belle and sebastian really haven't aged well, now have they?

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
after listening to the boy w/ the arab strap (the last worthwhile thing they did IMHO), the whole thing just SCREAMED out "1999!" they seem pretty irrelevant to just about ANYTHING going on musically now -- that may not be a BAD thing, but that is what i think nonetheless.

Eisbär (llamasfur), Thursday, 12 May 2005 03:58 (twenty-one years ago)

i guess it's around about a time for a listen, it's really been a while. i will report back

s1ocki (slutsky), Thursday, 12 May 2005 04:05 (twenty-one years ago)

'if you're feeling sinister' and 'tigermilk' still sound pretty great, i think. i liked 'dear catastrophe waitress' too. and i think i hear them in some other bands - architecture in helsinki for one.

but yeah, there's something about 'em that still makes me think of that era.

rajeev (rajeev), Thursday, 12 May 2005 04:09 (twenty-one years ago)

I've been on a B&S binge as of late. I don't know what you mean by "relevant", but it all still sounds pretty damn great.

shanecavanaugh (shanecavanaugh), Thursday, 12 May 2005 04:24 (twenty-one years ago)

oh and i'm pretty psyched for the new comp. finally i'll have "this is just a modern rock song" on CD.

rajeev (rajeev), Thursday, 12 May 2005 04:25 (twenty-one years ago)

You know what? I do know what you mean by relevant (er...irrelevant, actually). I first started listening to B&S a little before Dear Catastrophe Waitress, so I can't comment on the timelessness of it, I guess (though it sounds pretty much so, but that's just me). I still think Tigermilk is as good as anything I've heard recently.

shanecavanaugh (shanecavanaugh), Thursday, 12 May 2005 04:29 (twenty-one years ago)

Headphone Sex posted "Your Cover's Blown" a little while back. Belle & Sebastian do seem to be in their own little world, and a pretty interesting one at that, though a different one from that which gave birth to their first several albums.

Andy Slabaugh (andy.slabaugh), Thursday, 12 May 2005 05:03 (twenty-one years ago)

I wandered into a store a couple of weeks ago where they were playing If You're Feeling Sinister full-blast. It sounded FANTASTIC.

Douglas (Douglas), Thursday, 12 May 2005 05:07 (twenty-one years ago)

they seem pretty irrelevant to just about ANYTHING going on musically now

were they particularly relevant to anything when they first came out? I always thought their irrelevance was part of their charm.

Sym Sym (sym), Thursday, 12 May 2005 06:10 (twenty-one years ago)

Relevance arguments (or those which do not define a specific context) always seem pretty dubious, as if The Committee has agreed on a single Standard Way Forward To A Bright And Shiny Future, or like they've "failed to address the terms of reference" or something. Ugh. So, yeah, 'own little word' == good.

Nag! Nag! Nag! (Nag! Nag! Nag!), Thursday, 12 May 2005 06:57 (twenty-one years ago)

As someone who came on to them very late I never noticed that they sound dated at all. To me they always sounded like they were trying to sound like a cute but really ironic folk-rock group. I always thought they were channeling things from way before 1999 too.

Cunga (Cunga), Thursday, 12 May 2005 07:17 (twenty-one years ago)

I bought "If you're feeling sinister" last week and listened to it in full for the first time just the other day - it was very reminiscent of the late nineties to me, but I can't work out whether that's just because some of the songs, some of the lyrics/lyrical themes, their sound, reminds me of people I knew then, or because of something intrinsic.

I don't really understand what relevance is, but I think that in 1999 I knew about quite a few groups/artists who had a similar sound, or at least that I connected mentally with b&s for some reason (maybe it was a nick drake influenced thing? a tweeist thing?), and that kind of style has - temporarily? - passed, been replaced by a slightly more bombastic version. But then I don't listen to much new indie these days, so for all I know...

spontine (cis), Thursday, 12 May 2005 07:33 (twenty-one years ago)

They also sound fantastic to my ears. I don't know about relevance to other bands, but they're very relevant to making me smile and starting my foot tapping.

supercub, Thursday, 12 May 2005 07:35 (twenty-one years ago)

i thought they sounded dated in the MID '90S! (not that that's a etc)

cindy williams permafrost (Jody Beth Rosen), Thursday, 12 May 2005 07:37 (twenty-one years ago)

i thought they sounded dated in the MID '90S! (not that that's a etc)

Same here, completely baffled by this relevancy angle too.

