you've never read a worse review than this here

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
http://hartfordadvocate.com/gbase/Music/content?oid=oid:130436

"Tony Yayo's debut effort is an amalgamation of all things G-Unit, thugz, drugz, gunz, gunz, thugz, some more drugz, maybe some ice, and definitely a carz or two. Whatever, I am basically sick of this crap. I mean for f-sake, how many times do we need to hear how real these dudes are? About 4,373 according to Yayo. Yes, we know it's all about the "Benjamins," yes we know it's all about the "Escalades," and God damn it, we know it's all about the ho's. Why don't they rap on what it isn't about anymore, and that is, making something new. This is a shit record review, 'cause this is a shit record. Oh, track 5 is alright."

Jimmy_tango, Friday, 21 October 2005 01:15 (twenty years ago)

is that a real actual newspaper or some sort of hartford zine? haha hey just to really get people's goat, this guy also wrote this gem!!!

Clap Your Hands ...
Clap Your Hands and Say Yeah

by Andrew Bottomley - October 13, 2005


This New York-based fivesome is everywhere. Their music is a joyful and sporadic mix of lonesome summer days and a light, poppy wine spritzer with a sultana floating in it, (you heard me correctly). Unpredictable, CYHASY's self-titled debut is a record that, without vocals, would sound like a compilation by seven different bands. But, thanks to the rivetingly whiney yelps from frontman Alec "I can't be bothered to be here" Ounsworth, it comes together in what is sure to be one of the most talked-about records of the year. Best track is a toss-up between "Details of War," and "In this Home on Ice"

M@tt He1geson (Matt Helgeson), Friday, 21 October 2005 01:18 (twenty years ago)

wow i just xposted that same review!


He's like an ILM strawman come to life!

Sym Sym (sym), Friday, 21 October 2005 01:19 (twenty years ago)

Whatever, I am basically sick of this crap. I mean for f-sake, how many times do we need to hear how real these dudes are?

I, for one, agree with this part.

Alex in NYC (vassifer), Friday, 21 October 2005 01:22 (twenty years ago)

This New York-based fivesome is everywhere. Their music is a joyful and sporadic mix of lonesome summer days and a light, poppy wine spritzer with a sultana floating in it, (you heard me correctly).

This in particular, but his writing style in general reminds me of "The Outside Scoop" Jackey Harvey columnist for The Onion.

M@tt He1geson (Matt Helgeson), Friday, 21 October 2005 01:26 (twenty years ago)

surprisingly positive:

That's right, he started shaving, he drives, he doesn't vote, and he's dropped the "lil'." Wanted, the doggy-disciple's sophomore effort, is a mish-mash of post-pubescent rhymes and sophisticated beats. Guest appearances pepper the disc, but stints from Snoop Dogg, Omarion and J-Kwon lack venom. My beef is that Bow Wow rarely gives props to his hometown (Columbus, Ohio), resulting in a sound with no direction or location, losing that intersting neighborhoody feel. But the production is great, and the disc moves as smoothly as a disc can when it lacks substance. Sorry, Mr. Wow, your record's a lil' flat.

nothing rhymes with colombus anyways.

Sym Sym (sym), Friday, 21 October 2005 01:49 (twenty years ago)

He's like an ILM strawman come to life!

Yet correct in his assessment of "Details Of The War."

rogermexico (rogermexico), Friday, 21 October 2005 02:30 (twenty years ago)

Strawman: the ILM word of the day. Everyday. Forever.

Let's give it a rest now, people, Friday, 21 October 2005 03:12 (twenty years ago)

Their music is a joyful and spore-covered mix of Tampax Light Days and a toasted, poppy bagel with a placenta floating on it, (you heard me correctly).

Hurting (Hurting), Friday, 21 October 2005 03:17 (twenty years ago)

worst review for you

peepee (peepee), Friday, 21 October 2005 08:11 (twenty years ago)

WHo is the David Sheehan of music reviews?

iDonut B4 x86 (donut), Friday, 21 October 2005 08:15 (twenty years ago)

Considering how the internet is full of people who'd be willing to lick their grandmother's ass-cheeks to get a review published, how come newspapers can never actually find someone who wants to review music, and just get the dude from the financial desk to slot in instead?

Dom Passantino (Dom Passantino), Friday, 21 October 2005 08:18 (twenty years ago)

does anyone else open threads with titles like these and fear that their reviews will be staring them in the face?

Raymond Cummings (Raymond Cummings), Friday, 21 October 2005 10:53 (twenty years ago)

Holy shit Raymond I was just about to come in and type that. So, ah, yes!

marc h. (marc h.), Friday, 21 October 2005 11:08 (twenty years ago)

best review ever

Sociah T Azzahole (blueski), Friday, 21 October 2005 11:09 (twenty years ago)

Isn't that the Skyscraper guy?

