Kate Bush in 'Erotic Art' sensation!

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/entertainment/7045772.stm

Mark G, Tuesday, 16 October 2007 15:39 (eighteen years ago)

You're a dead man.

Noodle Vague, Tuesday, 16 October 2007 15:42 (eighteen years ago)

Martin Kemp(e) also?

Mark G, Tuesday, 16 October 2007 15:43 (eighteen years ago)

What it reveals above all is how styles of art have changed over the centuries, while human beings and their desires have essentially stayed the same.

O RLY

That one guy that hit it and quit it, Tuesday, 16 October 2007 15:44 (eighteen years ago)

HI DERE SPARTA

Noodle Vague, Tuesday, 16 October 2007 15:44 (eighteen years ago)

brian sewell wrote an unabashed slam of this show, and it has that weird mix of unabashed detail and almost comic fustiness that makes some british newspaper writing so fun to read

http://www.thisislondon.co.uk/arts/artexhibition-20637709-details/Seduced%3A+Art+And+Sex+From+Antiquity+To+Now/artexhibitionReview.do?reviewId=23416411

you want to be like 'tmi, brian!!' but that's his point

Tracer Hand, Tuesday, 16 October 2007 15:56 (eighteen years ago)

abashed he ain't

Tracer Hand, Tuesday, 16 October 2007 15:56 (eighteen years ago)

"almost comic fustiness" is Brian Sewell's vocation in life

Tom D., Tuesday, 16 October 2007 15:58 (eighteen years ago)

the ica has a (supporting?) season of porn films (ie "this is the one travis takes betsy to in 'taxi driver'" -- woo book me a ticket) and i am kind of ech on that. still, bums on seats and through gallery turnstiles is what it's all about.

That one guy that hit it and quit it, Tuesday, 16 October 2007 16:00 (eighteen years ago)

still, bums on seats screens and through gallery turnstiles is what it's all about

Tom D., Tuesday, 16 October 2007 16:01 (eighteen years ago)

That the ACTUAL Kate Bush? Pity if not, and prob not. She's admirably/honestly open about being into sex. That's crap about cultures always being uncomfortable about representing sex (calling ancient Greece!/Rome!whoever!), esp as I've been noticing western culture getting yet MORE uptight about it (and thus provoking more extreme representations of it, hello that doesn't work but it gives artists a cheapass way to look radical) in the last decade or so. Sex is good, sex is interesting, but no more interesting than anything else we do.

xpost yes yes obv an exhibition focussing on reps of sex has to be about titillation, grow up. That term was only invented to give dorks like "you" (yr prob just joking but a lot of people really think that) a way to justify yr prudery

President Evil, Tuesday, 16 October 2007 16:08 (eighteen years ago)

Gumph!

Tom D., Tuesday, 16 October 2007 16:11 (eighteen years ago)

not sure who President Evil is cavilling at

That one guy that hit it and quit it, Tuesday, 16 October 2007 16:12 (eighteen years ago)

"Sex is good, sex is interesting, but no more interesting than anything else we do."

uh

That one guy that hit it and quit it, Tuesday, 16 October 2007 16:13 (eighteen years ago)

He's a Spock-Puppet.

Noodle Vague, Tuesday, 16 October 2007 16:13 (eighteen years ago)

See, George Michael should have sung those lyrics instead.

Ned Raggett, Tuesday, 16 October 2007 16:14 (eighteen years ago)

Ned, did you get the ILX3 comp OK?

Mark G, Tuesday, 16 October 2007 16:17 (eighteen years ago)

esp as I've been noticing western culture getting yet MORE uptight about it

President Evil is actually a 5,000,000-year-old mountain gnome

Tracer Hand, Tuesday, 16 October 2007 16:20 (eighteen years ago)

You can talk

President Evil, Tuesday, 16 October 2007 16:39 (eighteen years ago)

For obvious reasons I have filtered any images containing the word 'bush' in my browser. This is how I am punished.

Autumn Almanac, Thursday, 18 October 2007 02:24 (eighteen years ago)

you son of a bitch

omar little, Thursday, 18 October 2007 02:34 (eighteen years ago)

ha

Surmounter, Thursday, 18 October 2007 05:30 (eighteen years ago)

What it reveals above all is how styles of art have changed over the centuries, while human beings and their desires have essentially stayed the same.

I think most social historians would actually disagree with this. Desire is not just some biological constant, it is very much affected by culture, and therefore it has changed throughout history. For example, the Ancient Greek men/boy love is not the same at all as today's stereotypical homosexual desire.

Tuomas, Thursday, 18 October 2007 06:16 (eighteen years ago)

http://www4.ncsu.edu/~kacollin/images/HeadInHands.jpg

Noodle Vague, Thursday, 18 October 2007 06:28 (eighteen years ago)

Tuomas is actually correct here, NV.

BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Thursday, 18 October 2007 07:41 (eighteen years ago)

delete the word "stereotypical" and it's not.

Mark G, Thursday, 18 October 2007 08:10 (eighteen years ago)

He's almost as correct as when quitney and me pointed it out at the top of this bleeding thread.

Noodle Vague, Thursday, 18 October 2007 09:16 (eighteen years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.