Ridiculous Hip Hop Fashion: Please Explain!

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Been seeing this bizarre style crop up a lot lately --- the trend among hip-hop kids of wearing HALF of their shirt, with the rest sort've slung/worn over the shoulder (the left arm not in the appropriate sleeve). I think I first saw it in a Nelly video, but I could be mistaken. In any event, I'm now constantly seeing it in the street and on the subway, begging the question: WHAT GIVES?!?! How can that be considered (a) cool (b) practical (c) anything but utterly ridiculous? Big, baggy pants is one thing, but intentionally "half-wearing" a jersey? That's only slightly more ridiculous than the whole Kris Kross baloney of ten years back where they'd wear their clothes backwards.

Someone please defend/explain this to me.

Alex in NYC, Thursday, 20 June 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

It's cool because you don't like it.

nabisco%%, Thursday, 20 June 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Whether I like it or not is irrelevant, and doesn't stop it from being an irrefutably silly thing.

Alex in NYC, Thursday, 20 June 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Someone told me about a sci-fi book that described urban folk who would leave toothbrushes sticking out of their mouths, a variation on the 'fro pick as a fashion accessory. You know it's bound to happen.

Ernest, Thursday, 20 June 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Ernest, that's already happened! Haven't you seen any of Method Man's 1998 MTV interviews?

Dan Perry, Thursday, 20 June 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

i'm going to start doing this.

geeta, Thursday, 20 June 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Ernest, that's already happened! Haven't you seen any of Method Man's 1998 MTV interviews?

Jesus Christ.

Ernest, Thursday, 20 June 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

alex don't make us dredge up killing joke photos.

jess, Thursday, 20 June 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

I've been rocking the face half-covered in shaving cream for the past few weeks. Very casual.

Tracer Hand, Thursday, 20 June 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

. I think I first saw it in a Nelly video, but I could be mistaken.
it was actually in a richard hell documentary.

nathalie, Thursday, 20 June 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Ripping a shirt is one thing --- intentionally "half-wearing" it is another.

Alex in NYC, Thursday, 20 June 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

alex sometimes I think you were sent from the nineteenth century in a wayback machine

Josh, Thursday, 20 June 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

alex, dude, you're probably like.. old or something. (jess, shut up, i am in denial about this).

nathalie, Thursday, 20 June 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

This is fantastic news. I'm taking my arm out of my right sleeve right now. What other clothes can be worn half? Surely not trousers? I'll be monitoring the streets of Amsterdam starting tomorrow to see how quick this thing crosses the Atlantic. Pretty quickly, I'm sure.

JoB, Thursday, 20 June 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Half boxer shorts and nothing else. There's yer trend.

Ned Raggett, Thursday, 20 June 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

(Job, get yer ass ovah to that d'n'b thread on Subj.board. hahahah)

http://image.allmusic.com/00/amg/pic200_web/drp000/p04 9/p04983ejgli.jpg

nathalie, Thursday, 20 June 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Not sure what your point is by referencing Devo, Nathalie, but MOCK THEM AT YOUR PERIL!

Look, I'm no hip-hop fan, me. Never really considered myself their target audience (and yes,...I'm an old man of 34), but my question is a genuine one: how/why does anything think this trend is even remotely clever, "phat", "fly" or otherwise when it is clearly a stupid -- let alone probably UNCOMFORTABLE --- way to wear one's clothes?!?! I'm still waiting for a proper explanation.

Alex in NYC, Thursday, 20 June 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

I doubt it's any less comfortable than wearing a scarf, or a shawl or something. They usually have another shirt on underneath it anyway so it's not like they're just hanging out all over the place.

Tracer Hand, Thursday, 20 June 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Oh and I think nabsico%% is on the money up there in his first post.

Tracer Hand, Thursday, 20 June 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Still, it's an awful lot of fabric to be sporting -- especially in warm weather like today (what prompted this question to begin with was a guy sitting across from me on the subway "rocking" this very look.) He didn't look especially comfortable with it.

