A Nirvana-Style Cleansing of Emo Bands?

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed

i was just working on some homework and my tv was on MTV2, and i caught two videos, one by Senses Fail and one by Hawthorne Heights. now, ive liked some of this emo stuff in the past, but my gut reaction to both of these videos was total revulsion.

now, id imagine this is how someone probably felt around 1990 when they saw a Ratt or Nelson or Poison video, this nauseated feeling of "this has so been done". those bands, like bands like Fall Out Boy and Relient K today, seem to be the height of cheese.

what im wondering, in two parts, is this: is it revisionist history on my part to believe that Nirvana/Grunge came along and completely obliterated the whole hair metal thing, making mainstream rock somewhat interesting for a few years before becoming a parody of itself? (i was only 9 when nevermind came out, still probably listening to DJ Jazzy Jeff)

and secondly, is something like that even possible with a style of music like emo? the one fundamental difference i can see between todays emo and yesterdays hair metal is the cult of legitimacy. the whole name of the game today is about how much you really MEAN it, the bloodstain on your shirt, the dear john email, so on, so forth. If my assumption is right, that Nirvana came along with something *real*, how could anything possibly out*real* emo?

or am i just totally off base on all of this?

JD from CDepot, Thursday, 28 July 2005 16:38 (twenty years ago)

It's all about the formulae. The parameters are just given different names every decade, that's all.

Also, I think it's your age as well -- and there's nothing wrong with your take on this, nor your revulsion.

donut ferry (donut), Thursday, 28 July 2005 16:44 (twenty years ago)

how could anything possibly out*real* emo?

If emo is "real", I want no part of reality.

Alex in NYC (vassifer), Thursday, 28 July 2005 16:47 (twenty years ago)

I'm avoid the word "real" as much as possible. I think Nirvana were "real" in the sense that they seemed genuinely awkwardly at the right place and right time when their second album came out, and didn't originally intend to be careerist about what they did from square one... but they certainly went through the motions, eventually.

Nirvana aren't the only act to be in that position though.. and that isn't restricted to dance music. It's not as common when acts that accidentally stumble upon success become a legacy and not a blip, though.

donut ferry (donut), Thursday, 28 July 2005 16:47 (twenty years ago)

and that isn't restricted to dance music.

and that isn't restricted to rock music. sorry.

(Although there were a few dancey Nirvana songs... kinda.)

donut ferry (donut), Thursday, 28 July 2005 16:48 (twenty years ago)

I think that emo is an extension of the need to be *real* that was grunge begat. Hair bands were self CENTERED, and grunge, and therefore emo, is self CONCIOUS (did I spell that right?). So, what is the next step past self-conciousness on this continuum? I expect it will be Awareness. Here'e where I see it going

CENTERED = look at me
CONCIOUS = Why are they looking at me
Awareness = They are looking at ME, and I know who ME is.

So, self-centered songwriters wrote stuff that was about their appearance. Self-concious song writers write music about figuring out what it is that they are doing/feeling/saying/hearing. Self-aware people write about...hmmmm.

But I agree that it feels like there may be something else coming around...if we could all take a reasoned look at controversy these days instead of just sticking our heads in the ground and not listening to each other, than maybe an open discourse about things like abortion, the war on terror, prisoner's rights, AIDS, etc., could be brought to a musical forum. As it is now, I think that a large amount of music out there right now is pacifying pablam, designed to be easily digestable and totally distracting from anything that could be controversial.

Big Loud Mountain Ape (Big Loud Mountain Ape), Thursday, 28 July 2005 16:50 (twenty years ago)

And yeah, I'm kinda with Alex on the "real"/emo thing. There's nothing any more real about Hawthorne Heights than REO Speedwagon. Or less real, for that matter. (in that I can safely assume the band are not robots.)

"Issue" rock has always been around, has (usually) always been occasional and benign, and will (usually) remain occasional and benign, as far as pop music goes.

donut ferry (donut), Thursday, 28 July 2005 16:52 (twenty years ago)

well, first of all, im not saying Emo is real. i agree with the distinction between centered and concious, but first and foremost, rock music descends from theatre, so it is essentially unreal.

that said, my guess is that Hawthorne Heights is seen as more *real* by their fans than REO Speedwagon was by theirs. Emo has this sort of need for Gangsta Rap style suburban street cred that mainstream rock fans even thought about, say, 25 years ago.

