the idea that hip hop isnt a genre for albums - C or D?

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
i say dud
it might not be an album genre these days but it used to be

okok, Monday, 22 August 2005 21:01 (twenty years ago)

I suspect Haikunym will agree it's dud but disagree with your conclusion of the present state of affairs (and I would have to agree with him).

Ned Raggett (Ned), Monday, 22 August 2005 21:22 (twenty years ago)

really ned? based on what?

3, Monday, 22 August 2005 21:23 (twenty years ago)

singles, i can name those easily. but albums? name me some great new modern rap albums from the past few years. please.

okoko, Monday, 22 August 2005 21:24 (twenty years ago)

Ghostface to thread.

Clay (cws), Monday, 22 August 2005 21:25 (twenty years ago)

i just love how on ILM, normal hip hop beliefs are turned upside down and totally reversed til i think im in some sort of alternate universe. its like hip hop way of looking at rap Vs pop way of looking at rap. i love it.

ghostface hasnt made a really great album since supreme clientele. everything since then has been good but bitty.

okokok, Monday, 22 August 2005 21:26 (twenty years ago)

Since some may require evidence that I don't reject all accusations of racism, here's one I think is justified. This "singles-oriented" canard combines an old semi-truism (60s r & b was mostly about singles) with a sports cliche (blacks are sprinters) and misapplies itself to the present day and a completely different genre. In fact, outside cities and metro areas, hip hop is primarily an album genre, if only because radio stations won't play it.

M. V. (M.V.), Monday, 22 August 2005 21:28 (twenty years ago)

maybe i should rephrase then, and ask if hip hop is still a GOOD album oriented genre

id like to discuss the truism that soul and R&B were singles oriented genres, since people like to state those things so regularly. im not sure how true they really are/were.

id say that today R&B and hip hop are neck and neck and have been for about a decade in terms of being more singles then album oriented.

okok, Monday, 22 August 2005 21:32 (twenty years ago)

not just dud but weird and wrong.

this goes for current hip hop and current r&b, both of which probably produce as many great albums on average as other genres.

The Lex (The Lex), Monday, 22 August 2005 21:33 (twenty years ago)

Hip-hop is a singles music in pretty much exactly the same way that prog-rock is a singles music (i.e., more than it would admit.) It's also an album music in pretty much exactly the same way that Top 40 pop is an album music (i.e., also more than it would admit, maybe.) In other words, yes, it's a great album music, a lot of the time. But not always when it thinks it is.

xhuxk, Monday, 22 August 2005 21:40 (twenty years ago)

(Or insert "disco" for "top 40 pop" above if you want.)

xhuxk, Monday, 22 August 2005 21:41 (twenty years ago)

you do know that prog rock and disco died many moons ago right?

okok, Monday, 22 August 2005 21:43 (twenty years ago)

Welcome to Brigadoon!

M. V. (M.V.), Monday, 22 August 2005 21:46 (twenty years ago)

C
Hiphop albums are usually unbearable, especially the recent ones. Too much tracks, skits, and overall too long.

zeus, Monday, 22 August 2005 21:49 (twenty years ago)

i don't know why the concept of the skip button continues to elude so many people, i'm the biggest luddite i know and even i know how it works.

The Lex (The Lex), Monday, 22 August 2005 21:53 (twenty years ago)

gotta say that Chuck is completely, exactly right up there. also gotta say that "a GOOD album genre" is a total bait-n-switch: first you wanted to talk about album-as-form, then you just wanna air out yr beef about how hiphop albums aren't the kinda albums you like.

also, anybody who liked Supreme Clientele but doesn't think Pretty Toney is at the very least a GOOD album is a krazyperson


Banana Nutrament (ghostface), Monday, 22 August 2005 21:55 (twenty years ago)

I can definitely think of some great hip-hop albums, but the large majority are padded-up affairs that demand frequent use of the skip button.

Also there aren't many hip-hop artists who consistently produce great LPs.

This coming from an avowed album-hater. I think no less of the genre for it.

Confounded (Confounded), Monday, 22 August 2005 21:59 (twenty years ago)

Too much tracks, skits, and overall too long.

http://images.amazon.com/images/P/B0009MWAPW.01._SCLZZZZZZZ_.jpg

M. V. (M.V.), Monday, 22 August 2005 22:00 (twenty years ago)

Pretty Toney is acceptable, but his worst, by some margin.

paulhw (paulhw), Monday, 22 August 2005 22:09 (twenty years ago)

no, Bulletproof Wallets is his weakest.

Shakey Mo Collier (Shakey Mo Collier), Monday, 22 August 2005 22:13 (twenty years ago)


hey...lets make broad overarching statements about an entire GENRE of music.

KevinGarnettNeedsaRing (KevinGarnettNeedsaRing), Monday, 22 August 2005 23:03 (twenty years ago)

you do know that prog rock and disco died many moons ago right?

of COURSE they did

Matos-Webster Dictionary (M Matos), Monday, 22 August 2005 23:17 (twenty years ago)

no, Bulletproof Wallets is his weakest.
-- Shakey Mo Collier (audiobo...), August 22nd, 2005

If you consider the tracks that were CRUELLY DISALLOWED from BP wallets, its probably my favorite Ghost album. Ironman is clearly his worst.