But suppose we take the cookie person's assesment that they're merely doing it because non-hip hop folks or oldsters (like myself) don't approve/understand/"like" it --- it seems to me that said end could be accomplished in a more efficient, less uncomfortable way. Going out of your way to wear an extra layer of fabric, worn in an impractical manner that impedes movement and looks frankly silly SOLELY in the intent to piss off/confuse people outside of the loop merely suggests that you're trying too hard.

At some point, utility must rear its head.

Alex in NYC, Thursday, 20 June 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

What, you haven't been to Hot Topic lately? They're selling half- shirts these days, for convenience. Even comes with tattered thread- fades.

Dare, Thursday, 20 June 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

"irrefutably"? "frankly"?

and when has fashion been about utility?

mitch lastnamewithheld, Thursday, 20 June 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

"let's wear this like this and piss alex in nyc off"
"okay, but isn't it a little cumbersome?"
"how mad you think he's gonna get if it looks comfortable?"

mitch lastnamewithheld, Thursday, 20 June 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Going out of your way to wear an extra layer of fabric, worn in an impractical manner that impedes movement and looks frankly silly SOLELY in the intent to piss off/confuse people outside of the loop merely suggests that you're trying too hard.

Sure: if we don't watch out those silly folks will start doing something really ridiculous, like knotting pieces of cloth around their necks and letting the free ends dangle toward their crotches, solely for the purpose of identifying themselves and evaluating others as part-of or not-part-of a certain sociocultural group.

nabisco%%, Thursday, 20 June 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

I mean, God forbid.

nabisco%%, Thursday, 20 June 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

and when has fashion been about utility?

Quite. This brings to mind some other fads: That preppy '80s thing of draping a lambswool sweater over the back with the arms knotted over the shoulders; that hateful '80s habit of wearing a jacket with the sleeves rolled up to the elbows - mostly sported by rock stars, I don't recall it being a particularly street thing; the 501s ripped-to- shreds-at-the-knees, again in the '80s; and (going back a bit now) the vogue for having 'blakies' or 'a quarter iron' embedded in the heels of one's brogues/loafers/'box gibsons'

David, Thursday, 20 June 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

The Cookie person exhorted: "Sure: if we don't watch out those silly folks will start doing something really ridiculous, like knotting pieces of cloth around their necks and letting the free ends dangle toward their crotches,solely for the purpose of identifying themselves and evaluating others as part-of or not-part-of a certain sociocultural group."

The fact remains: the sheer impracticality of this fashion trend (discomfort, impeding of movement, silly-looking) renders it stupid, regardless of sociocultural connotations.

Alex in NYC, Thursday, 20 June 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

They haven't caught onto this one yet out here in Ioway, but I yanked my left arm out of my sleeve as soon as I read this. Awesome. Still, the wearing of the Truly Enormous Clock Necklace trend spearheaded by Flava Flav has this & any future trends trumped for sheer ridiculousness.

Me, I'm one o' them fogey lefty types who can't understand why somebody'd pay money for shoes or shirts that loudly & by name announce the name of their manufacturers, so I figure I must be a big fashion dimwit. Bring on the runway full of halfshirts!

John Darnielle, Thursday, 20 June 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

do we really want all of our musicians to dress like pavement?

jess, Thursday, 20 June 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

"do we really want all of our musicians to dress like pavement?"

I see more kids in the street sporting this trend than actual musicians.

And, for the record, I always hated Pavement.

Alex in NYC, Thursday, 20 June 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

what's with all these kids wearing shoes made of canvas and rubber?

jess, Thursday, 20 June 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

next thing you know they'll be dressing in pants designed for miners and farm hands!

jess, Thursday, 20 June 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

So where does the arm go, Alex? Does it stick out of the neck of the shirt or does the kid just let it dangle inside the shirt? Whatever, it sounds sexy to me, I'm all for it. I wonder if it means something if you let the right side or the left side flap, you know like the gay bandana thing?

