which do you prefer to hear on your recordings of bach, mozart, buxtehude, etc?
I prefer period instruments. And along with that, as small an ensemble as possible.
― AaronK (AaronK), Wednesday, 9 March 2005 20:13 (twenty-one years ago)
it's fascinating to imagine how bach might have heard his own music.
― Amateur(ist) (Amateur(ist)), Wednesday, 9 March 2005 20:17 (twenty-one years ago)
― Amateur(ist) (Amateur(ist)), Wednesday, 9 March 2005 20:18 (twenty-one years ago)
― Michael White (Hereward), Wednesday, 9 March 2005 20:27 (twenty-one years ago)
― Amateur(ist) (Amateur(ist)), Wednesday, 9 March 2005 20:28 (twenty-one years ago)
I do agree with what i read once, that the music of bach tends to sound good on any instrument. even on electric guitar.
― AaronK (AaronK), Wednesday, 9 March 2005 20:29 (twenty-one years ago)
― Curt1s St3ph3ns, Wednesday, 9 March 2005 20:32 (twenty-one years ago)
― AaronK (AaronK), Wednesday, 9 March 2005 20:32 (twenty-one years ago)
― Amateur(ist) (Amateur(ist)), Wednesday, 9 March 2005 20:32 (twenty-one years ago)
multi x-post
― Michael White (Hereward), Wednesday, 9 March 2005 20:33 (twenty-one years ago)
― Amateur(ist) (Amateur(ist)), Wednesday, 9 March 2005 20:35 (twenty-one years ago)
― The Ghost of Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Wednesday, 9 March 2005 20:36 (twenty-one years ago)
― Julio Desouza (jdesouza), Wednesday, 9 March 2005 20:37 (twenty-one years ago)
http://www.s-hamilton.k12.ia.us/antiqua/serpent2.jpg Serpent (being played by Mr. Frightening)
― The Ghost of Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Wednesday, 9 March 2005 20:37 (twenty-one years ago)
― Ian John50n (orion), Wednesday, 9 March 2005 20:39 (twenty-one years ago)
I'm pretty sure (I'm at work) that all my Purcell and Lully stuff is on period instruments. I think I actually prefer not to hear Bach on a clavichord though. I would wager that the orchestration/conducting are the most important variable to me though.
― Michael White (Hereward), Wednesday, 9 March 2005 20:41 (twenty-one years ago)
― Ian John50n (orion), Wednesday, 9 March 2005 20:42 (twenty-one years ago)
― Michael White (Hereward), Wednesday, 9 March 2005 20:43 (twenty-one years ago)
Sorry.
― Ian John50n (orion), Wednesday, 9 March 2005 20:44 (twenty-one years ago)
― AaronK (AaronK), Wednesday, 9 March 2005 20:50 (twenty-one years ago)
― jocelyn (Jocelyn), Wednesday, 9 March 2005 20:52 (twenty-one years ago)
― J0hn Darn1elle (J0hn Darn1elle), Wednesday, 9 March 2005 20:54 (twenty-one years ago)
― mark s (mark s), Wednesday, 9 March 2005 20:59 (twenty-one years ago)
This is very subjective of course, but that's really the only sensible response.
― Michael White (Hereward), Wednesday, 9 March 2005 21:04 (twenty-one years ago)
"like two skeletons copulating on a tin roof", according to Sir Thomas Beecham. A great quote, even though I'm quite fond of the harpsichord.
― OleM (OleM), Wednesday, 9 March 2005 21:12 (twenty-one years ago)
― mark s (mark s), Wednesday, 9 March 2005 21:15 (twenty-one years ago)
― Julio Desouza (jdesouza), Wednesday, 9 March 2005 21:17 (twenty-one years ago)
― OleM (OleM), Wednesday, 9 March 2005 21:21 (twenty-one years ago)
does any recording "sound" like the experience of a chamber concert of the 17th century?
Short and overly simplistic answer: modern pitches are something like half a tone higher than they were 200-150 years ago; unless "historically informed" music enthusiasts make a point of using the older, lower pitches, that would be a difference.
― j.lu (j.lu), Wednesday, 9 March 2005 21:24 (twenty-one years ago)
I would have thought that you would be even more excited by the sackbut(t), Dan.
― j.lu (j.lu), Wednesday, 9 March 2005 21:27 (twenty-one years ago)
― j.lu (j.lu), Wednesday, 9 March 2005 21:28 (twenty-one years ago)
― OleM (OleM), Wednesday, 9 March 2005 21:28 (twenty-one years ago)
Yay!
― Lukas (lukas), Wednesday, 9 March 2005 21:34 (twenty-one years ago)
― Amateur(ist) (Amateur(ist)), Wednesday, 9 March 2005 21:56 (twenty-one years ago)
― AaronK (AaronK), Wednesday, 9 March 2005 23:41 (twenty-one years ago)
19th century ballads + arrangements using 17th century-style counterpoint + pre-renaissance instruments
in shirley and dolly collins records. there's nothing "authentic" about it some strict historical sense but there's something extremely commanding and intriguing about the results. and arguably something authentic in a truer sense.
although such a combination could produce something ghastly in the hands of people with less taste and talent, i'm sure.
― Amateur(ist) (Amateur(ist)), Thursday, 10 March 2005 00:55 (twenty-one years ago)
― Geir Hongro (GeirHong), Thursday, 10 March 2005 00:56 (twenty-one years ago)
― Amateur(ist) (Amateur(ist)), Thursday, 10 March 2005 00:57 (twenty-one years ago)
― OleM (OleM), Thursday, 10 March 2005 01:26 (twenty-one years ago)
― Pangolino again, Thursday, 10 March 2005 01:43 (twenty-one years ago)
― Curious George Rides a Republican (Rock Hardy), Thursday, 10 March 2005 02:12 (twenty-one years ago)
― J0hn Darn1elle (J0hn Darn1elle), Thursday, 10 March 2005 02:38 (twenty-one years ago)