A Love Supreme : most over-estimated record in jazz

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
"Flawed, even considered by some to be the most over-estimated record in jazz, A Love Supreme remains one of the music's most personal experiences." (taken from the wire's "100 most important records ever made").

Discuss.

nightingale, Saturday, 22 January 2005 23:35 (twenty-one years ago)

it's super brilliant.
it really made the end of "mo better blues" come together, too.

Forksclovetofu (Forksclovetofu), Saturday, 22 January 2005 23:45 (twenty-one years ago)

It's nowhere near my favorite Coltrane recording (I prefer Live at the Village Vanguard, Live at Birdland, Giant Steps, Coltrane's Sound, My Favorite Things, and Coltrane, to name a few).

It's good, but I think it's one of those records people latch onto because it has "hooks" so to speak. There's that simple, catchy "Da-dum da-dum" that repeats over and over again. There's the whole spirituality dimension that gives people something to relate to it (like programatic classical music). It's a very good album, don't get me wrong.

Hurting (Hurting), Saturday, 22 January 2005 23:52 (twenty-one years ago)

agreed, this is probably fifth on my 'trane ride
but with a career and discography as vast and winding as Coltrane had, that's still pretty damn high.

Forksclovetofu (Forksclovetofu), Saturday, 22 January 2005 23:57 (twenty-one years ago)

Yeah, it's still better than anything 99% of jazz artists every released.

Hurting (Hurting), Saturday, 22 January 2005 23:58 (twenty-one years ago)

I love Kind of Blue too, but when you've heard half-a-million vocalists cover All Blues, you start to want something else.

Hurting (Hurting), Saturday, 22 January 2005 23:59 (twenty-one years ago)

Do you have Ole' Coltrane or Black Pearls, Hurting?
Overlooked gems, in my opinion.

Forksclovetofu (Forksclovetofu), Sunday, 23 January 2005 00:01 (twenty-one years ago)

Its reputation may have gotten out of control, but I do think it's a special record. Hurting OTM about the hooks, all the themes are great. It also sort of encapsulates the Coltrane quartet within half an hour - there's the uptempo rager, the rubato 'Alabama' section, everyone in the band gets a feature, etc.

I listen to Crescent a lot more often, though.

Jordan (Jordan), Sunday, 23 January 2005 00:03 (twenty-one years ago)

Alabama isn't on "A Love Supreme" -- or do you mean that it's similar to Alabama?

Forks -- yes, I like Ole Coltrane a lot too. I haven't heard Black Pearls. I also really like John Coltrane Quartet Plays and Transition.

The only one I really find to be genuinely overrated is Blue Train.

Hurting (Hurting), Sunday, 23 January 2005 00:05 (twenty-one years ago)

Yeah, I just mean that it's the same type of thing as Alabama.

Jordan (Jordan), Sunday, 23 January 2005 00:07 (twenty-one years ago)

Oh ALS is a great entrance to Coltrane and to jazz for that matter. Comparing it to Kind of Blue in regards to playability is very OTM.

mcd (mcd), Sunday, 23 January 2005 00:08 (twenty-one years ago)

Transition has been tough for me. Ditto Ascension.
Holla if ya want to give BP a swirl, Hurt.

Forksclovetofu (Forksclovetofu), Sunday, 23 January 2005 00:13 (twenty-one years ago)

What era is it? Is it the classic quartet?

Hurting (Hurting), Sunday, 23 January 2005 00:13 (twenty-one years ago)

If Transition is the one I'm thinking of, it's sorta meh except for the bangin' first track. McCoy Tyner is all about the ONE.

Jordan (Jordan), Sunday, 23 January 2005 00:15 (twenty-one years ago)

Is there a thread on that Wire list?

Bumfluff, Sunday, 23 January 2005 00:22 (twenty-one years ago)

My fave Coltrane is Live at Village Vanguard ("Chasin' the Trane" being my favorite Coltrane track evah) and Interstellar Space.

mcd (mcd), Sunday, 23 January 2005 00:26 (twenty-one years ago)

A Love Supreme is my favorite album of all time.

polyphonic (polyphonic), Sunday, 23 January 2005 00:41 (twenty-one years ago)

My fave Coltrane is Live at Village Vanguard ("Chasin' the Trane" being my favorite Coltrane track evah)

OTM

eman (eman), Sunday, 23 January 2005 00:46 (twenty-one years ago)

