What are the musical equivalent? I'm thinking they can sing well, play an instrument well (as in, lead guitarist), is a songwriter, can dance, and probably has a "look" (i.e., isn't ugly).
I'll start with two:
Prince.Bruce Springsteen. (I know Miami Steve and Nils play lead in the band, but Bruce has been known to solo occasionally, and he isn't a slouch)
Also, try and keep the "tool" jokes to a minumum...
― Ben Crazee (Ben Crazee), Wednesday, 21 June 2006 10:18 (nineteen years ago)
― p@reene (Pareene), Wednesday, 21 June 2006 11:03 (nineteen years ago)
― Half loaf, half pompadour (noodle vague), Wednesday, 21 June 2006 11:07 (nineteen years ago)
― Colin Meeder (Mert), Wednesday, 21 June 2006 11:08 (nineteen years ago)
― dog latin (dog latin), Wednesday, 21 June 2006 12:00 (nineteen years ago)
― trees (treesessplode), Wednesday, 21 June 2006 12:22 (nineteen years ago)
― Josh in Chicago (Josh in Chicago), Wednesday, 21 June 2006 12:27 (nineteen years ago)
― hank (hank s), Wednesday, 21 June 2006 12:31 (nineteen years ago)
The last two have nothing whatsoever to do with ability as a musician. Well, maybe in the case of tappers who musically create with their dancing. This is not to be construed as a dismissal of dance as an art, I'm simply distinguishing dancing (which can be accomplished without music, after all) from the creation of music.
The looks thing is just idiotic, though.
Also, differentiating singing from playing a musical instrument (ie: tool-assisted musical creation) is an artificial difference as far as I'm concerned. Try telling an opera singer sometime that they're not 'really' a musician because they don't play an instrument. If you don't mind a face full of phlegm, that is.
Still, it's an interesting question - what 'dimensions' may be ascribed to musical talent? Let's see if I can get to five playing by my rules.
1. Dexterity/'chops'2. Tone3. Improvisational creativity4. Compositional creativity (maybe a cheat, if improvisation is considered spontaneous composition.)5. Okay, I'm stuck
x-post with Josh
― 100% CHAMPS with a Yes! Attitude. (Austin, Still), Wednesday, 21 June 2006 12:36 (nineteen years ago)
better than Bruce Springsteen...
― hank (hank s), Wednesday, 21 June 2006 12:39 (nineteen years ago)
― The Aff Its Heid Show (Dada), Wednesday, 21 June 2006 12:41 (nineteen years ago)
replace these two with "has stage presence" and "can lead a band" and I'm in.
― Colin Meeder (Mert), Wednesday, 21 June 2006 12:46 (nineteen years ago)
― 100% CHAMPS with a Yes! Attitude. (Austin, Still), Wednesday, 21 June 2006 12:51 (nineteen years ago)
― Haikunym (Haikunym), Wednesday, 21 June 2006 12:54 (nineteen years ago)
― 100% CHAMPS with a Yes! Attitude. (Austin, Still), Wednesday, 21 June 2006 12:56 (nineteen years ago)
(and dancing is probably as important as "hitting for average")
― Haikunym (Haikunym), Wednesday, 21 June 2006 12:57 (nineteen years ago)
― The Aff Its Heid Show (Dada), Wednesday, 21 June 2006 12:58 (nineteen years ago)
Can you explain this for the baseball illiterate, please?
― 100% CHAMPS with a Yes! Attitude. (Austin, Still), Wednesday, 21 June 2006 13:01 (nineteen years ago)
In baseball a traditional way to gauge how good hitters are is to average how many hit they have in relation to how many at-bats they have. A good average is .300 and above (ie, they get a hit 30% of the time.....but with walks and such it's kind of more complicated than that....)
Oh, I forgot Buddy Holly.
― Ben Crazee (Ben Crazee), Wednesday, 21 June 2006 13:40 (nineteen years ago)
I like my guidelines better.
― Ben Crazee (Ben Crazee), Wednesday, 21 June 2006 13:42 (nineteen years ago)
― steal compass, drive north, disappear (tissp), Wednesday, 21 June 2006 13:43 (nineteen years ago)
― Joseph McCombs (Joseph McCombs), Wednesday, 21 June 2006 13:53 (nineteen years ago)
Okay, fine. What I was trying to get at was whether Haikunym thinks dance is relevant to the discussion or not. I'm still not sure about this, but thanks for spelling out what Hitting for Average is.
> I like my guidelines better.
Of course you do, but I've explained why I think distinguishing vocal talent from instrumental talent isn't a good idea, and why I think dance doesn't really fit in here. Anyway, we seem to agree about composition being important, although you call it songwriting. As I said, improvising is possibly just part and parcel of that, so it can go out the window if a strong case is made that it's redundant. As for tone, please don't think I'm just talking about how close a player can come to a particular 'ideal' sound for a given instrument. Tone here is just a shorthand for creating a distinctive voice (either literal or metaphorical) in the music. Tom Waits scores as high on tone for me as Ella Fitzgerald does. So does Thelonious Monk, not only for his wierd piano approach, but for the way a Monk melody doesn't sound like anybody else's, no matter where you hear it or who plays it. So 'tone' can exist in any other dimension of music I'm describing here.
Also, Monk was a fantastic dancer.
― 100% CHAMPS with a Yes! Attitude. (Austin, Still), Wednesday, 21 June 2006 14:03 (nineteen years ago)
And what I meant to say above is that hitting for average is mightily overrated among casual fans, and that dancing is mightily underrated by music critics, so I think if we are including the former in our list of five tools then we had better include the latter as well.
