how do I write a good tune?

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Serious question.

I've been making electronic music for about 18 years, and sometimes I turn out a melody I find quite catchy, most of the time I don't. But the music I find myself increasingly listening to is really melodic.

So I've decided I want to learn more about and understand melody better. I'm looking for pointers to good theories of what makes a good tune, what tunes are good, and any generally profound insights into them people here have.

Any thoughts?

phil jones (interstar), Thursday, 31 March 2005 18:27 (twenty-one years ago)

no definitive answer, but this book is pretty good: http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/063400638X/qid=1112297784/sr=1-1/ref=sr_1_1/002-9618715-3873660?v=glance&s=books

AaronK (AaronK), Thursday, 31 March 2005 18:36 (twenty-one years ago)

Study the collected works of Stock, Aiken, and Waterman.

Alfred Soto (Alfred Soto), Thursday, 31 March 2005 18:40 (twenty-one years ago)

Collaborate with Geir Hongro.

nabisco (nabisco), Thursday, 31 March 2005 18:40 (twenty-one years ago)

If you are really interested, you should take a music theory class. It would basically explain all you want to know, in probably a more authorative fashion than ILM can (although Geir should be along with description on harmonic bridges and their contrapuntal nature to the verse-chorus-verse form etc.)

And of course the answers to questions like "what makes a good tune" and "what tunes are good" are going to be extremely moot.

Michael F Gill (Michael F Gill), Thursday, 31 March 2005 18:42 (twenty-one years ago)

"If you are really interested, you should take a music theory class. "

I kind of expected that response. I have some musical theory. But I can't help noticing that a lot of music from people with perfectly good musical training isn't very tuneful to my ears. So there's got to be more to it than that.

" It would basically explain all you want to know, in probably a more authorative fashion than ILM can"

But I'd like to hear the ILM version rather than the standard story. I'm curious about the idea of melody here.

"And of course the answers to questions like "what makes a good tune" and "what tunes are good" are going to be extremely moot."

Probably true. I'm also open to hearing different sides of a debate about whether there's an objective truth to the matter. For example, do all the song-writing courses teach the same thing? Or are there different schools with rival ideas, and what are the outputs from the different theories?

phil jones (interstar), Thursday, 31 March 2005 19:13 (twenty-one years ago)

immitate.

AaronK (AaronK), Thursday, 31 March 2005 19:20 (twenty-one years ago)

Find some songs that you think are melodic, "good", catchy tunes... What do they have in common? ?Major keys, 1/2-step/whole-step intervals, cadence, etc ...? (i.e. I have no idea.)

dave225 (Dave225), Thursday, 31 March 2005 19:29 (twenty-one years ago)

Some understanding of major, minor, and pentatonic scales will help. I also find that thinking of songwriting in terms of 3 or 4 separate melodies that work in tandem will produce more unique results vs. writing a chord progression with one melody on top of it. Not always the case obv, but a good exercise nonetheless.

darin (darin), Thursday, 31 March 2005 19:45 (twenty-one years ago)

find a tune you really like.
change a few notes.
thats it.

zappi (joni), Thursday, 31 March 2005 19:49 (twenty-one years ago)

The ability to compose memorable, original melodies is a congenital talent. You can either naturally do it, or you can't.
Obviously, people are blessed with the ability to varying degrees, and one can hone one's talent through study and practise... but in the final analysis, a composer who lacks innate inspiration will never be able to do anything but pastiche the works of others.

Palomino (Palomino), Thursday, 31 March 2005 21:38 (twenty-one years ago)

Often, the harmonies will mean just as much as the melody itself. Also, contrast brings life to the song. There is really no hocus pocus, though. It is all in your ears and your musical training.

And, no, musicall theory may not neccessarily help. Listening to lots of generally acclaimed songs will help a lot more, as good songwriting has always been about stealing, although in a creative way.

Geir Hongro (GeirHong), Thursday, 31 March 2005 22:15 (twenty-one years ago)

"The ability to compose memorable, original melodies is a congenital talent. You can either naturally do it, or you can't. "

this is bullshit. no creative act is "congenital". being creative is a learned skill, just like anything else. You have to train your mind to do it.