I never really bought the hype about this album. I finally bought it last week because I found a reasonably priced used copy. I listened to it once through, and my first impression was, Pleasant enough, but not particularly memorable. I think it must be a grower. But then again, that's kind of the same way I feel about "Kind of Blue". I'm not really a Miles or Coltrane type of jazz fan, I think. I'd much rather listen to Mingus, Monk, or Ornette most days.

o. nate (onate), Sunday, 23 January 2005 00:48 (twenty-one years ago)

"this album" = "A Love Supreme"

o. nate (onate), Sunday, 23 January 2005 00:50 (twenty-one years ago)

Oh, nate.

polyphonic (polyphonic), Sunday, 23 January 2005 00:51 (twenty-one years ago)

Well, I'm just being honest! I can think of a dozen jazz albums easily that I'd take over "Kind of Blue" or "A Love Supreme".

o. nate (onate), Sunday, 23 January 2005 00:52 (twenty-one years ago)

honesty killed the cat, dude.

polyphonic (polyphonic), Sunday, 23 January 2005 00:54 (twenty-one years ago)

If I was in a nettlesome mood, I might even claim that those two albums are "jazz for people who don't like jazz". But usually I hate that particular criticism ("x for people who don't like x") because it seems like nothing but scenester-snob insecurity.

o. nate (onate), Sunday, 23 January 2005 01:00 (twenty-one years ago)

If I was in a nettlesome mood, I might even claim that those two albums are "jazz for people who don't like jazz". But usually I hate that particular criticism ("x for people who don't like x") because it seems like nothing but scenester-snob insecurity.

Yeah, and also that would be a pretty bad criticism of me because my music collection is like 20% jazz.

polyphonic (polyphonic), Sunday, 23 January 2005 01:02 (twenty-one years ago)

Although it's possible that my entire collection is jazz for people who don't like jazz, I guess.

polyphonic (polyphonic), Sunday, 23 January 2005 01:09 (twenty-one years ago)

I don't know why some people are acting so shocked on this thread, if we had a thread entitled "'Pet Sounds': most over-estimated record in rock" then we'd also have posts like "No way, it's my fave record ever" and "I have five Beatles albums I prefer over 'Pet Sounds'" and "'Wild Honey' >>>> 'Pet Sounds'", etc. So basically, I'm saying that anything that's commonly labelled "Best ____ Album Ever" will be considered over-estimated by the 99.9% of people who don't wholeheartedly and unreservedly agree with that statement.

Hopefully everyone who has mentioned "Live at the Village Vanguard" is talking about or has heard the 4CD box set. One CD is JUST NOT ENOUGH. I think I'm on record on ILX (probably the Elvin Jones RIP thread) as saying that the rendition of "India" on Disc 2 is the greatest jazz recording I've ever heard, but in case I'm not, there it is again.

MindInRewind (Barry Bruner), Sunday, 23 January 2005 01:12 (twenty-one years ago)

I only have the 1cd, i should check that out.

polyphonic (polyphonic), Sunday, 23 January 2005 01:14 (twenty-one years ago)

I agree that it would be totally unfair to call "A Love Supreme" jazz for people who don't like jazz. Now it's true it may be one of the jazz CDs you'd be more likely to find in an otherwise non-jazz collection, but I think that has more to do with the high esteem in which the album is held by jazz aficionados which has made it known outside of those circles and therefore made it a likely candidate for those looking for a convenient specimen of the music. I think the motivation is more like, "Maybe I should give this jazz stuff a whirl, so I might as well start with the 'best' album and if I don't like it, then I'll know the stuff is not for me." Now of course, that's a totally misguided motivation, but that doesn't mean it might not exist in certain cases. Anyway, I'm not claiming to be any kind of jazz expert. But I sort of came to jazz via stuff like Beefheart and John Zorn - so I tend to be more comfortable with stuff like that.

o. nate (onate), Sunday, 23 January 2005 01:33 (twenty-one years ago)

Yeah, the Village Vanguard box is hot hot hot hot hot.

Douglas (Douglas), Sunday, 23 January 2005 01:42 (twenty-one years ago)

jazz for people who don't like jazz is Wynton Marsalis.

hstencil (hstencil), Sunday, 23 January 2005 01:43 (twenty-one years ago)

Or Kenny G.

