SMiLE is out today!

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
...and unless I've missed the thread, nobody seems to be talking about it. It made me cry lots at the Royal Festival Hall, and I'm halfway through my first listen now, and (even though I'm in the office, and the aircon's rumbling away in the background, and there's some guy outside on the street with a pneumatic drill) it's coming close again. The production sounds beautifully retro, it's not the scary shiny new thing I was worried it might be. Brian's vocals all seem fine, good even, in places. Definitely not a problem. I love that the booklet lists the lyrics of Our Prayer as "Ahh-oh-hm-". Ah, I'm nearly up to Surf's Up!

Sigh. I'm very happy.

JimD (JimD), Monday, 27 September 2004 14:06 (twenty-one years ago)

...and unless I've missed the thread

SMiLE coming soon

But perhaps this can be part two.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Monday, 27 September 2004 14:08 (twenty-one years ago)

It bears repeating: this is good.

Dominique (dleone), Monday, 27 September 2004 14:08 (twenty-one years ago)

I still don't get what the whole Beach Boys fuss is about. This seemed nice, but the Engineers mini-album I got today too was MUCH better on first listen.

Rasputin Kitten (Nick Southall), Monday, 27 September 2004 14:20 (twenty-one years ago)

Ah, sorry, didn't search well enough. Well, here's what I thought after I saw it live:

http://cheese.exo.org.uk/archives/000276.html

Too much more to say now though, it's just...ah, overwhelming. It really is as good as I ever could have hoped, and it's almost completely impossible to believe that this is the same Brian who released that awful album earlier this year. Ah, I love him.

JimD (JimD), Monday, 27 September 2004 14:22 (twenty-one years ago)

The view so far (I'm up to "Surf's Up")... Christ, this is expectation-exceedingly GORGEOUS. Really. It all sounds timeless, and exquisite, and pristine in a good way, and full of love and wonder and goodness. Even the non-BB vocal harmonisings work. (Oh God, do they ever work.)

mike t-diva (mike t-diva), Monday, 27 September 2004 14:37 (twenty-one years ago)

Has anyone picked it up in NYC yet?

Jimmy Mod, Los Sexx Yanqui (ModJ), Monday, 27 September 2004 16:03 (twenty-one years ago)

Anyone?

Jimmy Mod, Los Sexx Yanqui (ModJ), Monday, 27 September 2004 16:11 (twenty-one years ago)

Last week, there was a pretty lengthy NPR segment on the making of the album. Some brief interviews with Brian, his wife, Van Dyke, etc. It was good.

Roy Williams Highlight (diamond), Monday, 27 September 2004 16:12 (twenty-one years ago)

Ah, here it is:

http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=3934970

Roy Williams Highlight (diamond), Monday, 27 September 2004 16:14 (twenty-one years ago)

Has anyone picked it up in NYC yet?

Will today if I get the chance. i listened to a rip from the SMILE site stream all weekend. I'm very happy this record exists.

Jay Vee (Manon_70), Monday, 27 September 2004 16:19 (twenty-one years ago)

An interesting detail in that NPR interview was the revelation that Brian played, for the new musicians, tapes of the famous "fire" sequence from the original sessions (which he had supposedly destroyed).

morris pavilion (samjeff), Monday, 27 September 2004 16:20 (twenty-one years ago)

That was a myth. The tapes of that have circulated on boots for a long time.

Tim Ellison (Tim Ellison), Monday, 27 September 2004 16:38 (twenty-one years ago)

i might have to buy this

amateur!!st, Monday, 27 September 2004 16:44 (twenty-one years ago)

this was totally freaking unexpected by the way: that it would be made at all, and that it would actually be any good. i hope that surprise doesn't itself account for all the hosannas though.

amateur!!st, Monday, 27 September 2004 16:45 (twenty-one years ago)

It's the first time "Good Vibrations" has actually sounded like it was in the right place. Very good album, up there with Big and Rich for album of the year.

jel -- (jel), Monday, 27 September 2004 16:46 (twenty-one years ago)

Myself, I like that GV sessions boot w/ the blisteringly-fast "Hum-dee-dah" part. Now THAT would've been awesome. As it is, we get the inferior "I'm pickin' up!" version. Which is meh.