For me they always had a "past" vibe about them, a folky, rootsy 60s angle. Did anyone find them cutting edge at the time? Even their "electronic" stuff sounded very 70s to me.

Pleasant then, pleasant now - but then again I never understood the "cult" aspect which marks them as different from many other similair bands, maybe you were a big fan investing "magic" into the band and the benefit of time has given you a new outlook?

Chewshabadoo (Chewshabadoo), Thursday, 12 May 2005 07:44 (twenty-one years ago)

Their last album, Dear Catastrophe Waitress, was by some distance their best.

"irrelevant" = "I don't like it any more"

Marcello Carlin (nostudium), Thursday, 12 May 2005 07:52 (twenty-one years ago)

The problem is, how can a band be irrelevant when they're the most popular they've ever been?

Dom Passantino (Dom Passantino), Thursday, 12 May 2005 07:58 (twenty-one years ago)

The problem is the word "irrelevant."

Marcello Carlin (nostudium), Thursday, 12 May 2005 07:59 (twenty-one years ago)

after listening to the boy w/ the arab strap (the last worthwhile thing they did IMHO), the whole thing just SCREAMED out "1999!"

Well, it really screams out 1970, if you've heard Nick Drake's Bryter Later or any Donovan. B&S have always sounded dated to me.. which isn't meant as a slight against them. But I always thought that was the idea(?) of the band... maybe?

donut debonair (donut), Thursday, 12 May 2005 08:07 (twenty-one years ago)

B&S are SUBTLY contemporary, as opposed to screaming it in your face, which is why people still listen to them and not, for example, to Jesus Jones.

Marcello Carlin (nostudium), Thursday, 12 May 2005 08:11 (twenty-one years ago)

i don't turn off that one jesus jones song when it comes on the radio.

cindy williams permafrost (Jody Beth Rosen), Thursday, 12 May 2005 09:33 (twenty-one years ago)

no but it turns me off.

Marcello Carlin (nostudium), Thursday, 12 May 2005 09:36 (twenty-one years ago)

Count me in as another late-comer to B&S having put off listening to them until ILM did the best of the 90s poll a short while ago. Since then I've been hooked. I heard "Sleep The Clock Around" and thought "brilliant", downloaded "If You're Feeling Sinister" and had that on heavy rotation for a few months and now I have Dear Catastrophe Waitress, Tiger Milk, Boy With The Arab Strap and a few singles and EPs.
To me B&S are not representive of a particular time at all. They're like a hermetic experience like going to your Auntie's house and looking at old things, or reading an Iain Banks book. They never sang about the national lottery or the internet or anything like that.
If you look at what is happening in music at the moment we have Wilco, the freakfolk scene, Jennifer Gentle etc and these fit very well next to what B&S have been doing.

dog latin (dog latin), Thursday, 12 May 2005 10:24 (twenty-one years ago)

In other words, they are TIMELESS, unlike, for example, Timeless by Goldie.

Marcello Carlin (nostudium), Thursday, 12 May 2005 10:26 (twenty-one years ago)

Where does '(I've Had) the Time of My Life' by Bill Medley & Jennifer Warnes fit into all of this?

Chewshabadoo (Chewshabadoo), Thursday, 12 May 2005 10:35 (twenty-one years ago)

I owe it all to you.

Marcello Carlin (nostudium), Thursday, 12 May 2005 10:42 (twenty-one years ago)

Hm.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Thursday, 12 May 2005 11:52 (twenty-one years ago)

Who cares who is relevant or not? Good music is timeless, and works just as fine in any time or age.

Geir Hongro (GeirHong), Thursday, 12 May 2005 11:54 (twenty-one years ago)

What did "1999" sound like?