Shakey Mo Collier, Thursday, 31 March 2005 22:20 (twenty-one years ago)

surprisingly, I actually kind of agree w/Geir.

Shakey Mo Collier, Thursday, 31 March 2005 22:21 (twenty-one years ago)

The ability to compose memorable, original melodies is a congenital talent. You can either naturally do it, or you can't.

No. Certainly not true. It is a learned skill, as Shakey said. Some people do it better than others, but that is because of a certain training that have made them able to do so. For instance, Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart, who is sort of the master of melody, may not have had the healthies childhood you can imagine (no "Wunderkind" had that), but I guess his extremely early music upbringing helped him think tunes in a way that most people don't. His talent was still learned though, which is something virtually all musical talent (except a good singing voice, which may be something you possess from nature) is largely about.

Geir Hongro (GeirHong), Thursday, 31 March 2005 22:27 (twenty-one years ago)

One trick you can use is find a really good (or unusual) chord progression or bassline, which will usually limit the notes you can use in your melody. Then you construct a melody out of the notes that fit with each chord. Of course, such a melody could come off sounding really forced and unnatural, so beware!

And I read somewhere that Jobim, I think, would write his verse melody and then, when he got to the bridge, collect all the notes he hadn't used yet to write the bridge melody. Of course, I can't think of any Jobim songs that demonstrate this technique, so I can't speak to its efficacy.

And I think Paul McCartney's goal in writing "Paperback Writer" was a melody that consisted of one note. Which didn't exactly happen, but it's another example of using constraints. You may stumble upon a good tune every once in a while, but it's DEFINITELY something you can achieve through hard work, as long as it doesn't sound like hard work, but that's true of anything you construct.

dr. phil (josh langhoff), Thursday, 31 March 2005 22:52 (twenty-one years ago)

> a certain training [...] made them able to do so ...

What nonsense. Beethoven had two brothers, who were brought up in the same environment as him, but I doubt you could hum a tune by either of them.
If it really were the case that compositional ability were just a function of exposure to music, the millions of people around the world who are the products of households that are appreciative of music, and who study musical instruments from their early childhoods, would all be churning out masterworks to rival those of the greats. The reality is however that most of them don't originate any music in their entire lives, because the inspiration isn't present.
Mozart himself once wrote, "I write as a sow piddles" - by which he meant that the music flowed effortlessly and copiously from his mind and hands. Obviously, if he had never been taught to play an instrument, his vast talent would most likely have remained untapped - but to suggest that his remarkable body of work could have been produced by anybody who just worked hard enough at it is absurdly reductive.

Palomino (Palomino), Friday, 1 April 2005 11:59 (twenty-one years ago)

What nonsense. Beethoven had two brothers, who were brought up in the same environment as him, but I doubt you could hum a tune by either of them.

Which may be the result of one of these

1. His brothers were just as talented as him, but got sick of being raised as "Wunderkinder" and chose to do other stuff instead of music
2. His brothers were just as talented as him, but coincidences meant their work is generally forgotten now
3. His brothers didn't manage to utilize their upbringing the same way, and as such, never equalled his talent
4. His brothers, already during growing up, didn't have a lot of motivation for music the same way Ludwig did, and as such, they never learned as much as Ludwig.

Geir Hongro (GeirHong), Friday, 1 April 2005 12:03 (twenty-one years ago)

Play a piano with one finger. Pick like 6 notes and bam melody.

David Allen (David Allen), Friday, 1 April 2005 13:27 (twenty-one years ago)

exposure and childhood training /= learning to be creative. they are necessary elements of it, but they are not the only prerequisites. the person/child must also be motivated, posess an abiding love of music and its structures, a patience with their own speed of progress, etc. These are all more elements of the personality - but they are NOT some mystical, mysterious, God-given, natural "ability" to write a melody. If you combine these attitudes with exposure to a lot of music and rigorous practice, I guarantee you you will have an inspired composer. (in other words, Geir OTM)

Shakey Mo Collier, Friday, 1 April 2005 17:11 (twenty-one years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.