins' Eng. Comp. 901

I believe that music comes and goes in cycles, and some of us are lucky enough to ride the crests. The men in my family are perfect examples of this. Initially, I thought that perfect music appeared every 16 years, which is also the number of years between Fubert generations. My dad was born in 1971. In that year, landmark albums were released. They were Nursery Crime by Genesis (the first with Phil Collins), Yes Album by Yes, Aqualung by Jethro Tull, and In the Land of Grey and Pink by Caravan.

My grandfather skipped out on Vietnam-- because Jimi Hendrix himself told him to-- and he moved to Canterbury, which is in the United England. There, he got married to my grandmother, who used to sell baked goods to people at concerts, and they had my dad. After the war, they moved back with a box of awesome records like the ones I mentioned. I think it was cosmic or fate or something that my dad was born the same exact day Chrysalis released Aqualung, in March of 1971.

Jump ahead 16 years later and my dad got this girl pregnant, who turned out to be my mom. It was 1987 and a whole bunch of lame dance music was ruling the world, like Hitler or Jesus or something. But all of the sudden, albums like Metallica's ...And Justice for All, Celtic Frost's Into the Pandemonium, Queensryche's Operation: Mindcrime, and Slayer's South of Heaven came out. That's when I was born.

All those records were sitting around the house we all live in, and I grew up listening to them in the basement. So I couldn't wait until I was 16, because fate says that would be when 1) more kickass records would come out, and 2) I'd get sex. Both were due, because girls are dumb and listen to stuff like N'S(t)ync and BBSuk. But after this summer of 2001, I've had to rethink my entire cycle theory, like maybe the cycles of music are speeding as time goes forward, since two amazing things happened: Tool put out Lateralus and I saw Tool in concert.

I feel like this record was made just for me by super-smart aliens or something, because it's just like a cross of 1971 and 1987. Imagine, like, Peter Gabriel with batwings or a flower on his head singing while Lars Ulrich and Rick Wakeman just hammer it down. It's the best Tool record because it's the longest. All summer I worked at Gadzooks, folding novelty t-shirts, and on each break, I would listen to Lateralus because the store just plays hip-hop and dance. My manager would always get on me for taking my breaks 20 minutes too long, but that's how long the album is and it just sucks you in. It's like this big desert world with mountains of riffs, and drum thunderstorms just roll across the sky. The packaging is also cool, since it has this clear book with a skinless guy, and as you turn the pages, it rips off his muscles and stuff. Tool's music does the same thing. It can just rip the muscles and skin off you. I think that's what they meant. So my manager would be like, "Hey, there's a new box of 'Blunt Simpson' shirts I need you to put out and the 'Original Jackass' shelf is getting low." He's a vegan and I would buy him Orange Julius because he didn't know there's egg powder in there.

The first song is called "The Grudge," and it's about astrology and how people control stuff. Maynard sings like a robot or clone at the opening, spitting, "Wear the crutch like a crown/ Calculate what we will/ Will not tolerate/ Desperate to control/ All and everything." Tool know about space and math, and it's pretty complex. "Saturn ascends/ Not one but ten," he sings. No Doubt and R.E.M. sang out that, too, but those songs were wimpy and short. Maynard shows his intelligence with raw stats. I think there's meaning behind those numbers, like calculus. He also mentions "prison cell" and "tear it down" and "controlling" and "sinking deeper," which all symbolize how he feels. Seven minutes into the song, he does this awesome scream for 24 seconds straight, which is like the longest scream I've ever heard. Then at the end there's this part where Danny Carey hits every drum he has. This wall of drums just pounds you. Then the next song starts and it's quiet and trippy. Tool are the best metal band, since they can get trippy (almost pretty, but in a dark way) then just really loud. Most bands just do loud, so Tool is more prog.

Danny Carey is the best drummer in rock, dispute that and I know you are a dunce. I made a list of all of his gear (from the June issue of Modern Drummer):

Drums, Sonor Designer Series (bubinga wood): 8x14 snare (bronze), 8x8 tom, 10x10 tom, 16x14 tom, 18x16 floor tom, two 18x24 bass drums.

Cymbals, Paiste: 14" Sound Edge Dry Crisp hi-hats, 6" signature bell over 8" signature bell, 10" signature splash, 24" 2002 China, 18" signature full crash, #3 cup chime over #1 cup chime, 18" signature power crash, 12" signature Micro-Hat, 22" signature Dry Heavy ride, 22" signature Thin China, 20" signature Power crash.

Electronics: Simmons SDX pads, Korg Wave Drum, Roland MC-505, Oberheim TVS.

Hardware: Sonor stands, Sonor, Axis or Pro-Mark hi-hat stand, Axis or Pearl bass drum petals with Sonor or Pearl beaters (loose string tension, but with long throw).

