― Chris O'Connor (Chris O'Connor), Monday, 22 August 2005 06:32 (twenty years ago)
― Robin Goad (rgoad), Monday, 22 August 2005 06:38 (twenty years ago)
http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk_news/story/0,3604,1553680,00.html
― Robin Goad (rgoad), Monday, 22 August 2005 06:39 (twenty years ago)
Soft drugs (weed, mushrooms) are completely non-lethaland virtually non-addictive.
― medic, Monday, 22 August 2005 06:43 (twenty years ago)
― snowballing (snowballing), Monday, 22 August 2005 08:03 (twenty years ago)
― Myonga Von Bontee (Myonga Von Bontee), Monday, 22 August 2005 08:08 (twenty years ago)
― Chris O., Monday, 22 August 2005 10:35 (twenty years ago)
hippie
― Banana Nutrament (ghostface), Monday, 22 August 2005 11:00 (twenty years ago)
― m coleman (lovebug starski), Monday, 22 August 2005 11:51 (twenty years ago)
"Smart" is more accurate.
― medic, Monday, 22 August 2005 23:34 (twenty years ago)
― shookout (shookout), Monday, 22 August 2005 23:57 (twenty years ago)
But in medical literature, there are no severe or consistentPHYSICAL withdrawl symptoms, and it's potential foraddiction is low, much less than caffeineas a matter of FACT.
― medicfact, Tuesday, 23 August 2005 03:13 (twenty years ago)
And it's the same for any drug.
― shookout (shookout), Tuesday, 23 August 2005 15:19 (twenty years ago)
"I don't smoke weed or sess, cuz it's known to give a brother brain damage." - Dr. Dre, MD
― M@tt He1geson (Matt Helgeson), Tuesday, 23 August 2005 15:34 (twenty years ago)
Or, in this case, on Reuters' Web publishing tool. :-)
― Chris O., Tuesday, 23 August 2005 16:28 (twenty years ago)
― sam g (seahorsegeniurs), Tuesday, 23 August 2005 16:41 (twenty years ago)
― Dom Passantino (Dom Passantino), Tuesday, 23 August 2005 16:42 (twenty years ago)
― Chris O., Tuesday, 23 August 2005 18:36 (twenty years ago)
― Shaun (shaun), Tuesday, 23 August 2005 19:12 (twenty years ago)
1) 100% Non-Lethal
2) Less addictive than caffeine, nicotine, alcohol, speed etc.
Just because certain *individuals* have great difficulty quitting,doesn't mean that Cannabis is in the same addictive category asthe above-mentioned drugs.Your anecdotal hype does NOT refutethe BIG-PICTURE COMPARATIVE REALITY.Some people are 'addicted'to junk food, 'addicted' to biting their nails, 'addicted' tosports, 'addicted' to sex, 'addicted' to the internet, etc.
If you take a control group of 10,000 regular Cannabis users, andput them up against 10,000 regular users of coffee or nicotineor alcohol, and compare the presence/severity of withdrawlsymptoms, you see truth in a wider context based on SCIENCE.
MORONS !
― medic, Wednesday, 24 August 2005 02:21 (twenty years ago)
― sleep (sleep), Wednesday, 24 August 2005 02:38 (twenty years ago)
― jake b. (cerybut), Wednesday, 24 August 2005 02:41 (twenty years ago)
not true! i almost died laughing once
― amon (eman), Wednesday, 24 August 2005 02:52 (twenty years ago)
my older brother has smoked 10 joints/day for 30 years, whenhe takes a day off he sleeps 12 hrs./day, but what does thatactually prove ? nothing.it's anecdotal nonsense.applicableto a given individual, but not to larger populationalsamples.
― Chris B., Wednesday, 24 August 2005 03:53 (twenty years ago)
― medic, Wednesday, 24 August 2005 03:55 (twenty years ago)
Quite phenomenal indeed.
― medic, Wednesday, 24 August 2005 03:58 (twenty years ago)
― jmeister (jmeister), Wednesday, 24 August 2005 03:58 (twenty years ago)
What's very important is to recognize that a (legal) tobaccoaddict smokes 20-30 grams/day, 365 days/yr, mainlydue to nicotine being HIGHLY addictive.The averageamount smoked for regular cannabis users is 6-12grams per week.Tobacco addicts light upevery 5-20 minutes, and with pot becomingmore potent in thc, most pot smokers take a hoot or 2, and flyfor hours before having another.
Also, there are many many comparative studies whichprove that cannabis smoke contains more of certaintoxins, though less of others.The reefer-madness hypeof "pot smoke is 10 or 100 times more carcinogenic"is utter nonsense.The 2 forms of smoke are very similarin toxicity, especially when both forms employthe same filter mechanism.
― medic, Wednesday, 24 August 2005 04:09 (twenty years ago)
― Maike, Wednesday, 24 August 2005 04:10 (twenty years ago)
― Forksclovetofu (Forksclovetofu), Wednesday, 24 August 2005 04:12 (twenty years ago)
― amon (eman), Wednesday, 24 August 2005 04:36 (twenty years ago)
― jimmy glass (electricsound), Wednesday, 24 August 2005 04:38 (twenty years ago)
― Chris B., Wednesday, 24 August 2005 04:49 (twenty years ago)
― shookout (shookout), Wednesday, 24 August 2005 11:31 (twenty years ago)
This thread is funny. POT IS 100% HARM FREE!!!! IT'S PROVEN BY SCIENCE!!!!
― Colonel Poo (Colonel Poo), Wednesday, 24 August 2005 11:41 (twenty years ago)
― bump, Monday, 5 September 2005 22:17 (twenty years ago)