― peter smith (plsmith), Thursday, 24 June 2004 17:50 (twenty-one years ago)
― (Jon L), Thursday, 24 June 2004 18:02 (twenty-one years ago)
― Dan Selzer (Dan Selzer), Thursday, 24 June 2004 18:05 (twenty-one years ago)
― peter smith (plsmith), Thursday, 24 June 2004 18:07 (twenty-one years ago)
― JaXoN (JasonD), Thursday, 24 June 2004 18:12 (twenty-one years ago)
― Joe (Joe), Thursday, 24 June 2004 18:20 (twenty-one years ago)
Soft Machine 4: Classic, Dud, or ?
― Joe (Joe), Thursday, 24 June 2004 18:25 (twenty-one years ago)
― emma cleveland (emma cleveland), Thursday, 24 June 2004 18:28 (twenty-one years ago)
― el sabor de gene (yournullfame), Thursday, 24 June 2004 19:11 (twenty-one years ago)
I need to pull out those SM cds, I haven't given them a listen for a few years. I got the first six in one buy out of a used bin around 96. I gave them quite a few spins the first couple of years, but they have all blurred into one jam in my head.
I've never heard any of their records after Six. Are any of the later records worth hearing?
― earlnash, Thursday, 24 June 2004 19:23 (twenty-one years ago)
― hstencil (hstencil), Thursday, 24 June 2004 19:30 (twenty-one years ago)
― dialecticbricks (dialecticbricks), Thursday, 24 June 2004 19:36 (twenty-one years ago)
― Tim Ellison, Thursday, 24 June 2004 19:38 (twenty-one years ago)
― peter smith (plsmith), Thursday, 24 June 2004 19:53 (twenty-one years ago)
― Paul Ziemba (paul ziemba), Thursday, 24 June 2004 19:57 (twenty-one years ago)
― Stewart Osborne (Stewart Osborne), Friday, 25 June 2004 08:31 (twenty-one years ago)
― Nag! Nag! Nag! (Nag! Nag! Nag!), Friday, 25 June 2004 09:22 (twenty-one years ago)
if you'll excuse me for a minute, i'm going to go lie down until this cardiac episode passes. may answer you afterwards.
― el sabor de gene (yournullfame), Friday, 25 June 2004 15:35 (twenty-one years ago)
― ddb (ddb), Friday, 25 June 2004 15:44 (twenty-one years ago)
― Myonga Von Bontee (Myonga Von Bontee), Friday, 25 June 2004 16:02 (twenty-one years ago)
― Dan Selzer (Dan Selzer), Friday, 25 June 2004 16:45 (twenty-one years ago)
― (Jon L), Friday, 25 June 2004 16:56 (twenty-one years ago)
I vote for tie between 1 and 2. On "Third" I have use only for side 3.
― no opinion, Friday, 25 June 2004 17:12 (twenty-one years ago)
BTW, where is Ayers on this album? Did he PLAY on the thing at all (did he play bass on it?). There's almost no guitar on it (if there's any at all--last time I listened to it, I remember hearing one guitar part somewhere).
A punked up version of "We Did It Again" by Theoretical Girls would have been nice.
― Tim Ellison, Friday, 25 June 2004 17:23 (twenty-one years ago)
― Dan Selzer (Dan Selzer), Friday, 25 June 2004 17:29 (twenty-one years ago)
― JaXoN (JasonD), Friday, 25 June 2004 18:18 (twenty-one years ago)
― nickn (nickn), Friday, 25 June 2004 23:14 (twenty-one years ago)
― earlnash, Saturday, 26 June 2004 04:30 (twenty-one years ago)
great fucking band. and i cant really decide between 1 and 2 anymore. maybe ill try to track down 4 this weekend...
