0.1 thousands
― postcards from the (ledge), Wednesday, 7 July 2010 10:19 (thirteen years ago) link
Grrrrr...fuckin' Ian MacKaye.
― kkvgz, Wednesday, 7 July 2010 10:24 (thirteen years ago) link
let's just agree on millions of shows and call it a day
― progressive cuts (Tracer Hand), Wednesday, 7 July 2010 10:32 (thirteen years ago) link
Discussing Nietzsche in a college German class led to some amazing lols for me, particularly when the conversation veered towards a discussion of selfishness and altruism and I took the position that no one chooses of their own volition to be altruistic because the emotional reward from volunteerism/helping others makes them selfish acts.
People also didn't like it when I kept telling them that, when talking about the Uebermensch, Nietzsche was talking about us.
― emo WINNER! (HI DERE), Wednesday, 7 July 2010 13:57 (thirteen years ago) link
first line is a classic philosophy 101 challop.
― postcards from the (ledge), Wednesday, 7 July 2010 13:59 (thirteen years ago) link
It was a tense class but oh so worth it when the girl who was doing volunteer programs got super mad because she wouldn't let go of "selfish = bad" in an academic conversation divorced from reality.
― emo WINNER! (HI DERE), Wednesday, 7 July 2010 14:03 (thirteen years ago) link
found this on a mixtape me and lhgoo made in 1986 where everything seemed permissible plus th record was a dollar at Caldorand goo had just won lottoi think we thought wanna be black and black girls by violent femmes and all that fake tranxgression stuff was funnywe were 22no excuseand now that my gf is black i dont get away with anything anymore
John Cale - Wilson JolietShe was so afraid of everything she saidSince her mother told her why once upon a timeThere was no rhymeBefore the clock slammed another doorOf the weary hours we were facing a second hand shylockShylocked in, in on us
I saw what it had takenPlaying back that old brigade of mineEverything was dirty, everything was without rhymeEverything was dirty, everything was without rhymeCause me and nigger marchedYes, me and nigger blasted our way outOf here just like yesterday
Yesterday's streets were burnt down into shellsMothers weep while children sleepLike ancestors in the groundThe misery of nuns lie together like sons Who do not have the taste for the battle
We are shuffled like a pack of cards in the dead of nightLike lovers below Bataan, below the sensesCause the senses smell of tearsWhile we and nigger marchedBlasted our way out of hereClose the door and let's have some private life
― danbunny, Wednesday, 7 July 2010 14:24 (thirteen years ago) link
"no one chooses of their own volition to be altruistic because the emotional reward from volunteerism/helping others makes them selfish acts."
I volunteered for some pretty unrewarding stuff -- wouldn't necessarily call it altruistic, but in order to be selfish, they would have had to be rewarding on some level and they weren't.Do you think the girl was mad for trivializing her drudgery, or making it seem like volunteers were help-junkies addicted to helpahol?
― Philip Nunez, Wednesday, 7 July 2010 18:16 (thirteen years ago) link
what intellectuals are holding ian mackaye in high esteem??!
all the Continental philosophers are nuts about Repeater
― les yeux sans aerosmith (underrated aerosmith albums I have loved), Wednesday, 7 July 2010 18:21 (thirteen years ago) link
they recognize a fuckin jam when they parse one
― the reverend dr. william wiggins (upper mississippi sh@kedown), Wednesday, 7 July 2010 18:30 (thirteen years ago) link
― Philip Nunez
the standard argument is that ostensible altruists gain personal (emotional/ego) & social benefits that they seek in a self-interested manner even as they help others. for example, the sense that they are "doing the right thing."
this argument tends to piss people off because, A.) it's smug, and B.) it tricks people into defending positions that they don't actually hold (e.g., that it is possible to be entirely unselfish, or that altruism's moral precepts are invalidated if any conceivable benefit accrues to the altruist).
― good news if you wear cargo shorts (contenderizer), Wednesday, 7 July 2010 18:31 (thirteen years ago) link
I do kind of hold B) though -- not to the extent that an altruistic enterprise is invalid, but it sure taints it a little. It's pretty disheartening to look up stats on a charity and see personnel drawing hefty salaries (though it's probably a lebron james situation where they bring in more $ to the franchise than they earn)
― Philip Nunez, Wednesday, 7 July 2010 18:43 (thirteen years ago) link
Hey, let's talk about how Siegel and Shuster (Jews!) created Superman as a Nietzsche-inspired supervillain until true Nietzsche-inspired supervillain Hitler made explicit the notion of the ubermensch, causing Siegel and Shuster to switch their selfish supermensch into a selfless supermensch for good!
