this is the thread where i see if anyone gives a shit about the new Ryan Adams album

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed

so, Jacksonville City Nights, anyone else have/love it?

its pretty good, very classic country as opposed to alt, "A Kiss before I go" is pretty ace.

jesus, it will be a miracle is this thread reaches 30 posts.

JD from CDepot, Wednesday, 28 September 2005 19:29 (twenty years ago)

Someone I know recently had the nerve to favorably compare Ryan Adams' parodic tendencies to Bowie's shapeshifing. Huh?

southern lights, Wednesday, 28 September 2005 19:38 (twenty years ago)

Cold Roses felt like a kind of last straw to me. Should I come back?

rogermexico (rogermexico), Wednesday, 28 September 2005 19:57 (twenty years ago)

ehh, i dunno. thats my official answer.

i like JCN so far, but there are some moments (especially lyrically) where its just LAZY. the ambience of the album i really dig, but the tunes aren't there, like they are on heartbreaker.

"earthy, rich with pathos and almost disconcertingly dedicated to the idea that life's only two constants are losing a lover you probably didn't deserve in the first place and losing yourself in the bottom of a fifth of Jack Daniel's."
-from the rolling stone review of JCN.

so yeah, uh its nothing new, nothing startling. on par if not a little better than cold roses.

JD from CDepot, Wednesday, 28 September 2005 20:58 (twenty years ago)

"Ryan Adams' parodic tendencies to Bowie's shapeshifing"

i mean, there is SOME truth to that. i keep thinking about the dylan documentary last night, and just wondering in awe how anyone could have called Ryan Adams "the new dylan" (or how anyone could be called that for that matter)

Adams just makes the records he wants to make, and if he can keep his ego and self indulgent tendencies in control, the records can be quite good. but not great, and certaintly not on par with a bowie or a dylan.

JD from CDepot, Wednesday, 28 September 2005 21:02 (twenty years ago)

i didn't give a shit about any of the others, so no s'pose not.
don't really get him though.
bit contrived for my liking.
hope this helps.

cake (cake), Wednesday, 28 September 2005 22:02 (twenty years ago)

i really enjoyed cold roses. jcn is alright but not even near my favorite, i solidly like only three to four tracks.

katie, a princess (katie, a princess), Thursday, 29 September 2005 13:38 (twenty years ago)

i like it a great deal. adams as shape-shifter is one thing, but this time he didn't forget the songs. (or did i write that already somewhere?)

marc h. (marc h.), Thursday, 29 September 2005 13:48 (twenty years ago)

I bought the last Robbie Fulks, so I can't buy this.

k/l (Ken L), Thursday, 29 September 2005 14:01 (twenty years ago)

On first listen, it's a real improvement on Cold Roses -- on average, much better songs, both in terms of tunes and in terms of lyrics. I was almost ready to give up on him, but I guess I won't. I do kind of wish he had released one one-disk record with 6-7 of these songs and maybe 4-5 from Cold Roses. That could have been an incredibly strong album, and a little more varied in tone.

His run of Stranger's Almanac -> Pneumonia -> Heartbreaker -> Gold was really sensational, notwithstanding some stuff I could do without on the second and fourth of those. Of course, he isn't a never was or will be a "next Dylan". The legitimate comparison is Neil Young.

Vornado, Thursday, 29 September 2005 14:20 (twenty years ago)

He's legitimately talented, I never understood why people hate him so much. I like all his records, with the possible exception of Love is Hell. The new one is real good, I haven't heard it as much as the others so I can't say for sure where it ranks. Cold Roses may be my favorite of his solo records, but Strangers Almanac is where I got on board, so I'm always a little partial to that one.

kornrulez6969 (TCBeing), Thursday, 29 September 2005 15:12 (twenty years ago)

I think he's viewed as a bit of a slacker, like his pal Evan Dando.

k/l (Ken L), Thursday, 29 September 2005 15:19 (twenty years ago)

ryan adams reminds me of paul thomas anderson.

gear (gear), Thursday, 29 September 2005 15:20 (twenty years ago)

parker posey's name now shows up on my ipod

Susan Douglas (Susan Douglas), Thursday, 29 September 2005 15:27 (twenty years ago)

A slacker in what way? Say what you want about the guy, but anyone who releases 1-3 albums a year consistently and tours has a pretty strong work ethic.