― peter smith (plsmith), Tuesday, 25 January 2005 14:52 (twenty-one years ago)
4 and everything else is boring
― Dadaismugness (Dada), Tuesday, 25 January 2005 14:56 (twenty-one years ago)
― Dadaismugness (Dada), Tuesday, 25 January 2005 14:59 (twenty-one years ago)
― peter smith (plsmith), Tuesday, 25 January 2005 14:59 (twenty-one years ago)
― walter kranz (walterkranz), Tuesday, 25 January 2005 17:09 (twenty-one years ago)
― (Jon L), Tuesday, 25 January 2005 19:20 (twenty-one years ago)
― Trip Maker (Sean Witzman), Tuesday, 25 January 2005 19:38 (twenty-one years ago)
― walter kranz (walterkranz), Tuesday, 25 January 2005 19:49 (twenty-one years ago)
― Rabbieismus (Dada), Tuesday, 25 January 2005 19:50 (twenty-one years ago)
― Trip Maker (Sean Witzman), Tuesday, 25 January 2005 19:52 (twenty-one years ago)
― Rabbieismus (Dada), Tuesday, 25 January 2005 19:54 (twenty-one years ago)
― Rabbieismus (Dada), Tuesday, 25 January 2005 19:58 (twenty-one years ago)
― peter smith (plsmith), Tuesday, 25 January 2005 20:02 (twenty-one years ago)
― Rabbieismus (Dada), Tuesday, 25 January 2005 20:04 (twenty-one years ago)
― eman (eman), Tuesday, 25 January 2005 20:07 (twenty-one years ago)
Yeah, that's what I mean about the pulsating crap. One part of me says "hey cool! trip out man!" while the other part wishes I could see them play more clearly because they're actually really fun to watch. I'll have to dig that clip out again.
― walter kranz (walterkranz), Tuesday, 25 January 2005 23:46 (twenty-one years ago)
― petesmith (plsmith), Wednesday, 7 September 2005 16:26 (twenty years ago)
― Rockist_Scientist (RSLaRue), Wednesday, 7 September 2005 16:36 (twenty years ago)
― petesmith (plsmith), Wednesday, 7 September 2005 16:43 (twenty years ago)
― Paul (scifisoul), Wednesday, 7 September 2005 16:47 (twenty years ago)
Brilliant!
― Special Agent Dale Koopa (orion), Monday, 17 October 2005 14:31 (twenty years ago)
― js (honestengine), Monday, 17 October 2005 14:59 (twenty years ago)
― Monty Von Byonga (Monty Von Byonga), Friday, 27 October 2006 08:36 (nineteen years ago)
― nickn (nickn), Friday, 27 October 2006 17:15 (nineteen years ago)
BBC Sessions is one of their best, in many cases better versions of the songs -- anyone who's heard any of these, please chime in: http://www.cuneiformrecords.com/bandshtml/softmachine.html
― milton parker (Jon L), Friday, 27 October 2006 17:35 (nineteen years ago)
― nickn (nickn), Friday, 27 October 2006 17:43 (nineteen years ago)
ground and sky reviews make 'noisette' and 'grides' sound key
― milton parker (Jon L), Friday, 27 October 2006 17:55 (nineteen years ago)
― Tripmaker (SDWitzm), Friday, 27 October 2006 18:54 (nineteen years ago)
― nickn (nickn), Friday, 27 October 2006 19:18 (nineteen years ago)
― GOD PUNCH TO HAWKWIND (yournullfame), Friday, 27 October 2006 22:32 (nineteen years ago)
― poortheatre (poortheatre), Saturday, 28 October 2006 18:02 (nineteen years ago)
there's a version of that on middle earth masters, which I bought last night -- the sound is actually not bad, considering, although it's a room recording with almost no vocals in the mix whatsoever during the loud parts, which is most of it (apart from a long wyatt scat intro to 'hope for happiness' -- you can barely hear them -- but they did a great job eq'ing and restoring all the dropouts, so it's very listenable
they're still barebones, but with an insane amount of energy -- the songs are still skeletal riffs, but the improv sections are extremely abrasive, noisy and abstract. completely out for 1967, and not 'psychedelic' either -- kind of brutal and tough, not trance, everyone in the room wide awake. first impression is that this might not be for too many repeat plays, but very happy to be able to hear this.