Naive Teen Idol (Naive Teen Idol), Monday, 27 September 2004 16:51 (twenty-one years ago)

Isn't it out tomorrow, in the US at least?

Scott CE (Scott CE), Monday, 27 September 2004 16:51 (twenty-one years ago)

my understanding is that:
Monday new releases are in the UK, while
Tuesday is "new release day" here in the U.S.

mclaugh (mclaugh), Monday, 27 September 2004 17:23 (twenty-one years ago)

i've already got a bootleg of smile and the good vibrations box - so is this really worth getting?

J.D. (Justyn Dillingham), Monday, 27 September 2004 17:24 (twenty-one years ago)

yes

Dominique (dleone), Monday, 27 September 2004 17:26 (twenty-one years ago)

Recognizing that you're prob. reviewing it, what do you think of it, Dom?

Naive Teen Idol (Naive Teen Idol), Monday, 27 September 2004 17:31 (twenty-one years ago)

It bears repeating: this is good.

;)

Still hashing out the review, should be up soon. Suffice to say, I like it.

Dominique (dleone), Monday, 27 September 2004 17:33 (twenty-one years ago)

xpost: Unquestionably yes, it's worth purchasing. There's a whole added dimension here: of Wilson in his 60s completing the unfinished masterpiece of his 20s, and thus somehow achieving closure/peace of mind, whilst accompanied by trusted & familiar musicians who are entirely empathetic to the project (unlike Mike Love & co in the 60s, indeed), and how this all fits in with the essential optimism of the music, and how all the bad vibes that had previously surrounded the unfinished version simply melt away, allowing the music to shine through properly, and the added resonance of "the child is father to the man", with the frail-yet-in-control Wilson as the eternal child WITHIN the man, and oh, you can just HEAR the love and the warmth and the joy, and I'm making a gushing twat of myself, but there are, ahem, Levels Of Meaning attached to this new recording which make it unique in the, ahem, canon of pop, and it's definitely a classic in its own right, and not a dead-eyed session-musician old-and-grey-and-past-it set of cover versions, and OK, I really must stop now.

mike t-diva (mike t-diva), Monday, 27 September 2004 17:36 (twenty-one years ago)

SMiLE is not "good." It is a TEENAGE SYMPHONY TO GOD.

Tim Ellison (Tim Ellison), Monday, 27 September 2004 17:38 (twenty-one years ago)

It bears repeating: this is good.
;)

K, missed that. With only a few listens thus far, I'm a bit circumspect myself. Regardless, I'm a little blown away by the euphoric response that it's gotten.

Naive Teen Idol (Naive Teen Idol), Monday, 27 September 2004 18:01 (twenty-one years ago)

I might get this, and I've never seriously listened to the BB.

Jordan (Jordan), Monday, 27 September 2004 18:05 (twenty-one years ago)

Should clarify: given that it's not the original recordings (and all that goes with that: his voice, the new stuff, etc.)...

Naive Teen Idol (Naive Teen Idol), Monday, 27 September 2004 18:14 (twenty-one years ago)

Did you read Mike's most recent post?

Roy Williams Highlight (diamond), Monday, 27 September 2004 18:27 (twenty-one years ago)

ITS VERY GREAT.

VERY VERY GREAT.

ddb (ddb), Monday, 27 September 2004 18:31 (twenty-one years ago)

I have been listening to SMiLE 2004 live boots, "reconstructions" of the 2004 version from the original tapes, and leaked copies of the 2004 album thrice weekly since March. It's driving me crazy, it's so good. It has no right to be good. I don't understand why it's any good. But it is really, really, really good.