Mace, Thursday, 29 September 2005 19:18 (twenty years ago)

Maybe he's a slacker about the editing side of things.

k/l (Ken L), Thursday, 29 September 2005 19:19 (twenty years ago)

15 posts - this thread is halfway to the promised land!

joseph cotten (joseph cotten), Thursday, 29 September 2005 19:34 (twenty years ago)

what vornado and k/l said: yes,burn your faves, yes a slacker in editing of self. Also, haven't heard studio versions all that much, but live radio sets from Heartbreaker and Cold Roses real good: hard to do that laidback, subtle thing on the former(taped from PRI's Mountain Stage),without putting me to sleep, but he negotiates with my rockism; on latter (recent World cafe performance), it's like the hookier stuff on American Beauty meeting the impulsive lurches of live Neil and Crazy Horse.(Not like more restrained Neil mashed with wilder Neil, cos a def Deadishness to the poppier stuff here). And each thing balances the other, which prb would't've happened if originals had attempted it (although maybe they did and it worked, but I never heard that, so this is usefully enjoyable, and would be anyway, probably). Guests on new album?

don, Thursday, 29 September 2005 19:49 (twenty years ago)

"bit contrived for my liking."

that's the last reason i thought i would ever hear on ILM for disliking a piece of music. what do notions about contrivance vs. authenticity really have to do with music quality? (this was pretty much the point of my recent positive review of the alb.)

guest is norah jones, on what i thought was the worst and most out-of-place track on the album.

marc h. (marc h.), Thursday, 29 September 2005 20:49 (twenty years ago)

Anybody see him on CMT's Crossroads with Elton? Been a long time since they showed that, but heard it was okay. (Mostly material from Gold?)

don, Thursday, 29 September 2005 20:53 (twenty years ago)

keep the faith, my freinds, and perhaps we will get to *gasp* 40 posts....

Jacksonville city nights is a great drinking album, much like Heartbreaker before it. but ive been listening to JCN almost non stop since ive got it, and again, THE SONGS ARE NOT THERE! i said it up-post: the ambiance is beautiful, but there are only 4 or 5 songs worth noting on this new album.

that said, "the end" is pretty fucking great... (oh jacksonville, how you burn in my soul!)

JD from CDepot, Friday, 30 September 2005 05:38 (twenty years ago)

"Kiss" "End" "Hardest Part" "Silver Bullets" and "Heart" registered pretty well on my first (two) listens. But Cold Roses is twice as long, and there are only three songs that I could remember a week after I bought it ("Magnolia Mountain", which is almost magnificent enought to redeem the whole project, "Let It Ride", and "Cold Roses", and the last one only because of the sheer Deadish gall of it).

Adams (and Lost Highway) has something of a dilemma. He has a decent-sized, and generally rabid fan base (in the tepid fringes of which I include myself), who will buy pretty much anything he releases and still spend a fair amount to get their hands on the stuff he didn't release. That base seems to be expanding (certainly the concert audiences are), but not at a huge rate. The base is big enough to support a solid, but not sensational career. The attempts to grab mass-market stardom have failed miserably -- I think the heavily promoted Rock n Roll and the almost unpromoted (but O.C.-soundtracked) Love Is Hell sold about the same number of copies.

Obviously, he would have a better chance of breaking out if he edited more. But why should he? He probably isn't going to succeed that way in any event, and there are plenty of people who don't seem to care at all that he puts out a ton of second- and third- rate material with his (IMO) first-rate stuff. Eventually, his popularity is going to decline. But if he can sell 700,000 copies of three releases right now, why issue one release that, with a lot more promotion, would only sell half that at best?

The box set is going to be a bitch, though.

Are we there yet?

Vornado, Friday, 30 September 2005 16:36 (twenty years ago)

"He has a decent-sized, and generally rabid fan base"

i have to include myself on the tepid fringe too. the reason i start ryan adams threads here is because to go to any one of his fansite is an exercise in stupidity. ryanadams.org seems more concerned with what kind of toothpaste ryan uses or t-shirts he wears. here, i figure i might stand half a chance of being able to talk about the music in a more mature manner.

JD from CDepot, Friday, 30 September 2005 18:06 (twenty years ago)

"bit contrived for my liking."

no i'm not sure what i meant either!!
was in a post flu shit day at the office bad mood.

i have no problem with contrivance normally.
i like cocorosie for heaven's sake.

sorry about the blind alley red herring there!

cake (cake), Friday, 30 September 2005 18:11 (twenty years ago)

the new album is his best since Heartbreaker, which is to say that it's not as good as Heartbreaker. the country aesthetic employed comes off earnestly.

