― geeta (geeta), Friday, 19 November 2004 07:02 (twenty-one years ago)
― cooba, Friday, 19 November 2004 07:06 (twenty-one years ago)
― Andrew Blood Thames (Andrew Thames), Friday, 19 November 2004 07:09 (twenty-one years ago)
actually ask them if they approach each record with an overall idea or if its made up as they go along. or a bit of both.
― bulbs (bulbs), Friday, 19 November 2004 07:12 (twenty-one years ago)
― Stormy Davis (diamond), Friday, 19 November 2004 07:19 (twenty-one years ago)
― Stormy Davis (diamond), Friday, 19 November 2004 07:26 (twenty-one years ago)
― Drew Daniel (Drew Daniel), Friday, 19 November 2004 08:21 (twenty-one years ago)
― jack cole (jackcole), Friday, 19 November 2004 08:26 (twenty-one years ago)
― Does John Coltrane Dream of a Merry-go-round? (ex machina), Friday, 19 November 2004 08:26 (twenty-one years ago)
― Stormy Davis (diamond), Friday, 19 November 2004 08:30 (twenty-one years ago)
-- jack cole (jack_col...), November 19th, 2004.
____________________________________________
Having released it they might have some insight into the recording and might be willing to talk about it, also, artists are frequently shy or "in character" when the direct topic is their own work, so being asked about tangentially related stuff can relax them or make them break out of stock "tour stories" mode. Jeez. Simmer down. And as for "does a manipulated field recording matter" . . . . In the cosmic scheme o' things? Not a whit. In relation to the conditions of reception with which we listen to something as a "field recording" vs. the conditions of reception with which we listen to "collage" or "music" or "radio play" etc. etc.? Of course it matters. When you listen to Chris Watson's killer sub bass rumble and know that it's an unedited (if, yes, mastered) recording of a cheetah purring, that is a totally different experience of listening than hearing it and having him say, oh yeah, actually, just fucking with you, that's an oscillator sweep. Presumably things marketed as field recordings are exactly that.
― Drew Daniel (Drew Daniel), Friday, 19 November 2004 08:38 (twenty-one years ago)
― jack cole (jackcole), Friday, 19 November 2004 08:45 (twenty-one years ago)
― Drew Daniel (Drew Daniel), Friday, 19 November 2004 08:50 (twenty-one years ago)
― &, Friday, 19 November 2004 09:11 (twenty-one years ago)
― bulbs (bulbs), Friday, 19 November 2004 09:13 (twenty-one years ago)
HS
― hector savage, Friday, 19 November 2004 11:38 (twenty-one years ago)
They may launch into stories about the good ol' days.
I think the web address is 11eashland.com
― J. J. James (jjjames), Friday, 19 November 2004 13:50 (twenty-one years ago)
I'd ask them about how they (or alan) feel about the 'success' of the sublime frequencies series (it seems to me they got far more attention placed on them recently through it?).
I'd also ask them about how their UK gig (at ATP) went and how about playing in europe again?
― Julio Desouza (jdesouza), Friday, 19 November 2004 14:13 (twenty-one years ago)
― NickB (NickB), Friday, 19 November 2004 14:16 (twenty-one years ago)
(and I'd def ask about that rec Toop reviewed)
― Julio Desouza (jdesouza), Friday, 19 November 2004 14:23 (twenty-one years ago)
― 3underscore (___), Friday, 19 November 2004 15:28 (twenty-one years ago)
― Acme (acme), Saturday, 20 November 2004 01:40 (twenty-one years ago)
― Drew Daniel (Drew Daniel), Saturday, 20 November 2004 01:44 (twenty-one years ago)