Ultimate Battles: Fun House vs. Paranoid

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
http://images.amazon.com/images/P/B000005IU2.01._SCLZZZZZZZ_.jpg http://images.amazon.com/images/P/B000002KHH.01._SCLZZZZZZZ_.jpg

Released within a year of each other, both albums were positively seizmic in terms of their influence. Both hard as nails, but where Fun House swaggers, Paranoid bludgeons. Both dip their respective toes in jazz (albeit to very different degrees).

But....which beats which?

Alex in NYC (vassifer), Monday, 22 August 2005 17:17 (twenty years ago)

Funhouse beats everything

Diddyismus the Blind (of Alexandria) (Dada), Monday, 22 August 2005 17:21 (twenty years ago)

FH

k/l (Ken L), Monday, 22 August 2005 17:26 (twenty years ago)

FWIW, I too pick Fun House. Anyone can bludgeon. Not everyone can swagger.

Alex in NYC (vassifer), Monday, 22 August 2005 17:27 (twenty years ago)

These threads are called "TS".

Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Monday, 22 August 2005 17:27 (twenty years ago)

Also, Fun House

Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Monday, 22 August 2005 17:32 (twenty years ago)

funhouse by a medium sized amount. funhouse would only beat master of reality by a small sized amount.

petesmith (plsmith), Monday, 22 August 2005 17:33 (twenty years ago)

These two albums are too much for a simple "TS" to handle, Spencer.

Alex in NYC (vassifer), Monday, 22 August 2005 17:34 (twenty years ago)

Hmm. I have questions about their perspective influences (I was born a month after they both dropped, so forgive my memory).

Which was MORE influential INITIALLY?

"Paranoid" was a BIBLE album, as I recall. By the late 70s, when I was about 8 years old, everyone I knew had and still listened to this record.

Was "Fun House" the same way? I knew kids who had "Raw Power", but that was the first I knew of Iggy Pop.

Also, by the late 70s/early 80s, metal was much more popular than punk in the US.....

jsoulja (jsoulja), Monday, 22 August 2005 17:52 (twenty years ago)

I'd imagine Paranoid was more initially influential, given that neither of the first two Stooges albums sold especially well.

Alex in NYC (vassifer), Monday, 22 August 2005 18:05 (twenty years ago)


Also, by the late 70s/early 80s, metal was much more popular than punk in the US.....

A very plausible argument could be made for inclusion of Fun House in metal's pantheon.

Alex in NYC (vassifer), Monday, 22 August 2005 18:06 (twenty years ago)

Fun House, but this question is just cruel.

Funny thing about the influence question, though - while Black Sabbath were incredibly more popular and sold a truckload more albums than the Stooges could ever have hoped to, I really don't see a ton of obvious Sabbath-worship in metal bands 'til the stoner thing took off quite some time later. I mean, bands'll have a riff here, a song there, but the oozing, crushing wall of night - who else was doing that in the 70s? Seems like Zep was way more initially influential than Sabbath, cuz Sabbath were just too singular.

Zack Richardson (teenagequiet), Monday, 22 August 2005 18:07 (twenty years ago)

I was born a month after they both dropped

Neither album "dropped". That shit didn't start happening until the fucking 90's. These albums were released. Like once caged animals.

Alex in NYC (vassifer), Monday, 22 August 2005 18:07 (twenty years ago)

I can't help wondering how aware Sabbath were of the Stooges and vice versa. I know Zep and the Sabbs were well aware of each other, if not pals, but did Sabbath check out the Stooges?

Alex in NYC (vassifer), Monday, 22 August 2005 18:12 (twenty years ago)

i would bet that sabbath was not very aware of the stooges.

petesmith (plsmith), Monday, 22 August 2005 18:17 (twenty years ago)

Actually, if legend has it, I doubt Sabbath were esepcially aware of ANYTHING at the time.

Alex in NYC (vassifer), Monday, 22 August 2005 18:18 (twenty years ago)

"Neither album "dropped". That shit didn't start happening until the fucking 90's. These albums were released. Like once caged animals."

Blame hip-hop, which I don't even really listen to, for that slip.