JD from CDepot, Thursday, 28 July 2005 16:58 (twenty years ago)

*never even thought about*

JD from CDepot, Thursday, 28 July 2005 17:00 (twenty years ago)

B-b-b-but Nirvana knocked Skid Row and Michael Jackson off the Top 10...not just caused rocks bands to rethink.

PappaWheelie (PappaWheelie), Thursday, 28 July 2005 17:01 (twenty years ago)

Does anyone even care about the current wave of pop punk anymore? Maybe I am just TOO OLD.

I'm Hi, Jared Fogle (ex machina), Thursday, 28 July 2005 17:02 (twenty years ago)

Yeah, I don't think emo has anything to do with being "real"--it has to do with feeling and having strong feelings, but feelings that are accessible, essentially, to 15-year-old kids. It is about a kind of swoony, shallow emotionalism, not about anything like authenticity. Nirvana were angry, and anger leans a little more on authenticity or 'reality' than anything I see in emo.

I would say that emo is going to be swept away by the return of real anger to pop music. Remember when Enimem's "Mosh" was on the radio and the extremely angry video was on TV? That's the kind of stuff that I imagine will just drown out emo pseudo-emotion. Angry music like that has strong feelings that will appeal to the emo kids when they get a little older.

mrjosh (mrjosh), Thursday, 28 July 2005 17:05 (twenty years ago)

I listened to the Promise Ring's Nothing Feels Good the other day and it sounded NOTHING like what emo is today. At the time I remember it being some sort of touchstone. Now it sounds like indie rock. It's a great album. I don't know exactly how this pertains to the thread at hand, but oh well.

mcd (mcd), Thursday, 28 July 2005 17:08 (twenty years ago)

that said, my guess is that Hawthorne Heights is seen as more *real* by their fans than REO Speedwagon was by theirs.

I wouldn't be too secure in that guess. Then again, I was nine when REO Speedwagon were big, sooo....

B-b-b-but Nirvana knocked Skid Row and Michael Jackson off the Top 10...not just caused rocks bands to rethink.

It opened the doors for a lot of great, a lot of shitty, and a WHOLE lot of mediocre would-be-independent bands to sign mostly shitty major label deals.

would say that emo is going to be swept away by the return of real anger to pop music.

This is assuming pop music never had elements of anger in the first place. It has been there, and will always be there. The manner in which anger manifests itself in the results might change, but the presence of anger will slightly fluctuate at most.

donut ferry (donut), Thursday, 28 July 2005 17:08 (twenty years ago)

This is assuming pop music never had elements of anger in the first place. It has been there, and will always be there. The manner in which anger manifests itself in the results might change, but the presence of anger will slightly fluctuate at most.

Well it's always hard to talk about 'pop music' in general like I just did; but at least in emo the emotions are Dawson's Creek, Garden State emotions--that is, not really serious intense ones. Look at American Idiot--that's not a very angry record (like "Boulevard of Broken Dreams" is not that angry), but it was so relatively angry that the buzz on it revolved around how Green Day were pissed off, angry at the world, etc. They were actually the ultimate emo band at that point, since they had the aforementioned "suburban cred" + a healthy dose of anger.

mrjosh (mrjosh), Thursday, 28 July 2005 17:13 (twenty years ago)

No no, I'm actually referring to pop music since the late 50s as well. PLENTY of angry love songs back then.. extremely common. They just didn't use distortion pedals and jittery music videos to express them, then.

donut ferry (donut), Thursday, 28 July 2005 17:17 (twenty years ago)


donut, do you really think that fans of REO Speedwagon or Journey thought that their bands spoke for them the way that fans of Dashboard Confessional and Taking Back Sunday view their idols? (no, im not very secure in my guess, its just a hunch)

JD from CDepot, Thursday, 28 July 2005 17:19 (twenty years ago)

well, they probably did indeed think that they'd keep on loving you, cause that was the only thing they wanted to do, they didn't want to sleep, they just wanted to keep on loving you

Zack Richardson (teenagequiet), Thursday, 28 July 2005 17:22 (twenty years ago)


Scise it

Issac, Thursday, 28 July 2005 17:23 (twenty years ago)

Emo ain't real...I see them kidz acting all happy and shit. Plus they all seem to have girlfriends. Back in my day, indie rockers didn't have girlfriends!