What was this thread about again?
― Josh in Chicago, Wednesday, 7 July 2010 18:45 (thirteen years ago) link
if you want to discuss salary issues with charities ... let's not do it in this thread.
― sarahel, Wednesday, 7 July 2010 18:47 (thirteen years ago) link
I do kind of hold B) though -- not to the extent that an altruistic enterprise is invalid, but it sure taints it a little. It's pretty disheartening to look up stats on a charity and see personnel drawing hefty salaries (though it's probably a lebron james situation where they bring in more $ to the franchise than they earn)― Philip Nunez
well, there's a lot of wiggle room in the gap between "any conceivable benefit" and "a salary in the high sixes."
but what sarah said
― good news if you wear cargo shorts (contenderizer), Wednesday, 7 July 2010 18:49 (thirteen years ago) link
the entire point of the altruism/selfishness argument is to defend the idea that self-interest and selfishness aren't inherently bad concepts, not to defend the idea that altruism is evil; it should be okay and in fact encouraged to selfishly do things that help other people because um you are helping other people
― emo WINNER! (HI DERE), Wednesday, 7 July 2010 20:29 (thirteen years ago) link
The "altruism is selfish" line is actually sort of a well-meaning commonplace in the U.S., isn't it? Or rather, it's basically a commonplace to say that a rewarding emotional life involves helping others, or that the solution to your own soul problems is going to involve doing something for someone else. (I don't know if that actually benefits altruism or not, though, since it can also sort of compartmentalize it to a point where you're vigorously self-interested in your personal dealings and then go volunteer at a shelter twice a week.)
― oɔsıqɐu (nabisco), Wednesday, 7 July 2010 21:32 (thirteen years ago) link
Isn't the biological argument that societies/packs/gaggles, etc...w/o 'unselfishness' are more prone to disaster than those that have a modicum thereof?
― Grand amiral de la marine des licornes (Michael White), Wednesday, 7 July 2010 21:39 (thirteen years ago) link
so i guess having successfully unpacked the use of the n-word by artists were going to handle the paradox of altruism now?
― max, Wednesday, 7 July 2010 21:46 (thirteen years ago) link
yeah we're basically the new university of frankfurt
― plax (ico), Wednesday, 7 July 2010 22:05 (thirteen years ago) link
well when people say they volunteer and stuff because "it makes them feel good" there ya go right there. i used to think the genealogy of morals by FN was the bomb when i was younger. i should re-read it.
― scott seward, Wednesday, 7 July 2010 22:08 (thirteen years ago) link
my brother in law has a big problem with the golden rule. um, for what that's worth. i remember having an argument about it with him.
― scott seward, Wednesday, 7 July 2010 22:09 (thirteen years ago) link
I did it all for the nookie
― puff puff post (uh oh I'm having a fantasy), Wednesday, 7 July 2010 22:09 (thirteen years ago) link
― emo WINNER! (HI DERE), Wednesday, July 7, 2010 1:29 PM (2 hours ago) Bookmarkthat's true, but i've also heard it used to establish moral equivalence between ostensibly selfless and obviously selfish acts. like, "there is nothing uniquely wrong with egregious selfishness, because everyone is basically selfish, even people who seem or claim to be acting altruistically. it's all the same, and no one can claim the moral high ground, because everybody's just doing what they want." and while logically sound, i think that argument is BS on a moral level. it's simple nihilism, and it's often presented with a smug smirk - not that i'm accusing you of smugness.
― good news if you wear cargo shorts (contenderizer), Wednesday, 7 July 2010 23:12 (thirteen years ago) link
it's interesting the way that capitalism has incorporated altruism as a sales pitch
― sarahel, Wednesday, 7 July 2010 23:15 (thirteen years ago) link
:/
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hyK3RoDYZPg
― Whiney G. Weingarten, Saturday, 5 November 2016 21:34 (seven years ago) link
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P-z-mQyvkO4
― electric wight dorkestra (crüt), Sunday, 6 November 2016 01:00 (seven years ago) link
"This is about ARTISTIC use, so keep shit like Skrewdr1ver and Dav1d Allen C0e"
Why is it that racism can't be artistic? Like "hate" is some inert dark matter that can't have anything to do with real art. Is "Black Korea" somehow "more artistic" than 5kr3\/\/dr1\/er, and if so why? (Bonus pts for not falling back on the "racism is prejudice plus power")
― punksishippies, Sunday, 6 November 2016 04:42 (seven years ago) link
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O4a3V0f72-s
― flappy bird, Sunday, 6 November 2016 05:06 (seven years ago) link
I mean it makes no sense to act like that Guns n Roses N-word is somehow "more artistic" than Coe doing it when it's obviously just plain ol racism that Axl later explained away as babby Axle being "too real." The oi and outlaw country guys don't think they're being legitimately racist either, half the time. If we're gonna talk about "artistically" using a word, we may as well define what we mean.
