the swirlies- C/D?????

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
I enjoy what I've heard of the early albums.
what do y'all think>

howard finch (Ricky Ben-Udi), Thursday, 25 August 2005 21:04 (twenty years ago)

hopefully that copy of Blonder Tongue Audio Baton will still be in the Eastbourne of Cash Converters tomorrow. Then I will have an opinion.

jive session (elwisty), Thursday, 25 August 2005 21:10 (twenty years ago)

cissalC

Voodoo Child, Thursday, 25 August 2005 21:14 (twenty years ago)

Taking the Swirlies thread back to 2001 yo!

donut gon' nut (donut), Thursday, 25 August 2005 21:15 (twenty years ago)

so utterly classic!

cutty (mcutt), Thursday, 25 August 2005 22:09 (twenty years ago)

The latest mini-album was great.. and I finally got to see them live (in between Explosions In The Sky and the Lilies) a year or so ago.. they did the classics pretty much... fun show!

donut gon' nut (donut), Thursday, 25 August 2005 22:14 (twenty years ago)

Classictongue audiobaton

rasheed wallace (rasheed wallace), Thursday, 25 August 2005 22:34 (twenty years ago)

classic and severely underrated.

maria tessa sciarrino (theoreticalgirl), Thursday, 25 August 2005 23:20 (twenty years ago)

ONE OF MY ALL TIME FAVS.

ddb (ddb), Thursday, 25 August 2005 23:56 (twenty years ago)

the slumberland 45 is perfection

jimmy glass (electricsound), Thursday, 25 August 2005 23:59 (twenty years ago)

'They Spent Their Wild Youthful Days in the Glittering World of the Salons' at max volume in my car yesterday = classic.

Ryan WS (fffv), Friday, 26 August 2005 00:00 (twenty years ago)

the first few singles = classic
first album = not so much
next album = classic
mini-lp = classic
syrup usa/seana carmody = dud, although she used to make me swoon.

keith m (keithmcl), Friday, 26 August 2005 03:03 (twenty years ago)

Pancake!

I only have Blonder Tongue Audio Baton, but that's great. I saw them live supporting the Lilys at Spaceland when I was in LA in '03. I don't think they still had the girl singer in the band.

Colonel Poo (Colonel Poo), Friday, 26 August 2005 08:50 (twenty years ago)

"What To Do About Them" is essential stuff. "Blonder tongue Audio baton" in retrospect is pretty good, though at the time I was disappointed.

I always thought the Swirlies deserved more attention.

Brooker Buckingham (Brooker B), Friday, 26 August 2005 14:35 (twenty years ago)

saw them live when i was in high school, total classic. my parents wouldn't let them stay over, though.

hstencil (hstencil), Friday, 26 August 2005 14:54 (twenty years ago)

They seem like a classic example of a band that squandered momentum. I can plot an imaginary career where they keep releasing albums/touring, gradually go back to their early pop sound and end up *huge* (in a Dandy Warhols sense). I accidentally walked into one of their late, no girl, concerts (in the middle of san cristobal de las casas) and it felt/looked like some local prog-rock band and was hard to relate to the group I originally flipped over.

dlp9001, Friday, 26 August 2005 15:53 (twenty years ago)

I thought they were good...but not great. Obv. I was drawn to them for the MBVisms but something about them never really connected for me as it did for others. (I have a feeling my original disenchantment with what ended up becoming 'lo-fi' dates from around this time, so that could be part of the connection.) I'm not surprised at all that in terms of immediate post-gaze stuffage I went for, say, Seefeel far more intensely than this, since I felt Seefeel were riding some of the possibilities of Loveless more thoroughly where the Swirlies were, dare I say it, retrogressive -- a stalling.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Friday, 26 August 2005 16:01 (twenty years ago)

Ned, I think you caught the Swirlies circa Blonder Tongue Audio Baton, which would make sense.. I think that album is over-criticized personally (I mean, how many "shoe-gazy" albums sampled Raymond & Peter?), but it was the most derivative of all their releases. They Spent... was definitely Damon and co. honing his production craft... and a step away from MBV-land.

Maybe you just hate ostriches, Ned.