M@tt He1geson (Matt Helgeson), Thursday, 28 July 2005 17:29 (twenty years ago)

Hold the phone a second...if whiny post-indie rockers (by which I can mean either Nirvana or the emo band of your choice.) are the new mainstream, wouldn't the only way to "rebel" against (*cough*) "TEH REALNESS" would be to champion some band that is the epitome of fake?

Also, side question (considering me and a friend were bickering last night about how much of Emo can be blamed on Cobain...): So...How much of Emo can be blamed on Cobain (I mean, instead of Husker Du)?

Lord Custos Omicron (Lord Custos Omicron), Thursday, 28 July 2005 17:34 (twenty years ago)

more like how much of emo can be blamed on a 90's childhood (answer: a lot)

Zack Richardson (teenagequiet), Thursday, 28 July 2005 17:39 (twenty years ago)

I don't get what it would mean to 'blame' emo on Cobain. Sure, emo (as long as a ton of other music) has something to do with him, but it's not his fault as such.

I blame Death Cab for Cutie, not Cobain or the Promise Ring, for today's radio-friendly emo.

mrjosh (mrjosh), Thursday, 28 July 2005 17:40 (twenty years ago)

see, ive thought about this too, the whole supposed Cobain/Emo causal relationship. Oscar Wilde once said that the entire world had grown sad because Shakespeare had written Hamlet (or something along those lines, i dont remember the real quote)

sure, teh kidz maybe happy to see their bands in concert, but a certain joy is completely absent in emo that was deffinately there in hair metal and most of mainstream rock. sometimes im not to sure that cobain isn't the reason most of rock since him has been moody, if not outright depressed.

and as for the epitome of fake, isn't that the relationship between glitter rock and the over-earnestness of the sixties? (again, broad generalization, no *real* idea of what im talking about)

JD from CDepot, Thursday, 28 July 2005 17:41 (twenty years ago)

Weezer had a big hand in it too....I'd say Pinkerton is more the ground zero of current day emo than Nirvana (maybe Sunny Day figures in too)....

M@tt He1geson (Matt Helgeson), Thursday, 28 July 2005 17:44 (twenty years ago)

Franz Ferdinand and the Killers sure seem self-aware to me.

Eppy (Eppy), Thursday, 28 July 2005 17:48 (twenty years ago)

Any connection between Nirvana and emo is news to me, and sounds more like cheap or lazy revisionism. I thought the accepted narrative was organic growth of "emocore" out of the DC hardcore scene.

I blame Weezer - =W=:emo::Nirvana:grunge, bringin' it to the people. (xpost)

Death Cab still just strike me as indie pop, but then, emo no longer really means anything. I've heard kids argue strenuously that Sufjan Stevens is emo. Because he, y'know, sings about feelings and stuff. By which measure, Howlin' Wuff might as well be emo too. Is it unusual for a "new" genre to be so invested in "claiming" other artists for its own? Or is that just what rock'n'roll has always done?

PS - I would have killed to see a Ratt video in 1990. It was the Michael Bolton, Mr. Big, etc. stuff that felt most brutal. And there was plenty of great music happening in the "college rock" world at the time that got blown away by grunge along with the Wilson Phillipses.

rogermexico (rogermexico), Thursday, 28 July 2005 17:54 (twenty years ago)


"sounds more like cheap or lazy revisionism"

yeah, thats my gut feeling too, despite what I said above

JD from CDepot, Thursday, 28 July 2005 17:57 (twenty years ago)

Hair-metal killed new wave; grunge killed hair-metal; alt-pop killed grunge; hip-pop killed alt-pop; nu-metal killed hip-pop; nu-garage killed nu-metal; pop-punk killed nu-garage; emo killed pop-punk ...

Who buys into this dumb timeline, except for MTV watchers/Rolling Stone readers?