*cue Prince cut*

Alfred Soto (Alfred Soto), Thursday, 12 May 2005 11:55 (twenty-one years ago)

I first listened to them around "If You're Feeling Sinister".... they've never been contemporary in terms of sound per se; it's always been more about their voices (and accents) and Stuart Murdoch's lyrics, which are bitter and biting and sexual in a way that, say, Bryter Lyter's lyrics are not. I saw them live at one point and they were a great show.

I do know what people mean about how it seemed that there was a whole universe of music organized around Belle and Sebastian; remember Bowlie? Some of those bands (Camera Obscura!) are just B&S worshippers; others (the Delgados or Arab Strap) got a free ride because of Scottishness or that sexual edge or both; and others (The Field Mice, and especially Felt) got pulled into it retrospectively. It was a big thing. At the B&S show I went to there were more frat-boy guys singing along with "Sleep the Clock Around" than there were twee indie kids. I suspect that B&S did more to solidify a retrospective notion of what twee was then, say, Saint Etienne have.

Anyway, I still love those early records--Tigermilk, Sinister, Arab Strap. The thing I liked about them the most was what sounded to me like a pretty serious emotional heft... That's what I miss in the newer records.

mrjosh (mrjosh), Thursday, 12 May 2005 12:02 (twenty-one years ago)

At the B&S show I went to there were more frat-boy guys singing along with "Sleep the Clock Around"

The hell...? Fraternities have changed a lot since I was in school, apparently. Belle & Sebastian are the new Steve Miller?

Mark (MarkR), Thursday, 12 May 2005 12:06 (twenty-one years ago)

I know, it was crazy, re: frat boys. It was like the hugest surprise ever.

xpost: What I mean is: sure, they are less relevant today, because they were once incredibly relevant. But the old records still sound awesome.

mrjosh (mrjosh), Thursday, 12 May 2005 12:07 (twenty-one years ago)

They definitely create their own world - and their website helps a lot with that. I like this bit from Stuart's diary on Tuesday:

I’m probably better back in the kitchen. I can still see Jupiter from here.. just. Also, in the front room I spend my time gazing out over the rooftops, and don’t get anything done. I was speaking to this girl the other night, Sally, and she thinks she can see my house from her balcony.

“Oh God, I better be careful, I’m always walking about in the scud in front of the window!”

“Don’t worry about it. My neighbours seen my baps about fifteen times. I’m always sunbathing on my balcony.”

So I’ve been on constant bap patrol since last Thursday. Election Night, as it happened. Not much changed. Blair with a reduced majority; voter apathy. At least that wank Howard never got in. A wank’s always a waste of a good election.

Rick Spence (spencerman), Thursday, 12 May 2005 12:09 (twenty-one years ago)

Irrelevant to what is going on in music now = I really couldn't possibly care less, and why does this matter?

IYFS stands up to the test of time; none of the other ones were consistent at all anyway.

roxymuzak (roxymuzak), Thursday, 12 May 2005 12:26 (twenty-one years ago)

The trouble is that people confuse the term "irrelevant" with the term "music I liked five years ago but then went off."

Marcello Carlin (nostudium), Thursday, 12 May 2005 12:30 (twenty-one years ago)

Frontman, Lead Guitar and Trumpet went to see the Go-Betweens last night. Frontman was wearing that same hat he's always worn.

As for the music, I like a much smaller proportion of the new stuff than the old, but I haven't listened to any of it for ages because it's all on 12" and I don't have a turntable and Fopp are sticking to their guns and refusing to put them in the £5 section so it'll stay that way for a while. I really should get a turntable.

The DVD makes me feel slightly ill.

Madchen (Madchen), Thursday, 12 May 2005 12:30 (twenty-one years ago)

What I meant to say by the first bit, but forgot to write it down, is that compared to the rest of the G-Bs audience, they have aged rather well indeed. It was quite a wrinkly gig.

Madchen (Madchen), Thursday, 12 May 2005 12:31 (twenty-one years ago)

Well, it really screams out 1970, if you've heard Nick Drake's Bryter Later or any Donovan.
donut OTM! "Hazey Jane II" in particular.

