Woman are doing it for themselves

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Songs of Anger,Braddgico and obscenity that match men .
For Example:Faithfuls Why'd ya do it ?

anthony, Friday, 12 April 2002 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

PRETTY MUCH EVERY SONG BY A FEMALE RAPPER. LIL KIM, PRIME EXAMPLE.

Poops McGee, Friday, 12 April 2002 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Is this what they mean by the ILM mafia? The preceding postings make very little sense to my admittedly immature mind. Is it some kind of code?

Chris Sallis, Friday, 12 April 2002 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

"PRETTY MUCH EVERY SONG BY A FEMALE RAPPER". Ditto for rock,Phair/Apple/Harvey/OConner not enough testosterone (or too intelligent) to rage about much else unless you count making someones "shitlist".

kiwi, Friday, 12 April 2002 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

misread the thread ignore comments even more than usual

kiwi, Friday, 12 April 2002 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

heavens to betsy "terrorist"

di, Friday, 12 April 2002 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Yeasti Girls ("You Suck"), Gangsta Boo ("Suck A Little Dick") amoung others.

Mr Noodles, Friday, 12 April 2002 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Bikini Kill - Suck My Left One

Also, the thing I love about the lyrics to PJ Harvey - Rub 'Til It Bleeds is that she pretty much reduces the male to a smouldering pile of shit but still remains 100% woman

Also the Donnas sort of but they don't always succeed at being in control

Also Juliana Hatfield "Houseboy" sort of

Also the Gits r0x0r 4everrr RIP MIA ZAPATA "here's to your fuck"

Ron, Friday, 12 April 2002 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Pretty much any Bikini Kill song, right? Especially "New Radio" and "White Boy."

Justyn Dillingham, Friday, 12 April 2002 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

The thing is, though, that it often sounds like women are simply copying when they do this - perhaps this doesn't apply to female rappers. When feminist bands try to simultaneously cop a caring for the world attitude with an "I'm tough" attitude it doesn't seem perfect to me though it's still fun.

I think that when women do the opposite angle - total abjection - they're carving out genuinely unmapped, unspoken, and almost frightening territory: "He isn't true/He beats me too/What can I do?/Oh my man I love him so ..." (Bessie Smith), or "I'd change my ways for him/I'd change all of them/If only I could be/The girl he needs" (Lydia ...), or "I was born a woman/Born to be hurt/Born to be lied to, cheated on, stepped on, treated like dirt" (Sandy Posey) or "Will You Still Love Me Tomorrow", etc. Just by confessing these hideous truths these women are spitting in the face of society way more than someone who claims to be an "Independent Women" or a "Survivor." I mean, ha ha ha. Those very women who sing those words have to parade around like sluts just to make a buck. And even as celebrities like Drew Barrymore are fakely embracing Destiny's Childs 'independent stance,' they must feel some unease. In my opinion, a stab at the 'truth' goes further, is funnier, and has more effect than pretending to be something other than what you are.

But boasting is always pretty funny.

On the other hand, I find "Nasty Girl" funnier, wilder and more honest than "Independent Woman." I'm surprised it didn't end D.C.'s career though - they certainly deserved it after that!

Fuck I think I sound like some columnist for the Guardian who thinks they have THE key post-ironic view on post-feminism. Nevertheless, I genuinely do like the purity of those rare female songs of complete, utter abjection and subservience. It can't be wrong to express these all too human realities in music - even if they happened to be completely false exaggerations - after all, music is a distillation, not a mirror.

I could go even further, and say that often when women adopt a tough stance, it seems one step further in their subservience. For example, when the Trashwomen (who I really really like - in fact, adore) pose in boy-fantasy outfits, then claim lyrically that they want to go round screwing boys over, it seems as if they're saying, 'hey, I'm available, just like you always wanted, yeah I'm that slut ... yes I have indeed walked right into your trap. In fact, I'd do anything to please you, even pretend to be selfish and care about nothing but sex.' And to claim that they're being ironic ... just don't even bother.

I feel really bad for dissing the confident woman thing. I mean I can't even really tell, perhaps it is an important factor in liberating women from a position of subservience. But for example, when Toni Morrison (?) reads that 'Positively Absolutely Woman' poem, I feel - kind of unmoved. On the other hand, 'You Don't Own Me' really moves me and makes me feel liberated ... perhaps because it's defensive, rather than offensive. But you know, listening to 'Search and Destroy' or 'Rock and Roll (Made me a man)' or even 'I'm a Man', all those things make me feel boastful about myself too, because that's the way imagination works ...

I guess it's just that sometimes when women are talking about being tough or confident, it seems more like a lesson one must dutifully follow than a liberation. It's like when the preacher stands at the front of the church and talks about true love and you stare at the ceiling. It's potentially the most moving idea in the world, but he's stepping all over it by using it without sincerity, to manipulate people. On the other hand, there are honest preachers.

maryann, Saturday, 13 April 2002 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Maryann-Ive been waiting for a response to your comments as I found them very interesting. Do other women agree with Maryann?

kiwi, Sunday, 14 April 2002 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

I like songs about the hurt in the hedonism, which I think often come w/ the independant woman territory. I don't know why I don't hear the same sublimated betrayal in the orig "Star Star" as Joan Jett's, for example, but the re-sexualization makes it. Lydia Lunch is the possible exception to this.

