T/S - Bright Eyes' Digital Ash in a Digital Urn vs. I'm Wide Awake, It's Morning

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
So, for the three of four ILMers who don't hate Bright Eyes, which CD is better?

Here's 3 songs off each: http://www.mtv.it/music/esclusive/esclusiva.asp?id=695C7334CE584F9B95E47123FD060882&plugin=true

For anybody who cares, apparently Best Buy will be selling them both for only $8 each.

Mickey (modestmickey), Sunday, 23 January 2005 19:06 (twenty-one years ago)

I'm hardly a Bright Eyes sympathizer, but I may be as close as one gets on ILM. Personally, I don't think he makes a good album and I expect these to be trivial and relatively mediocre (more of the same), respectfully. "I'm Wide Awake.." will definately be a sleepy-time record and probably the better of the two by default because it's well-worn territory for him. People might not like Digital Urn because they won't be able to dance to it. It's sort of the culmination of all the cut-and-pasting he's done on the other records, only it's kind of boring for all it's bells and whistles. But I'm sure it will sound fine up against a dramatic scene in "Garden State 2." And then again, what do I know? I'm half-way standing up for this guy.

earinfections (Nick Twisp), Sunday, 23 January 2005 20:52 (twenty-one years ago)

But I'm sure it will sound fine up against a dramatic scene in "Garden State 2."

brilliant.

poortheatre (poortheatre), Sunday, 23 January 2005 20:54 (twenty-one years ago)


I've had both of them for about a month now, and I am liking "Digital". It sounds more like my favorite parts of "Letting Off" and "Fevers and Mirrors". "Wide Awake" is more in the vein of his collaborations with M Ward, and the acoustic parts of "Soil".

Garibaldianne (Garibaldianne), Monday, 24 January 2005 00:13 (twenty-one years ago)

Haven't heard all of "Wide Awake" but I'm loving "Digital". I've always dismissed Oberst based on three or four of his songs and ridiculously overblown press, + or - (the NY Times piece calling him the next Dylan, for instance). But this time the acclaim seems a bit more earnest and, IMO, deserved.

Rubberband Man (Rubberband Man), Monday, 24 January 2005 02:18 (twenty-one years ago)

Digital's kind of a mess, a few great moments but on the whole he mostly just bogs everything down in a bunch of murky electro gunk. I guess Wide Awake will probably be the less popular one here b/c it's "alt-country" and all that, but at least he really cuts loose on some of the songs rather than try to be all dark and moody. "Another Travelin' Song" is a straight Dylan rip-off that's still pretty exhilirating, and "Road to Joy" is nice and screamy. Still neither one of 'em's as good as Lifted...

Josh Love (screamapillar), Monday, 24 January 2005 02:24 (twenty-one years ago)

He needs to take a class on how not to come up with the worst titles ever.

Magic City (ano ano), Monday, 24 January 2005 02:31 (twenty-one years ago)

The Lyre of Orpheus is the slightly better disc, though the barn burners are on Abbatoir Blues.

14-42, Monday, 24 January 2005 02:35 (twenty-one years ago)

He also needs to learn how to open an album properly. The spoken intro on I'm Wide Awake isn't nearly as bad as that unlistenable first track on Lifted, but it ain't pretty. The second track, however, is quite pretty. Haven't heard Digital Ash yet.

Mike O. (Mike Ouderkirk), Monday, 24 January 2005 06:43 (twenty-one years ago)

Mmm, it's a shame cos the actual song, once it gets started, is great. I like I'm Wide Awake the best overall, I'm not sure digital embellishments add that much to what he does

DJ Mencap0))), Monday, 24 January 2005 10:49 (twenty-one years ago)

from pitchfork's front page:

"Once the textbook definition of adolescent "emocore," Omaha singer/songwriter Conor Oberst redefines himself with two new albums"

can i get a wtf?

emocore? when and how? emocore is way more aggro than bright eyes could ever hope to be. i'm no BE fan, and i don't come to kick him in the teeth here.... what the fuck is pitchfork doing? i try not to wreck on the fork... but damn... can we fuck up the "emo" tag any more? a whole new batch of dudes are gonna start calling BE emocore and totally fuck up the diction. "pitchfork says..." as if it wasn't already fucked.

sorry for the OT.
m.

msp (msp), Monday, 24 January 2005 15:16 (twenty-one years ago)

"Emocore" sounds like the evil corporation in a future-shock movie like "The Terminator"

Alfred Soto (Alfred Soto), Monday, 24 January 2005 15:21 (twenty-one years ago)

emocore is way more aggro than bright eyes could ever hope to be

Listen to his first band, Commander Venus, or Desperadecios. I think that's what Ryan meant more than Fevers & Mirrors.