MindInRewind (Barry Bruner), Sunday, 23 January 2005 01:46 (twenty-one years ago)

... or dave brubeck

jake b. (cerybut), Sunday, 23 January 2005 01:47 (twenty-one years ago)

no, I wouldn't say that, because Mr. Gorelick probably actually likes jazz. Whereas Wynton obviously hates it, so it's jazz for people who don't like jazz made by people who don't like jazz.

xpost don't bag on brubeck.

hstencil (hstencil), Sunday, 23 January 2005 01:47 (twenty-one years ago)

Yes, that makes sense.

MindInRewind (Barry Bruner), Sunday, 23 January 2005 01:51 (twenty-one years ago)

"Over-estimated" is a funny turn of phrase in this context, isn't it? People like it too much? Or too many people like it? The Wire would have to argue some to convince me it's not a hugely popular album, one of the Big Statements by one of the top three or four improvisors in the music, and an influential landmark from a wildly creative era.

So let's turn this thread into hosannas for the Vanguard box -- god, it's exhilarating!

briania (briania), Sunday, 23 January 2005 01:58 (twenty-one years ago)

I really do love this album, although - like most of the ppl on this thread - it isn't listened to as often as a good 4 or 5 other trane albums.

Kind of Blue, I think, is a different issue entirely...I'd say a good 40% of my collection is jazz, and I have a good amount of miles' recordings, but KoB remains consistently listend-to to this day.

djdee2005 (djdee2005), Sunday, 23 January 2005 01:58 (twenty-one years ago)

I actually think that jazz for people that don't like jazz is not something like Kind of Blue or even folks like Wynton, but rather whatever token avant-jazzer is the flavor of the day. Matthew Shipp maybe? Used to be David S. Ware ... or how about William Hooker, remember him? Those Hooker records were kinda bad, really. But anyway, point being that the audience for these jazz records that get released on Homestead Records or whatever are probably not the kind of people who are going to kick back with a Woody Shaw record on a Saturday afternoon. They're not going to pull out an Earl Hines or an Erroll Garner or a Benny Carter or a, yes, Dave Brubeck record and laze about on the sofa digging on it. I mean, I've known a lot of people into indie and/or noise or whatever who buy up that avant shit without really giving much of a damn about huge swaths of the wonderful music that really kinda defined what the heck jazz was in the first place. It seems like a bit of an affectation, that consuming this kinda music fits into a general anti-commercial worldview and fits nicely on the shelf next to Deerhoof or Wolf Eyes or whatever.

Stormy Davis (diamond), Sunday, 23 January 2005 02:01 (twenty-one years ago)

Man, but I love Matt Shipp and David Ware.

polyphonic (polyphonic), Sunday, 23 January 2005 02:22 (twenty-one years ago)

So do I! I am listen to Brotzmann right now, as it happens.

Stormy Davis (diamond), Sunday, 23 January 2005 02:26 (twenty-one years ago)

But the point is that people like me like Matthew Shipp too.

RS £aRue (rockist_scientist), Sunday, 23 January 2005 02:26 (twenty-one years ago)

I've never heard the Vanguard box, actually. Does it have bunch of Eric Dolphy on it? And I must add, that I like Coltrane on soprano despite myself. I often wondered why he didn't just stick to his main horn, even though he kills, too, on soprano. Maybe related, I love the Miles Plugged Nickel box - a sort of similar exercise in seeing how the tunes and players play it out over several sets. Totally hot. Now I'm interested.

mcd (mcd), Sunday, 23 January 2005 02:32 (twenty-one years ago)

I think the story goes he heard Steve Lacy playing the soprano -- since Lacy was pretty much the only one doing it at the time -- and just fell in love with the sound of it. And that it was an easy enough transition because the tenor and soprano are in the same key. Something like that. I'm certainly glad he did it.

Stormy Davis (diamond), Sunday, 23 January 2005 02:44 (twenty-one years ago)

jazz for people who don't like jazz is Wynton Marsalis.