Be Good, Jesus, Not Like Last Time (Roger Fidelity), Friday, 21 October 2005 11:48 (twenty years ago)

http://joyofsox.blogspot.com/scarecrow.jpg

k/l (Ken L), Friday, 21 October 2005 11:53 (twenty years ago)

this is the best review ever
at least its honest, packed with energy, passion, and its not regurgitating PR fluff

okok, Friday, 21 October 2005 11:55 (twenty years ago)

Clap Your Hands And Say Yeah

katrina vanden roffle (Jody Beth Rosen), Friday, 21 October 2005 12:09 (twenty years ago)

I think it has some competiton here:

OK, seriously now, this has got to be the worst review ever

Chewshabadoo (Chewshabadoo), Friday, 21 October 2005 14:33 (twenty years ago)

marc h, you work for pitchfork, you should have that fear whenever someone mentions music they'll include the sentence, "man pitchfork people must find it hard to hear the music with their head up the promo guys ass"

Dan Gr (certain), Friday, 21 October 2005 15:10 (twenty years ago)

does anyone else open threads with titles like these and fear that their reviews will be staring them in the face?

YES!!

Mr. Snrub (Mr. Snrub), Friday, 21 October 2005 16:37 (twenty years ago)

i don't have a problem with the review. in fact, i like it.

my name is john. i reside in chicago. (frankE), Friday, 21 October 2005 16:44 (twenty years ago)

Considering how the internet is full of people who'd be willing to lick their grandmother's ass-cheeks to get a review published, how come newspapers can never actually find someone who wants to review music, and just get the dude from the financial desk to slot in instead?

-- Dom Passantino

Dom, you speak the truth. Only Manchester's leading daily newspaper uses their idiot sports hack, coming up with classics like this:

ROOSTER are about as welcome on my stereo as a toilet break in the middle of the London Marathon.

I have heard their cliched brand of retro cock rock so many times before, most recently with the tired and tested sound of Reef.

But (isn't there always a but) I can almost forgive them this easy-going rock yarn. It's nowhere near so radio-friendly, guys and gals, as their earlier irritating offerings.

Yes, they still crow. And yes, they still wear Busted smiles while singing grown up rock songs.

But this Rooster track isn't nearly so foul as I'd expected.

That was the first one I could find by him, they get much much worse.

Affectian (Affectian), Friday, 21 October 2005 16:53 (twenty years ago)

Fine review.

vinegar (Koens), Friday, 21 October 2005 17:10 (twenty years ago)

(The Yayo one, the CYSY one is a bit wet)

vinegar (Koens), Friday, 21 October 2005 17:11 (twenty years ago)

"guys and gals"!!!!

DJ Mencap0))), Friday, 21 October 2005 18:26 (twenty years ago)

Maybe instead of tearing Yayo down, he could have given the new Blackalicious disc "The Craft" a spin. They are after all the polar opposite of bling, and he could have helped sell a few copies of a better album. I used to write these things, and know that it's more fun to write a crap review (e.g. "Shit Sandwich"), than really try and write for your audience. This one is pretty poorly executed however, and I didn't really learn anything that I didn't know already.

Matt Carlson (mattsoncarlhew), Friday, 21 October 2005 19:00 (twenty years ago)

I like the review at the top of this thread just fine. I've seen thousands worse, and have no fucking idea what is supposed to be so horrible about it. The Clap your hands review kinda stinks, though.

xhuxk, Friday, 21 October 2005 19:13 (twenty years ago)

I think "sultana" is the actual ILX word of the day. It's the second thread I've seen it on, and I wasn't familiar with it before today.

Jordan (Jordan), Friday, 21 October 2005 19:16 (twenty years ago)

My beef is that Bow Wow rarely gives props to his hometown (Columbus, Ohio)

I, for one, agree with this part.

Gavin, Friday, 21 October 2005 21:12 (twenty years ago)

what do you like about that review chuck? (curious)

M@tt He1geson (Matt Helgeson), Friday, 21 October 2005 21:15 (twenty years ago)

"Mr. Wow"?

disco violence (disco violence), Friday, 21 October 2005 21:41 (twenty years ago)

Doesn't every issue of Vice magazine qualify for this thread?

iDonut B4 x86 (donut), Friday, 21 October 2005 22:18 (twenty years ago)

the first one is as generic, as much of a cliche as what it claims to describe, and, worse, shows no evidence that he even listened. "oh, track 5 is alright." Yeah, right: why not dismiss him the way he dismisses the album. The second guy may not have listened either, but he's more plausible:I haven't heard this particular band, who may be great for all I know; but"could be a comp by 7 different bands" except for "rivetingly whiney yelps" certainly describes a lot of promos I *have* heard, and this also ranks funny on a lot of reviews I've read.

don, Saturday, 22 October 2005 00:44 (twenty years ago)

I've seen thousands worse, and have no fucking idea what is supposed to be so horrible about it.