Chris Dahlen (Chris Dahlen), Monday, 24 January 2005 17:13 (twenty-one years ago)

I was under the impression that what msp terms "emocore" is actually "screamo". I don't feel like fact-checking w/ Fourfa, though.

David R. (popshots75`), Monday, 24 January 2005 18:30 (twenty-one years ago)

Chris Dahlen, even so, does that not make the sentence really misleading? Plugging in what you claim, "Once the textbook definition of adolescent "emocore," [such as Desperadecios] Omaha singer/songwriter Conor Oberst redefines himself with two new albums"

After Desperadecios and adopting the Bright Eyes name is when Conor Oberst "redefined" himself. Yes, these two new albums are different from his past Bright Eyes releases, but they are definitely not part of his redefinition from "emocore" to whatever he may be now.

Even if you do want to claim it to be technically correct, that is definitely a misleading statement.

Mickey (modestmickey), Monday, 24 January 2005 18:34 (twenty-one years ago)

well, screamo is more aggro than emocore. screamo is more like the newer wave (read: early to mid 90s) of hardcore or grindcore bands that just had a whiny screamy singer... whereas emocore was more like rites of spring, etc. it had melodic parts. (although, screamo NOW could have melodic stuff... again, the kids use whatever damned words they please and so it's very easy to see a screamo bill and it have a band like poison the well who can be very lush before added 4 cups of screamy.)

i dunno. i didn't care for BE back in the day and so never bothered to check out just about any related projects whatsoever, so perhaps my madness came from nowhere... but as far as i know, BE has been a sweater totin' "emo" band since the later nineties... not a hardcore emo or an emocore band... more in common with indie rock than hardcore.

ah, who fuckin cares? the kids don't get it right. i don't get it right. why should pitchfork either?
m.

msp (msp), Monday, 24 January 2005 18:48 (twenty-one years ago)

Damn you, emo!

David R. (popshots75`), Monday, 24 January 2005 18:52 (twenty-one years ago)

Good point. Why should we trust music journalists to know what they're talking about!

Mickey (modestmickey), Monday, 24 January 2005 18:54 (twenty-one years ago)

Actually I think the more misleading statement comes directly after that when he refers to I'm Wide Awake... as a masterpiece.

cws (cws), Monday, 24 January 2005 19:21 (twenty-one years ago)

well, you sorta wonder if music history later will record hardcore emo, emo, emocore, etc etc as all one general thread or label and total kick out the micro-genres... especially now that post post post whatever emo is incorporating elements of all of those above and kids are calling it whatever they damned please. whatever communicates what pleading valentine skull sounds like...

i think most of the communication difficulty over emo is that a bunch of kids who started to suddenly play indie rock didn't want to be called indie rock, so they called it emo to avoid having to come to terms with how their tastes had mellowed into the tastes of their older siblings... "this is punk man!!"
m.

msp (msp), Monday, 24 January 2005 19:26 (twenty-one years ago)

roffle of the day to cws!!! i'm spitting burrito!
m.

msp (msp), Monday, 24 January 2005 19:26 (twenty-one years ago)

You know, the "emocore" controversy aside, that was one of the better reviews I've read on PFM. It actually had a non-condenscending tone and explained the music in understandable terms. To top it all of, it didn't seem like an essay trying to mask the lack of content with heavy thesaurus use.

Mickey (modestmickey), Monday, 24 January 2005 19:34 (twenty-one years ago)

I'm Wide Awake could stand to loose the harmony vocals but overall it's very, very good. Even touching at some moments. The romantisicm seems put to better use and the Dylanisms are actually pretty funny.

danh (danh), Friday, 28 January 2005 18:43 (twenty-one years ago)

four months pass...
Ok, so i've never really paid attention to Bright Eyes aside from mild dislike, but today i'm bored and my Dad has BOTH of the new albums. So i'm going to listen to them and see if i can't be won over.