But good point!

jsoulja (jsoulja), Monday, 22 August 2005 18:20 (twenty years ago)

xp - i don't know if i'd cite the Stooges as strong examples of clear-headedness at that particular point either

Zack Richardson (teenagequiet), Monday, 22 August 2005 18:21 (twenty years ago)

i bet the average sabbath fan at the time would call the average stooges fan at the time a fag. that might be true today, also.

petesmith (plsmith), Monday, 22 August 2005 18:21 (twenty years ago)

And very much agreed about "Fun House" echoes in metal.

jsoulja (jsoulja), Monday, 22 August 2005 18:21 (twenty years ago)

Paranoid

57 7th (calstars), Monday, 22 August 2005 18:22 (twenty years ago)

not that that has anything to do with the perception of the band members, but i just think they were in ENTIRELY separate circles.

petesmith (plsmith), Monday, 22 August 2005 18:22 (twenty years ago)

xp - i don't know if i'd cite the Stooges as strong examples of clear-headedness at that particular point either

Very true.

Alex in NYC (vassifer), Monday, 22 August 2005 18:23 (twenty years ago)

i dunno, pete - would you really wanna call the average detroit burnout (the stooges' self-stated audience) circa 1969/70 a fag?

Zack Richardson (teenagequiet), Monday, 22 August 2005 18:23 (twenty years ago)

motherfucker'd probably kill you is all i'm sayin

Zack Richardson (teenagequiet), Monday, 22 August 2005 18:24 (twenty years ago)

And perhaps Sabbath's sound wasn't hugely influential at the time, but their whole aesthetic OWNED the future of metal....

jsoulja (jsoulja), Monday, 22 August 2005 18:25 (twenty years ago)

And I was going to say "owned the future of metal until Poison, et al", but then I realized that since Iggy had a serious relationship with glam, Poison might just be the bastard child of the point where both The Stooges and Sabbath influences went terribly wrong....

jsoulja (jsoulja), Monday, 22 August 2005 18:28 (twenty years ago)

G'n'R covered the Stooges, not Sabbath, after all

Zack Richardson (teenagequiet), Monday, 22 August 2005 18:29 (twenty years ago)

but they had that glammy-arty thing, too. im not sure how accurate the stooges' idea of their own audience was, especially after welsh viola-playing velvet underground alum (gaygaygay) cale produced them. ill admit, s/t is different from funhouse, but it seems like that rep might have stuck for a few years.

and duh. they all would have killed me.

petesmith (plsmith), Monday, 22 August 2005 18:30 (twenty years ago)

all-time greatest sabbath article by a stooges fan:


http://www.creemmagazine.com/BeatGoesOn/BlackSabbath/BringYourMotherPt001.html

scott seward (scott seward), Monday, 22 August 2005 18:31 (twenty years ago)

I guess it's still to early for xhuxk and George Smith to come and turn this thread on its head.

k/l (Ken L), Monday, 22 August 2005 18:32 (twenty years ago)

yeah - definitely stooges influence on glam metal is HUGE (and awesome).

petesmith (plsmith), Monday, 22 August 2005 18:32 (twenty years ago)

But, since that last was an xpost, I guess scott will do.

k/l (Ken L), Monday, 22 August 2005 18:32 (twenty years ago)

i gave both albums 5 stars in the latest rolling stone album guide. as is only right and proper. i don't know if paranoid had 5 stars in the earlier editions. i don't think it did. i know funhouse probably did.(this is cultural revisionism on the move! i think i gave sabotage 5 stars too. and i know for a fact that it never had no five star review.) if i had to live without paranoid, i would still have all the other records. if i had to live without funhouse...well...i shudder to think.

scott seward (scott seward), Monday, 22 August 2005 18:40 (twenty years ago)

And I was going to say "owned the future of metal until Poison, et al", but then I realized that since Iggy had a serious relationship with glam, Poison might just be the bastard child of the point where both The Stooges and Sabbath influences went terribly wrong....


Yeah, but beyond sartorial/tonsorial influences, I don't hear a lot of "Glam" (i.e. Bolan/Bowie etc.) in Poison. I hear a lot of Kiss, I suppose (arguable glam affiliation), but not much proper Glam.

Alex in NYC (vassifer), Monday, 22 August 2005 18:44 (twenty years ago)

Paranoid is one of the best records ever. Fun House is the best record that ever will be.

sf sorrow, Monday, 22 August 2005 18:47 (twenty years ago)

I don't hear that much Sab in Poison either, though. (Or even Zeppelin, really.) Don't you think BS was influential on punk rock, at least American stuff? (I meant Black Sabbath originally but I guess bullshit was also an important influence.)