Charlie Chocolate, Thursday, 28 July 2005 18:00 (twenty years ago)

"MTV watchers/Rolling Stone readers"

= teh kids

rogermexico (rogermexico), Thursday, 28 July 2005 18:08 (twenty years ago)

(b/c rilly, who wants to identify with/purchase the music of a subculture that has been killed? Buy with confidence from a winner! And so it goes, round and round. Cha-ching!)

rogermexico (rogermexico), Thursday, 28 July 2005 18:10 (twenty years ago)

Which is to say, that "dumb timeline" is vitally important to the music biz.

rogermexico (rogermexico), Thursday, 28 July 2005 18:11 (twenty years ago)

There was anger in pop music in the years immediately leading up to Nevermind with Public Enemy, N.W.A. and Megadeth among many others. Also, I'm pretty sure bands like Helmet and Pantera would have recieved airplay regardless of whether Nirvana happened or not. As for today's music, I think System Of A Down seem pretty angry. However, it would be cool if some rap returned to being angry. Public Enemy seemed very close to actually being the soundtrack to some kind of revolution, and then it all disappeared somehow, around 94-ish.

Of course, it would be cool if a highly accesible angry group (like Nirvana) got huge and wiped out emo. I absolutely agree.

billstevejim (billstevejim), Friday, 29 July 2005 02:34 (twenty years ago)

http://www.emerchandise.com/images/p/GHB/pdSTGHB0002.jpg

rogermexico (rogermexico), Friday, 29 July 2005 02:42 (twenty years ago)

I think if we had another Sept 11th size attack (with WMDs?) we'd see all this posturing go away. If New York got nuked tomorrow who'd care about what some twenty-two-year-old emoboy was singing about?

Like others have said, emo is no more real than any other genre. I doubt most modern emo people could even articulte their frustration without just talking about meaningless buzzwords like feeling "disenfranchised", "lost", or "angry at society" (what does that even mean?).

Cunga (Cunga), Friday, 29 July 2005 04:58 (twenty years ago)

what we really need to 'wipe the slate clean' is something pure, robotic, cold, but fun. not in a hedonistic, disco sense either, something....more subversive of Kapitalist values.

hedonism and sulking, feeders of the Kapitalist Ego meat flesh machine need to be eliminated.

das latebloomer (latebloomer), Friday, 29 July 2005 05:12 (twenty years ago)

we need terminator rock

latebloomer: You may order a puppet similar to this one (latebloomer), Friday, 29 July 2005 05:14 (twenty years ago)

http://turbine.slackworks.com/robots/jc/tx.jpg

rogermexico (rogermexico), Friday, 29 July 2005 05:21 (twenty years ago)

phooey!

http://turbine.slackworks.com/robots/jc/tx.jpg

rogermexico (rogermexico), Friday, 29 July 2005 05:21 (twenty years ago)

I think it's time for the culture to whipe its ass with Nirvana and their mythic cult.

James Slone (Freon Trotsky), Friday, 29 July 2005 14:36 (twenty years ago)

Not that I wouldn't like to see emo purged, mind you.

James Slone (Freon Trotsky), Friday, 29 July 2005 14:37 (twenty years ago)

Any connection between Nirvana and emo is news to me, and sounds more like cheap or lazy revisionism. I thought the accepted narrative was organic growth of "emocore" out of the DC hardcore scene.

This paragraph is really funny as Dave Grohl was the drummer for DISCHORD RECORDS band "SCREAM".

I'm Hi, Jared Fogle (ex machina), Friday, 29 July 2005 14:42 (twenty years ago)

>is it revisionist history on my part to believe that Nirvana/Grunge came along and completely obliterated the whole hair metal thing, making mainstream rock somewhat interesting for a few years before becoming a parody of itself?<

how is this revisionist? it's been one of rock criticism's biggest cliche's for years now (and the first part is dead wrong, as well).

xhuxk, Friday, 29 July 2005 14:44 (twenty years ago)

I have a feeling that white boyz will still be clutching their guitars fiercely and defensively as a power symbol for quite a few decades.

Curt1s St3ph3ns, Friday, 29 July 2005 14:45 (twenty years ago)

Nirvana will always be overglorified because Cobain blew out the back of his head. It's the usual hyperbolic rock-n-roll death cult.

James Slone (Freon Trotsky), Friday, 29 July 2005 14:47 (twenty years ago)

If New York got nuked tomorrow who'd care about what some twenty-two-year-old emoboy was singing about?

Can we change that to Chicago or St.Louis or Los Angeles or something? Hasn't New York already taken one for the damn team already? Sheesh.