My dad thinks 'I'm Wide Awake' is a piece of shit but loves the other one.

Hari A$hur$t (Toaster), Sunday, 29 May 2005 10:11 (twenty-one years ago)

After being bored out of my mind by 'I'm Wide Awake' i put on 'Digital Ash' and i'm enjoying it so far. I can't see myself really getting into it but it's nice enough. That YYY's guy is a great guitarist.

Hari A$hur$t (Toaster), Sunday, 29 May 2005 10:36 (twenty-one years ago)

The unrelentingly harsh dismissals of Bright Eyes strike me as unusual and faintly irksome. If you ignore what Mr Oberst sings about and just listen to the fairly unexceptional alt. country or whatever else he backs himself with then I can imagine you being thoroughly underwhelmed, but then you've only yourself to blame. I think its the very notion, idea or essence of Mr Oberst that is what inspires such self-gratified dissing. But here I think people have got it wrong.

Generally, I have no interest in 'songwriters' and the thought of some intensely emotional young guy strumming a guitar and singing deeply personal, honest songs would have made me switch off a year ago, but I was exposed to a lot of Bright Eyes and, although I didn't (don't) like all of it, I was taken with the diamond-hard conviction, intensity, and honesty I heard in the lyrics. Having listened to a fair bit and seen him play live (twice; the second time brilliantly) I don't think he's slyly manipulating the hordes of fragile teenagers that adore him, and he'd have to be incredibly cynical to do that, and I don't really detect any cynicism at all. Someone said in that thread about his performance on some american talk show that he wreaked of "moooom, get out of my room!", but that seems way off. What really moves me when listening to Bright Eyes is Oberst's desire for redemption through love, which has grown in the last couple of releases into a sort of bold humanism and he now seems more bothered about everyone else. His scope has broadened so much that the typical criticisms you might level at more heart-on-sleeve emo stuff (like the one above) seem irrelevant. His politics appear horribly simplistic in places and there are plenty of unremarkable songs, embarassing bits etc as there are with a lot of artists, -but overall, the boldness, humanism and warmth in his music seems so touching and overwhelmingly GOOD that I don't doubt his integrity or world-view at all, and any of his more annoying trappings don't bother me. And it's so rare to find an artist with that conviction and integrity that it seems, well, a bit off to dismiss him so casually as if his whole intentions are obviously so incredibly off-base. But I tend to think it comes from not wanting to feel embarassed by such upfront emotion, however worthwhile it is. I appreciate there are things about Bright Eyes people might not like (his voice say), but that doesn't account for the contempt he seems to be held in.

And I pick "I'm Wide Awake It's Morning", which is pretty patchy, but the opener, "At The Bottom Of Everything" affected me more than anything else released for a while.

Ogmor Roundtrouser (Ogmor Roundtrouser), Sunday, 29 May 2005 12:39 (twenty-one years ago)

Songs I've kept from Digital Ash (and haha I've got to look up the silly titles on allmusic cuz my mp3s are just listed by track number):
Gold Mine Gutted
Arc Of Time (Time Code)
Take It Easy (Love Nothing)
Hit The Switch
I Believe In Symmetry
Light Pollution
Easy/Lucky/Free

I could probably cut one of those middle ones, but I think this makes a pretty great EP.

Songs I've kept from Wide Awake, It's Morning:


I think its a matter of whether you think Conor Oberst's voice should be the sole musical focus of an album. Personally I need some bombast to give that warble context.

miccio (miccio), Sunday, 29 May 2005 13:51 (twenty-one years ago)

Sometimes the muso-ness here is too precious for words.

Wide Awake is a perfectly lovely album that is chock full of good stuff. There really isn't a boring track on it, and some of the stuff is flat-out gorgeous. Nothing on it is innovative, or mind-bending, or anything like that, but it is a fully realized bunch of songs by a consistently interesting artist (with an annoying voice, just like you-know-who).

Digital Ash is pretty good, too. Miccio's EP is essentially the one I listen to as well.

So Wide Awake, definitely.

Vornado, Sunday, 29 May 2005 15:45 (twenty-one years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.