Sundar (sundar), Monday, 22 August 2005 18:47 (twenty years ago)

Both albums are equally classic while they're playing. I think I overall Funhouse has been a more influential album (grunge, droves of indie bands), and I might slightly prefer it. While Sabbath are one of my absolute Favorie Bands, I don't think Paranoid is their strongest album. I think that's Volume 4. But even Funhouse might beat that.

Tough question. If we're talking literally, I think the Stooges would be too strung out to fight properly and Sabbath would kick ass.

Ian John50n (orion), Monday, 22 August 2005 18:48 (twenty years ago)

BS was very important to black flag, eventually. until then, i dont see their contribution to US punk. tell me more, sundar...

petesmith (plsmith), Monday, 22 August 2005 18:49 (twenty years ago)

but ian, i think the stooges would resort to weapons first, which would give them a big advantage...

petesmith (plsmith), Monday, 22 August 2005 18:50 (twenty years ago)

both bands are funky as shit, by the way

Zack Richardson (teenagequiet), Monday, 22 August 2005 18:54 (twenty years ago)

DIRT is more perfect than any one song on Paranoid.

Ian John50n (orion), Monday, 22 August 2005 18:55 (twenty years ago)

Don't you think BS was influential on punk rock, at least American stuff?

Johnny Ramone was a fan. Henry Rollins was a huge fan. Oddly, Andy Partridge of XTC claims to be a huge fan too.

Alex in NYC (vassifer), Monday, 22 August 2005 18:56 (twenty years ago)

flipper & the melvins too

Zack Richardson (teenagequiet), Monday, 22 August 2005 18:57 (twenty years ago)

A fight?

Stooges would bring switchblades and maybe a .38 caliber.

Sabbath would bring flails and broadswords.

Both bands wouldn't even realize they'd been stabbed or shot or clubbed until most of the blood was spilled and gone anyway....

jsoulja (jsoulja), Monday, 22 August 2005 18:58 (twenty years ago)

Some will remember how the Stooges fared in this fite.

k/l (Ken L), Monday, 22 August 2005 19:01 (twenty years ago)

I blame my last speculation on reality television.

And maybe my bong.

jsoulja (jsoulja), Monday, 22 August 2005 19:02 (twenty years ago)

I guess that's what really inspired this thread for me, though. I mean, genre-wise, Fun House is always associated with Punk and Paranoid is categorically possessed by metal. But strip away the genre tags and such, and they're not really that different. Fun House is a bit looser (pardon the pun) and airier (strictly by comparison), but they're not all that different.

Alex in NYC (vassifer), Monday, 22 August 2005 19:04 (twenty years ago)

oh, i agree completely. sabbath is totally the british stooges and vice versa.

Zack Richardson (teenagequiet), Monday, 22 August 2005 19:06 (twenty years ago)

G'n'R covered the Stooges, not Sabbath, after all

Lots more people have covered Black Sabbath. There's no comparison actually.

And at the time "Paranoid" was released, backyard bands did definitely take notice. I was in one of them, playing in the school district and wherever we could cadge gigs, and Black Sabbath tone was gripping. We immediately tried to imitate it for parts of sets, turning things like "Sandman" by America into Sabbath-dirge. In fact, I saw a number of bands take that approach and run with it.

Of course, Uriah Heep was also influential sonically but that didn't stick at all past the 'eap's heyday.

"Paranoid" racked and charted in the US pretty quick upon initial release. Saunders was discussing this on an interior mailing list the other day for an upcoming VH-1 "history of metal" update that he was being interviewed for. He was writing for a bunch of pubs at the time, but may not have actually got to review "Paranoid." Could have been "Master of Reality," I'd have to check, but "Paranoid" definitely had an immediate commercial impact in the US.

"Funhouse" did not. Nary a ripple even when compared to other major label hard rock and metal releases that have since passed into history. As far as sheer rawness was concerned, early Grand Funk was far more influential early on at the garage band and grass roots level, too. That band sold in huge numbers and the "red" album and "black" live album are every bit as uncommercial and burned sounding as the Stooges were. It worked immediately for them.

The Stooges "Funhouse" didn't reach anywhere near enough people.

And "Funhouse" pretty much killed the label's interest in the band. It literally took a couple decades of critics and fan zinedom writing about the Stooges for its "influence," however broadly you wish to define it, to become significant.

Sabbath spawned hosts of imitators, even upon the publishing of "Paranoid." Before, actually, with the immediate resonance of the tri-tone riff off the first album. You don't know of any these bands now because hardly any were successful. If they made it to a second or third record by '72-'74, they would have been lucky.