Mind you, the Lilies' first album -- in comparison -- was FAR more derivative of MBV, and now they're just very derivative of, well, the Kinks and the Monkees -- for better or worse (excusing the one-off Darla Bliss Out thingie). And need I mention Loveless Records?

donut gon' nut (donut), Friday, 26 August 2005 16:09 (twenty years ago)

As for female singers, I think they've gone through three now? Seana first, then Christine, and for the last time I saw them a year or so ago, it was someone else, I think. However, I think the drummer was the original Swirlies drummer from the early singles days.

donut gon' nut (donut), Friday, 26 August 2005 16:12 (twenty years ago)

The band has also been plagued by drummers who mysteriously quit mid-tour as well. (I have no idea why, and I probably don't want to know.)

donut gon' nut (donut), Friday, 26 August 2005 16:12 (twenty years ago)

Maybe you just hate ostriches, Ned.

I have the photos of you and the ostrich, sir. Don't tempt me.

The Lilys, meanwhile...just, no.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Friday, 26 August 2005 16:19 (twenty years ago)

KEVIN SHEA.

i like "what to do..." the best. haven't heard it in years.

also seems weird to compare them with seefeel since they were doing completely different things.

hstencil (hstencil), Friday, 26 August 2005 16:20 (twenty years ago)

It's another thread, but the Lilys last album (released in 2 versions) moves away from the Kinks/Monkees thing in an interesting and initially very off-putting way. And I'm not sure Kinks/Monkees really helps as much as people think it does, given the bizarre song-structures underlying the familiar sound.

dlp9001, Friday, 26 August 2005 16:20 (twenty years ago)

also seems weird to compare them with seefeel since they were doing completely different things.

True, but it's the MBVgaze connection that existed with both which I was thinking of -- the comparison was random and leapt out at me as I was thinking about this thread, but it makes sense in my case because I first heard about them the same year (1993 -- and indeed it was Mr. Donut who turned me onto the Swirlies in the first place in our salad days at KUCI) and reflects two differing ways in using the impulse, one of which still holds much strength for me (Quique ended up in my 136 list) and one of which is less so. I'm not saying that gaze was the core necessarily of all they did, mind you!

Ned Raggett (Ned), Friday, 26 August 2005 16:25 (twenty years ago)

i can't really get into the lillys because of years of gygax! hype. maybe they're actually good, i dunno.

well, see ned, the swirlies were an AMERICAN band, so...

hstencil (hstencil), Friday, 26 August 2005 16:27 (twenty years ago)

I like "They Spent Their...," which sounds almost nothing like MBV, except for a fondness for distortion and the whammy bar.

Saw them at the Indie Rock Flea Market in Clarendon, VA back in '96 or '97 and was amazed by their superdistorted keyboards, a concept I had never thought of before and which I promptly ripped off in a bunch of terrible 4-track recordings.

n/a (Nick A.), Friday, 26 August 2005 16:29 (twenty years ago)

well, see ned, the swirlies were an AMERICAN band, so...

Precisely the problem! No dance beats! *flees in haste*

Actually Seefeel were probably the proto electronic/gaze band by default, though folks like Ulrich Schnauss and the like aren't quite in the same vein.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Friday, 26 August 2005 16:31 (twenty years ago)

Syrup USA was wicked! Solo Seana, not so much, but it was pretty good! Swirlies be WOOOOOOOOOOOO!

David R. (popshots75`), Friday, 26 August 2005 16:33 (twenty years ago)

(psst, i never liked syrup usa at all. I tried.)

donut gon' nut (donut), Friday, 26 August 2005 16:35 (twenty years ago)

i mean i love seefeel but it seems completely different. even mbv is only sorta texturally similar, but not, like, songwriting- or otherwise.

hstencil (hstencil), Friday, 26 August 2005 16:36 (twenty years ago)

Swirlies = great.
Lilys = great.
Seefeel = great.
MBV = great.

I don't really think of any of them sounding anything too much like each other. I guess maybe on first listen, but I feel some of the comparisons on this thread are similar to those way-offbase "Mogwai is a Slint rip-off" comparisons. I think there is even a thread about "common band comparisons that are untrue" in the archives.

gygax! (gygax!), Friday, 26 August 2005 16:48 (twenty years ago)

Ah, but were any four of the bands ever NOT great in turn? (I even say that about MBV, there's a reason the early early stuff is ignored...)

Ned Raggett (Ned), Friday, 26 August 2005 16:50 (twenty years ago)

ahem, donut.