J (Jay), Monday, 27 September 2004 19:03 (twenty-one years ago)

So, for someone too lazy to research this much further, is this new release just new recordings of old songs from the Smile sessions? And if so, will the original album ever see the light of day in legitimate form?

Baked Bean Teeth (Baked Bean Teeth), Monday, 27 September 2004 19:07 (twenty-one years ago)

maybe i'll buy this tonight if it's not too expensive at tower records (the only record store i will be near today)

amateur!!st, Monday, 27 September 2004 19:09 (twenty-one years ago)

there is NO "original album"--it was never finished. just fragments.

this is a "reconstruction" of what the original album MIGHT have been like, with inevitably a bunch of new arrangements mixed with the old. which means that it's a fucking miracle that it's any good (presuming you guys are not all on crack*).


* how safe is this presumption?

amateur!!st, Monday, 27 September 2004 19:10 (twenty-one years ago)

so. no synths are involved then? I have the bootlegged "unifinished" version and love it, admittedly partly because of its unfinished-ness. I'm just so skeptical of this project, it seems like such a bad idea on paper....

Shakey Mo Collier, Monday, 27 September 2004 19:12 (twenty-one years ago)

Tower says they'll have it in tomorrow.

Tim Ellison (Tim Ellison), Monday, 27 September 2004 19:13 (twenty-one years ago)

Well, most of the arrangements are very, very close to the originals. No stupid digital keyboard sounds, they got all the echo and vocal sounds right, etc. The only "new" stuff is some lyrics Parks had to come up with to use in songs that never had any finished ones, and a little new transitional music (though they discarded most of the new segueway music they had used live).

Dominique (dleone), Monday, 27 September 2004 19:13 (twenty-one years ago)

(actually, I thought I heard one synthesized trumpet in "Wonderful", but the rest sounds "real")

Dominique (dleone), Monday, 27 September 2004 19:14 (twenty-one years ago)

I only ask cuz the synth sounds on Brian Wilson's solo records are generally terrible, tho sometimes he does manage to punch through them with the sheer force of good songwriting (ie, "Love and Mercy")

Shakey Mo Collier, Monday, 27 September 2004 19:17 (twenty-one years ago)

Did you read Mike's most recent post?

I did — and I'm totally with Mike on the added dimension aspect of it coming out 37 years later. It's something I appreciate, but admittedly haven't spent enough time with the record to evaluate properly.

But in approaching it, I guess the questions on my mind are: how rewarding is that added dimension? And how much does it come at the expense of the innocence that embodied the original recordings? For Mike, it seems like it's become something else. But I think it's a relevant question anyway. I mean, at the end of the day, this isn't the same thing it was nearly four decades ago.

Again, these are just some thoughts I'm having. I need more time with it.

Naive Teen Idol (Naive Teen Idol), Monday, 27 September 2004 19:17 (twenty-one years ago)

It isn't the same thing, but given that we don't really know exactly what the original "thing" was, it's hard to compare. I will say that Smile 2004 struck me as a very happy record - a far cry from the melancholia of Pet Sounds. There are down moments on Smile, but the heart of this record is positive, celebratory, almost carnivalesque. I wonder if it would have come out like that in 1967, because the boots tend to paint a much stranger, imbalanced picture.

Dominique (dleone), Monday, 27 September 2004 19:20 (twenty-one years ago)

"And how much does it come at the expense of the innocence that embodied the original recordings?"

what do you mean by innocence exactly?

amateur!!st, Monday, 27 September 2004 19:25 (twenty-one years ago)

I guess I should buy it. It just gives me such conflicted feelings - I mean, when has a piece of work that was finished 40 years after the fact ever been any good? Am I gonna wanna hear the bootleg that I've become so familiar with instead of this new version, or is it gonna be the other way around? Is there any point in having both? I fear the George Lucas/Star Wars syndrome... "look it's all shiny and sparkling just as I originally planned it!" = the old crap with cheap bells and whistles attached.

