And a related question would be: if some lovable hipsters (The Earlies, The Mountain Goats, or Big & Rich) took a universally-hated / overwrought song's melody but made the song actually about something with interesting lyrics and song structure, is it OK to like? I'm thinking Mouse on Mars making a tune with a roller bass line mimicking "Stand" by REM and having their guy sing about KRS-One pissing himself in a police lineup. C/D?
― caspar (caspar), Monday, 23 August 2004 12:11 (twenty-one years ago)
― Andrew Blood Thames (Andrew Thames), Monday, 23 August 2004 12:14 (twenty-one years ago)
― caspar (caspar), Monday, 23 August 2004 12:16 (twenty-one years ago)
"It's just to present that these are good songs. I'm not trying to be like, 'I'm the person who can show you that these songs are good,'" says the mild-mannered O'Rourke from New York's West Park Hotel. "[If they're sub-par, it's] through bad recording or arrangements or because of the time these songs were done."
He cites the Crash Test Dummies' "Superman's Song" ("the mmmm mmmm mmmm mmmm song") as another diamond in the rough. "Oh! That song is really fucking good. There's too much piano playing and there's some bad bass playing, oh man, the guy's like 'LOOK AT ME I CAN PUT SOME EXTRA NOTES IN HERE,' but for the most part, I think it's a really amazing song."
― jaymc (jaymc), Monday, 23 August 2004 12:54 (twenty-one years ago)
― jaymc (jaymc), Monday, 23 August 2004 12:57 (twenty-one years ago)
― mzui, Monday, 23 August 2004 13:06 (twenty-one years ago)
― Joseph McCombs, Monday, 23 August 2004 17:44 (twenty-one years ago)
― jaymc (jaymc), Monday, 23 August 2004 17:45 (twenty-one years ago)
― jaymc (jaymc), Monday, 23 August 2004 17:46 (twenty-one years ago)
― Baaderoni (Fabfunk), Monday, 23 August 2004 20:14 (twenty-one years ago)