.. not counting "ironic" things like "Cockney Rejects Greatest Hits Vol 1".. Or then again.. yeah, counting that one!
― Mark G, Tuesday, 12 February 2008 17:17 (sixteen years ago) link
Phil Ochs-Greatest Hits (AKA "50 Phil Ochs Fans Can't Be Wrong")
― C. Grisso/McCain, Tuesday, 12 February 2008 17:19 (sixteen years ago) link
Yeah, funnily enough that was the LP I saw yesterday, prompting this thread!
― Mark G, Tuesday, 12 February 2008 17:20 (sixteen years ago) link
Can this be done without being ironic?
― chap, Tuesday, 12 February 2008 17:21 (sixteen years ago) link
Cockney Rejects - Greatest Hits Vol 2
― Colonel Poo, Tuesday, 12 February 2008 17:32 (sixteen years ago) link
BUT not Cockney Rejects - Greatest Hits Vol 3 - cos that's all live versions of old songs!
Cat Power-The Greatest
― C. Grisso/McCain, Tuesday, 12 February 2008 17:58 (sixteen years ago) link
The Who Sell Out
― kornrulez6969, Tuesday, 12 February 2008 18:00 (sixteen years ago) link
Fugazi - End Hits
― Gavin in Leeds, Tuesday, 12 February 2008 18:22 (sixteen years ago) link
Wonderful and Frightening World of The Fall
― city worker, Tuesday, 12 February 2008 18:29 (sixteen years ago) link
aphex twin - drukqs
― Jordan, Tuesday, 12 February 2008 18:34 (sixteen years ago) link
Do we mean the titles make then sound like Greatest Hits compilations, or do we mean the songs on the album seem to be representative of various stages of the history of the artist in question, but are all actually new? The latter's a more interesting question, I think. And Shack's The Corner of Miles & Gil fits the bill.
― JimD, Tuesday, 12 February 2008 18:38 (sixteen years ago) link
I agree with JimD, it seems most people are just posting titles. I think Simon and Garfunkel - Bridge Over Troubled Water, fits well also.
― our work is never over, Tuesday, 12 February 2008 19:57 (sixteen years ago) link
The New Pornographers' Twin Cinema sounds like a chronological greatest-hits, complete with crappy back end and a surprisingly good reunion song tacked on at the end.
― Simon H., Tuesday, 12 February 2008 20:05 (sixteen years ago) link
Do we mean the titles make then sound like Greatest Hits compilations
Based on the example that started off the thread I think it's pretty clear.
Ian Brown - Golden Greats
― musically, Tuesday, 12 February 2008 20:06 (sixteen years ago) link
As clear as can possibly be when an OP immediately changes his mind 180 degrees!
― Myonga Vön Bontee, Tuesday, 12 February 2008 20:31 (sixteen years ago) link
Yeah, I still don't know...
― our work is never over, Tuesday, 12 February 2008 21:15 (sixteen years ago) link
What do you mean, the OP has only posted twice, and both were all new albums with titles that sound like greatest hits collections.
― musically, Tuesday, 12 February 2008 21:48 (sixteen years ago) link
Yeah, he did!
― Mark G, Tuesday, 12 February 2008 23:16 (sixteen years ago) link
thread hijack!JimD:“do we mean the songs on the album seem to be representative of various stages of the history of the artist in question, but are all actually new?”I agree with JimD that this is a more interesting topic.
one way in which this can happen is if multiple producers/writers/arrangers were involved. also if there were a lot of successful distinctive singles from the album (especially if the album follows them as a summing-up of development so far - e.g Never Mind The Bollocks). or if so many songs are well known that there are few if any sleeper/deep cuts.
The O’Jays - Backstabbersand The Spinners - Spinners (1973)always seemed this way to me, especially compared to their more seamless follow-ups.
several Beatles albums are like this too, e.g. Revolver, Pepper’s, Abbey Roadand Michael Jackson - Thriller
what are some others?
