The tentative theory I've arrived at is this. Indie, in the limited sense of the word I used above, has become a dead end. The Shoegazers of the early 90s were the last Indie bands to produce innovative music. Everything since then has been not just referring to a previous style, but referring to a previous style that referred to a previous style.
I'm not saying that any music has ever been completely original and without antecedents, but it seems to me that early 80s Post Punk or even C86-type bands were doing something new-ish in a way that no longer seems possible for Indie music. It doesn't seem possible for anybody my age (35) to get that excited about a group like the Libertines, because they're so reminiscent of the stuff that was exciting when I was 15. And 25.
Maybe I'm just too old, maaaan. But Hip Hop or Dancehall or the thousand branches of Dance music seem to me to still be growing, innovating, surprising. The gap between, say, David Banner and Schooly D seems enormous compared to the gap between, say, The Thrills and The Stars of Heaven.
Is Indie the Trad Jazz of today? Am I a moaning old git? Does it matter? What does anything mean, basically?
― noodle vague (noodle vague), Tuesday, 17 August 2004 18:25 (twenty-one years ago)
― ())(())()()()(()(LASER)()()()LA(Z)E(R)()()()((L)()()(A)(S(E)R()()()) (ex machina, Tuesday, 17 August 2004 18:29 (twenty-one years ago)
― noodle vague (noodle vague), Tuesday, 17 August 2004 18:30 (twenty-one years ago)
― Dare, Tuesday, 17 August 2004 18:31 (twenty-one years ago)
― noodle vague (noodle vague), Tuesday, 17 August 2004 18:32 (twenty-one years ago)
― dickvandyke (dickvandyke), Tuesday, 17 August 2004 18:33 (twenty-one years ago)
― Alex in SF (Alex in SF), Tuesday, 17 August 2004 18:34 (twenty-one years ago)
― peter smith (plsmith), Tuesday, 17 August 2004 18:34 (twenty-one years ago)
― dickvandyke (dickvandyke), Tuesday, 17 August 2004 18:36 (twenty-one years ago)
― peter smith (plsmith), Tuesday, 17 August 2004 18:37 (twenty-one years ago)
This is pretty much bullshit.
― Alex in SF (Alex in SF), Tuesday, 17 August 2004 18:37 (twenty-one years ago)
― peter smith (plsmith), Tuesday, 17 August 2004 18:39 (twenty-one years ago)
― dickvandyke (dickvandyke), Tuesday, 17 August 2004 18:39 (twenty-one years ago)
― Tico Tico (Tico Tico), Tuesday, 17 August 2004 18:40 (twenty-one years ago)
― Huck, Tuesday, 17 August 2004 18:40 (twenty-one years ago)
All of those groups dick, plus maybe early Blur and something like Gene, even The Shop Assistants. It's not that I especially hate The Libertines, but I cannot imagine why anybody for whom they aren't the first band you've ever fallen in love with would care about them.
(Note to Pete Doherty and Jim Morrison fans. Getting high doesn't make you a poet. Writing poetry does.)
― noodle vague (noodle vague), Tuesday, 17 August 2004 18:42 (twenty-one years ago)
― Alex in SF (Alex in SF), Tuesday, 17 August 2004 18:42 (twenty-one years ago)
I wouldn't go that far myself, Alex. Though it's less a question of how one quantifies 'innovation' than it is one of whether or not 'innovation' as an argument matters in the first place for one's enjoyment. And it isn't like hip-hop is unknown or anything. ;-)
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Tuesday, 17 August 2004 18:43 (twenty-one years ago)
timbaland WAS innovative sure, but not anymore. he and missy were lucky, they were both succesful while still being innovative. but for every one of those, theres a million other smaller innovative artists who arent selling but ARE stil close to the innovative core. i dont see el-p selling millions for example.
― dickvandyke (dickvandyke), Tuesday, 17 August 2004 18:44 (twenty-one years ago)
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Tuesday, 17 August 2004 18:44 (twenty-one years ago)
a) Indie is a genre of its own, I think, not an equivalent term for Independentb) A lot of Indie fans continue to moan on about the originality and innovation of their music, despite all the evidence to the contraryc) It rhymes nicely with Schmindie
― noodle vague (noodle vague), Tuesday, 17 August 2004 18:45 (twenty-one years ago)
what? i can reel off a dozen early-mid 90s hip hop albums that were very innovative but were hardly pop hits.