L-I-L-Y-S.

this has been a public service announcement from yours truly.

maria tessa sciarrino (theoreticalgirl), Friday, 26 August 2005 17:10 (twenty years ago)

that syrup usa album is pre-dates mary timony's own fascination with D&D and other sci-fi geekery. maura can back me up on how good this record is.

maria tessa sciarrino (theoreticalgirl), Friday, 26 August 2005 17:12 (twenty years ago)

re: way-offbase "Mogwai is a Slint rip-off" comparisons

hahaha um i heard one of those comparisons from a colleague at work yesterday. y'know, at the place, like, that puts out mogwai's records.

hstencil (hstencil), Friday, 26 August 2005 17:14 (twenty years ago)

How's Carlos these days? Er, wait.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Friday, 26 August 2005 17:20 (twenty years ago)

I'm more bothered by the "Slint invented the soft-loud-soft thing".. which only applies to, what, two or three of their songs? I guess this is the lazy transitive deriving from the "Mogwai = Slint rip off" thing (which I don't agree with either, taking the term "rip off" literally, that is.)

donut gon' nut (donut), Friday, 26 August 2005 17:22 (twenty years ago)

Some explain the appeal of Seefeel to me.

I've only heard Quique. I heard it when it was released and I've revisited it recently, and it doesn't do anything for me. I'm not sure if its just aged poorly or if it's lacking substance. I like ambient approaches just fine, but it seems to me that Seefeel isn't all that good at it.

Should I be listening to some other release?

Brooker Buckingham (Brooker B), Friday, 26 August 2005 17:54 (twenty years ago)

How's Carlos these days? Er, wait.

i dunno, but i don't use the staff toilet.

hstencil (hstencil), Friday, 26 August 2005 18:00 (twenty years ago)

Actually, since it's probably never going to come up otherwise, does anyone else have any, well, not love, but maybe mild affection for that Lint album "Cold Scene" that Seana appeared on. Her song is cute fake Stereolab, in German. It's also the first CD that was also playable on a record player (flexidisc+scissors+glue), unless it wasn't. I'm assuming that Kim's sold most of their copies thanks to the "Swirlies!" sticker on the CD case.

dlp9001, Friday, 26 August 2005 18:17 (twenty years ago)

syrup usa album is horrible. about as good as a radial spangle record.

keith m (keithmcl), Friday, 26 August 2005 21:44 (twenty years ago)

three years pass...

The Swirlies are my favorite band. They exhibit shoegazey guitar techniques overall, but are way more varied than any other "shoegaze" band (Their 2003 album only had one song with a shoegazey guitar part...). Writing them off as one is a bit dismissive of everything they do that was or is original.

Why aren't they recognized as one of the best bands of the nineties??

Evan, Wednesday, 24 June 2009 14:52 (sixteen years ago)

Because they were not famous and did not do blow.

Ned Raggett, Wednesday, 24 June 2009 14:55 (sixteen years ago)

HAHA did Yo La Tengo do blow? Pavement?

Either way, not fair.

Evan, Wednesday, 24 June 2009 14:57 (sixteen years ago)

I will give these guys a li'l listen.

gosh I actually dig this shit (country matters), Wednesday, 24 June 2009 15:02 (sixteen years ago)

I recommend "In Harmony New Found Freedom" as a song to check out.

Evan, Wednesday, 24 June 2009 15:04 (sixteen years ago)

lol I started with the album that song is on and it has already pleasured me

in fact this is a good album so far

gosh I actually dig this shit (country matters), Wednesday, 24 June 2009 15:19 (sixteen years ago)

I loved them at the time too, but I think their lack of fame comes down to small number of real albums and meh live shows. Nightblooms have a better claim to the "90's overlooked semi-shoegazers" title. Maybe Jennyanykind too. Not to say that Swirlies aren't great.

dlp9001, Wednesday, 24 June 2009 15:24 (sixteen years ago)

This is *really* good! "Sterling Moss" just blew me away and I gather the final stretch is even better...

Guy de & (country matters), Wednesday, 24 June 2009 15:40 (sixteen years ago)

Shit, great album.

Guy de & (country matters), Wednesday, 24 June 2009 15:53 (sixteen years ago)

louis try the first ep it will blow your ~~~~mind~~~~

Mr. Que, Wednesday, 24 June 2009 15:54 (sixteen years ago)

OK, am trying.

Guy de & (country matters), Wednesday, 24 June 2009 15:55 (sixteen years ago)

Is ~~~~(x)~~~~ a thing now?

Guy de & (country matters), Wednesday, 24 June 2009 15:56 (sixteen years ago)

Am getting strong Mercury Rev vibes off this earlier stuff.

Guy de & (country matters), Wednesday, 24 June 2009 15:57 (sixteen years ago)

Massively overrated band, this.

I just wish he hadn't adopted the "ilxor" moniker (ilxor), Wednesday, 24 June 2009 15:58 (sixteen years ago)

This is quite good. "Upstairs" probably the highlight thus far. Not on the same level as that Salons album.