Shakey Mo Collier, Monday, 27 September 2004 19:26 (twenty-one years ago)

also, the imbalance/undercurrents of darkness in the original bootlegs add a ton of depth for me, that flipside is key to my enjoyment of the best Beach Boys stuff.

Shakey Mo Collier, Monday, 27 September 2004 19:27 (twenty-one years ago)

" I mean, when has a piece of work that was finished 40 years after the fact ever been any good? "


been to any cathedrals lately?

amateur!!st, Monday, 27 September 2004 19:28 (twenty-one years ago)

i got made fun for using the phrase "undercurrent of darkness" when i was 16 so be careful

p.s. it is a dumb phrase

amateur!!st, Monday, 27 September 2004 19:28 (twenty-one years ago)

Listening to it right now, and the "Child Is Father Of The Sun/Son" section right after "Wonderful" gives me goosebumps. Incredibly moving to hear this with full vocals/lyrics.

Jay Vee (Manon_70), Monday, 27 September 2004 19:28 (twenty-one years ago)

"positive" and "celebratory" are not words that i would apply to smile -- granted i haven't heard smile 2004 but rather a healthy diet of boots: ie, the entire beach boys box, bonus tracks on smiley smile/wild honey, and the vigitone and sea of tunes sessions. (xpost, shakey is OTM wrt: "darkness", stolen youth as allegory for cultural theft).

gygax! (gygax!), Monday, 27 September 2004 19:29 (twenty-one years ago)

i like it when he has dogs barking on the records

amateur!!st, Monday, 27 September 2004 19:29 (twenty-one years ago)

Or, to compare Smile 2004 with Pet Sounds: the latter ended w/"Caroline No", this one ends with "Good Vibrations". See, in my head, I had always envisioned Smile ending w/"Surf's Up", giving it that same melancholy, "dark" timbre as Pet Sounds.

Dominique (dleone), Monday, 27 September 2004 19:31 (twenty-one years ago)

The old SMiLE was also studio rock rendered as chamber music. It wasn't supposed to be the Kingsmen. But Mike Love would have preferred it if it had been.

Marcello Carlin (nostudium), Monday, 11 April 2005 10:17 (twenty-one years ago)

I meant finish or "digitalize" the old recordings w/ Van Dyke and the Wondermints or whomever. I got a morbid chuckle from the Dennis line, but much as I love his Pacific Ocean Blue, did Dennis contribute much to Smile in the first place?

I don't know anything bout classical music so I shouldn't have used the term "chamber." To me, the new Smile sounds like a skilled recital while the old feels like unbridled experimentation.

m coleman (lovebug starski), Monday, 11 April 2005 10:28 (twenty-one years ago)

Certainly I was disappointed that they could find no room for "George Fell Into His French Horn" on the new SMiLE, and that they de-weirded "Surf's Up" by removing the Woody Woodpecker bitonal brass from the first half and imposing a bland "medication time" string line on the second half.

Marcello Carlin (nostudium), Monday, 11 April 2005 10:42 (twenty-one years ago)

SMiLE is just an amazing CD, no two cents about it. A week or two after it came out I was talking to someone that complained about how clean it sounded and he just came off as whiney. I mean, sure something that was taped in the 60s is going to have a golden halo around it forever and ever, but do you really think it illogical to hire an orchestral section and record them without trying to make it as clear and crisp as possible? Brian doesn't have to worry himself with claims of authenticity, I'm sure he was just like "Shit, we're going to do Smile we may as well get the best sound we can get for it."

Btw, "Mrs. O'Leary's Cow", particularly the ending, is a mindblower. It's totally an old man singing psychedelic metal.

Does anyone have any recommendations for the new Smile session compilations? Surely by now someone must have reconstructed the new finished record from the old demos...