And obviously everyone is wrong, hip-hop has tons of great albums.

deej.., Tuesday, 23 August 2005 00:13 (twenty years ago)

"i don't know why the concept of the skip button continues to elude so many people"

if i have to skip stuff, then it ain't a good album.

i would say that across the board albums are just too long usually. cuzza the whole cd thing. 30 minutes or less is usually fine. we have been through all of this of course. albums longer than 50 minutes that i consider favorites in recent years are few and far between. mostly metal or droney shit that is supposed to go on forever. more than 20 songs on an album is just...a lot of songs. i guess i am still old-fashioned enough to think you should be able to listen to an entire album without getting restless. that's how they become favorites. you play them over and over again.

scott seward (scott seward), Tuesday, 23 August 2005 00:35 (twenty years ago)

hey...lets make broad overarching statements about an entire GENRE of music.

Like rock, maybe? OK, cool!

Banana Nutrament (ghostface), Tuesday, 23 August 2005 01:18 (twenty years ago)

hey...lets make broad overarching statements about an entire GENRE of music.

No, I think that would be racist and sexist.

Confounded (Confounded), Tuesday, 23 August 2005 02:29 (twenty years ago)

This is an interesting question. It's true that, for me, really solid hiphop LPs are quite rare. But I'm not sure whether that's because (a) I'm old enough (& rockist enuff) for rap to have been an acquired taste that I had to forcefully acclimatize myself to; or (b) because, like Seward says, LPs are just generally too long nowadays with all the skits and whatnot. Personally, I find that listening to an hour of hiphop wearies me in a way that an hour of Albert Ayler or Minor Threat or something similarly assaultive doesn't, but that's just a matter of personal taste and conditioning. I can't think of any good reason why hiphop should NECESSARILY be less suited to the full-length format than any other genre of popular music. So, dud, I guess.

Myonga Von Bontee (Myonga Von Bontee), Tuesday, 23 August 2005 02:46 (twenty years ago)

I reject the notion that hip hop 'used to be' an album genre - it's more NOW than ever! Previously mentioned Wu-Tangers, not to mention Mike Jones, Kanye...on the other hand, how many of you EVER got to Side 2 of the Das EFX album? Anybody remember anything past the first four songs on Special Ed's first album? Me, neither. In fact, if you exclude EPMD, Public Enemy, Eric B & Rakim and BDP, there really weren't a whole lot of popular hip hop groups making 'classic album' material until The Chronic dropped.

Yet another reason that The Wu are one of the most important and great hip hop crews in history.

Roger Fidelity (Roger Fidelity), Tuesday, 23 August 2005 02:52 (twenty years ago)

name me some great new modern rap albums from the past few years. please.

Blueprint
Stankonia
Cold Vein
Labor Days
Supreme Clientele
Original Pirate Material
Vaudeville Villain
Take Me To Your Leader
Under Construction
Miss E... So Addictive
Black Album
Boy in da Corner
Madvillainy
A Grand Don't Come For Free
Pretty Toney

poortheatre (poortheatre), Tuesday, 23 August 2005 05:08 (twenty years ago)

"Ironman is clearly his worst."

HA Ha and HA.

missy elliot doesnt make good albums, by the way.

okokoko, Tuesday, 23 August 2005 10:46 (twenty years ago)

"In fact, if you exclude EPMD, Public Enemy, Eric B & Rakim and BDP, there really weren't a whole lot of popular hip hop groups making 'classic album' material until The Chronic dropped."

i could name a hundred.

scott seward (scott seward), Tuesday, 23 August 2005 11:04 (twenty years ago)

missy elliot doesnt make good albums, by the way.

ok now you are smoking the loco weed

Scott I challenge you to name those hundred!

Banana Nutrament (ghostface), Tuesday, 23 August 2005 11:09 (twenty years ago)

"I reject the notion that hip hop 'used to be' an album genre - it's more NOW than ever!"

yeah,ok. fucking WHERE?!

"how many of you EVER got to Side 2 of the Das EFX album? Anybody remember anything past the first four songs on Special Ed's first album?"

i do. it was pretty good. it wasnt a case of 3 'hot' singles and filler, it might not have all been on the level of straight from the sewer, but it wasnt all completely skippable, it at least had replay value. i.e. a consistent album.

"there really weren't a whole lot of popular hip hop groups making 'classic album' material until The Chronic dropped."

how about
run dmc
NWA
eric b and rakim
epmd
redman
del the funky homosapien
masta ace
etc etc etc etc

what missy albums are good? seriously? she makes great singles and videos, albums though? nah.

okokoko, Tuesday, 23 August 2005 11:11 (twenty years ago)

>"there really weren't a whole lot of popular hip hop groups making 'classic album' material until The Chronic dropped."<

Yeah, this is baloney.

