Are digital guitar effects lame?

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
...

dogonwheels (dogonwheels), Tuesday, 18 October 2005 04:55 (twenty years ago)

only the shitty sounding ones

vacuum cleaner (electricsound), Tuesday, 18 October 2005 05:00 (twenty years ago)

No.

Paul in Santa Cruz (Paul in Santa Cruz), Tuesday, 18 October 2005 05:13 (twenty years ago)

fennesz is making pedals now?

vacuum cleaner (electricsound), Tuesday, 18 October 2005 05:18 (twenty years ago)

I love how Fennesz has sort of become "the case for".

It's easy to understand the charm and beauty of analog goodness. But too often we take sides radically, ruling out any positive attributes of the losing side. I think it's silly to assume digital processing can't be used as a successfully artistic tool. It just takes the right person to come along and learn how to say something with it.

(This, after spending the previous few hours shopping around for old analog equipment. =) )

godshapedhole, Tuesday, 18 October 2005 07:08 (twenty years ago)

The thing I've found about digital effects is that they are just that...digital. As long as you accept that they will never sound EXACTLY like the analog effect/amp/cabinet they are trying emulate, they become just another set of potential sounds, like travis said above.

You always know what you're going to get, sound-wise. They sound the same at 1 or at 10, so you can go TOTALLY overdrive in your bedroom and not piss off the wife/neighbors. They allow a whole large bunch of effects to be bundled in one package (see Line 6) for a year's salary less than the original analogs would.

If you have a problem with them, don't use them. I have had a lot of fun with mine, and I think everyon should at least give them a try.

Big Loud Mountain Ape (Big Loud Mountain Ape), Tuesday, 18 October 2005 12:41 (twenty years ago)

lately, there have been some very respectable-sounding amp simulators floating around. effect pedals, not so much.

definitely steer clear of the Pod and its ilk (the Vox equivalent is slightly better).

ultimately, it depends on what you're trying to do - what kind of space you want to construct in your songs. some music (hell, a lot of music) simply does not require the OMG-a-marshall-stack-just-landed-in-my-room presence of a real amp. some reggae and r'n'b makes shitty DI guitar sound interesting in its very shitty DI-ness.

joseph cotten (joseph cotten), Tuesday, 18 October 2005 12:49 (twenty years ago)

i like the POD. but I said that on the other thread.

kyle (akmonday), Tuesday, 18 October 2005 12:54 (twenty years ago)

is POD XT better? POD 2.0 was an embarrassment (and I played it live for a year).

joseph cotten (joseph cotten), Tuesday, 18 October 2005 12:57 (twenty years ago)

I like my Flextone. I have only ever fooled around with a BassPOD, and it seemed neat and portable. What didn't you like about the 2.0, Joseph?

Big Loud Mountain Ape (Big Loud Mountain Ape), Tuesday, 18 October 2005 12:59 (twenty years ago)

All amp simulators except the Fender Twin one struck me as very synthetic-sounding, and the effects were weirdly limited in how much you could tweak them.

That said, I loved the ability to measure out precise BPM for delays. I use a floorboard live to trigger samples, so I just hooked it up to the POD to dictate the proper delays - one touch would send a note-on signal to start a sample and a midi command to switch on a POD preset. That was pretty damn cool.

I have a feeling this thread should have been on I Make Music.

joseph cotten (joseph cotten), Tuesday, 18 October 2005 13:19 (twenty years ago)

oh, and I heard good things about the bass POD.

joseph cotten (joseph cotten), Tuesday, 18 October 2005 13:20 (twenty years ago)

the line 6 delay modulator sounds fine to me....and clearly sounds ok to plenty of practicing musicians..as every show i seem to go to has one lying on the stage.

but a good number of the digital things sound terrible. i played a line 6 amp once..horrible

bb (bbrz), Tuesday, 18 October 2005 13:38 (twenty years ago)

I like my Boss Digital Delay, but that's definitely it. Beyond that, I'm analog all the way, baby!

Roger Fidelity (Roger Fidelity), Tuesday, 18 October 2005 13:51 (twenty years ago)

I bought a Zoom 505 years ago (didn't know any better) and considered it a nice affordable toy for amateurs like me, for just screwing around in the privacy of your own home. Of course it's not much more than that, though.

Myonga Von Bontee (Myonga Von Bontee), Tuesday, 18 October 2005 13:57 (twenty years ago)

oh, i swear by Line 6 DL-4. it's become a running joke among my friends because i have not seen a single concert in about a year where the guitarist wouldn't use one. Delays seem to lend themselves best to digital reproduction...

the POD was the case of trying to cram a bit too much in one box, though.

joseph cotten (joseph cotten), Tuesday, 18 October 2005 14:06 (twenty years ago)

The PodXT is a great deal better than the old Pods, no doubt about it. Add the FX junkie model pack, and you're truly in style. The tracking on the synth patches is pretty amazing, compared to a lot of the VST trackers, or the old school Korg Guitar Synth.

I think digital guitar effects are fine, it just takes more trial and error to find ones that work for you, and further trial and error to tweak them to get appropriate sounds. I've tried virtually every software guitar amp simulator, and for the most part, they leave me cold. Guitar Rig isn't so bad, but it requires a lot of patience and customization.

