Alternatives to iTunes?

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
I've got an old-ish Mac, with an old OS and an old version of iTunes which Apple in their infinite greed and wisdom no longer supports. Does anyone know where I can buy new tracks (including chart stuff f'r'instance) easily that will fit into my iTunes library. Basically I want the iTunes stores usability. I don't mind paying for this stuff but all the other big MP3s seem to have it in for Macs.

Thanks.

Ned T. Rifle, Monday, 17 October 2005 06:19 (twenty years ago)

i've got a zx spectrum and i'd like to listen to all teh top chart hits too, please.

seriously, dude. if by "old OS" you mean pre-OS X, you're fucked. just upgrade. or buy CDs instead.

grimly fiendish (grimlord), Monday, 17 October 2005 11:55 (twenty years ago)

Well thanks a bunch.

No, actually it's 10.1 something. I cannot afford to "upgrade". Up until last week I could use iTunes perfectly finely.

You can't posibly be suggesting that only people who can afford to upgrade all the time should be 'allowed' to download?

Shucks, all I wanted was a little advice.

Ned, Monday, 17 October 2005 14:19 (twenty years ago)

i don't think you can still download the old iTUNES. I tried installing an old iCHAT program but it's not possible, so I'm assuming it's the same for iTUNES. Maybe youcould try versiontracker.com.

nathalie, a bum like you (stevie nixed), Monday, 17 October 2005 14:28 (twenty years ago)

You can download an old(-er) iTunes via versiontracker, and in fact when this problem started someone alos put the old version up on a website but you still have to upgrade your OS.

Even with my creaky OSX 1 I can look at the store anbd buy albums but not single tracks. That was why I was looking for an alternative.

Ned, Monday, 17 October 2005 14:32 (twenty years ago)

ihttp://brainwashed.com/vvm/images/_various/shiTunes_b.jpg

cozen (Cozen), Monday, 17 October 2005 14:33 (twenty years ago)

Even with my creaky OSX 1 I can look at the store anbd buy albums but not single tracks. That was why I was looking for an alternative.

without being funny: if you're using 10.1 (and yo, that level of detail is massively helpful when you're asking for advice) you're lucky you can use iTMS at all. 10.1 is, what, about four years old now? i don't think one OS upgrade in that time is exactly unreasonable.

You can't posibly be suggesting that only people who can afford to upgrade all the time should be 'allowed' to download?

not "all the time", no. but occasionally would be nice. otherwise what do you expect apple to do: never make any improvements to anything, just in case someone out there is still running system 6?

grimly fiendish (grimlord), Monday, 17 October 2005 14:46 (twenty years ago)

What I expect Apple to do is just let us use the old system, I could use it last week, but not this week. I'm not the only one. How much would it cost them? Virtually nothing is my guess. They are trying to force me to buy a new computer when I can't.

http://discussions.info.apple.com/[email protected]@.68bbac60

I (and loads of other people) have spent thousdands of pounds on Apple stuff and now feel we've been pretty much shafted because we can't (or don;' want to upgrade our OS - in my case I can't - it'll shaft my computer and see below).

Basically in order to buy stuff from iTunes now I need a new computer. I don't want to / can't afford to buy a new computer this one works fine (except for the f-ing iTunes store).

All I want is to be able to download legally new chart stuff that my kids want to hear. All the stuff I like I download from eMusic or other places.

As a matter of fact I have updated my OS once or twice and I ended up spending more time on the Apple forums trying to fix the bugs than I care to think about.

Ned, Monday, 17 October 2005 16:14 (twenty years ago)

there is absolutely no way that upgrading to 10.2 would shaft your mac. indeed, it will only be an improvement. you might, at a push, be able to get 10.3 on there, although i imagine 10.4 is a no-no (it would be on my iMac DVSE, unless i added more RAM). i think - although i'm not sure - you can still buy 10.2 and 10.3. to run iTunes 4.9 (the minimum you need), you need OS 10.2.8.

i appreciate how this must be a bit of a pisser for you, but ... er, really, if you're sitting there using 10.1 you must be noticing that there's an awful lot else you can't do (or can't do very well). without wishing to sound like Captain Apple, if you're willing to shell out for a shiny iMac, is it really such a big deal to upgrade the (vital) OS every now and then?

progress is good. and yes, it costs money. this is a shame, but what can we do?

grimly fiendish (grimlord), Monday, 17 October 2005 16:35 (twenty years ago)

OK, I'll go for that (although to be honest I haven't really had any other problems but then I don't do that much with my computer - maybe I would though if I had a better OS....hhhmmmm...).

Anyway....this isn't really the place to ask this but where might I buy such a thing as 10.2? I just put it in google and the only place in the UK selling it seemed to want £300 - that don't sound right do it?!? OS 4 is only £90. I guess it's back to the Apple forums...

As for your last point - when I bought my shiny iMac I had a spare grand, now with two kids and a mortgage up the yazoo I don't really have one (shiny or new) penny. I'm not complaining about THAT though! Kids and house are great...it's just this pesky iTunes store business has p-ed me off enormously (as you can probably tell!).

Thanks for your help though.

Ned, Monday, 17 October 2005 16:51 (twenty years ago)

the only place in the UK selling it seemed to want £300

greedy fuckers! no, that's not right. i thought apple still sold these things? hmm.

[makes phone call]

apparently not. o well. eBay is your best bet, then, i think.

grimly fiendish (grimlord), Monday, 17 October 2005 17:07 (twenty years ago)

also: check your e-mail.

grimly fiendish (grimlord), Monday, 17 October 2005 17:12 (twenty years ago)

I don't see why Ned shouldn't be able to use something today that he used perfectly well yesterday.

Sure things need to progress and improve, but Apple breaking old stuff on purpose is just nasty.

My 15 year old CD player still plays all the latest releases for it, so why not a 4 year old Mac?

mei (mei), Tuesday, 18 October 2005 09:20 (twenty years ago)

AMSTRAD CPC 6128 BITCHES

ESTEBAN BUTTEZ~!!, Tuesday, 18 October 2005 09:42 (twenty years ago)

so why not a 4 year old Mac

well, i have a four-year-old mac that runs iTunes 6 perfectly well: the issue here, as ned admits, is that he's chosen not to upgrade his OS until now. i don't think apple are being particularly unreasonable here: like i keep saying, what do we expect? that they never upgrade anything ever, just in case someone's still using a IIfx?

computers aren't the kind of thing you can just buy and run for ever. it's implicit that there will be software updates and so on and so forth. and, er, it's not as if iTMS existed when ned (or i) bought our iMacs, so ... we can't really complain, can we?

grimly fiendish (grimlord), Tuesday, 18 October 2005 10:07 (twenty years ago)

I agree up to a point. And that point is this. Why don't Apple just let us use the old one? They were getting income from my buying tunes. The thing is I still get the store, I can still buy albums, just not individual tracks. I don't understand the technology but if I can do all that why can't they let me just see the tracks. Is it really that important TO THEM that I upgrade? I'm still annoyed but not really about the upgrading anymore, I guess I should have upgraded (although when everythings working just fine it's difficult for us non-computer types to make that leap into thinking we should do this for the future), just by the mystery of it all. Does that make sense? I just felt kind of abandoned. Is that weird? I think it has more to do with being an Apple user than anything else!

Ned, Tuesday, 18 October 2005 13:24 (twenty years ago)

i think/assume the upgrade is to do with them substantially changing the way the digital rights management aspect of iTunes works ... eg because of security flaws in previous versions.

that's the big problem, i guess: the more we become reliant on software (MP3s) rather than hardware (CDs), the more we're going to have to accept occasional bouts of obsolescence.

grimly fiendish (grimlord), Tuesday, 18 October 2005 15:28 (twenty years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.