Nirvana vs. Alice in Chains

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
How to make music with distorted guitars and still have critics like you - stay diatonic, not chromatic. Keep vox harmonies in thirds instead of those alien-sounding fourths and fifths. If you must 'down-tune', do it on a single-coil guitar and say it was an accident. Sing in a recognisable power-pop tradition. Appear to fit comfortably in the singer-songwriter continuum rather than coming from a suspiciously uncool subculture like hair-metal, where (gasp!) you might have woodshedded enough covers to have learned how to play a guitar solo, thus throwing your cred out the window, how 'maladjusted' can you possibly be if you're able to socialise with other musicians? [Here's a paradox - Nirvana were once seen as the 'beginning' of something and AIC the 'end', and now everything seems exactly opposite! Like, would Gina Arnold consent to being locked in a room with "Would?" on repeat play? Think I know the answer to that one. Yeah I keep banging on about it but I really can't stand GA. See, if I was like her, I would've thrown away my copy of 'Meat Puppets II' just because SHE liked it, see?] I like both Nirvana and AIC but admit it, you wouldn't play Nirvana at a party where everybody just wanted to get crazy, would you? (Well I would, which may explain my lack of social interaction)

dave q, Thursday, 26 September 2002 14:11 (twenty-three years ago)

Tell me I'm not the only one who thought of that D Parker quote upon hearing about Layne Staley ("How could they tell?")

dave q, Thursday, 26 September 2002 14:12 (twenty-three years ago)

I've never been to a party where AIC has been spun while everybody gets crazy. Which is a shame cos thinking about it it could be fucking legendary - a packed out strobing basement room with the speakers booming: "Junk-fuck"... YEAHHHHHHHHHHH YEAHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH etc etc. *sigh* Can I just mention the Angry Chair drum line; Boof blah booff du blah, blblblblblah ba boof du blah, du du boof blah booff du blah.. complete with flapping hi-hat (repeat 10trillion times until slightly dodgy chorus) - ahhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh. Does anyone have any idea what I'm feeling here?

Roger Fascist (Roger Fascist), Thursday, 26 September 2002 14:34 (twenty-three years ago)

Ah. Oh.

Roger Fascist (Roger Fascist), Thursday, 26 September 2002 14:46 (twenty-three years ago)

I'm not sure what you're trying to say here, and I'm ignoring the whole second half of your paragraph since I have no idea who this Gina Arnold cat is, but you seem to be saying that AIC was more radical for being influenced by the "uncool" genre of hair metal, but at the time that AIC and Nirvana first around, hair metal was the mainstream and was not "uncool." From my understanding, Nirvana was seen as radical exactly because they were rejecting the technical playing of metal for simplicity and pop hooks. It sounds to me like you're trying to write a revisionist history: ie, because hair metal is uncool now, AIC was rebellious then by letting exhibiting this influence, and vice versa for Nirvana.

Nick A., Thursday, 26 September 2002 14:58 (twenty-three years ago)

Ignore the word "letting" in the last sentence.

Nick A., Thursday, 26 September 2002 14:59 (twenty-three years ago)

Wasn't Nirvana just mid-80s Sub Pop/Dinosaur Jr et al indie-guitarnoise going mainstream rather than a "rejection" of metal? For all their talk about how they "only listened to Celtic Frost", I never heard any of that in their actual music. Wasn't that just a case of random namedropping of innovative/revolutionary bands as influence to impress critics?

Siegbran Hetteson (eofor), Thursday, 26 September 2002 15:20 (twenty-three years ago)

I would say that Nirvana was "just mid-80s Sub Pop/Dinosaur Jr. et al indie-guitarnoise going mainstream" AND a "rejection" of metal, as opposed to RATHER THAN a "rejection of metal." I don't really see how those can't coexist (which seems to be your implication).

Nick A., Thursday, 26 September 2002 15:33 (twenty-three years ago)

Both of my AIC CDs are missing... do I buy them again?

Sean (Sean), Thursday, 26 September 2002 16:18 (twenty-three years ago)

"only listened to Celtic Frost" must've been something they only said to European journalists.

Kris (aqueduct), Thursday, 26 September 2002 18:54 (twenty-three years ago)

I'm not sure what you're trying to say here, and I'm ignoring the whole second half of your paragraph since I have no idea who this Gina Arnold cat is

Consider yourself one of the lucky ones.

brg30 (brg30), Thursday, 26 September 2002 20:57 (twenty-three years ago)

Trudat!

James Blount (James Blount), Thursday, 26 September 2002 21:03 (twenty-three years ago)

i don't know too much about these bands other than the early press/media each band got...

Nirvana was definitely coming from the underground/zine press route and Alice In Chains had their video on Headbanger's Ball and did a national tour opening for Van Halen a year before Nevermind was released and was featured in metal mags alongside GnR and such.