I liked the Stooges a lot. But when people write frequently, now, that a band sounds "like" the Stooges and I'm stupid enough to go find the CD, they never actually sound -like- the Stooges.

Actually, I described it this way about five years ago:

-It's gotten so it is almost impossible to turn around without reading how some band of people not alive in 1970 have made a record that sounds like the Stooges. If it sounds like bad altie hard rock that you should buy anyway because bad altie hard rock is better than whoever is the current favorite critics' scapegoat, it will be claimed to sound like the Stooges. And if it doesn't sound like anything, if it is so glum and nondescript that all that can be determined from it is that people are playing guitars, beating a drum, and shouting loudly, it will be said ... to sound like the Stooges.-

And a lot of glam metal bands did not sound like the Stooges. They particularly did not sound like Ron Asheton-guitar Stooges -- with its very distinctive primitive ripping fuzztone guitar -- and they definitely did not sound anything remotely like James Williamson "Raw Power" Stooges, a record with a totally different from "Funhouse"
and very unique guitar sound that just has never been duplicated. They may have -looked- like Iggy in his lame trousers from the front of "Raw Power" and may cop to having been inspired by that, but as for actual rock action similarity, forget it. They were likely to have come out of straight bar band hard rock and metal and Kiss or AC/DC, and those tones are all over glam metal records.

Iommi, on the other hand, also had a distinctive guitar tone for "Paranoid," one that is now a benchmark.

I still don't hear many bands that get the Stooges sound right, if even they're trying to even as promo for them professes to be aiming at "Funhouse" Stooge-land. Let's see, this year? Cheeseburger for a song or two on their EP, maybe.

Both have become easy placehooks for marketing purposes. "Sounds like...," "influenced by..." etc, etc.



George the Animal Steele, Monday, 22 August 2005 19:08 (twenty years ago)

Paranoid all the way. "War Pigs." "Electric Funeral." "Iron Man." Hell, even "Rat Salad." Just great great tunes.

Mr. Snrub (Mr. Snrub), Monday, 22 August 2005 20:09 (twenty years ago)

Funhouse. Paranoid is an undeniable classic, but just too grim and painful to put myself through most days.

Soukesian, Monday, 22 August 2005 20:57 (twenty years ago)

That's funny, I can't pick one over the other but I think on most days I'd rather listen to Paranoid than Fun House because FH is a little too intense to listen to that often.

walter kranz (walterkranz), Monday, 22 August 2005 20:59 (twenty years ago)

Different intensities. Funhouse is a party, though admittedly one you might not come back from. Paranoid is a bleak, bleak hangover.

Soukesian, Monday, 22 August 2005 21:05 (twenty years ago)

Well, that makes sense. I don't care much for parties but bleak, bleak hangover describes my mood most days.

walter kranz (walterkranz), Monday, 22 August 2005 21:13 (twenty years ago)

Paranoid is January 23rd in the northeastern United States, stoned at 3am. Also the best cure for above.

Ian John50n (orion), Monday, 22 August 2005 21:15 (twenty years ago)

God, this is a tough call. Overall, Fun House is a better, more consistent album. Paranoid is still so goddamn great though...

latebloomer's rectal mocha latte (latebloomer), Monday, 22 August 2005 21:37 (twenty years ago)

Led Zeppelin III

donut gon' nut (donut), Monday, 22 August 2005 21:40 (twenty years ago)

Funhouse, but "Paranoid" is my favorite song on either of these records.

Tim Ellison (Tim Ellison), Monday, 22 August 2005 21:45 (twenty years ago)

Well, Iggy even gives half-props to Sabbath in the notes to the Raw Power remaster:

Or like "Penetration" has a celeste playing on that line, that's a kind of touch. You wouldn't have found that with Black Sabbath, who are a fine band, but you wouldn't have found them using a celeste on that line. And that's the difference between my conception for that record and what was going on at the time.

(Which seems a little funny, thinking about it now, since Sabbath probably ended up using more overt classical elements.)

Sundar (sundar), Monday, 22 August 2005 23:00 (twenty years ago)

Maybe he meant that the celeste was more of a bizarre element than a Classical music-connoting one, as with John Cale's viola on "We Will Fall," Cale's arrangements for the Nico albums, etc.

Tim Ellison (Tim Ellison), Monday, 22 August 2005 23:06 (twenty years ago)

Because by that time, with prog, "Classical" connotations were surely seen as kind of stodgy and passe.