― dickvandyke (dickvandyke), Tuesday, 17 August 2004 18:45 (twenty-one years ago)
― scott seward (scott seward), Tuesday, 17 August 2004 18:46 (twenty-one years ago)
― dickvandyke (dickvandyke), Tuesday, 17 August 2004 18:46 (twenty-one years ago)
― ())(())()()()(()(LASER)()()()LA(Z)E(R)()()()((L)()()(A)(S(E)R()()()) (ex machina, Tuesday, 17 August 2004 18:47 (twenty-one years ago)
― Gear! (Gear!), Tuesday, 17 August 2004 18:47 (twenty-one years ago)
― Tico Tico (Tico Tico), Tuesday, 17 August 2004 18:49 (twenty-one years ago)
― cinniblount (James Blount), Tuesday, 17 August 2004 18:49 (twenty-one years ago)
some of my fave releases this year have been indie releases, but they're hybrids that fall messily somewhere between indie pop, indie rock, hip hop, dnb, techno, micro, idm, etc
stuff like The Egg, Chikinki, Kompakt 100, Dizzee, etc have stretched the definition of indie as far as I'm concerned, and that's a good thing. There will alway s be revival bands playing the same 3 chord songs, and just because you first heard then in 1986 by the Bodines rather than in 1966 by the Byrds doesn't make them any more forward thinking than if you're hearing them in 2004 by the Hives.
Music is moving forward at an unbelivably fast rate and hybridization, cross-pollination, and just general fuicking around have resulted in some pretty great things.
and that's why Indie doesn't suck in 2004
― rentboy (rentboy), Tuesday, 17 August 2004 18:50 (twenty-one years ago)
That doesn't prove that the commercial stuff wasn't cutting edge though, does it?
Akshully, I've just thought that perhaps the nature of Hip Hop, Dance music etc equates innovation with commercial success in a way that Indie doesn't. I.E., the former are always looking for new sounds, novelty is encouraged whereas the latter looks for comfortable referentiality.
― noodle vague (noodle vague), Tuesday, 17 August 2004 18:50 (twenty-one years ago)
You're missing the point of Alex's argument -- which is not that innovative hip-hop albums don't become hits, but that more mainstream hip-hop in a commercial/sales sense can and often does react to said innovations from whereever, not just in its own perceived genre (and as I noted, it's not just hip-hop that does this, etc. etc., entire history of music to thread).
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Tuesday, 17 August 2004 18:50 (twenty-one years ago)
― cinniblount (James Blount), Tuesday, 17 August 2004 18:50 (twenty-one years ago)
― peter smith (plsmith), Tuesday, 17 August 2004 18:50 (twenty-one years ago)
or roughly what Ned said at least a couple posts ago.
― Rockist_Scientist (rockist_scientist), Tuesday, 17 August 2004 18:51 (twenty-one years ago)
― Huck, Tuesday, 17 August 2004 18:51 (twenty-one years ago)
― noodle vague (noodle vague), Tuesday, 17 August 2004 18:51 (twenty-one years ago)
Plus, y'know, Irony.
― noodle vague (noodle vague), Tuesday, 17 August 2004 18:52 (twenty-one years ago)
― Huck, Tuesday, 17 August 2004 18:52 (twenty-one years ago)
― peter smith (plsmith), Tuesday, 17 August 2004 18:53 (twenty-one years ago)
― doomie x, Tuesday, 17 August 2004 18:53 (twenty-one years ago)
― Gear! (Gear!), Tuesday, 17 August 2004 18:54 (twenty-one years ago)
haha "indie"
― ())(())()()()(()(LASER)()()()LA(Z)E(R)()()()((L)()()(A)(S(E)R()()()) (ex machina, Tuesday, 17 August 2004 18:55 (twenty-one years ago)
― cinniblount (James Blount), Tuesday, 17 August 2004 18:57 (twenty-one years ago)
No, I meant the choice of title was ironic rather than a full statement of my considered opinion.
I think suck is too strong a word Gear! It's just that the current faves fill me with meh. If it helps to get me laughed at, the kind of Indie at the moment I don't think sucks would be The Unicorns or Xiu Xiu. But mostly I'm just not interested in the genre any more. I should have tied this in with a question about disliking groups more because their fans irritate you than their music.
― noodle vague (noodle vague), Tuesday, 17 August 2004 18:57 (twenty-one years ago)
― doomie x, Tuesday, 17 August 2004 18:58 (twenty-one years ago)
― CeCe Peniston (Anthony Miccio), Tuesday, 17 August 2004 18:59 (twenty-one years ago)
― ())(())()()()(()(LASER)()()()LA(Z)E(R)()()()((L)()()(A)(S(E)R()()()) (ex machina, Tuesday, 17 August 2004 18:59 (twenty-one years ago)
― noodle vague (noodle vague), Tuesday, 17 August 2004 19:00 (twenty-one years ago)
― scott seward (scott seward), Tuesday, 17 August 2004 19:49 (twenty-one years ago)
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Tuesday, 17 August 2004 19:50 (twenty-one years ago)
― scott seward (scott seward), Tuesday, 17 August 2004 19:51 (twenty-one years ago)
― Gear! (Gear!), Tuesday, 17 August 2004 19:52 (twenty-one years ago)
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Tuesday, 17 August 2004 19:52 (twenty-one years ago)
masta ace has been shit i thought since about 1997.