Oddly, it just occurred to me that I am considering putting Young Jeezy's album in my top ten this year even though (1) I have yet to play it all the way through and (2) May never actually do so. I listen to it (like I listen to lots of CDs these days) on random play in my home 5-CD changer, and it could make my top ten on the basis of (1) me loving tons of individual cuts on it and also (2) me not particularly hating any particular cuts on it. I'm not as extreme as Frank Kogan, who actually *programs* his CDs (I've never done that), and therefore says "in the CD era, all albums are EPs" and has no qualms with putting a David Banner (or Celine Dion for that matter) album in his top ten merely on the basis of loving three or four songs on them. To me, the last (as in second non-screwed) Banner album had too much crap balancing out its couple great tracks to even hint at top-ten consideration. (I did put the screwed and chopped version of his debut in my top ten, though, and the regular version of his debut came close.) This year, Mannie Fresh and Fannypack also have a shot, and I tend to play those more in my CD changer too. But I'm still not ready to disagree with Scott - hip-hop CDs (like many other CDs) (hell, MORE than CDs in lots of other genres, as far as I can see, if that''s generalizing, so what?) *do* often tend to be way too long these days, and are hence often impossible to play all the way through. Which was part of the point of my prog comparison above. (And yes, prog and disco do still exist.) So most of my all-time favorite rap albums, I still own on vinyl.

All Missy albums are good. None of them are great (at least to my ears.) She does indeed make great singles, though. Her greatest album will be her first greatest-hits album.

xhuxk, Tuesday, 23 August 2005 11:44 (twenty years ago)

missy elliott's debut is pretty consistent.

i listen to hip-hop almost entirely in the album format, and i have never found it a problem, so dud to the title question. although i do watch mtv base quite a bit.

the extra length of the average hip-hop album means that it will probably include a greater *number* of superfluous tracks than something from a genre where albums are shorter, but not necessarily a greater *percentage*. plus the added length means that missteps are more easily forgiven.

also, i am not convinced that some hip-hop albums widely-touted as filler-fests are indeed just that. like the last lil wayne album, which i play pretty much from start to finish.

weasel diesel (K1l14n), Tuesday, 23 August 2005 11:48 (twenty years ago)

Lil Wayne actually makes really consistent albums (consistently!)
So does Trick Daddy!

I loved maybe three cuts on that first Missy E. album though.

xhuxk, Tuesday, 23 August 2005 11:54 (twenty years ago)

(And the length thing isn't *just* a matter of "consistency". It's also a matter of, well, just plain *length.* Longer albums are more work to get through -- even when they're good!)

xhuxk, Tuesday, 23 August 2005 11:56 (twenty years ago)

"there really weren't a whole lot of popular hip hop groups making 'classic album' material until The Chronic dropped."

"Scott I challenge you to name those hundred!"

shit, i knew someone would call me out. um, off the top of my head, people who made classic albums before the chronic: big daddy kane, mc lyte, queen latifah, monie love, cookie crew, wee papa girl rappers, steady b, jungle brothers, tribe called quest, poor rightous teachers, special ed, run-dmc, ultramagnetic mcs, stetsasonic, slick rick, n.w.a., biz markie, d.o.c., above the law, nice & smooth, spoonie g, mc shan, main source, sir mixalot, gang starr, schoolly d, naughty by nature, chubb rock, newcleus, jonzun crew, kool g rap & dj polo, 3rd bass, sugarhill gang, salt & pepe, beastie boys, ll cool j, ice t, de la soul, doug e. fresh, whodini, tone loc, young mc, kool moe dee, 7a3, digital underground, mantronix, kid frost, kurtis blow, kmd, k-solo, 2 live crew, maggotron, divine styler, fat boys, geto boys, marley marl, mellow man ace, cash money & marvelous, too short, jazzy jeff & the fresh prince, grandmaster flash & the furious five, ice cube, eazy-e, cypress hill, tuff crew...shit, how many is that? that ain't a hundred, but i kinda got to go. someone finish that list of great album-makers pleeze.

scott seward (scott seward), Tuesday, 23 August 2005 13:46 (twenty years ago)

"salt & pepe"

what, you've never heard of the short-lived salt & pepe? great mexicali groove.

scott seward (scott seward), Tuesday, 23 August 2005 13:48 (twenty years ago)

Lil Wayne actually makes really consistent albums (consistently!)

Totally seconded -- the throwaway tracks on "Tha Carter" were still great. Mannie Fresh is so far beyond most Southern producers.

Confounded (Confounded), Tuesday, 23 August 2005 13:52 (twenty years ago)

It counts as a hundred because you mentioned the 7A3!

Banana Nutrament (ghostface), Tuesday, 23 August 2005 13:59 (twenty years ago)

Damn, called out by Ned in post #2 and never got to respond. Sadly, though, it's a different topic than this one -- I agree with Lex above (I always agree with Lex these days) but just because I don't mind longer albums (ME THE ANTI-SEWARD) doesn't mean that I think that albums are great for being long. It ain't no ironman triathlon.