Asymmetrical Shroom, Thursday, 20 June 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

As early as 1994 I was threatened with death by a guy with a toothbrush hanging out of his mouth. I was at a party... "What's with the toothbrush?" I asked,
"WHAT THE FUCK ARE YOU TRYING TO SAY MAN?!?!?"
"It just seems strange, having a toothbrush in your mouth." Suddenly his friend comes out of nowhere. "WHAT THE FUCK MAN! WHAT THE FUCK! YOU APOLOGISE!"
"Umm..."
"APOLOGISE TO THE TOOTHBRUSH."
"Ahh..."
"KISS HIS TOOTHBRUSH!!"
"I don't want to kiss his fucking toothbrush!"
"Yeah! I don't want him to kiss my fuckin' toothbrush!", the first guy interjects.
"YOU THINK THIS IS FUNNY?!" I think you can see where this is going. Anyway, irrefutable proof that this guy was well ahead of his time, and that the whole toothbrush trend is set to take off in the near future.

Andrew, Thursday, 20 June 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

I don't see this as any worse than some of the other fashion trends, like the pants that ride so low you have to waddle to walk without jamming your knee into your own pantleg (thus tripping yourself), or the one where you roll one pantleg up like you've just finished riding a bike or something. Whatever. It'll go away soon. (It's also no worse than those of us, myself included, who wear all black on really hot days.)

Sean Carruthers, Thursday, 20 June 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Alex! You're old! Once fashion becomes strictly utilitarian, you've lost all imagination.

Do not pass Go. Consign yourself to a lifetime of polyester and sweltering Florida sun.

Mark, Friday, 21 June 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

haha a friend told me abt her nightmare years as a teen going on holiday in a NATURIST CAMP thanx to her gravely mentalist dad:

Rule 1: No clothes obv
Rule 2: You CAN wear shoes if ground and/or activity permit
Rule 3: If v. cold you can wear i. hat, ii. shoes and socks, iii. sweater, iv. NO PANTS OR UNDERWEAR!! EVAH!!! You can wear what you like on yr arms and legs AS LONG AS WE CAN SEE YR GENITALS!!!
Rule 4: It is all totally natural and not at all pervy AS LONG AS WE CAN SEE YR GENITALS AT ALL TIMES!! Do you SEE!!??
RULE 5: As cook at a barbie tending hot spitting fat etc, you are allowed to wear a pinny PROVIDED IT IS SEE-THRU AT GROIN LEVEL!!
Rule 6: WHY DO YOU NOT PLAY TENNIS LIKE THE OTHAHS!!?? ARE YOU SUBTLY MOCKING OUR NATURIST WAYS!!??

mark s, Friday, 21 June 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Up yours, Mark. I didn't once say fashion had to be be STRICTLY utilitarian, but when it flies directly in the face of all that's practical, it becomes simply a statement of pointlessness, not fashion. Moreover, I doubt my age would change this impression.

Alex in NYC, Friday, 21 June 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

"Whether I like it or not is irrelevant"

I think you already answered your own question ;)

Ben Williams, Friday, 21 June 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

alex since you apparently do not accept the following answer — viz they do it to amuse themselves and to annoy others and to define their mini-community and fit into it and exclude others who think not as they - what kind of answer are you looking for, exactly? why do YOU think it happens?

mark s, Friday, 21 June 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

alex do you own leather pants?

Josh, Friday, 21 June 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Sorry, Josh, no leather pants in my closet (and that's a blessing for all parties concerned, believe me).

Mark S. sed: "alex since you apparently do not accept the following answer — viz they do it to amuse themselves and to annoy others and to define their mini-community and fit into it and exclude others who think not as they - what kind of answer are you looking for, exactly? why do YOU think it happens?"

Actually, Mark -- that's the most insightful and plainly worded response to this question I've yet to read on this thread. Most responses have been seemingly reactionary/defensive answers (how * DARE* I inquire with a derisive tone about something related to hip- hop!) I guess I have my initial answer. The question I'm left with, I suppose, is why that particular style? Who thought it up and decided it would be cool to wear shirts the wrong way? What did it beat out? "Let's see, shoes on hands? Nah...ummm...shorts undone? Nah, been done. Underwear on head? Nah...I'VE GOT IT: ONLY WEAR HALF MY SHIRT AND LEAVE THE REST SLUNG AWKWARDLY OVER MY SHOULDER! GENIUS!"

Alex in NYC, Friday, 21 June 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

dude, mark just repeated the old answers!

Josh, Friday, 21 June 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

No, but he conveyed a simillar sentiment in plainer language without any defensive baggage.