― dickvandyke (dickvandyke), Tuesday, 17 August 2004 19:53 (twenty-one years ago)
― scott seward (scott seward), Tuesday, 17 August 2004 19:53 (twenty-one years ago)
― dickvandyke (dickvandyke), Tuesday, 17 August 2004 19:54 (twenty-one years ago)
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Tuesday, 17 August 2004 19:55 (twenty-one years ago)
― scott seward (scott seward), Tuesday, 17 August 2004 19:55 (twenty-one years ago)
― nickalicious (nickalicious), Tuesday, 17 August 2004 19:55 (twenty-one years ago)
― scott seward (scott seward), Tuesday, 17 August 2004 19:56 (twenty-one years ago)
― Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Tuesday, 17 August 2004 19:57 (twenty-one years ago)
― Gear! (Gear!), Tuesday, 17 August 2004 19:57 (twenty-one years ago)
― scott seward (scott seward), Tuesday, 17 August 2004 19:59 (twenty-one years ago)
― scott seward (scott seward), Tuesday, 17 August 2004 20:05 (twenty-one years ago)
oh dear. thats frightening.
still i can't reject all undie out of hand. still like atmosphere even if i don't listen to him anymore (listening to Blueprint as I type - a clean version no less!). brother ali is a treat. maybe some of that is borne out of place-pride.
ps i also like el-p (and not just his inst records)
pps shout out to nateinstpinexile
― artdamages (artdamages), Tuesday, 17 August 2004 20:07 (twenty-one years ago)
― scott seward (scott seward), Tuesday, 17 August 2004 20:09 (twenty-one years ago)
― Shakey Mo Collier, Tuesday, 17 August 2004 20:10 (twenty-one years ago)
indie Rock = not so good.
i think this sums up my position on guitar indie.
― weasel diesel (K1l14n), Tuesday, 17 August 2004 20:10 (twenty-one years ago)
― scott seward (scott seward), Tuesday, 17 August 2004 20:11 (twenty-one years ago)
― weasel diesel (K1l14n), Tuesday, 17 August 2004 20:13 (twenty-one years ago)
― nickalicious (nickalicious), Tuesday, 17 August 2004 20:14 (twenty-one years ago)
Band examples? I'm trying to figure out why I like indie that most indie people seem to hate on.
― Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Tuesday, 17 August 2004 20:15 (twenty-one years ago)
― Doseone & Lil Jon "Gay Manga P0rn" (nickalicious), Tuesday, 17 August 2004 20:16 (twenty-one years ago)
― Doseone & Lil Jon "Gay Manga P0rn" (nickalicious), Tuesday, 17 August 2004 20:17 (twenty-one years ago)
jurrassic 5 can go to hell and die.
nickalicious you are a funney one
― artdamages (artdamages), Tuesday, 17 August 2004 20:17 (twenty-one years ago)
but MF Doom *does* occupy his own lonesome valley. thats what makes him so good.
― dickvandyke (dickvandyke), Tuesday, 17 August 2004 20:31 (twenty-one years ago)
― jess, Tuesday, 17 August 2004 20:35 (twenty-one years ago)
― artdamages (artdamages), Tuesday, 17 August 2004 20:43 (twenty-one years ago)
Also, my wife bought the NME yesterday with a Domino Records sampler on it and after listening to the first half it was the most turgid, plodding crap, track after track of wannabe garage bands.
I'm certainly not discounting everything brilliant that exists in the independent sector.
― noodle vague (noodle vague), Tuesday, 17 August 2004 20:44 (twenty-one years ago)
What if I don't feel like dancing? What if it's 3 in the morning, and I'm just in the mood to listen to something contemplative. I've never bought any of the rock-critic canon all-dance-is-dumb-and-therefore-bad crap, but I also don't buy the knee-jerk reaction of all-indie-is-corney-and-therefore-bad.
Besides, you don't see a large difference between Animal Collective, Le Tigre, Flaming Lips, Magnetic Fields, Sea and Cake, Silver Jews and Spiritualized? I don't even like some of those artists, but saying there isn't a sonic difference is b.s.