I don't think that there is any difference between hip-hop album quality and any other pop genre's album quality. Usually, to consumers, albums are distribution systems for singles, and that goes everywhere except maybe jazz these days. I happen to like, say, Francis the Mute and The Mind of Mannie Fresh, but that does not mean that I like them BETTER for being album-ish albums (themed, linked, conceptual, conscious of being "albums") than other CDs that are singles plus filler. I used to, but not really any more. It depends on the filler, doesn't it?

I think that hip-hop audiences have a different relationship with "album" CDs than other pop audiences (OR ROCK CRITICS), and that artists recognize that, and try to give the people what they want. If you don't like skits, then go ahead, that's fine. If hip-hop audiences start hating them, you'll know it, because the market will change instantly. Rap has a HELLA FAST feedback system.

Haikunym (Haikunym), Tuesday, 23 August 2005 14:04 (twenty years ago)

Also, to Scott: Original Concept's Straight from the Basement of Kooley High! Do you not have this classic or did you overlook it? It samples "Kashmir" and rhymes "dizzy" with "Thin Lizzy"!

Haikunym (Haikunym), Tuesday, 23 August 2005 14:10 (twenty years ago)

I admire your list scott, but i gotta take you to task brother

big daddy kane

ha ha ha which one? BDK was the epitome of a 'singles' MC. I challenge you to name THREE songs off of Prince of Darkness!!

mc lyte

no comment. Except to say "C'mon, dude." Lyte is and will always be a footnote. I had Ain't No Other and it was weak.

queen latifah monie love, cookie crew, wee papa girl rappers

See MC Lyte

jungle brothers

Again, which? Done By The Forces...I admit had a very favorable ratio of good to bad, but J Beez wiuth the Remedy, although to my ears now would probbaly be the superior album, back then, it was just too fucking WEIRD to be classic! No one I knew ever liked that one...

tribe called quest, poor rightous teachers

agreed on tribe, at least the first three albums. Score one for Brother Scott. But PRT is almost another perfect example of what I'm talking about. Of the first two albums, all you have is "Rock Dis Funky Joint" on the first, and "Easy Star" and "Shakiyla" on the second.

special ed, run-dmc

no way. albums LOADED with filler. "The Bush???" "Son of Byford??"

ultramagnetic mcs

Score two for Scott - both Critical Beatdown and The Four Horsemen are pretty close to perfect. That one in the middle, though, not so much...

stetsasonic

I love you Scott, but BWAHAHAHAHAHAHHAAA! The "hip hop band?" Weak. Even Daddy-O's solo album was an embarrassment.

slick rick

Both albums were filler-fests.

n.w.a.

I agree with you if we're talkin' Niggaz4life. But Compton is, like, 75% weak shit. How often do you listen to "Somethin 2 Dance 2?"

biz markie

if you're talking "Goin' Off," I agree. After that?

d.o.c.

Man, even the single ("The Formula," if I remember correctly) was weak on this one. Really, dude?

above the law

no way

nice & smooth

ugh!

spoonie g, mc shan

You're showing your age dude! Hahahahaa. I have albums by those cats but can barely recall them. The last Shan thing I bought was his 'comeback' maxi single, something about goin "wild in the penile" or some bullshit.

main source

OK, both albums pretty classic. Agreed.

sir mixalot

No comment.

gang starr

Gang Starr is another example of what I'm talking about. Though I will say that most Gang Starr albums from Step in the Arena on have considerably more classic material than filler, they bog down the albums with anything involving The Group Home, any 'skits" ("Aight Chill????") and painfully mediocre tracks like "Mostly Tha Voice"

schoolly d

No way

naughty by nature

Nineteen Naughty Three was pretty good all the way through. But that first one was filler city. Still, classic always and forever for "Uptown Anthem"

chubb rock

"Lost in the Storm" was his only good song, to my ears.

newcleus, jonzun crew

I don't know who these people are, and I'm rarely stumped when it comes to hip hop.

kool g rap & dj polo

No way. Total singles group. Even IF "Ill Street Blues" is one of hip hop's best singles ever.

3rd bass

two good albums, neither great. Why? FILLER!!! You think Derelicts of Dialect is a 'classic' album?? Come on..."Eye Jammy?"

sugarhill gang

which album are you referring to?

salt & pepe

No comment. Spinderella was always kinda hot though.

beastie boys

I'm going to spend the rest of the day trying to forget you said that Scott. It's a slap in the face to the entire genre to even include them in this list.

ll cool j

Singles. I dare you to sit through the entirety of "Walking With THe Panther." YOU CAN NOT DO IT.

ice t

Agreed. For all of Tracy Morrow's Hollywood aspirations, folks forget he put out some solid albums. Power and OG in particular still sound great.

de la soul

Pretty classic. Lotsa filler though. Only the first two albums even come close to classic. Buhloone Mind State on, it gets very weird.

doug e. fresh

No way!

whodini

No way!

tone loc, young mc, kool moe dee

No comment.