"My Heart Is Broken" is now, er, broken--his Whiskeytown version is better. The duet with Norah is mediocre at best, their voices don't really complement each other, and the production on that one is crap given her participation. Adams is still playing way too much piano--he's barely competent and the songs suffer as a result. I also don't like his upper register vocals at all--at times on this record, the Hank tribute seems appropriate, but most of the time it just isn't endearing.

don weiner (don weiner), Friday, 30 September 2005 18:54 (twenty years ago)

yes, less piano, more banjo(?).

an album w/ some of this and some of cold roses would be pretty great.

always on my mind should have been on the official release! truly ridiculous strings.

fancybill (ozewayo), Friday, 30 September 2005 19:06 (twenty years ago)

bango?

k/l (Ken L), Friday, 30 September 2005 19:12 (twenty years ago)

xpost concert audience expanding: yeah,if he can do live acoustic and electric like those radio sets, can see that. And if he can start bab bab babspazzing on at the mouf afterward, an extra added attraction (apparently does all kindsa shit after plant in audience yells request for a Bryan Adams song)(he should do one! Neil still does "Sweet Home Alabama" on occasion)

don, Friday, 30 September 2005 19:19 (twenty years ago)

keep thinking about the dylan documentary last night, and just wondering in awe how anyone could have called Ryan Adams "the new dylan"

Because the 50% of Heartbreaker that sucks is all Dylan impressions?

The duet with Norah

umm, I'm out

(JD, please don't take that the wrong way. I really appreciate your willingness to start non-snarky Ryan Adams threads, and for exactly the reasons you mention. Please keep doing so - maybe next month's release will bring me back!)

rogermexico (rogermexico), Friday, 30 September 2005 20:21 (twenty years ago)


no offense taken. and yeah, that duet with Norah sucks. im begining to think adams smokes too much pot. yet another reason for me to hate that drug.

JD from CDepot, Saturday, 1 October 2005 01:43 (twenty years ago)

adams is the kind of person who smokes too much pot yet thinks he's cool for doing so. He's almost adolescent in his adulation of weed and it's borderline pathetic.

don weiner (don weiner), Saturday, 1 October 2005 01:51 (twenty years ago)

five years pass...

this is the post where i see if anyone gives a shit about the new Ryan Adams album

http://ecx.images-amazon.com/images/I/51ryuGFF7tL._SL500_AA300_.jpg

i genuinely thought when i first joined that he was the admin (ilxor), Tuesday, 14 December 2010 01:51 (fifteen years ago)

Does even he give a shit about his new album?

Ned Raggett, Tuesday, 14 December 2010 02:14 (fifteen years ago)

Seems like he would need a Rick Rubin ass-kicking session at this point.

would like a calmer set (Eazy), Tuesday, 14 December 2010 02:21 (fifteen years ago)

probably not -- word is the sessions are 2007 era outtakes from a couple albums back?

i genuinely thought when i first joined that he was the admin (ilxor), Tuesday, 14 December 2010 02:32 (fifteen years ago)

xp to red naggett

i genuinely thought when i first joined that he was the admin (ilxor), Tuesday, 14 December 2010 02:33 (fifteen years ago)

Maybe it's time for an early-2000s-dudes version of The Highwaymen, with Adams, Jack White, maybe Julian Casabalancas...

would like a calmer set (Eazy), Tuesday, 14 December 2010 02:42 (fifteen years ago)

some old forlorn Whyskeytown song came up on shuffle yesterday and I remembered that for a while this guy was kinda alright

licorice oratorio (baaderonixx), Wednesday, 15 December 2010 17:22 (fifteen years ago)

yup

i liked whiskeytown, and heartbreaker, and promptly cut the dude off after that. i have a sizable chunk of friends who still sorta pay attn to the dude, and it breaks my heart

kanellos (gbx), Wednesday, 15 December 2010 17:28 (fifteen years ago)

I had no idea he was married to Mandy Moore!

http://austintownhall.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/_mar0303_ryan_adams.jpg

Cristal Kieslowski (admrl), Wednesday, 15 December 2010 17:29 (fifteen years ago)

I actually liked his stuff with the Cardinals quite a bit. I've only listened to the first disc of the new release, but it didn't do much for me. Almost all of the songs are the exact same tempo and have pretty similar structures, kind of the "pop" Cardinals that falls halfway between the jammy Dead-like Cardinals and the country Cardinals.

one pretty obvious guy in the obvious (jon /via/ chi 2.0), Wednesday, 15 December 2010 17:30 (fifteen years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.