On the bass, 57 7th, he wrote this (calstars), Thursday, 12 May 2005 12:36 (twenty-one years ago)

The Fantastic, Hopefully Comprehensive "Songs that Belle & Sebastian Songs Sound Like" List...

Madchen (Madchen), Thursday, 12 May 2005 12:41 (twenty-one years ago)

I have been listening to the compilation of the earlier eps and I feel that yes they are somewhat rooted in 1999, by which a time when indie was being Indie and courdroy rather than rock 'n roll and mullets. The music stands up, it's just the defiant fragility reminds me personally of a time and place defined by oppostion to S Club 7 and Steps rather than courting mass appeal in a way there later stuff (B&S not S Club) seems to.

elwisty (elwisty), Thursday, 12 May 2005 13:20 (twenty-one years ago)

Does anyone else rank If You're Feeling Sinister at or near the bottom of the heap?

1) Tigermilk [now traverse 18 astronomical units] 2) DCW 3) Strap 4) Sinister 5) Peasant

Aaron A., Thursday, 12 May 2005 13:31 (twenty-one years ago)

anyone who said sinister still sounds just as good as the first time they listened to it is OTM.

cutty (mcutt), Thursday, 12 May 2005 13:46 (twenty-one years ago)

Maybe they should add a DJ and have a rapper echo Stuart's lyrics a la Linkin Park. That could make them sound more current....

Rollercoaster ride/Gonna take y'all on a rollercoaster ride, yeeeah

kornrulez6969 (TCBeing), Thursday, 12 May 2005 14:04 (twenty-one years ago)

We'd like to play a new song now, latetly we've been listening to a lot of Grime...

Stick around after the gig where we're going to kick it up a notch and give you an extended 4 hour set of Minimal and Electro House.

Chewshabadoo (Chewshabadoo), Thursday, 12 May 2005 14:16 (twenty-one years ago)

Frontman, Lead Guitar and Trumpet went to see the Go-Betweens last night. Frontman was wearing that same hat he's always worn

Waitaminutewaitaminutewaitaminute. How was the Go-Betweens gig?

Alfred Soto (Alfred Soto), Thursday, 12 May 2005 14:49 (twenty-one years ago)

i don't have a housemate who plays them 24/7 now, so if anything i like them much more.

lauren (laurenp), Thursday, 12 May 2005 14:54 (twenty-one years ago)

I haven't listened to Sinister in ages.. I sold back the other one I had, Boy With The Arab Strap. My friend Joe used to play them incessantly. I don't think, if I listened to it, that Sinister would strike me the same way it did in high school (i.e. profound.)

I bet some of the instrumental bits would still rule though.

Ian John50n (orion), Thursday, 12 May 2005 14:58 (twenty-one years ago)

I rather like the Storytelling soundtrack in itslef.

dog latin (dog latin), Thursday, 12 May 2005 15:14 (twenty-one years ago)

Tigermilk still sounds great, it amazes me that this was anybody's debut record.

gygax! (gygax!), Thursday, 12 May 2005 15:48 (twenty-one years ago)

i bought more or less everything up to fold your hands... incl. 4 eps. then i lost interest. after sinister they became pale copies of themselves. and when they evolved with their latest album i didn't like that they had changed to a "normal" band with big production and stuff. those first two albums are still quite good but not as touching as when i heard them first. i hardly ever listen to them these days. i don't think their music didn't age well. maybe i didn't age well...

btw i always liked them as they reminded me of nick drake. i loved them for that nostalgic feel they gave me 25 years after drake's death. for their "datedness" even then...

alex in mainhattan (alex63), Thursday, 12 May 2005 16:43 (twenty-one years ago)

bands in their own little world >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "relevant" bands

Shakey Mo Collier, Thursday, 12 May 2005 17:03 (twenty-one years ago)

Is Electronic Renaissance supposed to sound all horrible or is that just my copy?

dog latin (dog latin), Thursday, 12 May 2005 17:10 (twenty-one years ago)

depends

RJG (RJG), Thursday, 12 May 2005 17:18 (twenty-one years ago)

Can someone please clue me in to some "relevant bands" so I can join the discussion.

everything, Thursday, 12 May 2005 19:38 (twenty-one years ago)

Electronic Renaissance sounds absolutely perfect.

gygax! (gygax!), Thursday, 12 May 2005 19:41 (twenty-one years ago)

Dog Latin, it sounds pretty horrible across the board. That said, it sounds pretty cool too. I guess what I mean is that you don't have a fucked copy.