7a3

I don't know who this is

digital underground

Sex Packets was pretty classic all the way through. Wonder if it holds up now?

mantronix, kid frost, kurtis blow, kmd

No comment but I wouldn't consider Mantronix part of the rest

k-solo

Good MC, WEAK albums. Even the singles were lame. "Letterman????" Christ. His best work was on cameos. See EPMD's "Headbanger"

2 live crew

Come on, man.

maggotron, divine styler, fat boys

Damn Scott you old school. Divine Styler?? Haven't heard that name in years, not since I used to run home to tape Video Music Box. Hahhahahah! Anyway I've never heard any full albums by any of those people

geto boys

First sides always good, I never get to the second sides of any Geto Boys album.

marley marl, mellow man ace, cash money & marvelous

Don't remember enough to say, which speaks for itself

too short

THIS one I agree with, even though all my East Coast hip hop friends would see me hanged to admit it. I still got love for $hort Dog!!

jazzy jeff & the fresh prince

He's The DJ...is probably another perfcet example of what I'm talking about. I mean, that album is like 90% filler, dude. And everything AFTER that is even worse.

grandmaster flash & the furious five

Singles group.

ice cube

I agree, for Death Certificate. But lotsa filler on the other albums. Probably lots on Death Certificate too but I'm remembering through rose-tinted glasses.

eazy-e

Classic "Side 1 MC"

cypress hill

Actually agree if we're talking the s/t album. I remember listening to that one non-stop when it came out.

OK, so I agree with maybe three of those.

Roger Fidelity (Roger Fidelity), Tuesday, 23 August 2005 14:31 (twenty years ago)

the point is kane, cypress hill, etc all have one classic or really really great album to their name. not dozens, but at least one.

okokok, Tuesday, 23 August 2005 14:35 (twenty years ago)

Newcleus and Jonzun Crew are early 80s electro-funk acts.

But I can't believe you'd hate on the Beastie Boys so much. The first two albums are both classic hip-hop records any way you slice it.

Dan Selzer (Dan Selzer), Tuesday, 23 August 2005 14:38 (twenty years ago)

"main source

OK, both albums pretty classic. Agreed."

Wait wait wait you like the album they released AFTER the Large Professor left?!? I've never heard anyone say that.

Alex in SF (Alex in SF), Tuesday, 23 August 2005 14:40 (twenty years ago)

Yeah I liked that one. That's the one that had the single "What You Need is The Source!" Yeah. I was like, 15 when that came out but I used to listen to it a lot.

I have NO LOVE for the Beastie Boys. Search the archives if you want, we've been through this before. They're right below Dave Matthews on my assasination list, actually. Worst...group...ever?

Roger Fidelity (Roger Fidelity), Tuesday, 23 August 2005 14:42 (twenty years ago)

AmeriKKKa's Most Wanted slays Death Certificate easy

Banana Nutrament (ghostface), Tuesday, 23 August 2005 14:42 (twenty years ago)

AMW>>>death certificate without a doubt
the second main source album is pretty fucking weak. mikey d (was that his name) was okay but kinda crap really. that album did have the lox on it though, who were good

okokok, Tuesday, 23 August 2005 15:06 (twenty years ago)

ALL WE ARE SAYING IS GIVE RAP A CHANCE

beatles fan, Tuesday, 23 August 2005 20:47 (twenty years ago)

I think in both instances we have genres where the majority of people are happy to make money coloring in-between the already well-defined lines, rather than attempt to draw new ones. they both seem pretty moribund to me.

Shakey Mo Collier (Shakey Mo Collier), Tuesday, 23 August 2005 20:48 (twenty years ago)

"they both seem pretty moribund to me."

Same as it ever was. Same as it ever was.

Alfred Soto (Alfred Soto), Tuesday, 23 August 2005 20:49 (twenty years ago)

"to just rep for fucking ultramagnetic mcs and wu tang and say that all modern rap is wack"

I don't think anybody's said that, except for maybe okokokok - he'll have to defend himself. My sympathies are more with deej, who appreciates the breadth of hip-hop's history but also just seems to have more enthusiasm than I do for seeking out the good stuff.

Shakey Mo Collier (Shakey Mo Collier), Tuesday, 23 August 2005 20:49 (twenty years ago)

should read "good NEW stuff"

Shakey Mo Collier (Shakey Mo Collier), Tuesday, 23 August 2005 20:49 (twenty years ago)

someone was playing the mf doom thing with all the adult swim samples on it the other nite. i don't even know what it's called, but i was really enjoying it. i need more doom stuff. i'm always up for hearing more new stuff. i just don't buy it like i used to cuz i don't live in a city anymore and i hate buying new cds (i always bought vinyl). now that we have the highspeed back in the house i'm gonna download more. i really liked the o-solo songs that were on the latest tvt sampler, so i'm looking forward to that album.

scott seward (scott seward), Tuesday, 23 August 2005 20:51 (twenty years ago)

Alfred: It's a helluva lot easier acclimatizing myself to a Ghostface or Jay-Z album than doing the same with fuckin' Wolf Eyes or any other indie du jour you care to mention.

I think it might depend on the person here. Conceivably?