Stop calling me "Dude." What are you people, surfers?

Alex in NYC, Friday, 21 June 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

alex do you own leather pants?
Half leather pants, known as leder hosen.

nathalie, Friday, 21 June 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

dude, you best start another thread for that

Josh, Friday, 21 June 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

I don't think "It's cool because you don't like it" was at all defensive. And I think my tie analogy was sarcastic but not defensive either. And I think the phrase "simply a statement of pointlessness, not fashion" invites the following analysis: (a) fashion is by definition pointless, except that (b) the point is to do pointless things with other people that define groups and communities and associations that do have points, thus visibly including and excluding others, the latter of which brings us back to (c) it's cool because you don't like it.

nabisco%%, Friday, 21 June 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

But isn't definining it as cool, taking it on face value (or whatever). It is more an expression and have value/relevance. Obv not to dude Alex. It expresses an ideology (just like safety pins/shoulder pads/... do).

nathalie, Friday, 21 June 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

alex in nyc: "explain/defend!" => responders explain defensively!!

mark s, Friday, 21 June 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Whatever happened to the backwards, upside-down sunvisor? I think eminem started that. That was a great idea - you don't see it so much anymore...

And the sleeveless, collarless (Flashdance) sweatshirt? Another good idea that for some reason people don't follow anymore.

What gives? These were very popular at one time, which means they were intelligent & practical. So why aren't they around anymore?? Did they become unintelligent & impractical?

Fashion. Don't even fuckin' get me started....

Dave225, Friday, 21 June 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Alex fashion is not practical and not fair a thesis clearly borne out by the disappearance of these:
http://www.jaredtibet.fws1.com/kangaroosshoes.jpg

Tracer Hand, Friday, 21 June 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Now we're getting into interesting territory.

For a start, Mark S., touche! I did indeed ask for someone to "defend/ explain", so you're absolutely correct. I stand down on that one.

Nabisco sed: "I don't think 'It's cool because you don't like it' was at all defensive. And I think my tie analogy was sarcastic but not defensive either. And I think the phrase 'simply a statement of pointlessness, not fashion' invites the following analysis: (a) fashion is by definition pointless, except that (b) the point is to do pointless things with other people that define groups and communities and associations that do have points, thus visibly including and excluding others, the latter of which brings us back to (c) it's cool because you don't like it."

Tough to argue with that one, although I don't necessarily agree with the theory that fashion is completely pointless. Fashion in itself is a bit too amorphous to pin down, but I believe it serves a myriad of purposes. It may often be trivial, but I don't think I'd call it categorically pointless.

Nathalie countered: "But isn't definining it as cool, taking it on face value (or whatever). It is more an expression and have value/ relevance. Obv not to dude Alex. It expresses an ideology (just like safety pins/shoulder pads/... do)."

I think the difference between the half-shirt phenom and the safety- pins/shoulder pads was that here is a trend that actively demands that you hamper your own movement and potentially make yourself uncomfortable. I suppose the act of putting safety-pins in your clothing (or elsewhere) also presents a self-defeating impediment, but not entirely to the same degree. Shoulder pads, meanwhile, didn't impede ambulatory movement, they just supplied a specific look (and I don't think anyone wore shoulder-pads to signify alleigance or membership to any specific community, but I could very well be wrong about that).

I think a better analogy would be another bit of the celebrated `77- era Punk wardrobe, the bondage pants with confining straps....certainly not designed for comfort nor convenience.

Alex in NYC, Friday, 21 June 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

i wear my sweater over my right arm only because im strapped fool,now speed on befo you get peed on alex-sheet.

tyrone jackson, Friday, 21 June 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Hark! The winged-one approacheth!

Alex in NYC, Friday, 21 June 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

There's certainly nothing new about fashions that are uncomfortable and potentially hamper movement - just look at women's shoes. Do you honestly think that those 6-inch stiletto heels are worn for comfort or convenience?

o. nate, Friday, 21 June 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Some of these young people today, you can't tell if they're girls or boys! Why, back in my day...

Martin Skidmore, Friday, 21 June 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

a friend of mine who at the time was a big hip hop fan used to suck on a pacifier. I tried to figure out if he was a hardcore hip hop fan or if he longed for his mothers nipples?

