It's hard to see how Roll Deep can make much money. There's so many of them: 12-odd MCs - including Breeze, Brazen, Jet Le, Riko, Flow Dan, Scratchy, Manga, Roachee and the excellently named Taliban Trim - plus DJs Karnage and Maximum and producers Wiley, Weed and Target. But when they do come into cash, they roll deep. "Split it in half," says Flow Dan. "Right down the middle."
Flow Dan coined the name in 2001, but the crew first came together in the mid-1990s. Target, Wiley and Flow Dan were all early members; so was Mercury prize-winner Dizzee Rascal. The latter's departure appears not to have had any dramatic effect. "I think he had a different vision to us anyway," shrugs Breeze. "That said," adds Weed, "people could learn a lot from that boy."
As the line-up changed, so did the sound. Now Roll Deep are considered forerunners of the British street sound grime, a name they reluctantly put up with but complain is negative and limiting. A vibrant stew of influences, grime borrows from UK garage, dancehall, eastern instrumentation and video arcade game effects. Not to mention the pop music the crew grew up with. "My mum would hoover listening to Sinéad O'Connor, Bob Marley, Tracy Chapman, Phil Collins," says Weed. "Always music, everywhere. All of us have had that from our families."
Music has already made the crew famous in their area. Up-and-coming rhymer Discarda, 17, Man Fred, 25, and numerous others on baby BMXs patiently follow the boys as they wander about the estate pointing out the sights. "I had a Desert Eagle [gun] put in my face there," Breeze says nonchalantly, nodding towards a second-level landing. "I was being lairy to this guy and he pulled the gun out and said, 'You don't like me, do you?' And then he wanted us to rob a shop with him," he says, shaking his head. "He was on Valium and all that," reckons Target.
They talk casually about the crime that has become a part of everyday estate life; point out "dead man alley", where "a couple" of people have died in mysterious circumstances; reminisce about a man who once got his face blown up; gossip about the crackheads, prostitutes and drug dealers who inhabit their residence. You'd imagine that such violent imagery would inform the majority of their album, but not so. In fact, the MCs have decided to all but steer clear of gun chatter and bad-man metaphors. Alongside lyrics about the worrying rise of gun offences are tales of police harassment, admissions of their fondness for weed and women, and awkward expressions of love.
Of course, violence still creeps in. "We live in the poorest borough in England and we haven't all had perfect happy family lives so if the MCs didn't cover it in some way we'd be lying," says Weed. "But we all went to school and got brought up properly. We're not just some moody hood-rats, we've got something to say."
That's not to say the boys themselves are angels. They constantly clash with other artists, Lethal B's Fire Camp in particular and most recently Demon, while both Riko and Taliban Trim admit to having "done time" for sentences they'd rather not discuss. "Whatever I got nicked for, I'm not that person any more. I know that myself," insists Riko.
But, Riko says, it's up to Roll Deep to show young kids that there's more to lyrical expression than dealing drugs and murdering people - subjects they admit to having covered extensively in the past. "Yout's today don't feel comfortable unless they're being a bad boy. 'Bore you out, my brother's a gunman,' blah, blah," he sighs. "If you chat negative you're supposed to be good, but that's bullshit. There's too many films like Kill Bill and rappers like 50 Cent with his bulletproof vests; turn on the TV and you get the war or look outside and what do you see on your own doorstep? It's too much."
Musically, too, the album veers into the unexpected. Grime has become known as tech-fest of odd bleeps and cutting-edge effects; In at the Deep End, however, offers irreverent samples and insanely catchy choruses that borrow liberally from 1980s bubblegum beats.
"This is a musical album, not just a grime thing," says Riko. "We've always wanted to branch out but we felt like we couldn't before because no one would have took it seriously." Adds Taliban Trim: "I want people to know that we can spit over anything because we're that versatile." While they admit they are concerned that their underground fan base may be disappointed, not finding the album edgy enough, the crew refuse to follow well-worn paths - and in any case, they're convinced other people will scramble to emulate them. "Watch producers try and bite it," smirks Wiley seconds later on Shake a Leg.
