T/S : Early vs. Late Depeche Mode

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Have we done this?

The Depeche Mode thread highlights that there are old folks like me, for whom Depeche Mode from "Construction Time Again" to "Music for the Masses" was indie-synth perfection.

But for whom that infamous guitar sound on "Personal Jesus" was a disturbing false note. And the general "rockism" of route 66 and the American tour movie, a hiddeous disillusionment. Violator "we wanted a name that sounded like the ultimate heavy metal album" kicked us in the stomach. And by "Songs of Faith and Devotion" they'd got so self-important (The whinging "Walking in My Shoes") that we'd had enough.

But I guess for some of you young whippersnappers DM are the ur-Limp Biskit ... who only made sense in the 90s. Probably you cringe with embarrassment when you hear "New Life" or "Leave in Silence"

phil, Friday, 21 June 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

But Phil, what about folks like Ned and me who think that everything from _Construction Time Again_ through _Exciter_ varies from great to really fucking great?

Dan Perry, Friday, 21 June 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

i'll opt for none of the above.

jack cole, Friday, 21 June 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

But Phil, what about folks like Ned and me who think that everything from _Construction Time Again_ through _Exciter_ varies from great to really fucking great?

Well you'll just have to decide which great is greater. Anyway, I don't belive you. The only stuff I've heard from late DM is tuneless, meandering whining over tired downtempo beats! (Maybe these were the remixes.)

phil, Friday, 21 June 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Well you'll just have to decide which great is greater.

To hell with that. And Phil, you had best believe my love , at least. ;-)

Ned Raggett, Friday, 21 June 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

The only stuff I've heard from late DM is tuneless, meandering whining over tired downtempo beats!

Wait, you're taking the DM era which was known for its monotone/static melodies ("Never Let Me Down Again", "Little 15", "To Have And To Hold", "A Question Of Time", "Stripped", "Something To Do", "Everything Counts", "Pleasure Little Treasure", "Behind The Wheel", "Fly On The Windscreen") and saying that, in comparison, latter-era DM is TUNELESS??? You must listen to the following songs post- haste:

Halo
Home
Useless
Dream On
Higher Love
Judas
The Love Thieves
Shine
It's No Good
Freelove
I Am You
One Caress
Mercy In You
Dangerous
Happiest Girl

If anything, Martin Gore's songwriting skills have grown stronger as time has gone on, not weaker.

Dan Perry, Friday, 21 June 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

From Black Celebration to SOFAD Depeche was at its peak from then on it's been downhill. This is not to say that Depeche is bad it's just that of late the band is rather patchy.

MICHELINE, Friday, 21 June 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Normally I would say that DM is just one of those bands that I can't really be critical of and leave the argument, but I really hate _Speak & Spell_ and most of _A Broken Frame_. Not every song they've done has brilliant (ie, the waste of time and space that is "It's Called A Heart": who told them that going back into twee-synth mode would be a good idea?), but the positives far outweigh the negatives.

Dan Perry, Friday, 21 June 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

I might be the only person who doesn't mind 'A Broken Frame' at all. We all have to have a guilty pleasure or two. ;) Of course, it's been ages since I revisted the record so I'll have to break it out to confirm that I still like it as much as I once did.

I haven't really enjoyed them post-'Violator', so there's where my vote lies.

Scott, Friday, 21 June 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Ned : I'm downloading some new DM now ... but I'll try to explain.

I was DM's biggest fan in the 80s. But by the early 90's, it's precisely the Nirvana and NiN influences that seem to have screwed them up. In the 80's there's strong sense that DM are *inventing* this stuff as they're going along. They're pioneering the mix of populist synth-pop, sado-masochistic sexuality, industrial experimentalism. No one else has done this before! DM are revolutionaries.

By the 90's, there's a flirtation with stadium rock. So it's probably fun to *be* a stadium rock band. But who cares? If I wanted stadium rock with a few synth sounds I could listen to U2! The new generation of techno acts, who drew on the 80s DM are pushing these sounds into new more interesting territories.

