* - not mandatory
― blahbarian, Friday, 6 May 2005 10:42 (twenty-one years ago)
1. Antony And The Johnsons2. Ray LaMontagne3. Rufus Wainwright4. Arcade Fire5. Willy Mason6. The Magic Numbers
for the love of sweet crimony
er, i mean.. go! the Magic Numbers
― shine headlights on me (electricsound), Friday, 6 May 2005 10:48 (twenty-one years ago)
1. The Mamas & Papas - Complete Anthology (Universal) 2. The Clash - London Calling 25th Anniversary Edition (Sony/BMG)3. Jeff Buckley - Grace 10th Anniversary Edition (Sony/BMG)4. The Kinks - Are the Village Green Preservation Society (Sanctuary)5. Jack Nitzsche Story 1962 - 1979 - Hearing is Believing (Ace Records)6. The Fall - The Complete Peel Sessions1978-2004 (Sanctuary)
Ah-HUP now! The biggest library yet! Ah-HUP now! The biggest library yet!
― mark grout (mark grout), Friday, 6 May 2005 11:05 (twenty-one years ago)
1. David Bowie2. John Lydon3. Siouxsie Sioux4. Marc Bolan5. The Ramones
Isn't it "Give stuff to the Ramones" year now?
― mark grout (mark grout), Friday, 6 May 2005 11:10 (twenty-one years ago)
― Dadaismus (Dada), Friday, 6 May 2005 11:29 (twenty-one years ago)
― steve-k, Friday, 6 May 2005 12:58 (twenty-one years ago)
the recipient of this award has enjoyed a spectacular career on a global scale.. John Lydon?
― mark grout (mark grout), Friday, 6 May 2005 12:59 (twenty-one years ago)
― Geir Hongro (GeirHong), Friday, 6 May 2005 13:00 (twenty-one years ago)
― Geir Hongro (GeirHong), Friday, 6 May 2005 13:01 (twenty-one years ago)
― Geir Hongro (GeirHong), Friday, 6 May 2005 13:03 (twenty-one years ago)
― Simon H. (Simon H.), Friday, 6 May 2005 13:04 (twenty-one years ago)
― benoit, Friday, 6 May 2005 13:07 (twenty-one years ago)
Does a band have to be rock to qualify? I don't know much about Mojo, it generally has someone I'm not very interested in on the front (Paul Weller, it seems, most of the time, when it isn't Jimi Hendrix) and so I've never explored further.
The Mamas and Papas were emphatically NOT rock. Thankfully.
― hobart paving (hobart paving), Friday, 6 May 2005 13:08 (twenty-one years ago)
No, I am just arguing against the assupmtion that Mojo readers only like "rock".
That applies only in a world where anything that isn't hip-hop, dance, electronica, R&B, funk, house nor disco is automatically classified as "rock". Which means, for instance, that all powerpop is "rock" (which it clearly isn't)
― Geir Hongro (GeirHong), Friday, 6 May 2005 13:10 (twenty-one years ago)
― mike t-diva (mike t-diva), Friday, 6 May 2005 13:26 (twenty-one years ago)
That applies only in a world where anything that isn't hip-hop, dance, electronica, R&B, funk, house nor disco is automatically classified as "rock". Which means, for instance, that all powerpop is "rock" (which it clearly isn't)"
*so* OTM here.
Rufus Wainwright may have released 4 LPs, but the Magic Numbers haven't even released a proper non-scumbag-collector-oriented single yet, so maybe this counterbalances.
― harveyw (harveyw), Friday, 6 May 2005 14:16 (twenty-one years ago)
― edd s hurt (ddduncan), Friday, 6 May 2005 14:30 (twenty-one years ago)
― mark grout (mark grout), Friday, 6 May 2005 14:31 (twenty-one years ago)
― Tim Ellison (Tim Ellison), Friday, 6 May 2005 14:37 (twenty-one years ago)
rock, guitar pop, you get my point--no blues, Southern soul,hip-hop, dance, electronica,funk, house or disco.
I love the Kinks too, but the Mojo spectrum is just so narrow.
― steve-k, Friday, 6 May 2005 14:39 (twenty-one years ago)
― Daniel_Rf (Daniel_Rf), Friday, 6 May 2005 20:55 (twenty-one years ago)
The extended R&B era iow. No, Mojo readers probably aren't very much into R&B, and in particular, they aren't much into funk and related genres.
There's still a lot to choose from though.
― Geir Hongro (GeirHong), Saturday, 7 May 2005 09:53 (twenty-one years ago)
Mojo generally covers mostly anything from the past. I don't remember if they've done a disco edition yet, but I'd expect them to.
As for current stuff, they often give good reviews to even R&B/hip-hop-related stuff, but they did put Destiny's Child on the front page once, and they got so many letters from angry readers that they will probably never do anything like that again.
― Geir Hongro (GeirHong), Saturday, 7 May 2005 09:55 (twenty-one years ago)
― elwisty (elwisty), Saturday, 7 May 2005 12:12 (twenty-one years ago)
― Geir Hongro (GeirHong), Saturday, 7 May 2005 15:37 (twenty-one years ago)