For Roll Deep, the point is not to stay in the grime underground. "My dream is to sell more than anyone else in the scene has, to sell more than a million," says Trim. After all, how else will they escape east London?
"It's not like we want to forget where we're from, but I want more than just the underground to hear this album," concludes Danny. "If I'm honest, I'm want the world to hear our music."
In at the Deep End is out on June 6 on Relentless.
― blahbariantheoriginal, Tuesday, 24 May 2005 09:02 (twenty-one years ago)
Good piece though.
― $V£N! (blueski), Tuesday, 24 May 2005 09:05 (twenty-one years ago)
Target otm! Canary Wharf is so beautiful.
"Watch producers try and bite it," smirks Wiley
to be honest I am a little afraid that this will happen.
― The Lex (The Lex), Tuesday, 24 May 2005 09:06 (twenty-one years ago)
Dizzee as Jay-Z, Rolldeep as Wu-Tang?
― $V£N! (blueski), Tuesday, 24 May 2005 09:08 (twenty-one years ago)
― Ronan (Ronan), Tuesday, 24 May 2005 09:12 (twenty-one years ago)
i thoguth this was one of the better newspaper articles about grime.
― ambrose (ambrose), Tuesday, 24 May 2005 09:55 (twenty-one years ago)
― Marcello Carlin (nostudium), Tuesday, 24 May 2005 09:55 (twenty-one years ago)
― ambrose (ambrose), Tuesday, 24 May 2005 10:03 (twenty-one years ago)
― blahbariantheoriginal, Tuesday, 24 May 2005 10:05 (twenty-one years ago)
― Marcello Carlin (nostudium), Tuesday, 24 May 2005 10:09 (twenty-one years ago)
― charltonlido (gareth), Tuesday, 24 May 2005 10:12 (twenty-one years ago)
― Marcello Carlin (nostudium), Tuesday, 24 May 2005 10:13 (twenty-one years ago)
re: wu-tang, wu-tang never compromised to get noticed. they stayed 'true' to their original ethos.
― blahbariantheoriginal, Tuesday, 24 May 2005 10:14 (twenty-one years ago)
― Marcello Carlin (nostudium), Tuesday, 24 May 2005 10:14 (twenty-one years ago)
― blahbariantheoriginal, Tuesday, 24 May 2005 10:17 (twenty-one years ago)
It is a good article though.
― The Lex (The Lex), Tuesday, 24 May 2005 10:17 (twenty-one years ago)
http://www.swr3.de/__pix/cover/500x435/5074.jpg
― Dom Passantino (Dom Passantino), Tuesday, 24 May 2005 10:19 (twenty-one years ago)
i love the album btw
― ambrose (ambrose), Tuesday, 24 May 2005 10:20 (twenty-one years ago)
― blahbariantheoriginal, Tuesday, 24 May 2005 10:22 (twenty-one years ago)
i havent heard the roll deep album, but theres a definite feeling they have to succeed with this one, or its over (not something wu-tang were faced with circa 36 chambers?)
― charltonlido (gareth), Tuesday, 24 May 2005 10:23 (twenty-one years ago)
― charltonlido (gareth), Tuesday, 24 May 2005 10:26 (twenty-one years ago)
― Marcello Carlin (nostudium), Tuesday, 24 May 2005 10:28 (twenty-one years ago)
― Marcello Carlin (nostudium), Tuesday, 24 May 2005 10:29 (twenty-one years ago)
wu-tang might have done the odd single or done the odd collaboration for the pop charts but never so insultingly/half-heartedly and they only did it in spurts. tical might have spawned the mary j duet, but that album was as grungy and goth as hip hop could have gotten in 94.
roll deep will never create an an empire cos theyre too busy second guessing the great british public. they will never win like this, nor will they be respected. theyre gonna be 'stuck' (their words) in the underground, but now theyre gonna be commercial failures too, who compromised, but sadly failed at it. if youre gonna 'sell out', at least sell out of the shops too. of course, this is just ominous forecasting, hopefully they will sell some units.