― Paul, Tuesday, 17 July 2018 03:13 (five years ago) link
well the first Velvet Underground LP is an obvious one - varied sounding songs pretty much all well-known
― Paul, Tuesday, 17 July 2018 03:23 (five years ago) link
RTX – Veterans of Disorder
― i’m still stanning (morrisp), Tuesday, 17 July 2018 03:55 (five years ago) link
the first Pretenders album
― flappy bird, Tuesday, 17 July 2018 05:53 (five years ago) link
Missing Persons - Spring Session M
Born in the USA
― the word dog doesn't bark (anagram), Tuesday, 17 July 2018 06:47 (five years ago) link
Daft Punk - DiscoveryKendrick Lamar - DAMN.
― octobeard, Tuesday, 17 July 2018 07:06 (five years ago) link
The Cars S/T
― PaulTMA, Tuesday, 17 July 2018 09:51 (five years ago) link
Prodigy - Experience
― Siegbran, Tuesday, 17 July 2018 10:06 (five years ago) link
Alphaville - Forever Young. (I'm a bit surprised that only four songs on that album were singles.)
― Valentijn, Tuesday, 17 July 2018 14:05 (five years ago) link
Cyndi Lauper, She’s So Unusual
― Isora Clubland (James Redd and the Blecchs), Friday, 20 July 2018 10:47 (five years ago) link
Future Islands - Singles(not a compilation as the name suggests but a studio album)
― Gâteau Superstar (dog latin), Friday, 20 July 2018 10:56 (five years ago) link
Flappy otm
― Legalize dreams (Ross), Friday, 20 July 2018 14:36 (five years ago) link
"golden hits" = 3 inferior re-recordings of their early '60s hits, 3 covers, and 4 new songs. it was reissued in 2004 under the similarly misleading title The Best of the Paris Sisters
https://i.imgur.com/GJFo8or.jpg
― ilxor-com-dog-meat-drawer-7-840-x-600.jpg (unregistered), Friday, 20 July 2018 14:37 (five years ago) link
And the cover photo is obviously not The Paris Sisters!
― Get aboard the flappy bird, departing gate 19 (Dan Peterson), Friday, 20 July 2018 17:04 (five years ago) link
huh, it's obviously them! (and fwiw they're wearing proper clothes on the back cover). I'm not sure who thought a lingerie photoshoot would revitalize their image and I'm not sure how many pervs bought the album on the strength of the cover art, but they never had any more hits and they broke up a year later
― ilxor-com-dog-meat-drawer-7-840-x-600.jpg (unregistered), Friday, 20 July 2018 17:16 (five years ago) link
honestly all 3 Vampire Weekend albums. I was going to say especially the first one but it's really all of them
― flappy bird, Friday, 20 July 2018 18:10 (five years ago) link
xp I stand corrected, I have never seen swinging sixties Paris Sisters. I always think of them looking like this:
http://www.history-of-rock.com/Paris_Sisters.jpg
― Get aboard the flappy bird, departing gate 19 (Dan Peterson), Friday, 20 July 2018 19:46 (five years ago) link
I don't really like "Back In Black" but for a year or 2 I thought it was a greatest hits album.
― billstevejim, Friday, 20 July 2018 21:37 (five years ago) link
Turns out "Singles Going Steady" is a comp. I wasn't sure until just now.
― billstevejim, Friday, 20 July 2018 21:39 (five years ago) link
I keep second guessing that one too
― Gâteau Superstar (dog latin), Friday, 20 July 2018 21:41 (five years ago) link
There's alot of overlap between this and "all killer, no filler" albums, but there's a difference between something like the first Cars or Pretenders albums that were all great songs but still were obviously the work of the same band recorded around the same time. Some albums are full of great songs but have tracks that sound much older or newer than they are, or barely sound like they're all the work of the same band. Those have a 25 year retrospective greatest-hits feel and multi-artist compilation vibe respectively, and are much more rare and interesting.
― Lee626, Friday, 20 July 2018 23:53 (five years ago) link
It's craziness that "Excitable Boy" hasn't already been posted to this thread.
― El Tomboto, Saturday, 21 July 2018 00:30 (five years ago) link
Electric Six have, unbelievably, got on to have 14 more albums that the one you've heard something.
― Peter Greenaway's Fleetwood Mac (S-), Wednesday, 25 May 2022 14:28 (one year ago) link