Wrong

gabbneb (gabbneb), Sunday, 23 January 2005 02:50 (twenty-one years ago)

interesting story of how coltrane picked up the, and a, soprano: he sharing a cab w/ a soprano player, who got off before coltrane and left his horn, which john noticed once he had gotten to his destination. since he had no way of contacting the forgetful sopranist he started noodling around on it and the rest is history etc etc

jake b. (cerybut), Sunday, 23 January 2005 02:51 (twenty-one years ago)

I'ma hafta put A Love Supreme on right now, I probably haven't listened to it in five years.

mcd (mcd), Sunday, 23 January 2005 03:11 (twenty-one years ago)

By the way, what's considered "flawed" about it? Is it the spiritual aspect (perhaps approaching cheesiness) or is it too repetitive? I don't agree with either of these, I'm just wondering.

mcd (mcd), Sunday, 23 January 2005 03:18 (twenty-one years ago)

Well, the greatest jazz record of all time is the Henry Threadgill Very Very Circus' "Too Much Sugar For a Dime" but there's sure nothing wrong with "A Love Supreme" or "Kind of Blue."

Austin (Austin), Sunday, 23 January 2005 03:21 (twenty-one years ago)

i listen to way more 50's coltrane then 60's coltrane.i'm probably in the minority here on ilm. and in the last 5 years or so, i've listened to a lot more dolphy then coltrane, period. he's a cool guy to discover if you have already played yer coltrane records to death.

scott seward (scott seward), Sunday, 23 January 2005 03:25 (twenty-one years ago)

right now i am listening to destroyer 666's cold steel for an iron age album, but after that is done i'm gonna throw on dig it! which is the red garland quintet with john coltrane. i love red. (you know, i had dinner with red once. true story!)

scott seward (scott seward), Sunday, 23 January 2005 03:29 (twenty-one years ago)

(Not that it makes a lotta difference, but due to some sloppy HTML formatting on my part, it looks as though I wrongly referred to Meditations as a quartet album, when I actually meant First Meditations (for quartet).

Myonga Von Bontee (Myonga Von Bontee), Tuesday, 25 January 2005 18:24 (twenty-one years ago)

I think Black Saint is different, though. I would never suggest that album as an entry way to Mingus (I'd leave that to Mingus Ah Um), whereas I wouldn't hesitate to suggest ALS to a non-jazzer. The thing about ALS is how the (very catchy) theme is woven along and spun out into this meditation, a very "jazz" idea (repitition of theme) done in a new & interesting way.

mcd (mcd), Tuesday, 25 January 2005 18:54 (twenty-one years ago)

one year passes...
this album is responsible for me not getting into coltrane 20 years ago. i bought it in my student days and was extremely disappointed. i find the theme dull and it is repeated lots of times. where is the spiritual feeling in this? i found this extremely matter of fact and somehow uninspired.

a year ago i got ascension and i find it much more fascinating than ALS. it is not a record to love, it is pretty dissonant and going on for a long time but extremely powerful. and there is a communion kind of thing going on with all the ten or so solos and the others joining in after a while.

this week i got giant steps. and i like it a lot. amazing sax play on the title, the speed of the chord successions and the immaculate sound coltrane still produces. some phantastic lyrical compositions like syeeda's song flute.

not sure what to buy next. either meditations or interstellar space.

alex in mainhattan (alex63), Friday, 28 April 2006 16:36 (twenty years ago)

btw right now i'm listening to izipho sam by pharoah sanders and i find it a million times more spiritual than ALS. that's the kind of free jazz i dig, i guess. there is intense soulful singing by leon thomas, there are drones (sonny sharrock), there is a cosmic world music feel.

alex in mainhattan (alex63), Friday, 28 April 2006 16:49 (twenty years ago)

not sure what to buy next. either meditations or interstellar space.

I think it's "Interstellar Space" for you, young man

They're Dairylea Mad, Them Kids (Dada), Friday, 28 April 2006 17:28 (twenty years ago)

i always thought of a love supreme as coltrane's tommy; it was necessary, it was a milestone, it certainly has its moments, but ultimately it's a transitional work. like tommy, a love supreme really came to life in a live setting (even though it was only played live once or twice). i actually much prefer the record that came after, the john coltrane quartet plays.... the quartet sounds much looser, more fearless.

Lawrence the Looter (Lawrence the Looter), Friday, 28 April 2006 17:48 (twenty years ago)

Eh. This album was played far, far too often while I was growing up to have any real critical distance on it. I love it unconditionally.

js (honestengine), Friday, 28 April 2006 17:55 (twenty years ago)

i'd like to second geting 'interstellar space'.

6335, Friday, 28 April 2006 17:56 (twenty years ago)

There are at least 50 jazz albums that I have listened to and like a lot better.