Alex in NYC (vassifer), Friday, 29 July 2005 14:48 (twenty years ago)

>the first part is dead wrong<

as is the second part, come to think of it. (don't know about you, but i'd take white stripes or franz ferdinand over fucking pearl jam anyday.)

xhuxk, Friday, 29 July 2005 14:50 (twenty years ago)

don't know about you, but i'd take white stripes or franz ferdinand over fucking pearl jam anyday

I find it so refreshing when Chuck and I agree on things.

Alex in NYC (vassifer), Friday, 29 July 2005 14:54 (twenty years ago)

>> Any connection between Nirvana and emo is news to me...

>This paragraph is really funny as Dave Grohl was the drummer for DISCHORD RECORDS band "SCREAM".

pwned!

I guess I was asking for it with that "any."

rogermexico (rogermexico), Friday, 29 July 2005 15:09 (twenty years ago)

Scream are D.C. hardcore, yeah, but....were they considered Emo??

Alex in NYC (vassifer), Friday, 29 July 2005 15:15 (twenty years ago)

heh nirvana took jawbreaker out on tour with them, so theres another emo connection

latebloomer: You may order a puppet similar to this one (latebloomer), Friday, 29 July 2005 15:16 (twenty years ago)

Six degrees of emo!

rogermexico (rogermexico), Friday, 29 July 2005 15:18 (twenty years ago)

Nirvana shared a practice space with Kill Rock Stars guitar shredders UNWOUND who, if not emo themselves, certainly helped set the tone for much of the post-hardcore scene of the 90s.

I'm Hi, Jared Fogle (ex machina), Friday, 29 July 2005 15:18 (twenty years ago)

Nate Mendel and William Goldsmith, members of EMO PIONEERS, Sunny Gay Feel Prostate, were also in FOO FIGHTERS.

I'm Hi, Jared Fogle (ex machina), Friday, 29 July 2005 15:21 (twenty years ago)

see its all part of the same continuuismnum

latebloomer: You may order a puppet similar to this one (latebloomer), Friday, 29 July 2005 15:25 (twenty years ago)

Yay Unwoud! I love their singles comp and their last album, Leaves Turn You Inside out is great!!! I need to buy more of their stuff...Their singer kinda LOOKED like Kurt Cobain when I saw them on their last tour....

M@tt He1geson (Matt Helgeson), Friday, 29 July 2005 15:32 (twenty years ago)

you guys are somehow forgetting one of the lynch-pins in the whole equation!
Smashing Pumpkins trumps Weezer.
where did the whole tortured theater come from, more so SP than Nirvana, i'd say...

eedd, Friday, 29 July 2005 15:48 (twenty years ago)

"Every single emo band is now an enemy of the Republic."

http://thousandrobots.com/blog/files/palpatine_02.jpg

Alfred Soto (Alfred Soto), Friday, 29 July 2005 16:06 (twenty years ago)

"Where's Cobain?"

"It would seem in you anger you accidentally killed him."

"NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!"

James Slone (Freon Trotsky), Friday, 29 July 2005 16:08 (twenty years ago)

Emo begins with BUDDY HOLLY, who demonstrated that you wear glasses with thick, black frames, and still rock and ladykill.

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/9/90/Buddyholly-emo.jpg

The next major contribution comes from TEH BEATLES, who introduced the notion of a cute frontman who both sings and plays electric bass guitar into the pop lexicon.

Then came the 70s, when everyone was too busy dancing and doing "party drugs" to express their true feelings, which were instead hidden away deep inside their lonely souls.

But TEH POLICE revived the cute, bass-playing frontman meme, and added an element of rebellious, authority-defying PUNK ROCK.

So that's how there is emo.

http://www.silver-dragon-records.com/images/hoover_emo.jpg

rogermexico (rogermexico), Friday, 29 July 2005 16:10 (twenty years ago)

Before there was emo there was emu:

http://www.mapleglen.co.nz/pics/birds/emu.jpg

Alfred Soto (Alfred Soto), Friday, 29 July 2005 16:18 (twenty years ago)

ihttp://namm.harmony-central.com/WNAMM04/Content/E-mu/PR/Emulator-X-Studio-lg.jpg

PappaWheelie (PappaWheelie), Friday, 29 July 2005 19:49 (twenty years ago)

I spent years convinced that emo was related to this guy:

Ihttp://www.bobandtom.com/gen3/8cover_img/emo_phillips.jpg

Chewshabadoo (Chewshabadoo), Saturday, 30 July 2005 01:22 (twenty years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.