― blahbariantheoriginal, Tuesday, 24 May 2005 10:30 (twenty-one years ago)
― Dom Passantino (Dom Passantino), Tuesday, 24 May 2005 10:35 (twenty-one years ago)
I have no problem with grime adding commercial elements, I'm pretty much Shystie's only defender on ILM, but if you're going to do that you have to make it...not lame and weak like In At The Deep End. KWhat I've heard of the Kano album does it perfectly, actually, apart from 'Typical Me'.
Or like the Crazy Titch/Keisha Sugababes duet! I'm convinced that could have been a decent-sized hit had it been a proper single.
― The Lex (The Lex), Tuesday, 24 May 2005 10:35 (twenty-one years ago)
― The Lex (The Lex), Tuesday, 24 May 2005 10:36 (twenty-one years ago)
as for the album, it still soudns a lot stranger than the commercial r'n'b pap being described by anyone here. i really dont see it as "pop", in the popular sense, and i think it will bomb. I think this mayeb wileys last throw of the dice. that doesnt go for all of roll deep, i think riko, trim for instance have enough presence/character/persona to build on it. cf kano when he was in nasty.
― ambrose (ambrose), Tuesday, 24 May 2005 10:37 (twenty-one years ago)
the weird thing is that the R&G stuff is way better than the R&B shit on roll deeps album. i mean, wiley did grime meets R&B way better himself on special girl in 2004....
as for the kano album, well that seems like a (musically) innovative hip hop album more than a grime one. i suppose its getting blurrier though.
― blahbariantheoriginal, Tuesday, 24 May 2005 10:40 (twenty-one years ago)
― $V£N! (blueski), Tuesday, 24 May 2005 10:44 (twenty-one years ago)
― blahbariantheoriginal, Tuesday, 24 May 2005 10:46 (twenty-one years ago)
I want grime to sell millions too but a) this is not the way to do it, and b) I think it can sell millions doing what it does, kind of - the music is not the barrier, the distribution &c is.
― The Lex (The Lex), Tuesday, 24 May 2005 10:49 (twenty-one years ago)
― Dom Passantino (Dom Passantino), Tuesday, 24 May 2005 10:49 (twenty-one years ago)
The question is then, what is the way to do it? Because I was looking at the Radio 1 playlist a minute ago, and there appear to be very few in-roads.
― Dom Passantino (Dom Passantino), Tuesday, 24 May 2005 10:50 (twenty-one years ago)
― blahbariantheoriginal, Tuesday, 24 May 2005 10:52 (twenty-one years ago)
― Dom Passantino (Dom Passantino), Tuesday, 24 May 2005 10:55 (twenty-one years ago)
― The Lex (The Lex), Tuesday, 24 May 2005 10:56 (twenty-one years ago)
i saw keisha at the de la soul gig in kentish town the other day. shes tiny!
― blahbariantheoriginal, Tuesday, 24 May 2005 11:04 (twenty-one years ago)
― snotty moore, Tuesday, 24 May 2005 11:10 (twenty-one years ago)
ima side with ambrose here; hearing the dull dull useless dull apologist rmx of 'the avenue', hearing kano's slickly uninspiring desire just to be competent, i came to be so glad that roll deep dared to be rubbish in the first place. twisted!
and the limbo feel charltonlido outlines... what does becoming established in england, that middle stage posited here between underground realness and overground "soft white gut" (whtvr) actually look like? does it just look like a cd-shaped official end-of-year-list document of what anyone who would already care already knows? why this contradictory confidence in albums as proof of pop penetration anyway? roll deep are the ppl's champs, streets locked without question by now, and have already paid their uncompromising dues surely. and it's not like they stopped being grimey is it, unrelenting pirates, 12s, riddims are still runnning parallel to everything, more than any other crew this year i should think.