Geir Hongro (GeirHong), Friday, 28 April 2006 21:45 (twenty years ago)

If you like Giant Steps get Coltrane's Sound. SOOO good, so overlooked.

Abbadavid Berman (Hurting), Friday, 28 April 2006 22:02 (twenty years ago)

Izipho Zam and Live At The East (available on expensive Japanese import only at present) are my two favorite Pharoah Sanders albums. And I agree, get Interstellar Space before Meditations, but do get Meditations at some point. And if you can find First Meditations, get that too; it's a version of Meditations that features only the quartet, and it's somewhere between that and ALS. I like it better than ALS.

Grachan Moncur III is playing this year's Vision Festival with Byard Lancaster and Bobby Hutcherson. I'm definitely gonna see that. I'm so bummed I missed his shows with Jackie McLean in 2004.

pdf (Phil Freeman), Friday, 28 April 2006 22:20 (twenty years ago)

i ordered interstellar space and ayler's spiritual unity.

is there any album or concert recording where the father coltrane, the son sanders and the ghost ayler play together? a little search on the web only yielded this. a tape of a 1966 concert in the new york philharmonic hall which is in the possession of the trane family! i am only starting to get into free-jazz, so please excuse this probably stupid question.

alex in mainhattan (alex63), Saturday, 29 April 2006 11:12 (twenty years ago)

I listened to Meditations this morning for the first time, and it ripped me apart, literally left me wailing, exhausted. What an incredible album...almost feels silly to use words like that to describe it. Maybe there's a thread dedicated to it, I'll look.

It's funny, I've never had much interest in jazz, finding even earlier Coltrane a bit stodgy for my tastes. But this morning I was putting together a mix of Sly, Funkadelic, Stooges, Can, Beefheart, and James Brown, and heard JB shout at the end of "Super Bad" to "blow me some 'Trane, brotha". So I decided to try some Coltrane for the mix, looked at what I had, and put on Meditations because of its date (1965, pretty late in the day). So maybe this is the right way for me to find my way into jazz, finally...

Euler (Euler), Saturday, 29 April 2006 19:13 (twenty years ago)

"meditations" has done that to me a few times too! It's a gas.

A Viking of Some Note (Andrew Thames), Sunday, 30 April 2006 00:44 (twenty years ago)

one month passes...
i wrote a little something on meditations here in my blog. a tremendous album. i am still trying to get into interstellar space. i kind of like it in theory but it seems a little spare. and venus does not seem to fit onto it. it's so soft and tender compared to the rest.

alex in mainhattan (alex63), Tuesday, 6 June 2006 13:59 (twenty years ago)

a question to all the people who recommended live at the village vanguard above. did you mean the first concert (1961) or the second (1966)? i don't know either of them but i am much more intrigued by the last one as i really think coltrane made his most exciting music in his free jazz period.

alex in mainhattan (alex63), Tuesday, 6 June 2006 14:06 (twenty years ago)

is there any album or concert recording where the father coltrane, the son sanders and the ghost ayler play together? a little search on the web only yielded this. a tape of a 1966 concert in the new york philharmonic hall which is in the possession of the trane family! i am only starting to get into free-jazz, so please excuse this probably stupid question.

there have been rumors over the last couple of years that this will be officially released. i knew someone who was at that concert; as soon as trane's set started (with ayler and pharoah), half the audience left. then trane started playing the theme to "my favorite things," which brought some of the audience back. then they left again during the solos. my friend was glad so many people left, as he got to sit much closer. also on the bill that night were coleman hawkins, stan getz, and sonny rollins; it was billed as the "titans of tenor" concert. it is the only known recording of coltrane, sanders, and ayler together.

Lawrence the Looter (Lawrence the Looter), Tuesday, 6 June 2006 14:33 (twenty years ago)

Coltrane made his most exciting music on the album with Duke Ellington - it was called "In a Sentimental Mood", and the best thing either of them has done.

The second concert is more "free", and has sanders on it so it should be your bag. the first gets my vote for eric dolphy ripping shit up, chasin' the train and, most of all, impressions.

Dr J Bowman (Dr J Bowman), Tuesday, 6 June 2006 14:55 (twenty years ago)


a question to all the people who recommended live at the village vanguard above. did you mean the first concert (1961) or the second (1966)? i don't know either of them but i am much more intrigued by the last one as i really think coltrane made his most exciting music in his free jazz period.

