Your favourite TYPE of popular contemporary Dance Music out of these genres/styles

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed

Beyond the stats curiosity you could use this thread to dicuss the following:

Why certain other styles (inc. those what fall within those listed) haven't been included either at all or separately

What it is you feel elevates your choice above the others

How you feel about categorisation these days as a critic of dance music (if you are one) or as a listener, a clubber, a producer, a DJ etc.

Something else

Thankyou for your time

Poll Results

OptionVotes
House 18
Techno 16
Hip Hop 10
Electro 9
Trance 8
R&B/Hip Pop 6
Disco-Punk 5
Jungle/DnB 3
Ragga/Dancehall/related3
Hardcore/Gabba/related 1
Breaks 1
Jazz-Funk 0


blueski, Wednesday, 23 May 2007 14:30 (nineteen years ago)

Where would I tick for nu rave?

Dom Passantino, Wednesday, 23 May 2007 14:30 (nineteen years ago)

see the Best Rock thread

blueski, Wednesday, 23 May 2007 14:31 (nineteen years ago)

OH NO DO NOT MAKE ME CHOOSE BETWEEN R&B AND HOUSE

though i don't understand these categories at all, really.

lex pretend, Wednesday, 23 May 2007 14:31 (nineteen years ago)

what's not to understand?

blueski, Wednesday, 23 May 2007 14:32 (nineteen years ago)

remember the 'House or Techno: choose one' thread? it's a bit like that, but with more choices.

blueski, Wednesday, 23 May 2007 14:32 (nineteen years ago)

is "hip pop" even a genre?

lex pretend, Wednesday, 23 May 2007 14:34 (nineteen years ago)

is hip hop dance music?

acrobat, Wednesday, 23 May 2007 14:34 (nineteen years ago)

No dubstep :(

Yes, I know you said popular.

House.

jim, Wednesday, 23 May 2007 14:34 (nineteen years ago)

Hip Pop is a more accurate description of R&B than R&B.

blueski, Wednesday, 23 May 2007 14:34 (nineteen years ago)

Trance, even though I can't stand listening to it anymore, I used to like it so much :( so I voted for it.

Pashmina, Wednesday, 23 May 2007 14:36 (nineteen years ago)

y no idm

ledge, Wednesday, 23 May 2007 14:59 (nineteen years ago)

"popular" "contemporary"

ledge, Wednesday, 23 May 2007 15:00 (nineteen years ago)

precisely arf

blueski, Wednesday, 23 May 2007 15:01 (nineteen years ago)

end of discussion

ledge, Wednesday, 23 May 2007 15:01 (nineteen years ago)

i'm calling all IDM 'Warptronic' these days.

blueski, Wednesday, 23 May 2007 15:01 (nineteen years ago)

i voted for trance

strongohulkington, Wednesday, 23 May 2007 15:06 (nineteen years ago)

pashmina and strongo - what's your favourite trance track?

blueski, Wednesday, 23 May 2007 15:07 (nineteen years ago)

Speaking only as a part-time casual trance fan I don't see how it could be anything other than Gouryella by Gouryella.

ledge, Wednesday, 23 May 2007 15:12 (nineteen years ago)

went for house. not much of a cop nowadays but then that wasn't what your question was about.

Jeb, Wednesday, 23 May 2007 15:17 (nineteen years ago)

i did want it to be 'vote based on which one you like best NOW' tho

blueski, Wednesday, 23 May 2007 15:17 (nineteen years ago)

"sandstorm" obviously

strongohulkington, Wednesday, 23 May 2007 15:18 (nineteen years ago)

argh

blueski, Wednesday, 23 May 2007 15:18 (nineteen years ago)

or DJ SAMMY

strongohulkington, Wednesday, 23 May 2007 15:18 (nineteen years ago)

is "cafe del mar" trance?

strongohulkington, Wednesday, 23 May 2007 15:19 (nineteen years ago)

I don't get it... What has disco do with punk? Are "jazz-funk" and "disco-punk" meant to denote single genres, or is it "jazz/funk" and "disco /punk"?

