Anyway, that is what we get for not having a landed aristocracy with tons o' money to blow on artistic patronage anymore, innit?
What kind of musical culture would Western Society have if all the music that was released publically was directly funded by some sort of Elite upper class/"landed gentry"/aristocracy...
― Lord Custos Omicron (Lord Custos Omicron), Thursday, 26 May 2005 02:48 (twenty-one years ago)
― j blount (papa la bas), Thursday, 26 May 2005 02:51 (twenty-one years ago)
― Orbit (Orbit), Thursday, 26 May 2005 02:52 (twenty-one years ago)
― shine headlights on me (electricsound), Thursday, 26 May 2005 02:53 (twenty-one years ago)
― ken taylrr (ken taylrr), Thursday, 26 May 2005 06:05 (twenty-one years ago)
― Lord Custos Omicron (Lord Custos Omicron), Thursday, 26 May 2005 06:29 (twenty-one years ago)
― Stewart Osborne (Stewart Osborne), Thursday, 26 May 2005 10:00 (twenty-one years ago)
2) Please a select audience.Appeal to a very selective demographic. Discerning musical gourmands with lots of money who will sponsor you and keep you (Heck, it worked for Tchaikovski), and enter into a very personal relationship with your fans. Until they also get bored or offended by some imagined or actual slight and withdraw their lifelines)
The problem is, as Colin Newman of Wire described it, music making is a balance between prostitution (pleasing your customer only) and masturbation (pleasing yourself only). Reducing your 'funding' to one patron means a hand to mouth existance, and no chance of doing something that your patron dislikes...
― mark grout (mark grout), Thursday, 26 May 2005 10:06 (twenty-one years ago)
― LRJP! (LRJP!), Thursday, 26 May 2005 10:16 (twenty-one years ago)
― mark grout (mark grout), Thursday, 26 May 2005 10:17 (twenty-one years ago)
― Kv_nol (Kv_nol), Thursday, 26 May 2005 10:25 (twenty-one years ago)
the key stuff you have to look at is 'released'. it's not as if music was ever restricted to that which was paid for by the aristocracy, and although i'm not 100% on the early history of recorded sound, i doubt that this was exclusively aimed at the aristos either. so what are you blithering on about?
― N_RQ, Thursday, 26 May 2005 10:45 (twenty-one years ago)
well, erm, the roots of these musics *did* happen anyway, they co-existed with the 'classical' tradition... what do you think 'folk' means?
― N_RQ, Thursday, 26 May 2005 10:48 (twenty-one years ago)
― JOCKEY, Thursday, 26 May 2005 14:20 (twenty-one years ago)
― The Sensational Sulk (sexyDancer), Thursday, 26 May 2005 14:33 (twenty-one years ago)
...so what are you blithering on about?Not sure yet. It just sounds like a fun idea for a science fiction story.
Hip Hop would be all about breeding.So, Crips aren't as good as Bloods because Bloods have officially recognized pedigrees?
― Lord Custos Omicron (Lord Custos Omicron), Thursday, 26 May 2005 15:22 (twenty-one years ago)
― teeny (teeny), Thursday, 26 May 2005 15:51 (twenty-one years ago)
― mark s (mark s), Thursday, 26 May 2005 19:26 (twenty-one years ago)
― Lord Custos Omicron (Lord Custos Omicron), Friday, 27 May 2005 00:40 (twenty-one years ago)