I think that comparing Nirvana's first record with Alice In Chains first record it is explicit that the bands are coming from very, very different planets. Not to mention the production values, major label debut vs. indie debut, technical prowess vs. lack of, I think dave q needs to listen to how much more "pro" AiC comes off than Nirvana... (i hate defending Nirvana).

gygax!, Thursday, 26 September 2002 21:20 (twenty-three years ago)

nine months pass...
"Lithium" is by no means diatonic

Curt1s St3ph3ns, Saturday, 5 July 2003 16:50 (twenty-two years ago)

Alice in Chains were actually pretty damn great. Facelift hasn't aged all that well (too much crappy - ugh - "funk metal"; what's that song, "Put You Down"? I haven't listened to it in a few years), but I really do love Dirt. That record's quite good. I mean, yeah, "heroin addiction" = boo fucking hoo but despite that tiresome theme, the record holds up - a dark personal exploration that works.

But I like Nirvana better.

TS: the great chorus melodies on "In Bloom" and "Sickman".

Actually, fuck, "Sickman" into "Rooster" is as good as hard rock got in the early 90's.

Mr. Diamond (diamond), Monday, 7 July 2003 03:04 (twenty-two years ago)

I really liked that AIC acoustic album when I was 16. What the hell was that thing called?

ben welsh (benwelsh), Monday, 7 July 2003 03:14 (twenty-two years ago)

um... MTV Unplugged?

Wyndham Earl, Monday, 7 July 2003 03:43 (twenty-two years ago)

nope, I think it was called Jar of Flies or something. It was an EP.

ben welsh (benwelsh), Monday, 7 July 2003 03:44 (twenty-two years ago)

Yeah, Jar of Flies. Pretty decent record, and a cool move for them at that time. And it had Mark Arm from Mudhoney on it!

I'm just relistening to Dirt just now, and it really is great, in fact better than I had remembered. To Sean's old question upthread - Yes, you should at the least re-buy Dirt!!

They really did have some nice melodies. They can actually sort of remind me of the Beatles; well, more like Lennon at his darkest on things like "I Want You", "Sexy Sadie", "Dig A Pony", "I'm So Tired"; things like that..

Mr. Diamond (diamond), Monday, 7 July 2003 04:13 (twenty-two years ago)

I hate hate hate Alice In Chains. Aside from "No Excuses," the weakest track on Nevermind is still better than anything I've heard from AIC. Layne Stanley is to blame for SOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO many shitty singers.

Anthony Miccio (Anthony Miccio), Monday, 7 July 2003 20:35 (twenty-two years ago)

Nirvana are just as guilty, tho', Antoine, of inspiring soooooo many shitty bands.

Alex in NYC (vassifer), Monday, 7 July 2003 21:02 (twenty-two years ago)

I wouldn't say they're just as guilty

James Blount (James Blount), Monday, 7 July 2003 21:04 (twenty-two years ago)

Alice In Chains ripoffs are inherently not good, while Nirvana has a few good ones (most specifically Local H).

Anthony Miccio (Anthony Miccio), Monday, 7 July 2003 21:06 (twenty-two years ago)

I wouldn't say they're just as guilty

I would. In fact, I just did. Fuck'em both, actually, that's what I'd say. Glad to be rid of the pair of'em!

Alice In Chains ripoffs are inherently not good,...

I'll give ya that.


....while Nirvana has a few good ones (most specifically Local H).

Never fully paid any attention to Local H (probably `cos of their crap name). However, for inspiring the absolultely indefensible Silverchair alone, Nirvana are guilty, guilty, guilty!

Alex in NYC (vassifer), Monday, 7 July 2003 21:09 (twenty-two years ago)

Was discussing this with Matos last Friday, and he cogently pointed out that, for better or worse, Alice In Chains has proven to be the far more influential band than Nirvana, gauging from the "modern" rock set, these days.

donut bitch (donut), Monday, 7 July 2003 21:16 (twenty-two years ago)

let it go Seattle!

James Blount (James Blount), Monday, 7 July 2003 21:18 (twenty-two years ago)

also Nirvana inspired the best songs by the Hives, so GOD BLESS 'EM!

Anthony Miccio (Anthony Miccio), Monday, 7 July 2003 21:20 (twenty-two years ago)

HAHA, I meant the Vines, natch.

Anthony Miccio (Anthony Miccio), Monday, 7 July 2003 21:24 (twenty-two years ago)

Was discussing this with Matos last Friday, and he cogently pointed out that, for better or worse, Alice In Chains has proven to be the far more influential band than Nirvana, gauging from the "modern" rock set, these days.

Heh. This reminds me of something Stripey has noted a variety of times, namely that while MBV are still Thee Shoegaze Band non pareil it's Slowdive that have had the most direct impact in terms of groups' sounds. In this case she says it's partially due to their songs' relative simplicity (more in the sense of 'easier to perform' than melodically simpler), something that isn't necessarily the case here! No question that Staley's growling slots in much more easily with nu-metal in general, though.