― milton parker (Jon L), Saturday, 28 October 2006 23:05 (nineteen years ago)
― So Ho La (So Ho La), Tuesday, 31 October 2006 01:35 (nineteen years ago)
― Hot Hot Heat (Hot Hot Heat), Tuesday, 31 October 2006 14:19 (nineteen years ago)
Did Ayers leave in the middle of 1 or something? Why does he do so few vocals? He's all over the stuff that predates Vol. 1.
― dan selzer, Friday, 18 February 2011 20:39 (fifteen years ago)
Wyatt is a real strong vocalist, too.
― Trip Maker, Friday, 18 February 2011 20:42 (fifteen years ago)
Wyatt's one of my all-time fave vocalists, but it seems like Ayers has more songwriting credits, and a unique voice. Just surprised it's not more present on that album.
According to wikipedia, he only left after the Hendrix tour that followed the LP.
― dan selzer, Friday, 18 February 2011 20:46 (fifteen years ago)
I'm not gonna lie: I love Wyatt, really love Whatevershebringswesing, but I havea hard time getting into the first two records.
― Naive Teen Idol, Monday, 7 March 2011 20:22 (fifteen years ago)
crazy talk.
― dan selzer, Monday, 7 March 2011 20:33 (fifteen years ago)
I know, I know. But it may be that I just don't have a place in my life right now to listen to hyperactive jazzy prog pop with organ blares and offkilter song structures.
― Naive Teen Idol, Monday, 7 March 2011 20:49 (fifteen years ago)
First one is wayyyy more listenable, I mean casually listenable. It's more like poppy prog psych.
― Aquarian Necromancer Octopus (GOTT PUNCH II HAWKWINDZ), Tuesday, 8 March 2011 02:32 (fifteen years ago)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VGxin_agFQQhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AQZH3E-J7QI
Old college buddy had ^this on a vhs and it freaked me OUT
― Trip Maker, Tuesday, 8 March 2011 02:36 (fifteen years ago)
Wonder how these would have fared in this new poll era. Listening to Third a lot lately...
― If Assholes Could Fly This Place Would Be An Airport, Tuesday, 27 March 2012 03:57 (fourteen years ago)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gZP9FY_4PNAnot sure if this is what trip maker posted above, but anyway -- blowing my mind today.
― tylerw, Monday, 20 August 2012 19:15 (thirteen years ago)
Nah, it was a different Euro tv appearance. ^This is higher quality and waaaay longer.Will have to check it out later.
― Trip Maker, Monday, 20 August 2012 19:28 (thirteen years ago)
yeah, pretty awesome to see them putting it all together. wyatt is an unbelievable drummer.
― tylerw, Monday, 20 August 2012 19:34 (thirteen years ago)
which is the one with "Lullaby Letter", that's the one
― frogbs, Monday, 20 August 2012 19:36 (thirteen years ago)
One I posted featured Wyatt going off on the drums with his bare hands and then chanting with some echo effects and psychedelic visuals.It was cool.
― Trip Maker, Monday, 20 August 2012 19:43 (thirteen years ago)
cool, think i'm going to digging around for more Soft Machine videos! This one is super high quality and very nicely filmed.
― tylerw, Monday, 20 August 2012 19:47 (thirteen years ago)
This is the "obscured by pulsating crap" one I was talking about
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CtYFVtNlpKg
― wk, Monday, 20 August 2012 23:19 (thirteen years ago)
alsohttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gETYS-sNI9E
One of my faves, from 1967. Seems to be truncated, but still excellent.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SN8pyoCj5rQ&list=FLdRAbd-ijOi91p1tG3koMPA&index=4&feature=plpp_video
― nickn, Tuesday, 21 August 2012 04:08 (thirteen years ago)
Hmmm, mislinked. I wonder if it's been removed and I'm seeing a cached copy.
Search for Soft Machine - Dim Dam Dom, Oct.1967
― nickn, Tuesday, 21 August 2012 04:10 (thirteen years ago)
I see the correct title when the ILX page refreshes, but it quickly changes to the Henry Cow clip.