Guy de & (country matters), Wednesday, 24 June 2009 16:13 (sixteen years ago)

everything they did was brilliant up to "...salons"

cutty, Wednesday, 24 June 2009 16:18 (sixteen years ago)

Ended up listening to that mid-career EP and "House of Pancake" rules

Guy de & (country matters), Wednesday, 24 June 2009 16:38 (sixteen years ago)

Not overrated... not enough people care or even know about the Swirlies to say that they're overrated, come on.

Guy- if you are into "House of Pancake" and everything else don't forget about Blonder Tongue Audio Baton. And yes "Upstairs" is the best song off of What To Do About Them!

Cats of the Wild Volume Two is also worth checking out up to track 6 or 7. My favorite song on there is "Sleepytime." Gorgeous and messy- my favorite combination.

Evan, Wednesday, 24 June 2009 21:22 (sixteen years ago)

"Two Girls Kissing" is the massive summer jam I needed around now

Guy de & (country matters), Thursday, 25 June 2009 17:36 (sixteen years ago)

Agreed. "Wrong Tube" is one of the best too. I saw them live in February and it was the only one they didn't play that I really really wanted them too.

Yeah, I know I won't shut up about them.

Evan, Thursday, 25 June 2009 21:02 (sixteen years ago)

two months pass...

"Ned, I think you caught the Swirlies circa Blonder Tongue Audio Baton, which would make sense.. I think that album is over-criticized personally (I mean, how many "shoe-gazy" albums sampled Raymond & Peter?), but it was the most derivative of all their releases. They Spent... was definitely Damon and co. honing his production craft... and a step away from MBV-land."

This is totally true, though What To Do About Them is probably more derivative.

Evan, Sunday, 20 September 2009 04:27 (sixteen years ago)

ya, "Tall Ships" esp. is a dead ringer for late-80s MBV (not that I'm complaining, mind you).

... (Pillbox), Sunday, 20 September 2009 05:24 (sixteen years ago)

three years pass...

wait the swirlies are opening for kurt vile on some of his current tour dates?!??!

congratulations (n/a), Thursday, 23 May 2013 16:10 (thirteen years ago)

i wasn't paying attention because i'm not a huge kurt vile guy but i would have considered going to the chicago show just to see the swirlies

congratulations (n/a), Thursday, 23 May 2013 16:10 (thirteen years ago)

Oh awesome! Yes, go. They'll be very loud though.

Evan, Thursday, 23 May 2013 16:17 (thirteen years ago)

too late! the show here was a couple of weeks ago. i saw them once at a weird indie festival in a parking lot in virginia in like 96 or 97.

congratulations (n/a), Thursday, 23 May 2013 16:30 (thirteen years ago)

What do you mean? All the dates are listed in July.

Evan, Thursday, 23 May 2013 16:42 (thirteen years ago)

oh duh. misread the dates. well good for me i guess!

congratulations (n/a), Thursday, 23 May 2013 16:43 (thirteen years ago)

Continuing our series of odd-year re-appearances, Swirlies will be opening for Kurt Vile and the Violators on the following dates:

07/09/2013 Cleveland Heights, OH / Grog Shop
07/10/2013 Detroit, MI / Magic Stick
07/11/2013 Chicago, IL / Metro
07/12/2013 Indianapolis, IN / The Vogue
07/14/2013 Nashville, TN / Mercy Lounge
07/15/2013 Birmingham, AL / The Bottletree
07/16/2013 Atlanta, GA / Terminal West
07/17/2013 Asheville, NC / The Grey Eagle
07/18/2013 Carrboro, NC / Cat's Cradle
07/19/2013 Charlottesville, VA / Jefferson Theater
07/20/2013 Washington, DC / 9:30 Club
The line-up will be Damon Tutunjian with long-time members Rob Laakso (who is also one of the Violators), Deb Warfield (Pure Sunray), and Adam Pierce (Mice Parade), plus some fresh blood in the form of Elliott Malvas (You’re Jovian, Suburban Living) on bass. Other current & former sneaky fluters could be joining in along the way. We may also be playing a few shows after the 20th in the Mid-Atlantic/Northeast – more on that later. See you there!

Evan, Thursday, 23 May 2013 16:43 (thirteen years ago)

Yeah, I'm hoping they come a little closer to New York again after the 20th!

Evan, Thursday, 23 May 2013 16:44 (thirteen years ago)

And they are!

http://www.brooklynvegan.com/archives/2013/05/swirlies_openin.html#more

Evan, Tuesday, 28 May 2013 15:00 (thirteen years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.