Roger: Indie deserves a far, FAR worse death than hip hop, what with everything from Hot Hot Heat to the Arcade Fire to TV on the Radio etc etc etc. Fucking disgrace.

Yes, please. Art rock has overstayed its welcome.

Confounded (Confounded), Tuesday, 23 August 2005 20:54 (twenty years ago)

Of course it's a personal choice, Confounded. But anyone who complains that hip-hop is "difficult" needs to get his/her head out of his/her ass and listen to Top 40 radio. Pronto.

Alfred Soto (Alfred Soto), Tuesday, 23 August 2005 20:57 (twenty years ago)

so, okay, here's a question: do people who grew up only knowing compact discs - and i obviously still have an LP mentality when it comes to albums and length and all that - feel ripped off if a record is only 30 or 40 minutes? just wondering. are they disappointed if it isn't 50/60/70 minutes long?

scott seward (scott seward), Tuesday, 23 August 2005 20:59 (twenty years ago)

Scott: history is funny. Ten years ago the answer to your question would've been, "Yes, they would have felt ripped off." Now, even the 18 and 19 yr-olds have some acquaintance with vinyl thanks to fetishists. The ones I've talked to prefer 40 min slabs of music.

Alfred Soto (Alfred Soto), Tuesday, 23 August 2005 21:03 (twenty years ago)

fair enough if it doesn't interest you, but i doubt you'd say the same thing about rock or indie or dance music

Oh I WOULDN'T???

oops (Oops), Tuesday, 23 August 2005 21:05 (twenty years ago)

I think it depends. Sometimes I feel ripped off esp. if the album is just a perfunctory sort of collection of singles anyway then definitely--the recent T.O.K. album really suffered for 1) not being the 22 track monstrosity that the promo version was and 2) missing a number key songs/singles. In those cases I want value and want CD quality versions of tracks I either have on 7" or mp3 not some artificial "album experience".

Alex in SF (Alex in SF), Tuesday, 23 August 2005 21:09 (twenty years ago)

But anyone who complains that hip-hop is "difficult" needs to get his/her head out of his/her ass and listen to Top 40 radio. Pronto.

Well, I think in terms of pop accessibility, it's easily the best thing going. But not everyone over 35 can relate to all the black male bravado and artifice. Again, not saying other genres don't have their indulgences.

Confounded (Confounded), Tuesday, 23 August 2005 21:11 (twenty years ago)

so, okay, here's a question: do people who grew up only knowing compact discs - and i obviously still have an LP mentality when it comes to albums and length and all that - feel ripped off if a record is only 30 or 40 minutes? just wondering. are they disappointed if it isn't 50/60/70 minutes long?

Hell no! I think 29 minutes is perfect. Room on Fire, Pink Moon, Histoire de Melody Nelson, Desertshore are all lovely little morsels of music. I always think that The Idiot is just about perfect in length, too, although it might be a little longer. I just bought this Sufjan Stevens album the other day, and I can't even find the time to listen to the whole fucking thing..

poortheatre (poortheatre), Tuesday, 23 August 2005 21:21 (twenty years ago)

"not everyone over 35 can relate to all the black male bravado and artifice."

yet they can relate to all the white male introspection and artifice?

Alfred Soto (Alfred Soto), Tuesday, 23 August 2005 21:24 (twenty years ago)

yet they can relate to all the white male introspection and artifice?

Did you read the next sentence, Alfred?

"Again, not saying other genres don't have their indulgences."

Confounded (Confounded), Tuesday, 23 August 2005 21:29 (twenty years ago)

I saw it. It's a weak qualification.

Alfred Soto (Alfred Soto), Tuesday, 23 August 2005 21:37 (twenty years ago)

I saw it. It's a weak qualification.

Not when the thread is about hip-hop. Yawns.

Confounded (Confounded), Tuesday, 23 August 2005 21:51 (twenty years ago)

So Alfred is it your position that everybody's gotta relate to hiphop, full stop? Or, like, if they don't, there's something wrong with 'em?

Banana Nutrament (ghostface), Tuesday, 23 August 2005 22:33 (twenty years ago)

If you don't like hip-hop there's nothing I or anyone else can do to change your mind (except perhaps write an exquisite review!). But accept your weakness; don't blame the genre's purported limitations.

Alfred Soto (Alfred Soto), Wednesday, 24 August 2005 01:00 (twenty years ago)

every genre has limitations, no? otherwise it wouldn't be a genre. some people don't place any or as high of a value on certain characteristics that hip hop, by and large, lacks. but [some of the some] should realize that music doesn't NEED to have those characteristics in order to be "good".

oops (Oops), Wednesday, 24 August 2005 02:31 (twenty years ago)

I didn't read through this thread so probably xpost.. but I wanted to say, I think there are very few hiphop artists left who record solid albums.

billstevejim (billstevejim), Wednesday, 24 August 2005 03:23 (twenty years ago)

Do we really need T.I. feat. Nelly etc)

yes, get loose is a great song!

jeremy jordan (cruisy), Wednesday, 24 August 2005 05:30 (twenty years ago)

I've jumper around on this quite a lot, so forgive me if this has already been addressed BUT:
what exactly are the qualifiers for something to be a good/great album?
Like if it's good, then 60 percent is good? Who the hell is making these distinctions? And who the hell has the time?