― nickn, Tuesday, 21 August 2012 04:11 (thirteen years ago)
Different links to the same thing? Should be Hope For Happiness/Improvisation, 5:27
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SN8pyoCj5rQ&playnext=1&list=PL0B9318D9F1834F0B&feature=results_main
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SN8pyoCj5rQ&playnext=1&list=PL593F407085FC7A9E&feature=results_main
― nickn, Tuesday, 21 August 2012 04:30 (thirteen years ago)
First one there may have worked.
― nickn, Tuesday, 21 August 2012 04:31 (thirteen years ago)
third by such a distance it's crazy
― the late great, Tuesday, 21 August 2012 04:49 (thirteen years ago)
vol 2
― Romney's Kitchen Nightmares (WmC), Tuesday, 21 August 2012 12:43 (thirteen years ago)
soft machine; 1968-08-25 Ce Soir On Danse
― Thomas K Amphong (Tom D.), Tuesday, 19 November 2013 13:47 (twelve years ago)
... good looking bunch of lads, I see a bright future for them
― Thomas K Amphong (Tom D.), Tuesday, 19 November 2013 13:51 (twelve years ago)
Highly improbable hairy chested Spooky Tooth-like cover of "A Certain Kind" by one-hit wonders Bloodrock (a band I'd never heard until about half an hour ago).
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rv-8us77U90
― Not waving but droning (Tom D.), Wednesday, 24 April 2024 17:56 (two years ago)
I hope Hugh Hopper earned some money out of it at least.
lol bloodrock- a band i checked out solely based on name/cover art and also one of the reasons i stopped doing that.
― interstellar anthropologist+music philosopher, (Austin), Wednesday, 24 April 2024 18:07 (two years ago)
utterly turgid. bloodrock seem like a band purpose-built to do doomy "heavy prog" epics about plane crashes... and yet they only did one. shocking that they didn't have a flautist!
― Kate (rushomancy), Wednesday, 24 April 2024 19:37 (two years ago)
Absolutely insane percentage of people in this thread did not pick the third album.
― Slim is an Alien, Wednesday, 24 April 2024 20:03 (two years ago)
if I'm picking a single track it's Slightly All The Time. But if I'm choosing a whole LP it's probably the first one. All three are 10/10 albums anyway.
― This is Dance Anthems, have some respect (Camaraderie at Arms Length), Wednesday, 24 April 2024 20:42 (two years ago)
really should get around to doing that Canterbury scene poll
― This is Dance Anthems, have some respect (Camaraderie at Arms Length), Wednesday, 24 April 2024 20:44 (two years ago)
yeah I'd have to go with the 1st one here, sorry 3 lovers
― I painted my teeth (sleeve), Wednesday, 24 April 2024 20:44 (two years ago)
my well worn and beloved US 2-fer copy of 1+2:
https://i.discogs.com/iAQosDNsUJMYciwTyhJbLkNo8D0D2uaAj4cmkj4gxao/rs:fit/g:sm/q:90/h:597/w:600/czM6Ly9kaXNjb2dz/LWRhdGFiYXNlLWlt/YWdlcy9SLTIwMDEz/MjYtMTQzMzMwNTU3/MC02NDQyLmpwZWc.jpeg
― I painted my teeth (sleeve), Wednesday, 24 April 2024 20:45 (two years ago)
the bloodrock singer sounds like joe cocker if he were a muppet.(that's bad)
― This is Dance Anthems, have some respect (Camaraderie at Arms Length), Wednesday, 24 April 2024 20:48 (two years ago)
The CD I have is of 1+2 and Box 25/4 Lid functions perfectly as a short breather between the two. Must be really odd to listen to it without the crashing opening to 2 following.
― This is Dance Anthems, have some respect (Camaraderie at Arms Length), Wednesday, 24 April 2024 20:54 (two years ago)
(xp) There was a lot of it about then.
― Not waving but droning (Tom D.), Wednesday, 24 April 2024 20:59 (two years ago)