Adam Bruneau (oliver8bit), Monday, 11 April 2005 16:47 (twenty-one years ago)

There's a SMiLE fan board called Smile Shop that probably has lots of discussion. It's at www.smileshop.net

Tim Ellison (Tim Ellison), Monday, 11 April 2005 16:52 (twenty-one years ago)

i think its a work of genius. the way the new version is sequenced is fucking perfect. the vocals are beautiful. the production is ace. i thinks its great. still. anyone going to see the new tour?

charleston charge (chaki), Monday, 11 April 2005 16:55 (twenty-one years ago)

Since buying this shortly after it came out I downloaded one of those approximations from the old tapes and I prefer listening to the old recordings. But I got a lot out of the new one as well.

Mark (MarkR), Monday, 11 April 2005 17:20 (twenty-one years ago)

I wish they would just finally release the originals, "finished" or not. They certainly sound finished enough to me. Hopefully the success of the remake will get the ball rolling on getting the real album released but I'm not holding my breath.

walter kranz (walterkranz), Monday, 11 April 2005 17:21 (twenty-one years ago)

eleven months pass...
Eugene Landy, Wilson's shrink, 'executive producer' and 'co-writer', has died: http://www.latimes.com/news/printedition/california/la-me-landy29mar29,1,4518880.story?coll=la-headlines-pe-california&ctrack=1&cset=true

James Mitchell (James Mitchell), Wednesday, 29 March 2006 16:34 (twenty years ago)

Shouldn't shrink be in quotes as well?

dan. (dan.), Wednesday, 29 March 2006 16:41 (twenty years ago)

not many people mourning that

kyle (akmonday), Wednesday, 29 March 2006 16:42 (twenty years ago)

six months pass...
i like it a lot ... but i think the original "windchimes" is about 1000x better than the new one. the moog on the original is great, it sounds like something by the white noise or the united states of america.

for some reason i like the original "cabinessence", "good vibrations" and "our prayer" better than the new one, too. but just about everything else is improved. i am especially tripping tonight on how awesome "in blue hawaii" turned out.

HUNTA-V (vahid), Thursday, 5 October 2006 05:26 (nineteen years ago)

I have only just seen the Eugene Landy news.

PJ Miller (PJ Miller 68), Thursday, 5 October 2006 06:02 (nineteen years ago)

I can't stand the fake harpsichord in "Roll Plymouth Rock" and "Wonderful" and the fake glockenspiel in "On a Holiday." You'd think a detail-obsessed band like the Wondermints would spare no pains to drag real instruments into the studio. The synths are pretty convincing, but they only barely capture the ghostly, echoey quality of the original recordings.


R.I.P. Gene Landy. You co-wrote some shitty songs on Brian's first solo album, and you saved his life by kidnapping his mind and wallet.

King-a-Ling (has no original or compelling ideas) (King-a-Ling), Thursday, 5 October 2006 06:25 (nineteen years ago)

three years pass...

I've had this a week now and basically think I'd die a happy man if I ever wrote music 1/10000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000th as beautiful as this....thanks to everybody's vivid descriptions in this thread, they were spot on.

how is Wilson's newest solo album? granted I figure it must be a letdown given that it wasn't a completion of a 37 year old composition, but ya know....

Phoenix in Flight (Cattle Grind), Wednesday, 14 April 2010 22:56 (sixteen years ago)

That Lucky Old Sun is pretty good

PaulTMA, Thursday, 15 April 2010 01:12 (sixteen years ago)

Capitol began production on a lavish gatefold cover with a 12-page booklet. Cover artwork was commissioned from Frank Holmes, a friend of Van Dyke Parks, and colour photographs of the group were taken by Guy Webster. 466,000 covers and 419,000 booklets were printed by early January 1967; promotional materials were sent to record distributors and dealers, and ads were placed in Billboard and teenage magazines including Teen Set.

Are these album covers and booklets around? Or were they all destroyed?