In contrast DM sound *tired*. I mean genuinely weary. Increasing use of sampled guitar loops and rock tropes instead of inventing new sounds. Bolt on dance rhythms that sound like they come from a catalogue. A live drummer? And Gore is in a thematic rut. How many more songs do I want to hear about his sex and guilt life?

Maybe I'm looking for something else in the 90s. I've stopped listening to songs - in favour of vocals as a wash for jungle, techno and rave. (And eventually garage) I listen to a lot of hip-hop. I hear so much interesting electronic experament. I dance to thrilling new rhythms. And DM just don't seem to have engaged with that world.

phil, Friday, 21 June 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Hey, but that's great! You're finding what works for you and fulfilling a need accordingly. :-)

Dan and I are in many ways lifers when it comes to bands (thus our continual need for new Cure and Prince albums, for instance), regardless of whether or not something is the lightning in a bottle/spirit of the age type thing. Everyone dumped on us for liking Bloodflowers, but we care not. ;-) And as you saw, Dan sees modern Depeche as a flowering of particular strain of Gore's songwriting style, whereas you see it as a compromise, though arguably maybe this is a core song-vs.-trappings interpretation? No right or wrong answers here, just thinking out loud. :-)

Ned Raggett, Friday, 21 June 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

But Depeche Mode's development isn't particularly linear. It baffles me, for example, that someone could like Ultra and not like Black Celebration, or vice versa, because despite the 10+ years that separate them they're quite obviously closer to eachother - in terms of songs, tone, lyrics, vocals and arrangements - than they are to the albums surrounding them.

Tim, Friday, 21 June 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

"Speak and Spell" was the only one that did it for me. Lots of songs about boys... too bad their fashion sense at the time leaned to rubbish sweaters. Actually, they always looked pretty embarassing.

Sean, Friday, 21 June 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

It baffles me, for example, that someone could like Ultra and not like Black Celebration, or vice versa, because despite the 10+ years that separate them they're quite obviously closer to eachother - in terms of songs, tone, lyrics, vocals and arrangements -

Oh, but it's so easy. Right now I'm listening to "Shine" and it's just fucking turgid. Did DM just get *slower*? Did you ever hear that really dismal, droney mix of Black Celebration without beats? That just sounds so more thrilling than this.

And why do late DM just fucking *complain* so much ... "you're hung on a rope of mediocrity, la la la you're insecurity, I need someone to shine for me"

Gore used to be perverse and daring and demanding. But there used to be a sense that he and his lovers were partners in something exciting. "Somebody" is a thrilling agenda for a relationship. "Master & Servant", "I Want You, Now". On Black Celebration the songs were about stuff, sometimes even political stuff like "New Dress".

Every nu-DM song I hear is just about Gore's tiredness and disappointment with some generic "you". His demmands sound like a nagging wife 30 years into a marriage!

phil, Saturday, 22 June 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

I claim no responsibility for anything on Exciter though Phil, as nothing I've heard has incited me to buy it.

Tim, Saturday, 22 June 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

oh yeah (doh!) ... they all blur into each other when you download.

phil, Saturday, 22 June 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Then you're both beyond help. ;-) No, seriously, try "When the Body Speaks" if you've not already. Delicacy in action.

Ned Raggett, Saturday, 22 June 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

No, seriously, try "When the Body Speaks" if you've not already. Delicacy in action.

OK ... delicate, but not exactly ... but still fit's my characterization of nu-DM as somehow "weary".

OTOH I think I just found a song off Exciter I *will* burn to CD and listen to again : Freelove. Got a bit of choon to it, that one! In fact someone should do a speed-garage cover.

phil, Saturday, 22 June 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Yeah, that's a good one -- works as its own singalong at the shows, I've found. But Dave helps make it so. ;-)

Ned Raggett, Saturday, 22 June 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

I consider DM to be one of my favorite groups, but Exciter really didn't sit well with me either. The new production seems to be priority one, whereas on all the albums before it the production changes served better as flavor. A few songs aside ("When the Body Speaks" certainly one of them) I didn't care for it.

Vinnie, Saturday, 22 June 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Songs I adore off of _Exciter_: "Dream On" (which is very close to the same tempo as "Master And Servant"), "Shine", "When The Body Speaks", "Comatose", "Breathe", "I Feel Loved" (another stomper), "I Am You".