Izotope Trash is a phenomenal distortion vst, but it seems to work best on guitars that have been miked.

My goal for several months has been to find a batch of vsts that i could use to create my own mangled/mungled guitar sound. It's a LOT of work, and it's hard to find approaches that haven't been used by the likes of Fennesz, Keith Fullerton Whitman, Oren Ambarchi, etc.

But it's fun.

Brooker Buckingham (Brooker B), Tuesday, 18 October 2005 16:10 (twenty years ago)

Also, i'm a big fan of those 90s effect processors like the Yamaha SPX-90 (Kevin Sheilds secret weapon) and the Ensoniq DP/4. You can get them for under $200, and they have excellent reverbs and delays.

Brooker Buckingham (Brooker B), Tuesday, 18 October 2005 16:13 (twenty years ago)

some are good, some are bad*

*this statement applies to everything, not just digital guitar effects

M@tt He1geson (Matt Helgeson), Tuesday, 18 October 2005 16:58 (twenty years ago)

I'd love to move this discussion to I Make Music, but while here, I've been shopping for a nice mid-priced multi-fx and have been set on a Lexicon, but the concept behind the DP/4 (and price) make it very appealing.

Dan Selzer (Dan Selzer), Tuesday, 18 October 2005 17:02 (twenty years ago)

no, they are not lame. lots of great new relatively inexpensive new digital pedals are out and are really versatile.

where the hell am i going to find an analog reverb pedal that has anywhere near the functionality of the Digiverb/Boss reverbs?

There's no inherent reason why digital has to be crappy. There are lots of terrible horrible analog pedals out there too.

AaronK (AaronK), Tuesday, 18 October 2005 17:05 (twenty years ago)

i just bought a behringer v-amp 2 ($100 pod knockoff). it does a good job modeling amplifier hum and feedback at volumes that allow me to enjoy the ball game on tv. the secret is good speakers--i run it direct into my $15 amplified subwoofer pc speakers and pretend that i'm in boris. i'm debating picking up a $35 behringer digital mixer to set up an effects loop and really go crazy.

dan (dan), Tuesday, 18 October 2005 17:40 (twenty years ago)

I've used Roger Linn's Adrenalinn from versions 1 to the most recent update and it's amp emulations have always sounded very good. Like most of these boxes, it furnishes way more types than I need. It's Marshall Super Lead is great, so is its Jazz Chorus as well as the Fender Bassman. Between minor variations that pretty much covers my desires. It back ends well with old analog fuzz-tones and overdrives in my box and sounds just like when I had to do it the hard way twenty years ago, only it's a lot easier. And the reproduction of the tone is consistant, not dependent on tube wear, battery wear, the weather, mic placement, a bad day, bad luck, temperature, and so on.

George the Animal Steele, Tuesday, 18 October 2005 18:32 (twenty years ago)

i just bought a behringer v-amp 2 ($100 pod knockoff). it does a good job modeling amplifier hum and feedback at volumes that allow me to enjoy the ball game on tv. the secret is good speakers--i run it direct into my $15 amplified subwoofer pc speakers and pretend that i'm in boris. i'm debating picking up a $35 behringer digital mixer to set up an effects loop and really go crazy.

this is the best gear set up ever!

kyle (akmonday), Tuesday, 18 October 2005 18:39 (twenty years ago)

does the pod xt live do everything that the pod xt does? because having the pedals would be nice but not if it's at the expense of other functions..

vacuum cleaner (electricsound), Tuesday, 18 October 2005 22:20 (twenty years ago)

i just got a boss me50 cos its
1) cheapish
2) robust
3) has lots of knobs so you can adjust things just how you like them without having to navigate through crappy LED menus.

zappi (joni), Tuesday, 18 October 2005 22:30 (twenty years ago)

i had one of those zooms for a while but i think they ultimately sound awful

amon (eman), Tuesday, 18 October 2005 23:54 (twenty years ago)

"some are good, some are bad*

*this statement applies to everything, not just digital guitar effects "

You rule, Matt. Long live the grey area.

godshapedhole, Thursday, 20 October 2005 04:04 (twenty years ago)

seven months pass...
Being 42 and playing for as long as i can remember, (I think at last count about 9 electric guitars and 17 different amps later). I'm currently running a piece "o" crap 75 watt amp single 12" on one side with a 12" box under neath stereo'd to a peavy 75 watt bass amp through a Digitech RP3, Wah Pedal and 7 band EQ.
(Best value for money sound EVER!)
Nb: the secret as someone mentioned above CELESTION SPEAKERS!!!!

Mick R, Wednesday, 24 May 2006 08:24 (twenty years ago)

I still haven't heard a decent digital model of a modulation effect.

The phases and flanges in the Line 6 Modulation Modeller are thin and characterless.

I think there will be some serious innovation in the next few years with digital effect modelling. It would be great if someone would create a digital distortion pedal that gave you some of the aggression and break-up found in the VST plug-in world.

Brooker Buckingham (Brooker B), Wednesday, 24 May 2006 14:58 (twenty years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.