Tuomas, Wednesday, 23 May 2007 15:19 (nineteen years ago)

man, dfa needs a better distribution deal in finland...

jermainetwo, Wednesday, 23 May 2007 15:25 (nineteen years ago)

i was going to vote in this poll, but then i decided not to

696, Wednesday, 23 May 2007 15:26 (nineteen years ago)

thanks for keeping us abreast, as always

strongohulkington, Wednesday, 23 May 2007 15:27 (nineteen years ago)

hah until strongo's post i was about to ask if 'sandstorm' is trance

deej, Wednesday, 23 May 2007 15:28 (nineteen years ago)

in college that song got played at EVERY russian suite party

deej, Wednesday, 23 May 2007 15:28 (nineteen years ago)

that's a shame 696, maybe you prefer the more cerebral 'best track on this album' or 'best album that came out THIS year according to the Daily Mail and some amazing pigeons' polls. scoff scoff.

is "cafe del mar" trance?

i'd lump it in there as the lighter side of trance - it's pizz strings breakdown is just too epic to be prog-house

blueski, Wednesday, 23 May 2007 15:30 (nineteen years ago)

i was going to vote in this poll, but then I decided not to

when good people stop caring democracy has failed. this poll may stave off another vital poll for minutes to come.

Ronan, Wednesday, 23 May 2007 15:31 (nineteen years ago)

Is "dico-punk" the same as "dance-punk"? If so, I think the latter name is much better, or at least the tunes I've heard have had very little to do with disco. And why is "jazz-funk" listed as a "contemporary dance music genre"? Have I missed a revival?

Tuomas, Wednesday, 23 May 2007 15:32 (nineteen years ago)

you have missed many things apparently

strongohulkington, Wednesday, 23 May 2007 15:33 (nineteen years ago)

Picked dancehall.

"What it is you feel elevates your choice above the others"

It's actually still good.

Alex in SF, Wednesday, 23 May 2007 15:33 (nineteen years ago)

what makes it still good?

i think 'Sandstorm' is as close to Hard House as it is to Trance but few songs escape such overlapping.

blueski, Wednesday, 23 May 2007 15:33 (nineteen years ago)

So there is a jazz-funk revival?

Tuomas, Wednesday, 23 May 2007 15:34 (nineteen years ago)

i think 'Sandstorm' is as close to Hard House as it is to Trance

reason being 'Sandstorm's vague similarity to something like the Pump Panel mix of New Order's 'Confusion' which was the template a lot of Hard House from mid 90s onwards.

blueski, Wednesday, 23 May 2007 15:35 (nineteen years ago)

So there is a jazz-funk revival?

no there isn't. but there should be.

Jeb, Wednesday, 23 May 2007 15:36 (nineteen years ago)

Jamiroquai is still popular.

blueski, Wednesday, 23 May 2007 15:36 (nineteen years ago)

it's all jazz-funk at the end of the day

strongohulkington, Wednesday, 23 May 2007 15:37 (nineteen years ago)

esp. Herbert lol

blueski, Wednesday, 23 May 2007 15:37 (nineteen years ago)

I voted for hip hop because it's the only thing I ever hear at clubs or where-ever else you go to dance. But I live in America.

filthy dylan, Wednesday, 23 May 2007 15:37 (nineteen years ago)

"what makes it still good?"

A 40+ year lineage of music to fall back when you run out of new ideas.

Alex in SF, Wednesday, 23 May 2007 15:38 (nineteen years ago)

the lack of BLOG HOUSE on this list is an oversight

strongohulkington, Wednesday, 23 May 2007 15:38 (nineteen years ago)

no it was a conscious decision based on sound judgement

blueski, Wednesday, 23 May 2007 15:39 (nineteen years ago)

A 40+ year lineage of music to fall back when you run out of new ideas.

so 40 is better than 25?

blueski, Wednesday, 23 May 2007 15:39 (nineteen years ago)

more hooks to recycle

strongohulkington, Wednesday, 23 May 2007 15:40 (nineteen years ago)

for the benefit of Tuomas the archetypal popular contemporary Disco-Punk track is either 'Let's Make Love And Listen Death From Above' or 'House Of Jealous Lovers' depending on whether it's an odd or even hour of the day.

blueski, Wednesday, 23 May 2007 15:41 (nineteen years ago)

this is all relative really. i mean, house music these days (not funky house and that shit with scantily-clad blondes miming on Bubble Hits) has so much in common with electro and techno it may as well be one of those. I'd call Justice, Gabriel Ananda and Michael Mayer House, but really they're not very House at all.