The first one is better. But if you prefer his free shit by all means check out the second.

deej.. (deej..), Tuesday, 6 June 2006 14:57 (twenty years ago)

Love Supreme: yes
Ole: YES
Village Vanguard box: OH YES
One Up, One Down - Live at Half Note: yessir
Jack Johnson over Bitches Brew: yes
Lee Morgan: yep
Jeff Parker: yes
Jeff Parker in new Vandermark project Powerhouse Sound: YES
Marion Brown: underrated

socks b. (socks b.), Tuesday, 6 June 2006 15:14 (twenty years ago)

I have both the '61 village vanguard box and the later '66 village single disc. The box set is mind blowing, tons (compared to the original '61 release lp) of Dolphy on bass clarinet and alto.

India (third set, fourth disc) from the '61 shows is unbelievable, and probably one of my favorite soprano Coltrane recordings. Highly recommended.

Re: '66 disc, the highlight for me is a killer bass solo (real solo, w/o the rest of the band!) as an intro to My Favorite Things.

MadMaryWilliams (MadMaryWilliams), Tuesday, 6 June 2006 18:34 (twenty years ago)

Coltrane made his most exciting music on the album with Duke Ellington - it was called "In a Sentimental Mood", and the best thing either of them has done.

That's quite a statement, esp. wrt Duke.

Jeff Parker in new Vandermark project Powerhouse Sound: YES

I want to hear this band!

Jordan (Jordan), Tuesday, 6 June 2006 18:41 (twenty years ago)

I wouldn't go that far but that recording of Sentimental Mood is incredible.

deej.. (deej..), Tuesday, 6 June 2006 18:59 (twenty years ago)

Coltrane made his most exciting music on the album with Duke Ellington - it was called "In a Sentimental Mood", and the best thing either of them has done.

That's quite a statement, esp. wrt Duke.

yeah, and probably deserves a thread of its own. but... the whole Duke/Trane album normally gets underrated as a curiosity item, a date set up by bob thiele because coltrane had fucked up his reed (like the rocket with his tips) and duke was between contracts. but this one song changed the whole way coltrane recorded (duke forced him to go with one take rather than re-recording endlessly), and this intersection just happened to produce something magical - i mean maybe there's a gap in my collection where i'm missing where ellington came up with that ostinato (that "indelible vamp" giddings calls it) but it's just... you know, the ideal of what a jazz ballad, what music should be.

it's interesting because you can hear coltrane is listening with the same intensity he normally plays with - he was a great listener (got downbeat pieces where he's blind testing new releases and picking out bassists, drummers, 'bonists by name etc. - compare to miles's "i don't listen to jazz" shtick of the period, or that episode where they called his ass out when he claimed he could "hear" the difference between a white player and a black player (he couldn't of course, but I bet Trane could have told them exactly who the player was)) but i get the impression Tyner left the group because Trane stopped listening to him - like tyner would lay out and trane wouldn't even notice until he came back in to signal the ending.

anyway, the song is exciting as far as coltrane is concerned because he's playing within himself as far as no sheets of sound, screeching, split notes etc. are concerned, but outside himself as far as trying to go with what his "accompanist" is feeding him.

Dr J Bowman (Dr J Bowman), Tuesday, 6 June 2006 21:04 (twenty years ago)

I have all four takes of "India" from the Vanguard box set burned to a single disc, and most times I pull it from the shelf I listen to it more than once

milton parker (Jon L), Tuesday, 6 June 2006 21:09 (twenty years ago)

two weeks pass...
Yeah, I like the singing a lot.


-- Hurting (Hurtingchie...), January 25th, 2005.


Count me as someone who loves the singing.
-- deej

Has anybody besides me ever been weird enough to throw on Meditations and sing 'along' to "The Father And The Sun And The Holy Ghost"? (Or, at least IMAGINE how it would sound with Coltrane singing it?) Because the ascending eleven-note motif matches PRECISELY the eleven-syllable song title! Was that just a coincidence; or did Trane originally intend to add vocals, all chanting the title in unison with the sax parts? We'll never know...

Monty Von Byonga (Monty Von Byonga), Thursday, 22 June 2006 06:02 (nineteen years ago)

Eh. This album was played far, far too often while I was growing up to have any real critical distance on it. I love it unconditionally.

-- js ([email protected]), April 28th, 2006.

So I guess you know where I come down on this thread. I really resist the phrase "overrated". Frampton Comes Alive is overrated. Citi Movement is overrated. ALS is something that everyone should own, whether or not they ever play it.

