― Eisbär (llamasfur), Thursday, 12 May 2005 03:58 (twenty-one years ago)
― s1ocki (slutsky), Thursday, 12 May 2005 04:05 (twenty-one years ago)
but yeah, there's something about 'em that still makes me think of that era.
― rajeev (rajeev), Thursday, 12 May 2005 04:09 (twenty-one years ago)
― shanecavanaugh (shanecavanaugh), Thursday, 12 May 2005 04:24 (twenty-one years ago)
― rajeev (rajeev), Thursday, 12 May 2005 04:25 (twenty-one years ago)
― shanecavanaugh (shanecavanaugh), Thursday, 12 May 2005 04:29 (twenty-one years ago)
― Andy Slabaugh (andy.slabaugh), Thursday, 12 May 2005 05:03 (twenty-one years ago)
― Douglas (Douglas), Thursday, 12 May 2005 05:07 (twenty-one years ago)
were they particularly relevant to anything when they first came out? I always thought their irrelevance was part of their charm.
― Sym Sym (sym), Thursday, 12 May 2005 06:10 (twenty-one years ago)
― Nag! Nag! Nag! (Nag! Nag! Nag!), Thursday, 12 May 2005 06:57 (twenty-one years ago)
― Cunga (Cunga), Thursday, 12 May 2005 07:17 (twenty-one years ago)
I don't really understand what relevance is, but I think that in 1999 I knew about quite a few groups/artists who had a similar sound, or at least that I connected mentally with b&s for some reason (maybe it was a nick drake influenced thing? a tweeist thing?), and that kind of style has - temporarily? - passed, been replaced by a slightly more bombastic version. But then I don't listen to much new indie these days, so for all I know...
― spontine (cis), Thursday, 12 May 2005 07:33 (twenty-one years ago)
― supercub, Thursday, 12 May 2005 07:35 (twenty-one years ago)
― cindy williams permafrost (Jody Beth Rosen), Thursday, 12 May 2005 07:37 (twenty-one years ago)
Same here, completely baffled by this relevancy angle too.
For me they always had a "past" vibe about them, a folky, rootsy 60s angle. Did anyone find them cutting edge at the time? Even their "electronic" stuff sounded very 70s to me.
Pleasant then, pleasant now - but then again I never understood the "cult" aspect which marks them as different from many other similair bands, maybe you were a big fan investing "magic" into the band and the benefit of time has given you a new outlook?
― Chewshabadoo (Chewshabadoo), Thursday, 12 May 2005 07:44 (twenty-one years ago)
"irrelevant" = "I don't like it any more"
― Marcello Carlin (nostudium), Thursday, 12 May 2005 07:52 (twenty-one years ago)
― Dom Passantino (Dom Passantino), Thursday, 12 May 2005 07:58 (twenty-one years ago)
― Marcello Carlin (nostudium), Thursday, 12 May 2005 07:59 (twenty-one years ago)
Well, it really screams out 1970, if you've heard Nick Drake's Bryter Later or any Donovan. B&S have always sounded dated to me.. which isn't meant as a slight against them. But I always thought that was the idea(?) of the band... maybe?
― donut debonair (donut), Thursday, 12 May 2005 08:07 (twenty-one years ago)
― Marcello Carlin (nostudium), Thursday, 12 May 2005 08:11 (twenty-one years ago)
― cindy williams permafrost (Jody Beth Rosen), Thursday, 12 May 2005 09:33 (twenty-one years ago)
― Marcello Carlin (nostudium), Thursday, 12 May 2005 09:36 (twenty-one years ago)
― dog latin (dog latin), Thursday, 12 May 2005 10:24 (twenty-one years ago)
― Marcello Carlin (nostudium), Thursday, 12 May 2005 10:26 (twenty-one years ago)
― Chewshabadoo (Chewshabadoo), Thursday, 12 May 2005 10:35 (twenty-one years ago)
― Marcello Carlin (nostudium), Thursday, 12 May 2005 10:42 (twenty-one years ago)
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Thursday, 12 May 2005 11:52 (twenty-one years ago)
― Geir Hongro (GeirHong), Thursday, 12 May 2005 11:54 (twenty-one years ago)
*cue Prince cut*
― Alfred Soto (Alfred Soto), Thursday, 12 May 2005 11:55 (twenty-one years ago)
I do know what people mean about how it seemed that there was a whole universe of music organized around Belle and Sebastian; remember Bowlie? Some of those bands (Camera Obscura!) are just B&S worshippers; others (the Delgados or Arab Strap) got a free ride because of Scottishness or that sexual edge or both; and others (The Field Mice, and especially Felt) got pulled into it retrospectively. It was a big thing. At the B&S show I went to there were more frat-boy guys singing along with "Sleep the Clock Around" than there were twee indie kids. I suspect that B&S did more to solidify a retrospective notion of what twee was then, say, Saint Etienne have.
Anyway, I still love those early records--Tigermilk, Sinister, Arab Strap. The thing I liked about them the most was what sounded to me like a pretty serious emotional heft... That's what I miss in the newer records.