Tim Ellison (Tim Ellison), Monday, 22 August 2005 23:08 (twenty years ago)

Paranoid moves your head and your fists. Fun House moves your whole body.

Alex in NYC (vassifer), Monday, 22 August 2005 23:21 (twenty years ago)

This is a "Sophie's Choice" if there ever was one.

I'm going with Paranoid, and "Planet Caravan" is what puts it over the edge. No other song I know of pulls off that outer-space-stoned-spaceship vibe as well as that one does--it's very singular and when placed in between the mega riffs of "Paranoid" and "Iron Man" it's all the more special. Plus I bought it when I was twelve! I didn't hear Funhouse until my twenties (the SHAME).

That said, Funhouse is still a total motherfucker and it destroys everything in its path, even Paranoid on some days. Just not today.

Keith C (lync0), Monday, 22 August 2005 23:24 (twenty years ago)

i actually see paranoid as a more fun album, despite the overbearing tone of the lyrics. the jazzy, skittery nature of the tracks makes it a little less of a constant headfuck than funhouse, though they're both intense albums.

chris andrews (fraew), Tuesday, 23 August 2005 01:12 (twenty years ago)

the jazzy, skittery nature of the tracks

Yeah, "War Pigs," "Hand of Doom," "Iron Man" and "Fairies Wear Boots" sure are skittery. Next.

George the Animal Steele, Tuesday, 23 August 2005 02:19 (twenty years ago)

bump

bump, Monday, 5 September 2005 22:26 (twenty years ago)

Paranoid fer chrissakes

you people disappoint me sometimes

Roger Fidelity (Roger Fidelity), Monday, 5 September 2005 22:29 (twenty years ago)

two years pass...

Did Funhouse ever inspire this, after all:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JOAzuqngOYo

Ned Raggett, Wednesday, 7 May 2008 20:04 (eighteen years ago)

That's terrifying. Weren't those two used on the sleeve of an early Sonic Youth single?

Alex in NYC, Wednesday, 7 May 2008 20:22 (eighteen years ago)

Cutting to the yawning dog during the solo was classy.

BigLurks, Wednesday, 7 May 2008 20:30 (eighteen years ago)

Never saw this thread before. Count me as a superdelegate for Paranoid.

Bill Magill, Wednesday, 7 May 2008 21:02 (eighteen years ago)

Great clip by the way.

Bill Magill, Wednesday, 7 May 2008 21:03 (eighteen years ago)

Funhouse, 'cuz it's meant more to me over the long haul, though I'm more likely to spin Paranoid these days.

contenderizer, Wednesday, 7 May 2008 21:06 (eighteen years ago)

Thread started out full of Funhouse love, but eventually tilted towards Paranoid. Wonder if the thread would run quite differently if it'd been started today.

contenderizer, Wednesday, 7 May 2008 21:11 (eighteen years ago)

four months pass...

http://hardrockheavymetal.wordpress.com/2008/08/04/reissue-report-black-sabbath-paranoid-1970-to-be-reissued-by-universal-music-on-double-vinyl-3-cd-deluxe-edition-on-september-29th/

* Disc 1: the album you know and love
* Disc 2: quad mix
* Disc 3: karaoke

I'd hoped for unused songs or early run-throughs of Master of Reality from the Paranoid sessions, but if they exist, they're not here. But then it's amazing to see any expanded reissues from a band (I'm talking 1969-1982) that has no studio outtakes in circulation, even on bootleg that I know of. The quad mix is probably the real selling point.

drench, Tuesday, 23 September 2008 17:15 (seventeen years ago)

DIRT is more perfect than any one song on Paranoid.
― Ian John50n (orion), Monday, August 22, 2005 2:55 PM (3 years ago) Bookmark

This is the true Ultimate Battle: Dirt v. War Pigs.

Paranoid is classic (esp. Fairies, War Pigs, and Planet Caravan) but overplayed. Fun House is inexhaustible. The fight is a mite bit unfair, since as said before, Sabbath isn't quite represented by their best (Vol. 4, though I haven't listened to all of the albums) but...Fun House destroys that as well.

One more thing:

Sabb's influence on punk = Black Flag (also stated before)
Stooges' influence on metal = Motorhead

Drugs A. Money, Tuesday, 23 September 2008 20:46 (seventeen years ago)

fourteen years pass...

Iggy still wins.

Alex in NYC, Thursday, 5 January 2023 19:39 (three years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.