Ryan Schreiber reports:After more than five years of bringing you sad, sleepy suckers your morning music news, and reading letter after letter whining that our once-a-day, five-times-a-week updates are simply not enough to keep you abreast of the latest happenings... we've caved. Your demands were many, and our patience is not what it used to be. You want your news live, in real-time, as it happens-- not on some archaic daily schedule like the ones limited technology forced on us back when people still relied on paperboys and printing presses. Understood.
(etcetera)
Not that I care but, I don't suppose they have an RSS feed or anything? Something to dispel the smart-ass tone and become a useful improvement perhaps.
Or would that upset the advertisers and their page-impression requirements?
― [email protected], Monday, 21 March 2005 17:43 (twenty-one years ago)
― Tim Ellison (Tim Ellison), Monday, 21 March 2005 18:06 (twenty-one years ago)
But without Pitchfork, all the indie kids that Pitchfork both despises and relies on would have to find their abuse somewhere else.
― Xii (Xii), Monday, 21 March 2005 18:14 (twenty-one years ago)
― Chris Ott (Chris Ott), Monday, 21 March 2005 18:15 (twenty-one years ago)