Adam Bruneau, Thursday, 15 April 2010 02:13 (sixteen years ago)

I've seen them for sale in record stores for $20. Neat artifact, but it is an empty record cover worth a $20?

dad a, Thursday, 15 April 2010 02:20 (sixteen years ago)

Good timing for a revival, since I played this just last week for the first time in 5 years. (Bought it because of this thread of course.) I've recently made a decision to acquaint myself with '67-71 Beach Boys, about which I know far too little, and figured it to be most convenient starting point

Half lies and gorilla dust (Myonga Vön Bontee), Thursday, 15 April 2010 05:06 (sixteen years ago)

oh dude, Myonga, get *everything* from that time period you described (if yer a vinyl guy, then get the vinyl, but if you are a CD guy, it's super easy to get those 2LPs on 1CD things that Capitol did in the mid-90s, they are such a bargain and the bonus tracks are rad as hell!)

Stormy Davis, Thursday, 15 April 2010 06:12 (sixteen years ago)

so is Phil2 still on ILX at all? he and I saw the live show of SMiLE together in Chicago. I've lost touch with him :(

Stormy Davis, Thursday, 15 April 2010 06:14 (sixteen years ago)

He's on twitter - MrStreetPeeper

http://streetpeeper.com/sites/default/files/phil-oh-street-peeper-1.jpg

Bob Six, Thursday, 15 April 2010 07:22 (sixteen years ago)

if you are a CD guy, it's super easy to get those 2LPs on 1CD things that Capitol did in the mid-90s, they are such a bargain and the bonus tracks are rad as hell!

Seconding this recommendation. I actually broke out SMiLE last week along with the Smiley Smile/Wild Honey reissue. Excellent tunes all around.

I just wish he hadn't adopted the "ilxor" moniker (ilxor), Thursday, 15 April 2010 13:24 (sixteen years ago)

Did anyone have the 3LP Smile bootleg, back when?

Side 6 was taken up with the Beach Boys (and whoever) in a boat (in the studio), and they had this game where they had to vote somebody out. First up the vote went against Mike Love.

The rest of the track (30 mins) was MLove outside the studio, creating and stomping, and the rest of them still in the boat, laffing.

So, basically, the Beach Boys invented the Big Brother TV prog.

Mark G, Thursday, 15 April 2010 13:28 (sixteen years ago)

That Lucky Old Sun is damn good, and I'm not sure how that happened after Gettin' in Over My Head and What I Really Want for Christmas.

skip, Thursday, 15 April 2010 13:55 (sixteen years ago)

Van Dyke Parks. Orange Crate Art is also way awesome.

solid yet bouncy (herb albert), Thursday, 15 April 2010 14:07 (sixteen years ago)

After hearing so much praise for Smiley Smile/Wild Honey, I still think Smile and SMiLE is so much more enjoyable. I like Smiley Smile's stoner mixtape atmosphere tho (and the singles are godlike).

Adam Bruneau, Thursday, 15 April 2010 14:35 (sixteen years ago)

Orange Crate Art was soooo treacly to me. The sentiment just too heavy. I just couldn't roll with it, I really wanted to.

A friend of mine made an edit of the 60s Smile mtrl to exactly replicate the assembly BW performed live in the 00's. It makes a great listen. I gather Purple Chick or one of those types also did the same thing.

I Smell Xasthur Williams (Jon Lewis), Thursday, 15 April 2010 16:20 (sixteen years ago)

Smiley Smile's stoner mixtape atmosphere

Perfect description, and the reason it's my favourite Beach Boys.

village idiot (dog latin), Thursday, 15 April 2010 16:22 (sixteen years ago)

i was a Beach Boys obsessive about ten years ago and made my own ultimate Smile out of the best versions I could hunt down online. the real SMiLE was a dream come true but I hardly ever play it because the original is so utterly amazing (the vocals, my God). i also prefer the song order, mostly the same but has Good Vibrations in the middle (beginning of Side 2) and ends with Surf's Up->You're Welcome.

solid yet bouncy (herb albert), Thursday, 15 April 2010 16:45 (sixteen years ago)

Has there been a poll/thread on the best stoner mixtape albums? Like the first Macca, "The Freed Weed", "Stereopathetic Soul Manure"?