Forksclovetofu (Forksclovetofu), Wednesday, 24 August 2005 05:50 (twenty years ago)

it's a tough question to answer, like what's better - an album with 15 good-to-solid tracks but nothing spectacular, or one with 4-5 really fantastic songs and a bunch of "filler" (see new Kanye for latter). i'd like to say it's the latter, but i think i'm subconsciously more apt to give the former higher marks, like "congratulations for managing to avoid sucking!"

also, while we're on it, can somebody explain the young jeezy thing to me again? i like the album alright, but i'm just not seeing what's getting everybody else so worked up, and to date i really haven't read anything about him that's been good enough to make me reevaluate.

Josh Love (screamapillar), Wednesday, 24 August 2005 08:13 (twenty years ago)

"okokokok for all your wisdom how many albums i listed have you heard?"

im not saying i know it all, but for all your sarcasm, i should probably just say that my comments above about wanting hip hop to die are to do with raised expectations caused from listening to nothing but hip hop from 13 to when i was about 22 (well with some exceptions, but well, not many). i was prob being a bit overdramatic when i said hip hop should hurry up and die, but a lot of it leaves me cold these days. and im not one of those golden age-pining fuxors, i dont want everything to sound like it was 94 again, i just find a lot of production today to not actually be that 'hard'. too many hip hop beats are so slick and sterile these days theyre like digital murder muzak (ho ho). im not saying ALL rap today sucks - some albums i really love/like from recent years include madvillain, most of mf dooms stuff (although dangerdoom is pretty boring and doom by numbers), slim thug, lil scrappy, ying yang, lil jon, lil wayne, killer mike, things like that. but i dont really hear anyone trying to 'change the game' or whatever. those albums you mentioned are good, but theyre not brilliant IMHO. the last album i heard and thought it was really different to what else was happpening was kings of crunk cos it was so hardcore. plus, out of all the things you mentioned, theyre all pretty interchangeable. obviously i know how TI sounds compared to trick daddy, but theyre all rapping about the same ol (post-?)gangsta stuff. its like everyones drawing from the same character pool.

okokok, Wednesday, 24 August 2005 09:30 (twenty years ago)

basically, i find hip hop to be playing it exceedingly safe these days.

okokok, Wednesday, 24 August 2005 09:36 (twenty years ago)

is the dangerdoom one the one with the adult swim stuff on it? i thought it was entertaining - but not brilliant or anything - and it did make me want to go get the other albums. so it did the trick i would say.

scott seward (scott seward), Wednesday, 24 August 2005 09:45 (twenty years ago)

i'd recommend you get
operation doomsday
madvillain
king geedorah
mmmfood

if you like those, then get the viktor vaughn albums - the beats arent as good as when doom produces himself though (or lets madlib do it).

okok, Wednesday, 24 August 2005 10:00 (twenty years ago)

i got a viktor vaughn promo in the mail but it was filled with those anti-piracy HEY YOU ARE LISTENING TO A CD! snippets and i couldn't listen to it.

scott seward (scott seward), Wednesday, 24 August 2005 10:14 (twenty years ago)

"If you don't like hip-hop there's nothing I or anyone else can do to change your mind (except perhaps write an exquisite review!). But accept your weakness; don't blame the genre's purported limitations."

i'd say that hip hop has placed even more limitations on itself then ever before, and its more than happy being limited by them, as long as the money keeps rolling in.

oko, Wednesday, 24 August 2005 10:17 (twenty years ago)

If you don't like hip-hop there's nothing I or anyone else can do to change your mind (except perhaps write an exquisite review!). But accept your weakness; don't blame the genre's purported limitations.

Not me, for heaven's sake, I've loved hiphop for years! But listen to yourself: a person who doesn't like it should "accept [his] weakness" - this is laying a path for a really hideous critical orthodoxy. A person who dislikes a genre and lays out critical grounds for his position doesn't have a "weakness," he has a critical position. That's what criticism is all about! I can't imagine that if somebody wanted to argue (as one might) "indie rock is stagnant and boring" you'd tell them that the fault lay in them & not in the music: or would you? And, if so, do you think people just shouldn't criticise music at all? And, if so, what are we doing here?

Banana Nutrament (ghostface), Wednesday, 24 August 2005 11:19 (twenty years ago)

Scott I grew up in the age of the LP and the cassette tape (and even the eight-track fer god's sake) and I feel very ripped off if an album isn't at least40 minutes long and I love 50 and 60 and 78 minute CDs even more. BONUS TRAXXX! Remixes! Foreign language editions! Commentary tracks!

Oh my god, I'm a size queen

Haikunym (Haikunym), Wednesday, 24 August 2005 12:41 (twenty years ago)

"A person who dislikes a genre and lays out critical grounds for his position doesn't have a "weakness," he has a critical position."