Anyway, the Vines even have songs that can be called 'best'? *hides*

Ned Raggett (Ned), Monday, 7 July 2003 21:48 (twenty-two years ago)

I'll stand by those two singles to the very end, ESPECIALLY "Get Free." I really must buy that CD burner fast so that Ned can try another flavor: Anthonymusic (hup hup hup hup).

Anthony Miccio (Anthony Miccio), Monday, 7 July 2003 21:50 (twenty-two years ago)

Ummmm,........THE VINES ARE CRAP! There was a brief handful of nano-seconds that I thought "Get Free" was alright, but that trivial period of time passed with the swiftness of a hungry cheetah with an oblivious gnu in its sights.

Alex in NYC (vassifer), Monday, 7 July 2003 22:18 (twenty-two years ago)

I've heard "Get Free" and it is The Stink. Or perhaps even more accurately and even worse, The Generic.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Monday, 7 July 2003 23:08 (twenty-two years ago)

I hope I die before I get old. Failing that, I hope I don't HATE FUN when I get old. I cough to the west and fart to the east (Alex gets the fart because he didn't go the FAP. I wanted yell GC lyrics at you and make rap handgestures, dude!)

Anthony Miccio (Anthony Miccio), Monday, 7 July 2003 23:54 (twenty-two years ago)

oh, and I don't like all the Vines stuff. Just the Nirvana rips.

Anthony Miccio (Anthony Miccio), Monday, 7 July 2003 23:55 (twenty-two years ago)

Alex gets the fart because he didn't go the FAP

Why oh why must there be farting involved....especially in this heat?

Maybe if you masterplanners didn't plot these things on major holidays I could attend! Seriously, having a FAP on July 4th is like having a wedding on Labor Day Weekend. SHITTY!

Alex in NYC (vassifer), Tuesday, 8 July 2003 11:44 (twenty-two years ago)

eleven months pass...
Alice In Chains lead singer Layne Staley is described as having a 3-4 inch penis, and a sexual disappointment.

People love Gravity and Ebullition! (ex machina), Thursday, 24 June 2004 17:04 (twenty-one years ago)

What disturbs me is the implication that this description is current, and was recently gathered.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Thursday, 24 June 2004 17:08 (twenty-one years ago)

hahaha

People love Gravity and Ebullition! (ex machina), Thursday, 24 June 2004 17:10 (twenty-one years ago)

Kurt Cobain is described as having a foul odor.

Gear! (Gear!), Thursday, 24 June 2004 17:12 (twenty-one years ago)

he didn't brush his teeth regularly either.

latebloomer (latebloomer), Thursday, 24 June 2004 17:36 (twenty-one years ago)

he once went 10+ years without bathing.

AaronK (AaronK), Thursday, 24 June 2004 19:07 (twenty-one years ago)

that's just ignorant!

peter smith (plsmith), Thursday, 24 June 2004 19:10 (twenty-one years ago)

one year passes...
Alice in Chains is just as good and in my opinion better than Nirvana. I guarantee Layne Staley did not have a 3-4 inch cock unless you are saying when it was flacid. I can't really prove anything because he is dead. I find Alice in Chains to be less grunge than Nirvana and more heavy metal amd even though many of their songs are about death and heroine the flow of lyrics reminds me of poetry. Good poetry.

Todd MacIntosh, Saturday, 27 May 2006 02:06 (twenty years ago)

I liked both bands regardless of style, penis size or who they influenced. ;)

If you were drinking and clubbing back in those days it was tough to avoid getting a that unbelievably sore neck after slamming/moshing to any of the big 4 (Soundgarden and Pearl Jam added to the other two of course) Seattle bands.

Damn those were fun times!

shorty (shorty), Saturday, 27 May 2006 02:29 (twenty years ago)

3-4 inch flaccid penis? Sigh. I wish I had one of those. Sometimes, I have a baby mushroom acorn penis, but generally it's hangs a might 3 inches on a good day.

Statue of David, Saturday, 27 May 2006 03:07 (twenty years ago)

Actually the acoustic EP previously mentioned is called "Sap", and it might be the only thing left of Alice in Chains that I can stand to hear. It's too bad they couldn't have a sense of humor more often like on the last track on that EP. Mark Arm and Chris Cornell being on it really adds to it.
Obviously I'm gonna have to go with Nirvana on this one. The seriousness of Alice in Chains comes off as really corny to me. But they seemed the most creative with things like the Nona Weisbaum video they did with Jerry Cantrell in drag and Sean Kinney dressed as a clown.

xgurggleglgllg (xgurggleglgllg), Saturday, 27 May 2006 03:51 (twenty years ago)

......check it out.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WQwOP_n348s&search=nona%20weisbaum

xgurggleglgllg (xgurggleglgllg), