it's nice of the record company to make both readily available, but
the choice leaves me in indecision. i know this happened a lot back
then (i.e. the bizarre cuts made on early Elvis Costello albums before
they made it to the US), but is there any particular history to the 2
different running order/selections? which one is preferred by members
of the band? what are the pros and cons of each?
― al, Sunday, 14 July 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)
Can someone explain this "xOr" business to me please?
And how come nobody voiced
this definition?:
Ramones, Clash, Pistols = not punk = punk-ROCK! (punks would not
cover Phil Spector or Chuck Berry)
punk = GBH, The Exploited = bands that only real punks give a shit
about, not music nerds like us
Rock'n'roll was invented before rock, punk-rock was invented before
punk, hardcore punk was invented before hardcore, and hardcore techno
was invented before ardkore. It was a matter of eliminating the
roll, the rock, the punk, and the techno. (& the 'n' & the h & the
c) Oh yeah, let's not forget hythm & lues. Purification, baby.
― Keith McD, Monday, 15 July 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)