No surprises

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/entertainment/4653662.stm

whatever (boglogger), Friday, 27 January 2006 12:25 (twenty years ago)

The first defendant, from King's Lynn, said the BPI had no direct evidence of infringement, but the judges dismissed this and ordered him to make an immediate payment of £5,000.

Hmm, so you can be found guilty without actual evidence now?

mark grout (mark grout), Friday, 27 January 2006 12:33 (twenty years ago)

there's a slight difference between a defendant claiming there is no evidence and there actually being no evidence.

fact checking cuz (fcc), Friday, 27 January 2006 12:56 (twenty years ago)

Hmm, so you can't even lie in court anymore?

Dittoismus (Dada), Friday, 27 January 2006 13:03 (twenty years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.