― mrjosh (mrjosh), Thursday, 12 May 2005 12:02 (twenty-one years ago)
The hell...? Fraternities have changed a lot since I was in school, apparently. Belle & Sebastian are the new Steve Miller?
― Mark (MarkR), Thursday, 12 May 2005 12:06 (twenty-one years ago)
xpost: What I mean is: sure, they are less relevant today, because they were once incredibly relevant. But the old records still sound awesome.
― mrjosh (mrjosh), Thursday, 12 May 2005 12:07 (twenty-one years ago)
I’m probably better back in the kitchen. I can still see Jupiter from here.. just. Also, in the front room I spend my time gazing out over the rooftops, and don’t get anything done. I was speaking to this girl the other night, Sally, and she thinks she can see my house from her balcony.
“Oh God, I better be careful, I’m always walking about in the scud in front of the window!”
“Don’t worry about it. My neighbours seen my baps about fifteen times. I’m always sunbathing on my balcony.”
So I’ve been on constant bap patrol since last Thursday. Election Night, as it happened. Not much changed. Blair with a reduced majority; voter apathy. At least that wank Howard never got in. A wank’s always a waste of a good election.
― Rick Spence (spencerman), Thursday, 12 May 2005 12:09 (twenty-one years ago)
IYFS stands up to the test of time; none of the other ones were consistent at all anyway.
― roxymuzak (roxymuzak), Thursday, 12 May 2005 12:26 (twenty-one years ago)
― Marcello Carlin (nostudium), Thursday, 12 May 2005 12:30 (twenty-one years ago)
As for the music, I like a much smaller proportion of the new stuff than the old, but I haven't listened to any of it for ages because it's all on 12" and I don't have a turntable and Fopp are sticking to their guns and refusing to put them in the £5 section so it'll stay that way for a while. I really should get a turntable.
The DVD makes me feel slightly ill.
― Madchen (Madchen), Thursday, 12 May 2005 12:30 (twenty-one years ago)
― Madchen (Madchen), Thursday, 12 May 2005 12:31 (twenty-one years ago)
― On the bass, 57 7th, he wrote this (calstars), Thursday, 12 May 2005 12:36 (twenty-one years ago)
― Madchen (Madchen), Thursday, 12 May 2005 12:41 (twenty-one years ago)
― elwisty (elwisty), Thursday, 12 May 2005 13:20 (twenty-one years ago)
1) Tigermilk [now traverse 18 astronomical units] 2) DCW 3) Strap 4) Sinister 5) Peasant
― Aaron A., Thursday, 12 May 2005 13:31 (twenty-one years ago)
― cutty (mcutt), Thursday, 12 May 2005 13:46 (twenty-one years ago)
Rollercoaster ride/Gonna take y'all on a rollercoaster ride, yeeeah
― kornrulez6969 (TCBeing), Thursday, 12 May 2005 14:04 (twenty-one years ago)
Stick around after the gig where we're going to kick it up a notch and give you an extended 4 hour set of Minimal and Electro House.
― Chewshabadoo (Chewshabadoo), Thursday, 12 May 2005 14:16 (twenty-one years ago)
Waitaminutewaitaminutewaitaminute. How was the Go-Betweens gig?
― Alfred Soto (Alfred Soto), Thursday, 12 May 2005 14:49 (twenty-one years ago)
― lauren (laurenp), Thursday, 12 May 2005 14:54 (twenty-one years ago)
I bet some of the instrumental bits would still rule though.
― Ian John50n (orion), Thursday, 12 May 2005 14:58 (twenty-one years ago)
― dog latin (dog latin), Thursday, 12 May 2005 15:14 (twenty-one years ago)
― gygax! (gygax!), Thursday, 12 May 2005 15:48 (twenty-one years ago)
btw i always liked them as they reminded me of nick drake. i loved them for that nostalgic feel they gave me 25 years after drake's death. for their "datedness" even then...
― alex in mainhattan (alex63), Thursday, 12 May 2005 16:43 (twenty-one years ago)
― Shakey Mo Collier, Thursday, 12 May 2005 17:03 (twenty-one years ago)
― dog latin (dog latin), Thursday, 12 May 2005 17:10 (twenty-one years ago)
― RJG (RJG), Thursday, 12 May 2005 17:18 (twenty-one years ago)
― everything, Thursday, 12 May 2005 19:38 (twenty-one years ago)
― gygax! (gygax!), Thursday, 12 May 2005 19:41 (twenty-one years ago)
― KeefW (kmw), Thursday, 12 May 2005 19:41 (twenty-one years ago)
― KeefW (kmw), Thursday, 12 May 2005 20:53 (twenty-one years ago)
― Marcello Carlin (nostudium), Friday, 13 May 2005 05:16 (twenty-one years ago)
Do you mean sort of distorted and muffled? My Vinyl copy's like that.
Reminds me I must dig that out and have another listen. Slow-Jungle.
― Chewshabadoo (Chewshabadoo), Friday, 13 May 2005 07:40 (twenty-one years ago)
Well, there could be a link.
I wasn't a big B&S fan. But Lazy Line Painter Jane is one of my favourite songs ever. Bought the single way back and played it on repeat for an hour.
― nathalie's baby (stevie nixed), Friday, 13 May 2005 07:43 (twenty-one years ago)
― Dadaismus (Dada), Friday, 13 May 2005 08:25 (twenty-one years ago)
― Marcello Carlin (nostudium), Friday, 13 May 2005 08:47 (twenty-one years ago)
― Dadaismus (Dada), Friday, 13 May 2005 08:51 (twenty-one years ago)
― Marcello Carlin (nostudium), Friday, 13 May 2005 08:59 (twenty-one years ago)
I do. The rest is slightly less stripped-down, and sound better to my ears.
― Geir Hongro (GeirHong), Friday, 13 May 2005 09:41 (twenty-one years ago)
Also, Baby Bird, Simple Kid, Seahorses, Space, Drugstore, Darling Buds, Fauves, Preston School of Industry, Tricky, Sigur Ros, The For Carnation.
― everything, Friday, 13 May 2005 16:16 (twenty-one years ago)
― Marcello Carlin (nostudium), Monday, 16 May 2005 05:55 (twenty-one years ago)
― gypsy mothra (gypsy mothra), Monday, 16 May 2005 06:13 (twenty-one years ago)
― Marcello Carlin (nostudium), Monday, 16 May 2005 06:21 (twenty-one years ago)
― Gear! (can Jung shill it, Mu?) (Gear!), Monday, 16 May 2005 06:43 (twenty-one years ago)
― Marcello Carlin (nostudium), Monday, 16 May 2005 06:44 (twenty-one years ago)
― Eisbär (llamasfur), Monday, 16 May 2005 15:27 (twenty-one years ago)
― s1ocki (slutsky), Monday, 16 May 2005 21:41 (twenty-one years ago)
― gypsy mothra (gypsy mothra), Monday, 16 May 2005 22:05 (twenty-one years ago)
― RJG (RJG), Monday, 16 May 2005 22:13 (twenty-one years ago)
For some reason I pair Belle & Sebastian in my head with the Wu Tang Clan -- both eccentric, sprawling, clubby, insular. Two of the best bands of the '90s, and I think they both still stand up just fine.
― gypsy mothra (gypsy mothra), Sunday, May 15, 2005 11:13 PM (3 years ago) Bookmark
pretty genius comparison, that is. and the wu and belle & sebastian may be my 2 favorite 90s acts, not coincidentally.
― Eisbaer, Sunday, 5 October 2008 07:57 (seventeen years ago)
i actually disagree strongly with the idea that they haven't aged well. there are isolated songs that sound odd ("Electronic Renaissance"), but most of the Sinister album has aged magnificently to my ears.
― Shushtari (res), Sunday, 5 October 2008 19:32 (seventeen years ago)
..plus they released The Life Pursuit in 2006 shortly after this post and just kept it all going! I'm another fan of both Belle and Sebastian and the Wu Tang Clan who likes the comparison, hah!
― mineminefusic (Finefinemusic), Sunday, 5 October 2008 19:48 (seventeen years ago)
For some reason I pair Belle & Sebastian in my head with the Wu Tang Clan
you're not the only one... I remember some time back in Glasgow, that Avalanche record shop had a sign up advertising a free t-shirt for the purchaser of any "Indie Wu-Tang" record.
― The Real Dirty Vicar, Sunday, 5 October 2008 19:56 (seventeen years ago)
there used to be a zoo, in glasgow,
― the pinefox, Sunday, 5 October 2008 21:26 (seventeen years ago)
the old records have aged, very well indeed
i don't think a band of pop classicists like b+s could sound dated in the first place. a lot of their tunes could have been made any time since the late 60s.
― skinny jeans + tight plaid shirt (internet person), Sunday, 5 October 2008 21:36 (seventeen years ago)
i think what happens is people discover B&S and fall in love with them, forgo the effete tweeness and sensitivity for their strong sense of lyricism and melody and end up listening to practically nothing else for months. then a few years later they dig out "boy with the arab strap" and "sinister" and all they can hear are these songs about school bullies and anorexics and church meetings, thinking "what on earth was i doing getting into this embarassing sentimental slop?"
It's not that B&S have aged badly, but it's subjective thing.
For the record I still think they're a fine band but I'm not sure I can listen to them in the same way i did back when I first got into them.
― dog latin, Monday, 6 October 2008 08:30 (seventeen years ago)
I disagree with you.
― the pinefox, Monday, 6 October 2008 11:30 (seventeen years ago)
ah it's that WE have aged badly, right?
― Mark G, Monday, 6 October 2008 11:33 (seventeen years ago)
We have aged baldly indeed.
― NickB, Monday, 6 October 2008 11:36 (seventeen years ago)