Chris, Friday, 21 June 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

I tried to figure out if he was a hardcore hip hop fan or if he longed for his mothers nipples?

Oh - I misread that.. I thought you were saying that the latter is what identifies the former.

Dave225, Friday, 21 June 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Check out this album cover. Looks like the Burmese had the jump on this halfway-on shirt fashion:

http://images.amazon.com/images/P/B000000E49.01.LZZZZZZZ.jpg

o. nate, Friday, 21 June 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

It actually goes the other way... you take one arm out of one sleeve and leave everything else as-is so it kind of rides around your shoulders. (it really doesn't look that inconvenient, Alex!)

Tracer Hand, Friday, 21 June 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Some of these young people today, you can't tell if they're girls or boys! Why, back in my day...
haha Coco Chanel to thread.

nathalie, Friday, 21 June 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

This might be a good bridge between punk fashion & hiphop fashion
http://www.adam.com/b2b/products/demos/odh/images/SplintsSlingsFi g43.jpg

Dave225, Friday, 21 June 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Up yours, Mark. I didn't once say fashion had to be be STRICTLY utilitarian, but when it flies directly in the face of all that's practical, it becomes simply a statement of pointlessness, not fashion. Moreover, I doubt my age would change this impression.

First off, the "you're old" thang was slightly in jest; I've no idea what your age actually is. I was merely playing on the fact that a sure symptom of aging involves gawking disbelievingly at 'the kids' while simultaneously defending your own generation's questionable (and - yes indeed - often impractical) tendencies with spurious protestations to the tune of: 'but it was different when we did it' or smth similar. I'll not worry about restating the obvious problems with your fairly restrictive view of what 'fashion' is or should be and concentrate instead on this:

when it flies directly in the face of all that's practical, it becomes simply a statement of pointlessness

I'd be interested to hear you elaborate on that.

Mark, Friday, 21 June 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Fret not, Mark, my "up yours" was in jest as well (one should *NEVER* take anything they read on ILM too seriously/personally).

"I'll not worry about restating the obvious problems with your fairly restrictive view of what 'fashion' is"

I don't think my view of fashion is restrictive at all (but then, I wouldn't think so, would I!) I said above that I think it's a hard thing to adquately define, and that it serves a myriad of purposes.

But regarding my statement: "when it flies directly in the face of all that's practical, it becomes simply a statement of pointlessness", I meant that when the short-comings of a particular trend outweigh its "wearability" (is that a word?), then it simply becomes a self- defeating and pointless act.

Alex in NYC, Friday, 21 June 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Perhaps the kids should be informed?

Tracer Hand, Friday, 21 June 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

I suppose that, in the end, it's just a matter of prioritizing. Your priorities (with reference to fashion, anyway) = some degree of convenience. Hip-hop kids' priorities = bewildering the Christ out of people like you (re: not hip-hop kids) by boldly robbing their armholes of almost certain occupation.

What a strange world we live in.

Mark, Friday, 21 June 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Okay: I'm doing it with my shirt right now and it's not uncomfortable in the least.

nabisco%%, Friday, 21 June 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Wear another shirt underneath it and walk around all day with it. I dare ya.

Alex in NYC, Friday, 21 June 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

I'm doing it with my shirt right now

I trust you're not wearing a hair shirt.

Ned Raggett, Friday, 21 June 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

What does it "mean" though, this hip-hop trend? Like, the preppy- sweater-over-the-shoulder means, "I am thoroughly practical and dress in layers -- this sweather will come in handy if I get cold." Tearing a shirt in two and then safety-pinning the halves together means, "This world is falling apart and I'm going to live off the scum I scrape from the bottom of the barrel." Wearing a thick down jacket in summer means, "Don't fuck with me, because I might be really strong under here or I could be hiding a gun."

This half-worn shirt could mean, "I can't be bothered to put on my clothes completely. I am a very busy person." Or is it something else?