Heads: Evans Power Center on snare batter (medium high tuning, no muffling), G2s on tom batters with G1s underneath (medium tuning with bottom head higher than batter), EQ3 bass drum batter with EQ3 resonant on front (medium tuning, with EQ pad touching front and back heads).

Sticks: Trueline Danny Carey model (wood tip).

He has his own sticks, even. In "Schism," the double basses just go nuts at the end. They also do in "Eon Blue Apocalypse." And in "The Grudge." And in "Ticks & Leeches." And nobody uses more toms in metal. You can really hear the 8x8 and 10x10 toms in the opening for "Ticks & Leeches." Over the summer, I counted the number of tom hits in that song, and it's 1,023!! Amazing. That's my favorite song, since it's the one that starts with Maynard screaming, "Suck it!" Then he says, "Little parasite." Later he shouts, "This is what you wanted... I hope you choke on it!" Every time I watched my boss suck down those Orange Juliuses I had that stuck in my head.

There is simply no way you could just dismiss the music (which is excellent). The bass playing is just really creepy and slow and sometimes it has this watery effect. Tool even follow in the footsteps of Caravan with Middle Eastern or Asian or something sounds. "Disposition" features bongos, and then on the next song, "Reflection," Carey's toms sound like bongos or tablas or whatever is in those Fruitopia commercials. Close your eyes and imagine if Asia had a space program. This is like the music they'd play. The song is called "Reflection" since it's quieter and slower and sounds like it's from India, where people go to reflect. Maynard's voice sounds like that little bleached midget girl flying around inside the walls in Polterghost. It's messed up.

In conclusion, there is more emotion on that album than would be on 30 Weezer albums. At the very least, there's 2.5 times as much. Like I said, it's messed up, like the world, which makes it very real. I don't think I'm going to have a kid this year, but that's also a good thing. Just imagine the Tool record that will come out in three years, according to my theory. It will be the future, and albums can be like longer with better compression and technology. Even as amazing as Lateralus is, I feel like there's a monster coming in three years. Music comes in cycles, and works on math, and my life and Tool are proof of that for sure.

-Brent DiCrescenzo

The reason this makes me sick is not so much that he pokes fun at Tool and their obsessive fans, but that the review itself is the journalistic/reviewer equivalent of the wankery that the writer accuses Tool of exemplifying.

latebloomer (latebloomer), Thursday, 27 May 2004 21:28 (twenty-two years ago)

The first part of the review was fine, then he has to go and try to show off and say "look at me, I'm so much more clever than those dumbass tool fans (suckers!) so I'll run my point into the ground and mock them".

I'm no Pitchfork basher, but that's the kind of review that creates Pitchfork bashers.

latebloomer (latebloomer), Thursday, 27 May 2004 21:32 (twenty-two years ago)

I always hated Pitchfork's positive review of Kylie Minogue's Fever which was actually, omg lol, an April Fool's Day review.

Gear! (Gear!), Thursday, 27 May 2004 21:33 (twenty-two years ago)

(I'm not sure if the review was sincerely positive or not, but it did note explicitly that it was an April Fool's Day review.)

Gear! (Gear!), Thursday, 27 May 2004 21:35 (twenty-two years ago)

a lot of album reviews dance around whether or not the guy (or girl) actually liked the album. that makes me sick. and then more dancing around whether or not someone else might. more nausea. so gimme a score or letter grade or a list of artists who do it better or worse and i'll move on with my life.

harshaw (jube), Thursday, 27 May 2004 23:58 (twenty-two years ago)

Come on, though. You don't like any good criticism that's a little more in depth???

Tim Ellison, Friday, 28 May 2004 00:25 (twenty-two years ago)

There's no pleasing anyone. Especially Kylie fans.

dleone (dleone), Friday, 28 May 2004 00:27 (twenty-two years ago)

my latest review on spec (dunno if any will get run) is high-concept as all fuck AND explicitly sez it likes the album cuz it is "pretty and fun".

best of both worlds.

Sterling Clover (s_clover), Friday, 28 May 2004 01:53 (twenty-two years ago)

Anything by that Clem girl who I think may be a writer for Stylus.

I'd like to take out a court order to prevent her writing from coming within 100 ft. of me.

Sasha (sgh), Friday, 28 May 2004 01:53 (twenty-two years ago)

a lot of album reviews dance around whether or not the guy (or girl) actually liked the album. that makes me sick. and then more dancing around whether or not someone else might. more nausea. so gimme a score or letter grade or a list of artists who do it better or worse and i'll move on with my life.

i said this before on the other thread, but jeez, just get the 30-second clip from amazon and figure out for yourself whether you might like the record. music writers write about music and sometimes they know damn well that whether they like something has no bearing on whether you the reader/listener will like it because very likely the music writer doesn't know you and has no idea what kind of taste in music you have (even with specialty magazines the genres are pretty broad) and very possibly they approach music in a completely different way than you do, so the best they can do in lieu of all that is try to make some sense of what the music is and really that tells me a hell of a lot more about whether I personally would like the album than whether the reviewer "likes it" or "doesn't."

stockholm cindy (Jody Beth Rosen), Friday, 28 May 2004 02:06 (twenty-two years ago)

the author's opinion is the last thing i consider when reading a review (if i consider it at all). i just want to see the music described.

stockholm cindy (Jody Beth Rosen), Friday, 28 May 2004 02:09 (twenty-two years ago)

at any rate, i don't think the mars volta review above is brilliant, but it's fine. people use hyphens. they use periods too. it's just punctuation like anything else.

stockholm cindy (Jody Beth Rosen), Friday, 28 May 2004 02:15 (twenty-two years ago)

dashes are better than hypens though. and semicolons!

Sterling Clover (s_clover), Friday, 28 May 2004 02:18 (twenty-two years ago)

Semicolons are so aesthetically unpleasant, tho.

David R. (popshots75`), Friday, 28 May 2004 02:23 (twenty-two years ago)

also i get the impression that the reason some crits don't feel comfortable with the star-rating system is that they don't want to "overrate" something they really like for their own crazy reasons (which they try to spell out in the review, which of course is there for you to read) but know a lot of other people will find flawed. and sometimes they don't want to overrate (without the scare quotes this time) something they're just interested in because it's part of the prevaling zeitgeist or whatever. then there's the "why did you give this album a generally positive review if you only awarded it two stars" syndrome, which is a pain in the ass if the writer is "generally positive" about the record (i.e. it's not even mediocre or anything; it's fine, enjoyable enough for a few listens) but would rather save the higher rating for something he gets a little more pleasure from.

stockholm cindy (Jody Beth Rosen), Friday, 28 May 2004 03:12 (twenty-two years ago)

this one, from april 2003, really really bothered me. i was quite amazed that it made it into print:

THE WALKMEN: Everyone Who Pretended to Like Me Is Gone (Startime International) Just what we always wanted--Jonathan Fire*Eater grows up. Put some DreamWorks money into a studio, that was mature. Realized Radiohead was the greatest band in the world, brainy. Stopped playing so fast, hoo boy. And most important, switched vocalists from Nick Cave imitator to Rufus Wainwright imitator. Wainwright makes up better melodies with a dick in his mouth, and not only that, Cave has more literary ability. New York scene or (hint hint) no New York scene, DreamWorks isn't buying. C PLUS

fact checking cuz (fcc), Friday, 28 May 2004 03:16 (twenty-two years ago)

it was only a matter of time...

Sterling Clover (s_clover), Friday, 28 May 2004 03:17 (twenty-two years ago)

(has that one already been discussed to death?)

fact checking cuz (fcc), Friday, 28 May 2004 03:19 (twenty-two years ago)

Realized Radiohead was the greatest band in the world

surely the writer does realize that there were bands that sounded like that before radiohead came along?

stockholm cindy (Jody Beth Rosen), Friday, 28 May 2004 03:20 (twenty-two years ago)

Flowery prose does tend to give me a headache (nothing makes my stomach hurt except for exceptionally funny reviews--"THANKS LAUREN HILL") in all writing (I like straight and simple writing cuz it easy to read, yes.) Like stockholm cindy, I just like good descriptions of music (that Mars Volta seems pretty vivid and descriptive--even it is slightly over the top--is it totally incorrect or something?)

Alex in SF (Alex in SF), Friday, 28 May 2004 03:33 (twenty-two years ago)

that first review was totally awful, although the difference between it and most rock criticism is one of degree and not of kind.

amateur!st (amateurist), Friday, 28 May 2004 03:36 (twenty-two years ago)

What's awful about it?

BTW that Tool review is awful, but it has nothing to do with what is purporting to review and is more just an excuse for Brent to engage in his terrible creative writing student muse (no I wouldn't read a short story by this guy either.)

Alex in SF (Alex in SF), Friday, 28 May 2004 03:42 (twenty-two years ago)

What's awful about it?

too many hyphenates

amateur!st (amateurist), Friday, 28 May 2004 03:45 (twenty-two years ago)

the bound to happen was w/r/t xgau getting thrown in for no good reason. i like the tool review too, btw. its the type of thing brent was good at -- meta without insanely so, he does a good job with the character i think, gets the tone mainly spot on, and it tells you a whole BUNCH about the music! except it makes you like the album, is the one thing.