Techno to me means the colder, darker shit. An aversion to wailing divas, piano triads and general flounciness. Stuff like Jeff Mills, Richie Hawtin, early Aphex Twin etc is pure Techno. But then Orbital are also Techno in my mind and they can be quite pretty.

Plaid used to be black dog who were ambient techno but i'd call them IDM*. chems started out being lumped into big beat and trip hop but then got labelled "electronica" by the US press (i don't like the term "electronica" unless it is used to mean any electronic music in general).

*"i hate the term idm, it implies that other dance music is stupid and anyway you can't dance to it" - Everyone in the fucking world for the millionth time.
"no it doesn't, yes you can" - me :-)

the next grozart, Monday, 28 May 2007 23:46 (nineteen years ago)

srsly why do people hear Justice as House? have they even made a 4/4 track ever? it's not as if Daft Punk were 100% House ten years ago or on 'Discovery'.

blueski, Monday, 28 May 2007 23:53 (nineteen years ago)

woah, this is one of the weirdest discussions on dance music i've seen in a while. wherez yo headz?

also, it always astounds me that there are still lots of dnb freaks out there.

i voted techno. either that or deep house is what gets me excited.

the table is the table, Monday, 28 May 2007 23:57 (nineteen years ago)

why weird?

blueski, Monday, 28 May 2007 23:58 (nineteen years ago)

grozart, you don't follow today's techno, and it is obvious.

the table is the table, Monday, 28 May 2007 23:59 (nineteen years ago)

weird? because it sort of seems like people are talking as much about the past as right now, when the thread title reads "contemporary." that and some of these categories are a bit off-- jazz-funk should really be replaced with space/beardo (in my mind), and deep-house should really be up there. the number of people listening to Deep House in 2007 definitely beats the number of people who are still really into gabba.

the table is the table, Tuesday, 29 May 2007 00:02 (nineteen years ago)

i mean, just flip through the DJ Nights section of any paper, or even go into a dance record store, and there's tons more contemporary Deep House than contemporary Hardcore/Gabba.

the table is the table, Tuesday, 29 May 2007 00:04 (nineteen years ago)

hmm ... you must not live in the netherlands

moonship journey to baja, Tuesday, 29 May 2007 00:07 (nineteen years ago)

that's sound advice

blunt, Tuesday, 29 May 2007 00:08 (nineteen years ago)

i think you have a point in that today there is so much fragmentation that the inclusive terms above do not mean so much today. critics and whoever can refer to increasingly narrow/marginal styles and scene names which operate like branches of the above terms.

i do not yet recognise "space/beardo" as an official subgenre - is it listed in any magazines? anything 4/4 in that vein i'd stick under House, anything else is Jazz-Funk ;) just keeping it simple you understand...

But Deep House is a subset of House obviously. I don't recall ever noticing anyone on ILM keener on Gabba/Hardcore stuff more than anything else but one lives in hope.

blueski, Tuesday, 29 May 2007 00:11 (nineteen years ago)

we need a Gabba Geir who tediously insists that if it's not 180bpm+, risks accusations of fascism and gives you a nosebleed just 4 seconds in then it's rubbish.

blueski, Tuesday, 29 May 2007 00:13 (nineteen years ago)

Steve seriously what crack pipe are you smoking on this thread?

But Deep House is a subset of House obviously

yeah so just fucking leave it out, as if within house there can be no opposing sounds.

Ronan, Tuesday, 29 May 2007 00:16 (nineteen years ago)

i do not yet recognise "space/beardo" as an official subgenre - is it listed in any magazines? anything 4/4 in that vein i'd stick under House, anything else is Jazz-Funk ;) just keeping it simple you understand...

that's the right kind of thinking. i hate people who divide and and conquer. united we stand!

Jeb, Tuesday, 29 May 2007 00:18 (nineteen years ago)

oh look an Angry Ronan

what about all the opposing sounds in Hip-Hop, Indie-Rock etc. - does it stop people referring to them as unified set of sounds/ideas? NOPE

blueski, Tuesday, 29 May 2007 00:24 (nineteen years ago)

what about all the opposing sounds in "music", or the many opposing factions under the umbrella of "things".