― hold tight the private caller (mwah), Tuesday, 24 May 2005 11:24 (twenty-one years ago)
― DJ Mencap0))), Tuesday, 24 May 2005 11:31 (twenty-one years ago)
― blahbariantheoriginal, Tuesday, 24 May 2005 11:33 (twenty-one years ago)
― Tom (Groke), Tuesday, 24 May 2005 11:40 (twenty-one years ago)
― blahbariantheoriginal, Tuesday, 24 May 2005 11:42 (twenty-one years ago)
― Tom (Groke), Tuesday, 24 May 2005 11:48 (twenty-one years ago)
the funny thing is, i bet kano's album is going to end up sounding quite listenable as a whole, and might do v well. but hearing each track slip out by itself, be it radio 1 or internet leak, has been massively underwhelming. 156 diff directions - yet is there a single in there? its an interesting relationship.
(cmon the album thing shdnt be too hard to disprove, chop chop ppl)
― hold tight the private caller (mwah), Tuesday, 24 May 2005 12:00 (twenty-one years ago)
track 1 (intro) 0- hiphop bombasttrack 2 - sort of r'n'bish, but ice puck sounds and squaling anachronistic guitar makes it un-beverly knight to me. track 3 - sort of hiphop, in the aim high style. why does everyone like this shit on the aim high mixtape but not on this album. i hate targets piano lines. track 4 - shake a leg......r;n;b?!?!?!!? amerie will be doing really cheap, bad samba music, with dead cheesey and funny lines like "this is loco to flow to"??!?!?!?! i dont reckon!track 5 - more guitar power moves. did they make r'n'b 20 years ago? wasnt it caleld soul then or something?track 6 - they dont know. target puts in accordian instead of piano, thank fuck. this is sort of r'n'b ish (i dont even know what that m,eans i guess). track 7 - okay, this is the killer tune. a straight rip of somethign straight outta 198?. kids laugh at this stuff, they dont buy it. track 8 - ground zzero. straight eskitrack 9 - sortta eski/hiphop. bit boringtrack 10 - the first straight up r'n'b tune ive got to. doesnt seem that bad as it goes. nice harp (?!) line. alex whatshername (is it her?) is a competent singer. track 11 - more piano target badness. this is hiphop, i guess. track 12 - i guess this is another r'n'b track. that makes 2 so far. track 13 - the avenue. this isnt pop. this isnt hiphop. this isnt rnb. this is just.........fucking weird! off the chain! the only people that listen to this music are 50 yr olds in social clubs! check they bit where some one tuenlessly sings along! awesome! zemko is right, the avenures remix is so boring, spineless.track 14 - eski. this is pretty good!track 15 - more grimetrack 16 - YES! more fucked up 80s soul funk stuff! still not pop, as in modern pop music!track 17- bit boring target hiphop.track 18 - yep, its kinda r'n'bishtrack 19 - decent hiphop sortta tune. track 20 - final rnb tune.
that makes 4 out of 20 by my count. i think people need to go back and listen to some of those mixtapes! all grime comps etc have X number of lameish hiphop/rnb tunes, why is this album any different?i realsie that my "rundown" has cruely exposed my lack of knowledge about any of this shit, but it realyl does strike me that you are overstating the commercial/pop/rnb aspects of this album. just cos it doesnt all sound like "frontline riddim"!
― ambrose (ambrose), Tuesday, 24 May 2005 12:12 (twenty-one years ago)
like, yeah...
― N_RQ, Tuesday, 24 May 2005 12:23 (twenty-one years ago)
― hold tight the private caller (mwah), Tuesday, 24 May 2005 12:32 (twenty-one years ago)
― N_RQ, Tuesday, 24 May 2005 12:35 (twenty-one years ago)
― the black hand, Tuesday, 24 May 2005 14:18 (twenty-one years ago)