Now that I've been working on my friends college radio station for a bit and we have to play the indie stuff we get sent, I've grown surprised at how bad most of it is. There are just so many bands that noodle on guitars or toy instruments aimlessly and then overlap some beeps and call it experimental. Or croon and are "literate" with a "slight beach boys pop sensibility" as the review on the jewel cases so often reads. Bands by the hundreds wearing vintage shirts, suit coats, tassled hair; list in hand of approved influences. All that aside, indie is such a vague definition (we have yet to be able to make one ourselves) that it's bound to encompass a huge range of different styles.
― David Allen (David Allen), Tuesday, 17 August 2004 20:44 (twenty-one years ago)
hmmm...i don't *buy* much indie-rock anymore, but i still listen to old favourites plenty and maybe the odd new thing. not to say that indie-rock has disimproved, just a little burnt out perhaps (although maybe the current press-favourites are focussed mainly on indie-ROCKin as opposed to the other qualities i previously stated as positive).
anyway, here are indie-rock things old and new which have received much stereo-time chez kilian the last year or so:
gay dad "leisurenoise", low box set, bedhead, red house painters, various REM albums, black box recorder, broadcast, mercury rev "deserters songs", new albums by liars and campag velocet, blur's britpop albums, pulp "this is hardcore", the singles by keane and franz ferdinand and the thrills, mbv, the first sparklehorse album, lemonheads, jeff buckley "grace", the last sleepy jackson album, nada surf's "popular", all american rejects "swing".
of course, many of these bands can rock out when necessary,
― weasel diesel (K1l14n), Tuesday, 17 August 2004 20:45 (twenty-one years ago)
― weasel diesel (K1l14n), Tuesday, 17 August 2004 20:46 (twenty-one years ago)
― weasel diesel (K1l14n), Tuesday, 17 August 2004 20:48 (twenty-one years ago)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
no, i just found this thread.
― amateur!!!st, Tuesday, 17 August 2004 20:49 (twenty-one years ago)
― Gear! (Gear!), Tuesday, 17 August 2004 20:51 (twenty-one years ago)
― weasel diesel (K1l14n), Tuesday, 17 August 2004 20:56 (twenty-one years ago)
― amateur!!!st, Tuesday, 17 August 2004 20:59 (twenty-one years ago)
― Gear! (Gear!), Tuesday, 17 August 2004 20:59 (twenty-one years ago)
Yet more proof that English-speaking people cannot deal with words that begin with 'i' especially self-singular pronouns. "intelligent" "initiative" "intense" "insane"
DO YOU LIKE GOOD MUSIC? SWEET SOUL MUSIC? I know.. you love the song... but hate the kid in the t-shirt.
― Jimmybommy JimmyK'KANG (Nick Southall), Tuesday, 17 August 2004 20:59 (twenty-one years ago)
― Gear! (Gear!), Tuesday, 17 August 2004 21:00 (twenty-one years ago)
-- jess (hat...), August 17th, 2004 7:35 AM. (later)
you need to buy my next album. it has several.
― purple patch (electricsound), Tuesday, 17 August 2004 23:50 (twenty-one years ago)
I went off most indie pop/rock for a few years, listening to only a select few bands and shying away from more new acts. This was mostly for the reasons Noodle Vague outlined - disgust and at the NME rehashers, the feeling that indie is a non-scene. But it's only until very recently I've been discovering a whole bunch of new and boundary-pushing stuff that is a million miles away from the tawdry Strokes and Libertines crap. If bands like the Animal Collective and the Earlies aren't doing new and exciting things, then I'd like to know what is.
― dog latin (dog latin), Wednesday, 18 August 2004 08:42 (twenty-one years ago)
― Jimmybommy JimmyK'KANG (Nick Southall), Wednesday, 18 August 2004 08:51 (twenty-one years ago)
(although The Dears are even better than The Earlies, early warning alert...)
Drum 'n' bass is the trad jazz of 2004, not indie.
― Marcello Carlin, Wednesday, 18 August 2004 09:05 (twenty-one years ago)
― Jimmybommy JimmyK'KANG (Nick Southall), Wednesday, 18 August 2004 09:06 (twenty-one years ago)
Also Animal Collective are horrid.
Pot + QSurround + Headphones says otherwise.
― dog latin (dog latin), Wednesday, 18 August 2004 09:19 (twenty-one years ago)
― Jimmybommy JimmyK'KANG (Nick Southall), Wednesday, 18 August 2004 09:24 (twenty-one years ago)
― dog latin (dog latin), Wednesday, 18 August 2004 09:29 (twenty-one years ago)