But a friend/coworker doesn't believe in personal reshuffling. He figures that every album, even if it's a compilation, deserves to be listened to all the way through. I have nothing against playing a disc from start to finish...if it's good. Or if I'm in the mood to hear it all. But not all albums stand up to front-to-back scrutiny.
Where do you guys stand? Do you eliminate the lesser tunes from a disc or do you just press "play" and deal wit' it?
― Rev. Hoodoo (Rev. Hoodoo), Friday, 20 October 2006 04:04 (nineteen years ago)
― A-ron Hubbard (Hurting), Friday, 20 October 2006 04:09 (nineteen years ago)
― Tim Ellison (Tim Ellison), Friday, 20 October 2006 04:30 (nineteen years ago)
I particularly skip "Dreams Reoccurring" or "Reoccurring Dreams" from "Zen Arcade"
― I say we take off and nuke the site from orbit (I say we take off and nuke the), Friday, 20 October 2006 05:10 (nineteen years ago)
but that's the ole neuroses actin' up 'gin.
― poortheatre (poortheatre), Friday, 20 October 2006 05:29 (nineteen years ago)
― poortheatre (poortheatre), Friday, 20 October 2006 05:30 (nineteen years ago)
It IS less work...if you're doing something involving, like reading a good book or cleaning house, and you don't want nothin' to disturb your groove while you're doing it.
― Rev. Hoodoo (Rev. Hoodoo), Friday, 20 October 2006 12:35 (nineteen years ago)
I guess previous to my personal MP3 revolution I was a big fan of listening to albums all the way through as the artist intended. Why? Partly because I like the concept of albums as a whole. You wouldn't want to swap round or get rid of certain notes and sections in a song and therefore you wouldn't want to fuck with the layout of an album.
The other reason is down to a fear of become complacent with my listening. It's very easy, if you have the power, to only play your favourite tunes off of an album and to neglect tracks that maybe you didn't realise you liked. There might be a magnificent earth-shattering coda on a track I previously thought wasn't all that. Or maybe I just didn't "get" the tune on first listen.
― wogan lenin (dog latin), Friday, 20 October 2006 12:46 (nineteen years ago)
― Moderation Request Line (fandango), Friday, 20 October 2006 12:55 (nineteen years ago)
In other news, wtf Charlie?!
― Sick Mouthy (Nick Southall), Friday, 20 October 2006 13:49 (nineteen years ago)
― o. nate (onate), Friday, 20 October 2006 14:12 (nineteen years ago)
By "You", you really mean "I", right? :)
Personally, I'd embrace the option of doing a little editing of my own - removing obligatory tedious unaccompanied bass solos from jazz performances and so forth. I'm with Hurting.
― M. Agony Von Bontee (M. Agony Von Bontee), Friday, 20 October 2006 16:42 (nineteen years ago)
― M. Agony Von Bontee (M. Agony Von Bontee), Friday, 20 October 2006 16:45 (nineteen years ago)
On the contrary, it's one more area where vinyl kicks ass over CD's
― Diddumsismus (Dada), Friday, 20 October 2006 16:45 (nineteen years ago)
This doesn't mean I never skip a track, it just means I usually don't plan to skip a track in advance.
― Zachary Scott (Zach S), Friday, 20 October 2006 17:55 (nineteen years ago)
― Joseph McCombs (Joseph McCombs), Saturday, 21 October 2006 02:55 (nineteen years ago)
― Charlie Howard (the sphinx), Saturday, 21 October 2006 04:37 (nineteen years ago)
what, just 'cause you gotta work harder to avoid the dud track on a vinyl record, that makes it greater? hell, i STILL buy vinyl on the regular and even I dont get THAT statement!
― Rev. Hoodoo (Rev. Hoodoo), Saturday, 21 October 2006 07:11 (nineteen years ago)