Ronan, Tuesday, 29 May 2007 00:26 (nineteen years ago)

is it listed in any magazines?

well, no. usually in a magazine it's designated as disco/funk, or something dumbo like that.

the table is the table, Tuesday, 29 May 2007 00:27 (nineteen years ago)

they are totally irrelevant here imo (xp)

blueski, Tuesday, 29 May 2007 00:28 (nineteen years ago)

technically Deep House is not a subset of House. Deep House was the term that was used to describe pre-house music from the early 80s, and basically disco, for at least a few years before Deep House came to mean house music that draws from those sources. For instance, when I was first getting into the stuff, Let No Man Put Asunder, Touch and Go, Together Forever etc was all "Deep House".

dan selzer, Tuesday, 29 May 2007 00:45 (nineteen years ago)

ok

1. i'm not sure what any of these genres mean any more. they were invented up to two decades ago and have since shifted and changed and blended together it's impossible to discern them.

2. what the fucking fuck is beardo/space?

the next grozart, Tuesday, 29 May 2007 01:16 (nineteen years ago)

Beards cannot grow in space.

kingkongvsgodzilla, Tuesday, 29 May 2007 01:31 (nineteen years ago)

xpost. Don't be so Tuomas/Lexy. There's a whole Beardo thread on ILM if you really care.

jim, Tuesday, 29 May 2007 01:37 (nineteen years ago)

it has about a billion answers on it though jim. also, what is tuomas/lexy?

the next grozart, Tuesday, 29 May 2007 01:42 (nineteen years ago)

Asking what something is or stating that you are unfamiliar with something when a quick search of ILX or even just a google could elucidate things for you.

jim, Tuesday, 29 May 2007 01:43 (nineteen years ago)

Although I just realised that googling beard house is fairly futile.

jim, Tuesday, 29 May 2007 01:46 (nineteen years ago)

yeah - i did try! is it really a genre or something that ilx has made up? is it like, amorphous androgynous or what?

the next grozart, Tuesday, 29 May 2007 01:52 (nineteen years ago)

grozart, beardo/space in the contemporary context is:
Lindstrom/Prins Thomas collabs, Idjut Boys, most anything from Whatever We Want Records (Quiet Village, Map of Africa), a lot of the stuff on Bear Funk (Lexx, Michoacan, etc).

space disco is quite old tho, so eh.

the table is the table, Tuesday, 29 May 2007 01:53 (nineteen years ago)

ok man, cheers for that. must say i've never heard a single thing by any of those apart from one idjut boys track that i really liked... "underwater" i think it was? or maybe it wasn't even by them.

the next grozart, Tuesday, 29 May 2007 01:56 (nineteen years ago)

a good summation of the beardo aesthetic can be found on the Beats in Space site...Nov. 3rd 2005 mix from Carlos and Quiet Village.

the table is the table, Tuesday, 29 May 2007 01:57 (nineteen years ago)

really a fantastic mix, imo..

the table is the table, Tuesday, 29 May 2007 01:57 (nineteen years ago)

much better then the dan selzer plays early industrial/post-punk synth stuff on beats in space. or at least I assume, as that doesn't happen untill tonight.

dan selzer, Tuesday, 29 May 2007 04:27 (nineteen years ago)

http://loveanddancing.sitesled.com/493531372_2555967b1b_o.jpg

Display Name, Tuesday, 29 May 2007 04:38 (nineteen years ago)

thanks for reminding me to turn images off

blueski, Tuesday, 29 May 2007 09:49 (nineteen years ago)

cool

blueski, Tuesday, 29 May 2007 23:01 (nineteen years ago)

The results seem to match pretty well the amount these styles get talked about on ILM ratio-wise.

I voted Electro because of what I hear as it's distinct pervasive influence on House, Pop, Rap and indeed Rock music, whether by a slow burn process or specific period of revivalism, this decade. And because I like the vibes of it.

blueski, Tuesday, 29 May 2007 23:07 (nineteen years ago)

so.... house and techno are the most popular dance genres?

never acid again, Wednesday, 30 May 2007 00:13 (nineteen years ago)

*takes notes*

never acid again, Wednesday, 30 May 2007 00:14 (nineteen years ago)

grozart if you really want to get a handle on the beardo / space disco thing it's basically a continuation of cosmic disco as practiced in club cosmic in italy during the disco heyday.

lfam, Wednesday, 30 May 2007 01:12 (nineteen years ago)

everything goes in, dancing comes out

lfam, Wednesday, 30 May 2007 01:14 (nineteen years ago)

but isn't beardo/cosmic more to actual disco/proto-house what trip-hop/IDM is to actual hip-hop/techno, i.e. more chill-out/headphone music than the soundtrack to freaking out? i think so. it's great for what it is though.