1. Poor and empty use of the word "basically": "I am basically sick of this crap."

2. Gratuitous and condescending use of scare quotes: "Yes, we know it's all about the 'Benjamins,' "

3. No commentary on the album itself except for its predominant lyrical themes -- which he may well be correct on, but it would be helpful to know how his delivery or his beats or his one-liners stack up against similarly themed albums in the genre. Since there's nothing of the sort marshalled as evidence, one might assume he hasn't heard other works within the genre; indeed, one can easily see this critic as dismissing the entire genre as, "oh, look at those rap guys, they're all about their 'Benjamins,' all about their 'gunz.' "

Their music is a joyful and sporadic mix

How the fuck can a music mix be described as "sporadic"? It only plays at occasional intervals?

Joe McCombs, Saturday, 22 October 2005 02:05 (twenty years ago)

I believe that was the best review I've read for a very long time.

King Money, Saturday, 22 October 2005 08:53 (twenty years ago)

xpost sporadic: maybe it only makes any impression at all sporadically, thus only "plays" sporadically? And/or maybe it's dub? (I keed! I keed the dub!)

don, Saturday, 22 October 2005 16:34 (twenty years ago)

Some reasons that the review on the top of this thread cannot possibly be the worst review ever written, or even close: The review has a real visceral energy to it, it has a concrete opinion that's more or less comprehensible, it has a sense of humor (i.e., it made me laugh), it sounds pissed off and therefore somewhat conveys the writer's personality, it has at least a grain of truth in it (about the genre, if not necessarily about the specific record in question, which I've never heard and have no opinion about), it is liable to piss some people off by pointing out said genre's flaws (which i'm not saying i necessarily agree with, mind you.) many reviews -- thousands upon thousands -- have NONE of the traits I've just mentioned. But right - the review's complaints are pretty hackneyed; the language is often awkward; the review may be wrong (i wouldn't know), and the review might not exactly make the best consumer guide. Though i see no reason why every review *has* to be a consumer guide. Or, let me rephrase that; the review only mentions one song, and doesn't necessarily say what's good about that song. Though my point is that, for a review like this, it might not HAVE to say what's good about that song. The blunt ending is actually what made me laugh, so getting more specific probably would have wrecked the joke. (Which, right, may not be the most original joke in the world. Big whoop. Nobody is claiming this is the BEST review ever written. Only that it's not nearly the worst.) (Also: He is basically implying that the Yayo record is a generic example of a shitty genre. And he never says whether there might be other examples of the genre that are *less* generic, and hence less shitty. I don't agree with him about this particular genre, but I can for sure see the point of castigating a record for being generically shitty. I've done it myself, many times.) (Also: the review ADMITS that it's a half-assed review. Which means it has more self-knowledge than approximately 99 percent of the half-assed reviews out there, right?)

xhuxk, Saturday, 22 October 2005 18:50 (twenty years ago)

Also, all the Tony Yayo I've heard has been pretty shit.

Hurting (Hurting), Saturday, 22 October 2005 20:24 (twenty years ago)

From Allmusic! Favorite part bolded.

On their debut, Havoc and Prodigy tell the listener in all sorts of overconfident manners that there are few people out there who can mess with Mobb Deep. In fact, they do so in 14 different ways on Juvenile Hell. Mostly produced by Mobb Deep themselves, this album is rawness at an unrelenting pace, with an undeniable, relentless and often irrational energy. The intro cut sets the mood as a warning, set to a "Queens brand" production. The tempo is kind of fast, but the bassline rolls to easily facilitate a strong headnod. The sampled horn stabs help to remind you that after all, it's still music. Over this beat Prodigy cautions: "it's called Juvenile Hell, you won't survive long." In the first few songs, Mobb acquaints the listener with the life of a "frustrated and confused young juvenile" living in Queens. Juvenile Hell is hardcore, but not void of musical pr creative effort and accomplishment; it's really cool, serious, and 100% hip-hop. Highlights include "Flavor for the Non Believes," "Peer Pressure," "Stomp Em Out" (featuring Big Noid), and "Hold Down the Fort." When Juvenile Hell was initially released, it didn't do so well in the stores. Perhaps it was the excess of threats and proclamations making up Juvenile Hell that kept buyers away in 1993, or maybe it was the label's inability to market this virulent project correctly. In any event, it's an album worthy of historical note.

Gavin, Saturday, 22 October 2005 20:48 (twenty years ago)

"Black Eyed Peas Bring Hip-Hop to Campus": the thread where we make fun of college newspaper articles

Hurting (Hurting), Saturday, 22 October 2005 20:51 (twenty years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.