Sterling Clover (s_clover), Friday, 28 May 2004 04:19 (twenty-two years ago)

the bound to happen was w/r/t xgau getting thrown in for no good reason.

i threw in xgau for a damn good reason. the damn good reason being that xgau for no good reason felt the need to joke rather graphically (and unfunnily) about rufus wainwright's sexual habits in a review of the walkmen. it's a bizarre line and it completely upset my stomach when i read it. i'm sure xgau isn't a homophobe. what i'm not sure about is what on earth he was thinking when he wrote that line.

fact checking cuz (fcc), Friday, 28 May 2004 04:32 (twenty-two years ago)

probably about cocksucking?

Sterling Clover (s_clover), Friday, 28 May 2004 04:44 (twenty-two years ago)

um, sure, ok.

fact checking cuz (fcc), Friday, 28 May 2004 04:46 (twenty-two years ago)

well, what else would it have been about?

Sterling Clover (s_clover), Friday, 28 May 2004 04:47 (twenty-two years ago)

Kathleen Wilson's braindead piece on The Church for The Stranger, is so wildly inaccurate that I'm already sick by the time I attempt to decode what the hell she's talking about.

Elvis Telecom (Chris Barrus), Friday, 28 May 2004 04:52 (twenty-two years ago)

(x-post)
why not "wainwright makes up better melodies with a fist in his butt"? i mean, as long as you're trying to make an impact.

fact checking cuz (fcc), Friday, 28 May 2004 04:54 (twenty-two years ago)

or, alternatively, why not "bjork makes up better melodies with a dick in her mouth"?

fact checking cuz (fcc), Friday, 28 May 2004 04:59 (twenty-two years ago)

NEVER READ PITCHFORK DRUNK!!`

Sonny A. (Keiko), Friday, 28 May 2004 06:32 (twenty-two years ago)

"BTW that Tool review is awful, but it has nothing to do with what is purporting to review and is more just an excuse for Brent to engage in his terrible creative writing student muse (no I wouldn't read a short story by this guy either.) "

Yeah, that's what annoyed me, he was criticising Tool's ponderousness and wankery and was pulling off a pretty fair-size chunk of indulgence himself.

latebloomer (latebloomer), Friday, 28 May 2004 07:01 (twenty-two years ago)

http://www.drownedinsound.com/articles/9617.html

hot karl, Friday, 28 May 2004 09:02 (twenty-two years ago)

" people use hyphens. they use periods too. it's just punctuation like anything else."
Stockholm Cindy is OTM about the futility of using-reviews-as-consumer-guides but the sentences quoted in the question read like a grisly train wreck. I thought punctuation was supposed to organize/clarify the writer's flow. This critic employs hyphens as a crowbar, trying to cram too many references and metaphors onto a shakey structure. It gave me a headache, actually.

lovebug starski, Friday, 28 May 2004 09:35 (twenty-two years ago)

haha brent notes the irony of the review/album style in the second para!

"At last, the secret motivation of my schtick and the etymology behind our name can be revealed. These reviews have been less critique than loquacious concept reviews by an entertaining tramp. So you'd think an 80-minute opus by Tool would be right up our alley. You'd be wrong."

(does acknowledgement of a flaw ameliorate its defective character? no -- but it ironizes it!)

Sterling Clover (s_clover), Friday, 28 May 2004 15:19 (twenty-two years ago)

fact checking cuz OTM re: xgau's surprising burst of Vice-itude

Anthony Miccio (Anthony Miccio), Friday, 28 May 2004 15:22 (twenty-two years ago)

the replies in this post are beginning to upset my stomach.

thesplooge (thesplooge), Friday, 28 May 2004 15:28 (twenty-two years ago)

anyway the dick joke i think is about the difficulty of making up a melody if your mouth is otherwise occupied so that its all muffled when you hum it.

Sterling Clover (s_clover), Friday, 28 May 2004 15:33 (twenty-two years ago)

*insert Fyvush Finkel photo here*

Anthony Miccio (Anthony Miccio), Friday, 28 May 2004 15:41 (twenty-two years ago)

don't be a kelly hata!

Sterling Clover (s_clover), Friday, 28 May 2004 16:08 (twenty-two years ago)

one year passes...
Pish. This is close enough to what I was really searching for, i.e. reviews that hurt your brain because they are total nonsense saying nothing at all. In XLR8R on the new Ov3rton3 12":

All progressive ragga souljahs step to this –Brooklyn’s Redbud takes a gritty tech-dub ting (think Stereotyp or The Bug) from Lithuania’s Overtone down to Nostrand Ave. In the process, Germany’s DITD (Inverse Cinematics) hijacks the convoy and breaks the beat into a dancefloor killer that should have ‘em juxin’ n’ jamming at London’s Co-Op club.

Candicissima (candicissima), Monday, 27 June 2005 16:59 (twenty years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.