― Haikunym (Haikunym), Wednesday, 21 June 2006 14:08 (nineteen years ago)
― Haikunym (Haikunym), Wednesday, 21 June 2006 14:09 (nineteen years ago)
― Joseph McCombs (Joseph McCombs), Wednesday, 21 June 2006 14:09 (nineteen years ago)
― mummy wrapped in bacon (nickalicious), Wednesday, 21 June 2006 14:12 (nineteen years ago)
Come again?
― The Aff Its Heid Show (Dada), Wednesday, 21 June 2006 14:13 (nineteen years ago)
― Offisa Pump (Rock Hardy), Wednesday, 21 June 2006 14:17 (nineteen years ago)
― Haikunym (Haikunym), Wednesday, 21 June 2006 14:17 (nineteen years ago)
― The Aff Its Heid Show (Dada), Wednesday, 21 June 2006 14:18 (nineteen years ago)
― Haikunym (Haikunym), Wednesday, 21 June 2006 14:22 (nineteen years ago)
But to say that a musician who doesn't dance as part of their performance isn't as good as one who is just strikes me as ridiculous. A lot of people play instruments that keep them fixed to a spot. A lot of great singers are paralyzed ffs.
― 100% CHAMPS with a Yes! Attitude. (Austin, Still), Wednesday, 21 June 2006 14:23 (nineteen years ago)
― mox twelve (Mox twleve), Wednesday, 21 June 2006 14:25 (nineteen years ago)
― The Aff Its Heid Show (Dada), Wednesday, 21 June 2006 14:28 (nineteen years ago)
― Tripmaker (SDWitzm), Wednesday, 21 June 2006 14:30 (nineteen years ago)
― Eppy (Eppy), Wednesday, 21 June 2006 14:32 (nineteen years ago)
― Haikunym (Haikunym), Wednesday, 21 June 2006 14:37 (nineteen years ago)
― "tool" musicians!?!?! (nickalicious), Wednesday, 21 June 2006 14:38 (nineteen years ago)
BY THE WAY WELCOME BACK DOOD
― Haikunym (Haikunym), Wednesday, 21 June 2006 14:41 (nineteen years ago)
I like my musicians to dance, is that so wrong?
Some more (replacing dancing with charisma):
Billy Corgan? Hank Williams? Alison Krauss (does she write songs too?)?
― Ben Crazee (Ben Crazee), Wednesday, 21 June 2006 15:20 (nineteen years ago)
And no, for the sixth time, there's nothing wrong with liking musicians who dance.
― 100% CHAMPS with a Yes! Attitude. (Austin, Still), Wednesday, 21 June 2006 15:26 (nineteen years ago)
― Christopher Costello (CGC), Wednesday, 21 June 2006 15:37 (nineteen years ago)
― The Aff Its Heid Show (Dada), Wednesday, 21 June 2006 15:40 (nineteen years ago)
take yer Moneyball to Dissensus!
"No he can't, they were keeping him on the bench for a fucking reason."
but he was "ready to play", and we all know that 90% of success is *preparation*...
― hank (hank s), Wednesday, 21 June 2006 15:44 (nineteen years ago)
Congratulations.
The point of the initial question was to think of musicians who had the whole package -- good at everything. That's it.
― Ben Crazee (Ben Crazee), Wednesday, 21 June 2006 15:46 (nineteen years ago)
― Steve Shasta (Steve Shasta), Wednesday, 21 June 2006 15:50 (nineteen years ago)
― mummy wrapped in bacon (nickalicious), Wednesday, 21 June 2006 15:51 (nineteen years ago)
nick - Most of the time, yes. Do you really mean to say that dancing is impossible without music? Or are you taking the position that by dancing one creates music, regardless of whether sound results from the dance? Is music something more than sound then?
― 100% CHAMPS with a Yes! Attitude. (Austin, Still), Wednesday, 21 June 2006 15:55 (nineteen years ago)
― Steve Shasta (Steve Shasta), Wednesday, 21 June 2006 15:57 (nineteen years ago)
Maybe.
― mummy wrapped in bacon (nickalicious), Wednesday, 21 June 2006 16:02 (nineteen years ago)
And James Brown is no technical whiz, but he kicks serious ass on the organ. Those little solos on the early '70s stuff embody funk more than just about anything else on Earth
― novamax (novamax), Wednesday, 21 June 2006 16:04 (nineteen years ago)
― Adolescence Mokushiroku! (gendo ikari), Wednesday, 21 June 2006 21:46 (nineteen years ago)
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Wednesday, 21 June 2006 21:47 (nineteen years ago)
― Adolescence Mokushiroku! (gendo ikari), Wednesday, 21 June 2006 21:52 (nineteen years ago)
I'll be sure and pass on to Fred Wesley that you think his estimation of JB's musical skill is "ignorant bullshit".
― Shakey Mo Collier (Shakey Mo Collier), Wednesday, 21 June 2006 21:56 (nineteen years ago)
― Shakey Mo Collier (Shakey Mo Collier), Wednesday, 21 June 2006 21:57 (nineteen years ago)
James Brown is like the Stan Lee of funk music.
― Shakey Mo Collier (Shakey Mo Collier), Wednesday, 21 June 2006 21:59 (nineteen years ago)
― Adolescence Mokushiroku! (gendo ikari), Wednesday, 21 June 2006 22:01 (nineteen years ago)
― trees (treesessplode), Thursday, 22 June 2006 14:39 (nineteen years ago)
― Haikunym (Haikunym), Thursday, 22 June 2006 14:48 (nineteen years ago)
― mummy wrapped in bacon (nickalicious), Thursday, 22 June 2006 15:05 (nineteen years ago)
― Will (will), Thursday, 22 June 2006 16:10 (nineteen years ago)