KeefW (kmw), Thursday, 12 May 2005 19:41 (twenty-one years ago)

Although I've wondered for a decade now if I've got a fucked copy of a Guy Called Gerald's "Black Secret Technology", does anyone know?

KeefW (kmw), Thursday, 12 May 2005 20:53 (twenty-one years ago)

"Relevant bands" in pop history - Andrew WK, Pop Will Eat Itself, Menswear, Orlando, King Trigger, Animal Nightlife, Funkapolitan, Jobriath, Brett Smiley, Racing Cars, Any Trouble, the Tony Crombie Sextet, Terris.

Marcello Carlin (nostudium), Friday, 13 May 2005 05:16 (twenty-one years ago)

Although I've wondered for a decade now if I've got a fucked copy of a Guy Called Gerald's "Black Secret Technology", does anyone know?

Do you mean sort of distorted and muffled? My Vinyl copy's like that.

Reminds me I must dig that out and have another listen. Slow-Jungle.

Chewshabadoo (Chewshabadoo), Friday, 13 May 2005 07:40 (twenty-one years ago)

The hell...? Fraternities have changed a lot since I was in school, apparently.

Well, there could be a link.


I wasn't a big B&S fan. But Lazy Line Painter Jane is one of my favourite songs ever. Bought the single way back and played it on repeat for an hour.

nathalie's baby (stevie nixed), Friday, 13 May 2005 07:43 (twenty-one years ago)

I was hoping this thread would be about the physical decline of Stuart Murdoch and co and how they weren't fanciable anymore

Dadaismus (Dada), Friday, 13 May 2005 08:25 (twenty-one years ago)

Were they ever?

Marcello Carlin (nostudium), Friday, 13 May 2005 08:47 (twenty-one years ago)

No, but the idea that someone somewhere might have thought they were amused me - mind you, that wee bird who was in them was no bad looking

Dadaismus (Dada), Friday, 13 May 2005 08:51 (twenty-one years ago)

You want fanciable - have a look at the sleeve of Derek B and Evan P's London Concert wot has just been reissued on Emanem. They are standing at a bus stop. Derek B looks like Jarvis Cocker's Rain Man older brother and the ladies will love his sexy 1975 duffel coat. Evan P, meanwhile, looks like an Al-Qaeda operative.

Marcello Carlin (nostudium), Friday, 13 May 2005 08:59 (twenty-one years ago)

Does anyone else rank If You're Feeling Sinister at or near the bottom of the heap?

I do. The rest is slightly less stripped-down, and sound better to my ears.

Geir Hongro (GeirHong), Friday, 13 May 2005 09:41 (twenty-one years ago)

"Relevant bands" in pop history - Andrew WK, Pop Will Eat Itself, Menswear, Orlando, King Trigger, Animal Nightlife, Funkapolitan, Jobriath, Brett Smiley, Racing Cars, Any Trouble, the Tony Crombie Sextet, Terris.

Also, Baby Bird, Simple Kid, Seahorses, Space, Drugstore, Darling Buds, Fauves, Preston School of Industry, Tricky, Sigur Ros, The For Carnation.

everything, Friday, 13 May 2005 16:16 (twenty-one years ago)

Bit unfair on Tricky and The For Carnation but otherwise OTM.

Marcello Carlin (nostudium), Monday, 16 May 2005 05:55 (twenty-one years ago)

For some reason I pair Belle & Sebastian in my head with the Wu Tang Clan -- both eccentric, sprawling, clubby, insular. Two of the best bands of the '90s, and I think they both still stand up just fine.

gypsy mothra (gypsy mothra), Monday, 16 May 2005 06:13 (twenty-one years ago)

Wu-Tang had the better solo spinoff records, however.