Sterling Clover, Sunday, 14 April 2002 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

I had been wanting to respond to maryann but after rereading your comments i'm not sure I was understanding you well enough... but maybe you could elaborate on why the man isn't 'laughing all the way to the bank' when a woman adopts this subservient role willingly. Your points about the confident stance being reactionary are valid. In fact after I first posted I listened to "suck my left one" and the lyrics are not so much pro-woman as they are anti-man.

Ron, Sunday, 14 April 2002 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

i don't find DC's lyrics empowering at all. they are about as empowering as a tampon ad - ooh whoopdy shit, women have the power to choose what boy they will date and what clothes they will buy, without challenging society at all. i don't think DC are anti-male or pro-woman, i think they are pro-capitalism and pro-heterosexuality. BBOORRIINNGG.

i disagree with maryann about the kind of "my man treats me like shit but i love him anyway" lyrics. they are not empowering. when the cardigans "lovefool" was released, all i remember for ages was hearing a bunch of nitwits running around going - "its just like my life!" - as if the song wasn't a pisstake, as if it was an excuse to behave like a brainless ninny.ick!

what i really like are lyrics which are hopeful and constructive. theres some stuff on "all hands on the bad one" by sleater-kinney that fits here. on "milkshake n honey" where they parody the whole male- sexuality-in-rock ethos - they aren't copying it they are sending it up for sure, "i've always been a guy with a sweet tooth and that girl was just like a king-sized candy bar". and i also love the way "#1 Must Have" ends with the line, directed at women "now is the time to invent" - its constructive and hopeful. sorry for talking so much about sleater-kinney. i do admit that i have a somewhat unhealthy fixation with that band.

i'm not overly huge on the anti-male thing, but what struck me about the riot grrrls and pj harvey was their assertion that it's okay to be angry, screw whether or not its ladylike. to me it was affirming the humanity of women, in a world where we are expected to be quiet and polite and demure and well i guess angelic. this assertion may strike some people as an old- fashioned sentiment, but in reality there are many men, including ones who pay lipservice to feminism, who express a dislike of loud abrasive women. thats why i found riot grrls and pj harvey so radical.

di, Sunday, 14 April 2002 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

For example, when the Trashwomen (who I really really like - in fact, adore) pose in boy-fantasy outfits, then claim lyrically that they want to go round screwing boys over, it seems as if they're saying, 'hey, I'm available, just like you always wanted, yeah I'm that slut ... yes I have indeed walked right into your trap. In fact, I'd do anything to please you, even pretend to be selfish and care about nothing but sex.'

how do you know that they aren't authentically selfish? why do you assume that they dress "slutty" (and i use the word in inverted commas because i think you have used it in an offensive and judgmental manner) to impress boys? i've always thought they were saying "hey we might not look like supermodels, but up yours with your ideals of feminine beauty - we're here to expand the ideals" and thats something i find powerful, as a girl who hovers between a size 12 and 14. i think they're speaking to women with that, not to men. thats something i have often tried to express myself - i'm not skinny and i'm not ashamed of my body so i sometimes wear short skirts and hope that girls realise they don't have to be ashamed of their bodies if they aren't skinny either.

di, Sunday, 14 April 2002 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

I think that when women do the opposite angle - total abjection - they're carving out genuinely unmapped, unspoken, and almost frightening territory:

its just this kind of thing often doesn't go far enough, and ends up coming across as self-piteous tripe. it isn't all that useful to whinge on about how things sux if you aren't going to look for solutions to the problem. its reeks of, "this is the way it is, and ever shall be".

di, Sunday, 14 April 2002 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

it is helpful to first recognise the genre a song is written in or else you can end up making some pretty odd comparisons - bessie smith (blues) to DC(pop).

ducklingmonster, Sunday, 14 April 2002 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

duckling is on the money here. actually i think kim pieters (sorry to namedrop) brought it up in a convesation with me... the way women musicians are all lumped in together as if being a woman musician was a genre in itself.

di, Monday, 15 April 2002 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Is there an argument to be had that the most empowered stance of all is just writing songs which have nothing to do with sexuality or gender war or empowerment?

Ronan, Monday, 15 April 2002 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Ronan - if I recall a variation on this argument was originally used by Virginia Woolf re: why "Wuthering Heights" was a piece of flawless genius but "Jane Eyre" wasn't. The problem with it as I see it: Charlotte Bronte clearly feels the social inferiority of women in "Jane Eyre", but she doesn't allow it to get in the way of her writing skillxor or her story. Conversely, the fact that Emily Bronte portrays gender relations in "Wuthering Heights" that were/are alien to the real world doesn't necessarily mean she's 'transcended' gender relations; it could just as easily be escapism (though admittedly of a rather grim sort).

Which is not to say that you or Woolf are incorrect, but rather that the argument isn't watertight. Definitely agree though that it's a case of employing the issue rather than letting the issue employ you.

Tim, Monday, 15 April 2002 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Definitely agree though that it's a case of employing the issue rather than letting the issue employ you. umm can you clarify that for me please? i don't quite understand.

di, Monday, 15 April 2002 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

its funny how reading that women dont get genuinely angry makes me genuinely angry

ducklingmonster, Monday, 15 April 2002 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.