I like the points made about Ellington/Coltrane. Another underrated album would be Ellington/Mingus/Roach Money Jungle.

I know that it is unlikely that posters upthread will revisit, but I'd like to hear some substantiation for On The Corner "is better than" (another phrase that is weird) Bitches Brew. I just don't understand.

J Arthur Rank (Quin Tillian), Thursday, 22 June 2006 23:30 (nineteen years ago)

This thread has forced me to haul out ALS and play it--for the first time in a year, most likely. Also put Black Unity (Pharoah), No Blues (a Miles boot), African Marketplace (Abdullah Ibrahim) and Moto Grosso Feio (Wayne Shorter).

ALS stands the test of time quite well, I think, and the connections between that and Black Unity are fairly evident. I'm not sure what the hate is about. From the opening wash of Jones's cymbals and the opening call by Coltrane to the final fade, this is a well conceived and well executed piece of music.

For those who wanted to put more players on this disc, you may be referring to the short bit of Archie Shepp that appears on an alternate take released with the deluxe remastered double disk anniversary edition. That bit is certainly not worth getting excited about.

On ALS, each musician gets an extended showcase that is integral to the piece, a change in form from the typical jazz of head, tradinng fours, laying out for a solo, restating the theme, solo, chorus, solo, return to head. While quite a bit of innteresting music is made in that form, I think it also allowed for a lot of less-than-eloquent musicians to solo just because the form demands it. Live, I have seen musicians literally freeze up for lack of annything to say and I have seen others blather about with nothing to say for an inordinately long time. What does this have to do with ALS? Imo, at 32 minutes running time, the piece doesn't fall to that sort of jazz hokery.

J Arthur Rank (Quin Tillian), Friday, 23 June 2006 14:27 (nineteen years ago)

seven years pass...
seven years pass...

wasn't sure which coltrane topic to post on, but i was wondering if there were any thoughts on this yet?

https://www.discogs.com/master/2345266-John-Coltrane-A-Love-Supreme-Live-In-Seattle

things repeat forever and there never is a remedy (Austin), Tuesday, 26 October 2021 18:10 (four years ago)

it is...good. Pretty lo-fi.

"Devious" Licks (Boring, Maryland), Tuesday, 26 October 2021 18:18 (four years ago)

yeah, i had it on in the background and it seemed okay. i always thought for sure they would give a standalone release to the antibes set that was on the second disc of this reissue, but nope. it makes me wonder just how much else they have in "the vault" that could see a legitimate release.

(ftr: i won't be purchasing it. just doesn't seem very essential. the antibes set is way better and this feels a little like barrel scraping, unfortunately.)

things repeat forever and there never is a remedy (Austin), Tuesday, 26 October 2021 18:24 (four years ago)

thread title has always annoyed me, wtf does "most over-estimated record" mean?

akm, Tuesday, 26 October 2021 18:25 (four years ago)

someone thought it was a double album?

things repeat forever and there never is a remedy (Austin), Tuesday, 26 October 2021 18:25 (four years ago)

I wrote about it for Stereogum as part of a roundup of a whole bunch of versions of ALS (John Coltrane, Alice Coltrane, Carlos Santana/John McLaughlin, etc.). I like it a lot.

but also fuck you (unperson), Tuesday, 26 October 2021 18:27 (four years ago)

ethan iverson wrote about it…among other things, he points out that this band's activity in the period in which ALS the original work was frenzied, and while its considered one of the most scrutinized works in the history of african american improvised music since like the 70s, none of those guys would have had a notion that that this one work was going to be that major. So while Trane knows what's going on as they're playing it, it doesn't seem like Jones or Tyner remember the work as recorded all that well… this is not like playing "Cherokee" or something…

https://www.thenation.com/article/culture/coltrane-love-supreme/

veronica moser, Tuesday, 26 October 2021 18:27 (four years ago)

i recall similar conversation in the ashley kahn love supreme book. elvin jones was quoted as telling a fan at the time, "if you like our other albums, you'll like this one too."

guess he kinda knew what was going on lol.

the beginning of the end of discourse. (Austin), Tuesday, 26 October 2021 18:32 (four years ago)

In that same book, a contemporary fan who went on to become a well-known jazz musician (don't remember who), says "we liked A Love Supreme, but we were always most interested in what he was going to do next".