Adam Bruneau, Thursday, 15 April 2010 17:03 (sixteen years ago)

The best Smile fan mix will always be Mokomok's. Just go White Album and throw everything in there. Hell if I can choose any of it that should be cut.

Smile 2004 is utterly useless for me. I'll listen to a Wondermints record if I want to hear the Wondermints and the original session material if I want to hear Smile. Brian sounds awful and it's distracting. I'm really really glad I got to see him perform live, but hearing Jeff Foskett sing about ten times louder than him and seeing the twenty people required to put on a so-called "Brian Wilson" concert was sad in the extreme.

skip, Thursday, 15 April 2010 17:44 (sixteen years ago)

Yeah, I've seen that "Smiley/Honey" collection here and there, that'd definitely be the place to start. Awfully generous of Capitol to release most of the BB's catalog as twofers (and throw in bonus tracks besides!)

xxxxxxxxxxpost

Half lies and gorilla dust (Myonga Vön Bontee), Thursday, 15 April 2010 22:24 (sixteen years ago)

oh dude, Myonga, get *everything* from that time period you described (if yer a vinyl guy, then get the vinyl, but if you are a CD guy, it's super easy to get those 2LPs on 1CD things that Capitol did in the mid-90s, they are such a bargain and the bonus tracks are rad as hell!)

^^^OTMx10000

there is a great ILM Beach Boys bootleg thread that contains a lot of great material from this era as well FYI

I won't vote for you unless you acknowledge my magic pony (Shakey Mo Collier), Thursday, 15 April 2010 22:27 (sixteen years ago)

and yeah I prefer the OG bootlegged Smile versions (usually a combo of released and unreleased/unfinished material) to the 2004 version. I have no use for the Wondermints or Brian's fried voice.

I won't vote for you unless you acknowledge my magic pony (Shakey Mo Collier), Thursday, 15 April 2010 22:29 (sixteen years ago)

i liked the sequencing of the 2004 smile -- it seemed like a logical way to do it, but was a little bit unpredictable too. But once I found the Purple Chick reconstruction (mentioned upthread) I didn't really have any need for the 2004 version.

tylerw, Thursday, 15 April 2010 22:43 (sixteen years ago)

I don't know, the moment I heard Brian's old fragile voice singing "I've been in this town so long, so long to the city..." in the acapella part towards the end of "Heroes & Villains" in the new one, I was in!

Smile boots rule though, except there are so many out there, so many isolated vocal takes, alternate sections, etc, the best thing is to get a bunch and just queue them up while you're doing something else. As for listening to the thing straight, yeah I like Purple Chick's but Brian's/Wondermint's is pretty rad. I mean they're no Wrecking Crew, but they can hit those harmonies dead on...

Adam Bruneau, Thursday, 15 April 2010 23:27 (sixteen years ago)

Brian sounds awful and it's distracting.

wtf, he sounded 300 times worse on "Love You"...and he's about 25 years older than he was then! y'all realize that age also impacts vocal cords to a degree too, right? I mean I ain't denying his 'lifestyle' and drugs didn't have an impact, but most agree that the voice begins to deteriorate in one's late 40s ANYWAY.

I don't think he sounded that bad...and he sounds better on That Lucky Old Sun. Not so 'mushmouthed'. Yea yea "studio technology" but whatever....

Phoenix in Flight (Cattle Grind), Thursday, 15 April 2010 23:38 (sixteen years ago)

ut most agree that the voice begins to deteriorate in one's late 40s ANYWAY.

depends what yr style is, I can think of a bunch off the top of my head who's voices still sound like solid gold at 50+ (Willie Nelson, Ralph Stanley, both of the surviving Gibbs brothers, Mavis Staples, etc.)