Jeb, Wednesday, 30 May 2007 01:26 (nineteen years ago)

i don't know, the beardo producers do some tight mixes

lfam, Wednesday, 30 May 2007 01:37 (nineteen years ago)

although yes it seems to all be -120 bpm

lfam, Wednesday, 30 May 2007 01:37 (nineteen years ago)

yeah it depends, I've seen people freak out to Prins Thomas "Fehrara" but there's some pot smokin' slo-mo jazz fusion stuff that falls under the umbrella too

dmr, Wednesday, 30 May 2007 01:57 (nineteen years ago)

you can also mix fehrara in with old chicago records and it fits really nice. 122bpm

I think there is a separation between the beardo/cosmic hipster stuff and the more functional track based nu-disco stuff. I have been enjoying 40 Thieves, Disques Sinthomme, Barfly on Rong, the environ/escort related material and a handful of good random edit records. I definitely think there is a line between this stuff that is modern dance music with retro window dressing and the "ironic" balearic throwback that seems to be gain ground at the moment.

It depends on who is doing and where they are coming from. I have a problem with a lot of this stuff because it just seems so steeped in obscurity and irony. I have far less patience for the hipster/record nerd aspect of beardo than I do for the DJ/producer angle. I just can't stand the intentional silliness of some of the mixes I've heard. I just get this feeling of closet indie snobs subconsciously thinking: haha I get dance music too, haha isn't it great to dabble in this fake music.

Display Name, Wednesday, 30 May 2007 02:35 (nineteen years ago)

I think there is a separation between the beardo/cosmic hipster stuff and the more functional track based nu-disco stuff.

well yeah but a lot of times I don't know where it is. like the title of the thread is "not idjuts / lindstrom" but the latest lindstrom track is a cover of vangelis "let it happen" which is like nu-beardo canon.

I guess what you call the "hipster/record nerd aspect" I appreciate as crate digging, and I don't see that much irony in it .... then again I am a record nerd and I like Daniel Wang and some of the more e-z listening stuff about equally

dmr, Wednesday, 30 May 2007 02:59 (nineteen years ago)

I respect digging. What I don't respect is when music appreciation becomes the sonic equivalent of comic book collecting. I don't like it when I hear a set and I feel like I am listening to a DJ show off his sweet collection of Marvel obscurities. I respect people digging up great records that are rare but inherently great rather than records that are obscure for a reason but obscure from a fashionably correct time period.

I am thinking of people on myspace that go crazy for a shitty italo pop obscurity that isn't good at all. It isn't even the second rate stuff, it is just cheesy garbage. They go on about some mp3 like they have uncovered some lost holy italo grail. It produces zero visceral reaction, there isn't anything clever or funky about it. It just makes me wonder if these guys have ever really gotten off on a good dance gig.

I am sorry if you feel that I was taking a shot at you, I wasn't.

Display Name, Wednesday, 30 May 2007 05:10 (nineteen years ago)

not at all, just discussing

I agree w/ your latest post

the previous one I interpreted as saying something along the lines of "no one could like Alan Parsons Project [insert other beardo revival names here] except ironically" ... which ain't the case

"inherently great" is kind of a weird measuring stick for records though. I know what yer saying but I guess I give a little benefit of the doubt and just think "some people are way too into italo"

dmr, Wednesday, 30 May 2007 12:47 (nineteen years ago)

display name...I agree with you most of the time, but I also feel like its to easy to say that when very often, people are just playing what they like and what turns them on. Everybody is more forgiving of their little pet genres and for every DJ who's just showing off some obscurity, there's another who genuinely likes it, even if you think it's cheesy garbage.

dan selzer, Wednesday, 30 May 2007 13:16 (nineteen years ago)

Noooo, DnB got shafted!

chap, Wednesday, 30 May 2007 14:35 (nineteen years ago)

no contemporary dance as in MERCE CUNNINGHAM.

re-poll oh wait!

xyzzzz__, Wednesday, 30 May 2007 18:01 (nineteen years ago)

i voted for jazz funk

moonship journey to baja, Wednesday, 30 May 2007 18:25 (nineteen years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.