Halfway there but for you, Tuesday, 26 October 2021 18:40 (four years ago)

"Flawed" and "over-estimated" my ass.

birdistheword, Tuesday, 26 October 2021 18:50 (four years ago)

I think this release still very much tells an interesting story about Coltrane and his times. The album has a very young Carlos Ward (still a local Seattle guy) getting thrown in the deep end!

"Devious" Licks (Boring, Maryland), Tuesday, 26 October 2021 21:24 (four years ago)

I really love this new Live one, I can understand some of the complaints that Coltrane himself is a little low, but everyone else sounds so good that it feels like a minor complaint. It's always just such a joy to hear this group playing these songs.

a superficial sheeb of intelligence (jon /via/ chi 2.0), Tuesday, 26 October 2021 21:28 (four years ago)

Coltrane (and Sanders and Ward) are so low in the “mix” (it’s just a 2-track recording) that I found it frustrating having to aurally squint to hear what they’re doing. Jones and Tyner are front-and-center, and it’s actually one of the better recordings of Jones from that time, live or studio. This definitely should’ve been released, no question, but I prefer the 1971/1994 live release…for that matter, I actually prefer the decidedly lower-fi The Olatunji Concert: as distorted as it is, Coltrane’s extremely forward in that “mix.”

Montgomery Burns' Jazz (Tarfumes The Escape Goat), Tuesday, 26 October 2021 21:39 (four years ago)

Honestly, the prominence of piano and rhythm over horns is one of the big selling points, to me. Tyner used to get buried, especially in 1965 and after - it was one of the main reasons he quit! So to really hear what he was doing in this kind of situation is fantastic.

but also fuck you (unperson), Tuesday, 26 October 2021 21:43 (four years ago)

Good piece by Iverson. I haven't had the right moment to listen to this but I am very much looking forward to it.

change display name (Jordan), Tuesday, 26 October 2021 21:52 (four years ago)

No question, hearing Tyner clearly in this context — for once — is great. And I feel like I’m hearing the full breadth and depth of Elvin’s kit for the first time (apart from the one time I saw him live). But because Live In Seattle is one of my favorite records (by anyone), my expectations for this, and what I’d imagined it would sound like, were probably irrationally high. Also, the basses are mostly inaudible apart from the duo spots, which are fascinating. Trane should’ve worked with two basses more.

xp

Montgomery Burns' Jazz (Tarfumes The Escape Goat), Tuesday, 26 October 2021 22:03 (four years ago)

this new live set is INCREDIBLE

I haven't even gotten to part 3 yet, mind you. but this is very different from the other live version of a love supreme i've heard.

Honestly, the prominence of piano and rhythm over horns is one of the big selling points, to me. Tyner used to get buried, especially in 1965 and after - it was one of the main reasons he quit! So to really hear what he was doing in this kind of situation is fantastic.

otm. also i'm biased because i listen to things with drummer eras (particularly jazz) but it is really cool to get to hear jones up a bit higher in the mix. i could see how that would make it sound off-balance to others, but to me it's thrilling to hear coltrane on the left side on my headphones, mixed hard to the size, with the drums and bass near the middle, the piano off to the right. it feels like you're in the drummer's seat, witnessing coltrane going off with some perspective, as a balance to the interplay with tyner's piano.

Karl Malone, Wednesday, 27 October 2021 19:29 (four years ago)

and they are really, really extending these songs. this is like if you could get a bonus deluxe edition of an album, only instead of adding on some extra takes or leftover songs, you get this reinvigorated edition with all these additional passages and variations on the theme that perfectly fit

Karl Malone, Wednesday, 27 October 2021 19:30 (four years ago)

This is powerful & beautiful, the bootleg quality only make it more impressive in a way (because we've all heard gig tapes with similar sound quality, and much less transcendent playing). Resolution is so intense.

The way Elvin plays super fast tempos (like Pursuance) is like a magic trick to me, he's almost never stating the full cymbal pattern, but it still has that constant circular motion thing and is in the pocket.

change display name (Jordan), Friday, 29 October 2021 18:04 (four years ago)

ok I'm going in

Communist Hockey Goblin (sleeve), Friday, 29 October 2021 18:22 (four years ago)

Elvin is massive on this (I mean, he's always massive, but there are some insanely powerful moments here)

tylerw, Friday, 29 October 2021 18:58 (four years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.