True. But I have yet to read an original defense of the thread title. All I've read are the usual reasons, explicit ('as long as the money keeps rolling in") and implicit ("those party-animal black people, they can't record albums as good as A.C. Newman's")

Alfred Soto (Alfred Soto), Wednesday, 24 August 2005 12:50 (twenty years ago)

"And, if so, do you think people just shouldn't criticise music at all? And, if so, what are we doing here?"

people should just accept that if they find onw flaw in a genre, they just dont like that genre, full stop. nothing more to it then that.

"those party-animal black people, they can't record albums as good as A.C. Newman's"

who has said that here? no one. theres plenty of fantastic blues, soul, R&B, hip hop etc etc albums to prove otherwise.

okokok, Wednesday, 24 August 2005 13:01 (twenty years ago)

Reread my sentence: I said "implicit."

Alfred Soto (Alfred Soto), Wednesday, 24 August 2005 13:16 (twenty years ago)

To answer Scott's earlier question: If I buy an album and it won't fit on one side of a C-90, I'm just the slightest bit bummed out. 35-45 minutes is ideal, 60 should be the maximum allowed. There's no reason in the world I need 77 minutes of something called 'Awol One and Soul Doubt.'

Roger Fidelity (Roger Fidelity), Wednesday, 24 August 2005 15:22 (twenty years ago)

You cant tell the difference between T.I. and Trick Daddy!?

deej.., Wednesday, 24 August 2005 19:06 (twenty years ago)

of course i can tell the difference between them when i hear them, im not a complete idiot, im just saying that their personas, the stuff they rap about, and how, its not especially different. TI's whole im so weary shtick gets boring after a while. still, trap muzik is great, despite too many girl tunes, and david banner, while i like his crunk tracks, his switch from the crooked lettaz days to doing utter crap like play is lame.

okokok, Wednesday, 24 August 2005 19:39 (twenty years ago)

>theyre all rapping about the same ol (post-?)gangsta stuff.<
>despite too many girl tunes, <

might be wrong, but i THINK there were girls before there was gangsta rap. (then again, there were gangsters before there was gangsta rap too, i guess.) anyway, how many girl tunes is too many, okokok?

and anyway, trick daddy raps about how he loves the kids!!

xhuxk, Wednesday, 24 August 2005 19:52 (twenty years ago)

No, girls did not exist before gangsta rap. Males reproduced hermaproditically by sprouting little men on their chest which then fell off and became little kids who were then loved by Trick Daddy. It's hard to remember back that far but I'm pretty sure Jeff Chang goes over it in his book.

Alex in SF (Alex in SF), Wednesday, 24 August 2005 19:55 (twenty years ago)

I dont really see the connection between Trick and TI or what it is that makes the other redundant, or how many girl songs is too many or what T.I.'s 'im so weary schtick' is, unless you mean songs like "Prayin for help" which hardly dominate any of his albums.

deej.., Wednesday, 24 August 2005 19:56 (twenty years ago)

xhuxk - i've always wanted to ask you this.
What do you think of Harlem World by Ma$e?

deej.., Wednesday, 24 August 2005 19:57 (twenty years ago)

too many girl tunes = too many soppy tracks about women.

jeff chang says that women were created when eazy e came into the picture. unfortunately he paid for his valiant attempts to create them by contracting HIV which sent him to an early grave.

anyway, deej, you carry on being an eternal optimist and lover of everything hip hop. ill carry on being a curmudgeon. i obviously never liked it in the first place, otherwise i wouldnt be having difficulty listening to the likes of the not-garbage-at-all juelz santana.

okokok, Wednesday, 24 August 2005 20:07 (twenty years ago)

>xhuxk - i've always wanted to ask you this.
What do you think of Harlem World by Ma$e?<

Ha ha:

http://www.laweekly.com/ink/98/17/music-eddy.php

xhuxk, Wednesday, 24 August 2005 20:17 (twenty years ago)

way to work in that hair metal reference.

Shakey Mo Collier (Shakey Mo Collier), Wednesday, 24 August 2005 20:24 (twenty years ago)

modern hip hop = rap's hair metal

okok, Wednesday, 24 August 2005 20:26 (twenty years ago)

I'm an eternal optimist yet you're the one defending the output of Juelz Santana?

deej.., Wednesday, 24 August 2005 20:26 (twenty years ago)

implicit ("those party-animal black people, they can't record albums as good as A.C. Newman's

if you're going to claim somebody's saying something like this you ought to at least quote the sentence where you think they're saying it & point out very clearly where you think this sentiment's implicit! not my place to tell you what to do of course but you seem to think/imagine that there's a really virulent racism underlying positions that don't seem (to me) to be saying what you're hearing at all.

Banana Nutrament (ghostface), Wednesday, 24 August 2005 20:32 (twenty years ago)

"I'm an eternal optimist yet you're the one defending the output of Juelz Santana?"

sarcasm my friend, its BACK LIKE COOKED CRACK in 2005!
dips = horrifically wack except for killa 'king of all mumblers' cam

okoko, Wednesday, 24 August 2005 20:36 (twenty years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.