Luckily there are better songs on "The Woods" - and lucky for the girls that this thing is at the end.
― Alfred Soto (Alfred Soto), Tuesday, 24 May 2005 21:00 (twenty-one years ago)
― cindy williams permafrost (Jody Beth Rosen), Tuesday, 24 May 2005 21:03 (twenty-one years ago)
― jaymc (jaymc), Tuesday, 24 May 2005 21:07 (twenty-one years ago)
― joseph cotten (joseph cotten), Tuesday, 24 May 2005 21:15 (twenty-one years ago)
― Gear! (can Jung shill it, Mu?) (Gear!), Tuesday, 24 May 2005 21:19 (twenty-one years ago)
― miccio (miccio), Tuesday, 24 May 2005 21:37 (twenty-one years ago)
― miccio (miccio), Tuesday, 24 May 2005 21:39 (twenty-one years ago)
― miccio (miccio), Tuesday, 24 May 2005 21:40 (twenty-one years ago)
I feel like the only reason this song is linger than 3 1/2 minutes was so reviewers could comment on their "bold new direction" with longer songs. I feel like Green Day beat them to the punch in this regard.
― Actor Sizemore fails drug test with fake penis (jingleberries), Tuesday, 24 May 2005 21:43 (twenty-one years ago)
― Gear! (can Jung shill it, Mu?) (Gear!), Tuesday, 24 May 2005 21:44 (twenty-one years ago)
We're getting off target, though. I wanna talk about SK's attempt at a magnum opus. The Zep comparisons strike me as ludicrous; even in their epic stuff, their blues background kept their arrangements terse and coiled.
― Alfred Soto (Alfred Soto), Tuesday, 24 May 2005 21:44 (twenty-one years ago)
― miccio (miccio), Tuesday, 24 May 2005 22:13 (twenty-one years ago)
i'm no led zep expert but i feel embarrased for s-k that that comparison is being leveled. it doesn't work.
― reina, Thursday, 26 May 2005 07:08 (twenty-one years ago)
― Michael F Gill (Michael F Gill), Thursday, 26 May 2005 07:26 (twenty-one years ago)
nd I only heard the single so far - who knows, I may really dig this album - but i just wanted to give props to Manthony for that really sharp line he had in his Stylus review abt how you can't seriously attack the patriarchy if you're aping The Who, etc. Word. That was h0t.
― Vichitravirya XI, Thursday, 26 May 2005 10:24 (twenty-one years ago)
― jaymc (jaymc), Thursday, 26 May 2005 18:17 (twenty-one years ago)
― Matthew C Perpetua (inca), Friday, 27 May 2005 01:34 (twenty-one years ago)
― Matthew C Perpetua (inca), Friday, 27 May 2005 01:36 (twenty-one years ago)
― Ian John50n (orion), Friday, 27 May 2005 01:36 (twenty-one years ago)
― A Viking of Some Note (Andrew Thames), Friday, 27 May 2005 01:48 (twenty-one years ago)
― Ian John50n (orion), Friday, 27 May 2005 01:53 (twenty-one years ago)
― A Viking of Some Note (Andrew Thames), Friday, 27 May 2005 05:58 (twenty-one years ago)
― MindInRewind (Barry Bruner), Saturday, 28 May 2005 17:02 (twenty-one years ago)
As far as "Let's Call it Love" goes: bloated, wanky, overstuffed and simply insufferable for a band that used to play within and around the "punk aesthetic" so masterfully
Kind of like half the other songs on this album. I'm very underwhelmed...gah
In everything I've read about The Woods, no one ever seems to mention that "Wilderness" is the best and most musically interesting song on the record. It blows my mind that this would not be a universal opinion.
Matt once again has the same exact opinion as me...other than Wilderness, which is still flawed due to that unnecessary jerk-off section inserted around 2:06 and ending around 2:31, i quite like the single, and "Rollercoaster" is also ace. the rest i don't know yet how i feel about, but a few are definitely differing degrees of blah, as of yet
and come on..."Jenny" is one of their very best songs
― Vichitravirya XI, Saturday, 28 May 2005 19:37 (twenty-one years ago)