I won't vote for you unless you acknowledge my magic pony (Shakey Mo Collier), Thursday, 15 April 2010 23:40 (sixteen years ago)

Certainly, it's still possible to sound 'good' in later years, for sure, depending on how you maintain your voice - and no doubt Brian did plenty to speed up the deterioriation of his own voice. But even former opera and classically trained singers, which they often still sound "good" in their later years, begin to show signs of wear and decline. Decreased range, hoarseness occurs sooner....etc.

Phoenix in Flight (Cattle Grind), Thursday, 15 April 2010 23:43 (sixteen years ago)

I don't have a problem with a change in tone or hoarseness, I have a problem with not even coming close to hitting the notes. Either sing in appropriate keys or just give it up. "Colonnaded ruins domino" during "Surf's Up" is Jeff Foskett, not Brian Wilson, and when he does go for the high stuff solo it's bad -- "TOUGH to cry" etc. Then add the fact that the backing tracks sound so canned and synthy. There's no comparison to in-their-prime Beach Boys vocals and the Wrecking Crew. Thank God they finished the damn thing but I don't know why you'd listen to it over the session material.

skip, Friday, 16 April 2010 00:34 (sixteen years ago)

cuz it's complete?

Phoenix in Flight (Cattle Grind), Friday, 16 April 2010 00:35 (sixteen years ago)

I also dnt agree that the backing tracks sound canned or synthy at all....sound pretty authentic especially given that they were done in the 21st century, and I know Brian labored to get it to sound that way.

Phoenix in Flight (Cattle Grind), Friday, 16 April 2010 00:36 (sixteen years ago)

backing vocals sound fine to me on the 2004 version -- string arrangements are kinda synthy sounding at times though. Are they synths or is that an actual string section?

tylerw, Friday, 16 April 2010 01:00 (sixteen years ago)

God damn them for not finding a time machine and finishing it in 1967

PaulTMA, Friday, 16 April 2010 01:04 (sixteen years ago)

I don't listen to this very much despite being a big beach boys fan because....I dunno, although this would have been the best beach boys album,I don't think it contains the group's most interesting music.

I think the quality of the 2004 version is pretty impressive all things considered, though there are a few things that always bug me. they drums in the middle of 'wind chimes' at the 2 minute mark...argh.

iatee, Friday, 16 April 2010 01:16 (sixteen years ago)

Brian Wilson's next gig is a 2xLP about Booty Pop

Phoenix in Flight (Cattle Grind), Friday, 16 April 2010 01:20 (sixteen years ago)

oh , Bob Six -- thx for the Phil update! i am now a subscriber.

Mark G -- yah, I have that 3LP Smile thing. with the poster, which used to hang in the stairwell in our old house in Kenwood in the 90s. good memories. I never really listened to that last side more than once, I don't think! you make me wanna drag it out again though

I never heard That Lucky Old Sun, but wow I am kinda surprised at some of the Orange Crate Art love here. Believe me, I wanted to love that thing SOOOO bad! And actually, the first track -- title track -- is pretty much perfect. I just wish the rest of the album followed suit. It's kinda all downhill from there. I guess I'm with Jon Lewis on this one. Sold my copy years back, although honestly if I found the CD for a couple bucks I might pick it up again just to have the title track on file...

Stormy Davis, Friday, 16 April 2010 03:36 (sixteen years ago)

(totally unrelated but Stormy, I lured phil back to ilx not too long ago with memories of aged salted fatty meats: charcuterie )

_▂▅▇█▓▒░◕‿‿◕░▒▓█▇▅▂_ (Steve Shasta), Friday, 16 April 2010 05:42 (sixteen years ago)

If you do, Stormy, mp3 that side 6 ta!

Mark G, Friday, 16 April 2010 07:08 (sixteen years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.