Marcello Carlin (nostudium), Monday, 16 May 2005 06:21 (twenty-one years ago)

Isobel Campbell's Wu: The 13th Disciple is supposed to be fucking awesome, though.

Gear! (can Jung shill it, Mu?) (Gear!), Monday, 16 May 2005 06:43 (twenty-one years ago)

Not a patch on Nigga Please by Looper.

Marcello Carlin (nostudium), Monday, 16 May 2005 06:44 (twenty-one years ago)

you ain't lived till you've heard stevie jackson's "glasgow zoo." he's probably cussing up a storm, but you can't understand it w/ that thick-ass glasgewian accent!

Eisbär (llamasfur), Monday, 16 May 2005 15:27 (twenty-one years ago)

SHIMMERY SHIMMERY YEAH

s1ocki (slutsky), Monday, 16 May 2005 21:41 (twenty-one years ago)

Shame on a Frigger

gypsy mothra (gypsy mothra), Monday, 16 May 2005 22:05 (twenty-one years ago)

there used to be a zoo, in glasgow, but I'm not sure SJ ever had a glaswegian accent.

RJG (RJG), Monday, 16 May 2005 22:13 (twenty-one years ago)

three years pass...

For some reason I pair Belle & Sebastian in my head with the Wu Tang Clan -- both eccentric, sprawling, clubby, insular. Two of the best bands of the '90s, and I think they both still stand up just fine.

― gypsy mothra (gypsy mothra), Sunday, May 15, 2005 11:13 PM (3 years ago) Bookmark

pretty genius comparison, that is. and the wu and belle & sebastian may be my 2 favorite 90s acts, not coincidentally.

Eisbaer, Sunday, 5 October 2008 07:57 (seventeen years ago)

i actually disagree strongly with the idea that they haven't aged well. there are isolated songs that sound odd ("Electronic Renaissance"), but most of the Sinister album has aged magnificently to my ears.

Shushtari (res), Sunday, 5 October 2008 19:32 (seventeen years ago)

..plus they released The Life Pursuit in 2006 shortly after this post and just kept it all going! I'm another fan of both Belle and Sebastian and the Wu Tang Clan who likes the comparison, hah!

mineminefusic (Finefinemusic), Sunday, 5 October 2008 19:48 (seventeen years ago)

For some reason I pair Belle & Sebastian in my head with the Wu Tang Clan

you're not the only one... I remember some time back in Glasgow, that Avalanche record shop had a sign up advertising a free t-shirt for the purchaser of any "Indie Wu-Tang" record.

The Real Dirty Vicar, Sunday, 5 October 2008 19:56 (seventeen years ago)

there used to be a zoo, in glasgow,

the pinefox, Sunday, 5 October 2008 21:26 (seventeen years ago)

the old records have aged, very well indeed

the pinefox, Sunday, 5 October 2008 21:26 (seventeen years ago)

i don't think a band of pop classicists like b+s could sound dated in the first place. a lot of their tunes could have been made any time since the late 60s.

skinny jeans + tight plaid shirt (internet person), Sunday, 5 October 2008 21:36 (seventeen years ago)

i think what happens is people discover B&S and fall in love with them, forgo the effete tweeness and sensitivity for their strong sense of lyricism and melody and end up listening to practically nothing else for months. then a few years later they dig out "boy with the arab strap" and "sinister" and all they can hear are these songs about school bullies and anorexics and church meetings, thinking "what on earth was i doing getting into this embarassing sentimental slop?"

It's not that B&S have aged badly, but it's subjective thing.

For the record I still think they're a fine band but I'm not sure I can listen to them in the same way i did back when I first got into them.

dog latin, Monday, 6 October 2008 08:30 (seventeen years ago)

I disagree with you.

the pinefox, Monday, 6 October 2008 11:30 (seventeen years ago)

ah it's that WE have aged badly, right?

Mark G, Monday, 6 October 2008 11:33 (seventeen years ago)

We have aged baldly indeed.

NickB, Monday, 6 October 2008 11:36 (seventeen years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.