Dan Perry, Monday, 24 June 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

four years pass...
What is early and what is late?

I prefer Depeche Mode post-"A Broken Frame", pre-"Music For The Masses". I guess that is kind of a mid period, and also the period their most lojal and "fanatic" fans (particularly in Europe) are most of all into.

Geir Hongro (GeirHong), Friday, 10 November 2006 23:30 (nineteen years ago)

I want to know what Phil thought of Playing The Angel!

The Android Cat (Dan Perry), Friday, 10 November 2006 23:38 (nineteen years ago)

The recent tour DVD, BTW, is quite excellent.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Friday, 10 November 2006 23:40 (nineteen years ago)

I guess I am more into the documentary that has surfaced with about half an hour with each of the re-releases. By the time the last four albums are released in their new edition, we will have more than five hours worth of great documentary material.

Geir Hongro (GeirHong), Friday, 10 November 2006 23:45 (nineteen years ago)

i don't hear ANY "nirvana influence" in post-violator DM as phil complains above. where?

kyle (akmonday), Saturday, 11 November 2006 00:06 (nineteen years ago)

"nirvana influence" = OH NOES, GEETAR

The Android Cat (Dan Perry), Saturday, 11 November 2006 00:08 (nineteen years ago)

That darned guitar! Why couldn't Depeche have stuck to their principles of not using guitar on songs like "Never Let Me Down Again" and "Behind the Wheel" and "Love In Itself" and the like!

Ned Raggett (Ned), Saturday, 11 November 2006 00:48 (nineteen years ago)

No Nirvana influence, no, but "Songs Of Faith And Devotion" had way too much U2 and NIN influence. Luckily, it was a one-off.

Btw. was there really guitar on "Love In Itself"? Sure there are a lot of guitars on the (interesting) acoustic version on the 12 inch single but otherwise?

Geir Hongro (GeirHong), Saturday, 11 November 2006 01:21 (nineteen years ago)

my fave lp are Speak And Spell and Ultra. So both, early and late.

minerva estassi (minerva estassi), Saturday, 11 November 2006 03:09 (nineteen years ago)

I can't get into anything past Speak & Spell, DM not taking itself seriously is the only way i want them. I associate them with a sort of teenage moodiness that i want no part of at this stage of my life, maybe later i'll be able to get past that association, obv. an enduring band like that has something going for it.

timmy tannin (pompous), Saturday, 11 November 2006 03:21 (nineteen years ago)

A little something.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Saturday, 11 November 2006 03:24 (nineteen years ago)

;-)

timmy tannin (pompous), Saturday, 11 November 2006 03:37 (nineteen years ago)

Taking things entirely too seriously is the essense of DM.

Grey, Ian (IanBrooklyn), Saturday, 11 November 2006 04:55 (nineteen years ago)

HOW DARE YOU MAKE FUN oh wait.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Saturday, 11 November 2006 05:11 (nineteen years ago)

i hear no NIN in SOFAD.

kyle (akmonday), Saturday, 11 November 2006 06:38 (nineteen years ago)

"Rush" is essentially Depeche does NIN does Depeche.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Saturday, 11 November 2006 06:51 (nineteen years ago)

Rush is essentially Depeche does "Achtung Baby"-era U2.

It must be added, though, that "Love Is Blindness" is essensially U2 doing Depeche Mode, so was both ways.

Geir Hongro (GeirHong), Saturday, 11 November 2006 16:56 (nineteen years ago)

"Rush", that is, not Rush the band :)

Geir Hongro (GeirHong), Saturday, 11 November 2006 16:57 (nineteen years ago)

That sounds even awesomer that Rush the band and I LOVE Rush the band.

The Android Cat (Dan Perry), Saturday, 11 November 2006 17:15 (nineteen years ago)

Well, I guess I prefer the "Depeche Mode does Yellow Magic Orchestra" approach of "Construction Time Again" :)

Geir Hongro (GeirHong), Saturday, 11 November 2006 17:53 (nineteen years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.