― punksishippies, Sunday, 6 November 2016 05:11 (seven years ago) link
no one here claimed that axl rose's use of the word served any legitimate artistic purpose. with others, like patti smith and cocorosie, the consensus was that their use of the word was ill advised in the end, even if their intention wasn't to express racism.
expressing racism is not a valuable artistic enterprise.
― Treeship, Sunday, 6 November 2016 05:28 (seven years ago) link
http://sd.keepcalm-o-matic.co.uk/i/keep-calm-and-love-fp-21.png
― yokohama fuckdolphin (bizarro gazzara), Sunday, 6 November 2016 07:10 (seven years ago) link
Is anyone here defending "Black Korea"?
― Spiritual Hat Minimalism (Sund4r), Sunday, 6 November 2016 13:50 (seven years ago) link
Showing off your working knowledge of actual racist music is just wink-wink bullshit and the thread doesn't need it.
― Whiney G. Weingarten, Sunday, 6 November 2016 14:28 (seven years ago) link
Winky G. Winkgarten
― how's life, Sunday, 6 November 2016 14:30 (seven years ago) link
thought for sure that this revive was going to be about Honey G
― soref, Sunday, 6 November 2016 14:39 (seven years ago) link
punkishippies is always on about this shit
― blonde redheads have more fun (upper mississippi sh@kedown), Sunday, 6 November 2016 14:44 (seven years ago) link
We should probably get into how Douglas Pearce is misunderstood while we are at it
― blonde redheads have more fun (upper mississippi sh@kedown), Sunday, 6 November 2016 14:58 (seven years ago) link
Can't be bothered to read thread. What did we decide about The Classical in the end?
― imago, Sunday, 6 November 2016 15:12 (seven years ago) link
I guess I'll give punkishippies that the distinction between 'artistic' use of a racial slur and 'actually racist' use is vague and worth questioning. I agree that GnR were being actually racist in "One in a Million".
― Spiritual Hat Minimalism (Sund4r), Sunday, 6 November 2016 15:15 (seven years ago) link
xp i always thought the use of the word, in "the classical," modified as it is with the word "obligatory," wass supposed to point out how societies have this tendency to marginalize certain groups -- sort of a foucauldian thing. the target is not the out group, but society, for creating out groups.
however, i am reading now that he is targeting the bbc's tendency toward tokenism, putting a few black people in the crowds of televised performances. this is a less defensible use of the word in my view. the target is still the "bbc" but the black people in the crowd are also being singled out in a very disrespectful kind of way.
inconclusive.
― Treeship, Sunday, 6 November 2016 16:09 (seven years ago) link
30 albums and he never did it other than 20 seconds into his would-be breakout record. total provocateur move, still makes me a bit uncomfortable though
― imago, Sunday, 6 November 2016 16:16 (seven years ago) link
I mean, it's meant to, yeah yeah
― imago, Sunday, 6 November 2016 16:17 (seven years ago) link
definitely mars a song with otherwise amazing lyrics
― Treeship, Sunday, 6 November 2016 16:18 (seven years ago) link
ts: 1981 vs. 2016
― xiphoid beetlebum (rushomancy), Sunday, 6 November 2016 16:32 (seven years ago) link
recent events reminded me of this classic exchange upthread:
Slayer: two Latinos and a Jew (Kerry King). Granted, the other guy is about as Aryan as you can get and is obsessed with Nazi imagery, but what are you gonna do.― Chicago to Philadelphia: "Suck It" (Bill Magill), Wednesday, June 23, 2010 9:38 AMnot be obsessed with nazi imagery― max, Wednesday, June 23, 2010 9:39 AM
― Chicago to Philadelphia: "Suck It" (Bill Magill), Wednesday, June 23, 2010 9:38 AM
not be obsessed with nazi imagery
― max, Wednesday, June 23, 2010 9:39 AM
― this iphone speaks many languages (DJP), Wednesday, 16 August 2017 20:03 (six years ago) link
lol
― I Love You, Fancybear (symsymsym), Thursday, 17 August 2017 04:40 (six years ago) link