Mark, Friday, 21 June 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

If your fashion sense, or lack there of, makes you defensive to a question of what is the point of a certain look, then you prove the point of just how pointless and really moronic the look actually is. If you lack the intellectual fortitude to answer the question, sans the attacking style used in order to try and make some real sense out of this fashion fuck up, you have already proved that point. Jumping Alex's shit, and calling him and old man, etc, does not change the fact that "hip hop" is, and continues to be, a bastion of talentless trash and fashion without a clue. I think that answers the question more than any of the witless insults tossed about like a bunch of their graders in the school yard.

Jester, Saturday, 22 June 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

"It's not even music! They don't even know how to play their guitars!"

A Regular Poster Using an Alias, Saturday, 22 June 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Excellent question...

Stupid fashion conformity is the Elder Gods' method of identifying the various meat herds on this particular planet. We have found the the local monkeys don't react well to physical branding, so we convince the you to adopt identifying marks to determine age, feed, and fat content. For example, bell-bottoms and tie-dye mean a fine vegetarian and macrobioic fed cut of quasi-sapient, with a fine herbal infusion. The current "urban" look signifies a well-marbled, malty carcass, bulked up on our latest designer drugs, and fattened nicely on re-processed human meal obtained from our fast-food troughs.

Sorry if this is coming as a bit of shock to you Terrans. Didn't ever wonder why we allow such idiots as yourself to live? We're not philanthropists, after all. Keep up the good work breeding indiscriminently, and remember not to exercise- it makes you stringy.

B. Shoggoth, R'lyh Terrestrial Ape Meats Ltd

Bob Shoggoth, Saturday, 22 June 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Wow, this has taken a bizarre bent. Alright, my question's been answered, I'm out of this one. Thanks for everyone's responses.

Alex in NYC, Saturday, 22 June 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

I love Alex in NYC.

Color Me Arthur, Saturday, 22 June 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

An influx of panicked messages has prompted this entity to respond once again.

No, there really is no way to avoid the inexorable "bolt to the head", once marked. However, it is possible to enter the former in the "pets or food" category. Try a rite of supplication to the Elder Gods Miles Davis or Jaz Coleman. Robes and T-shirts sporting their eldritch sigils may be purchased at better music and/or occult stores.

B. Shoggoth - try our tasty "Boy-band on a Stick"

Bob Shoggoth, Saturday, 22 June 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

More props to Alex in NYC. He keeps ILM from getting too homogenized.

Jester: name me a scene with good fashion sense. I dare ya.

bnw, Saturday, 22 June 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

See, the thing is everyone is too busy being smart arse to answer the real question: doesn't anyone else think this looks moronic? I mean, it certainly isn't flattering or anything like that. Which is why I don't think this is much of a trend at all - I don't see that many people trolling the streets of NYC with their shirts half on, Alex.

Ally, Sunday, 23 June 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

I have yet to see it myself, but I also have a heard time not laughing at the baggy pants thing, which is an Oshawa west thing. But by now its a pretty much a suburban angsty white kid thing like 90s plaid jackets.

Mr Noodles, Sunday, 23 June 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

i saw petey pablo doing it, and i don't think i would have noticed if not for this thread. it doesn't looks ridiculous because it's just another assymetrical thing like all the girls have been doing. and it's not like there was this big empty sleeve flopping around either, he'd tied it neatly into a knot on his shoulder. didn't look uncomfortable or unpractical at all really.

minna, Sunday, 23 June 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

I hadn't read this thread AT ALL before today and on Saturday I started doing this all by myself! It was mostly because I was feeling a bit hot and bored and wondered if my shirt was stretchy enough to do it and I probably looked pretty bad. But now I feel GOOD!

Tom, Monday, 24 June 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

I still really want someone to explain neckties.

nabisco%%, Monday, 24 June 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Neckties were originally invented to help men keep food off of their nice shirts during messy meals.

Dan Perry, Monday, 24 June 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Wanna see it in action? Watch the CRIBS episode with Sysqo. Then try to tell me it's cool with a straight face.

Alex in NYC, Monday, 24 June 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

tie theory one (at bottom of page)
mentalist one (all over page)

Tracer Hand, Monday, 24 June 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Next trend -- Head through one of the sleeves, one arm through the neck hole, the other arm comes from the bottom of the shirt, per the style that started this thread.

Mark, Monday, 24 June 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.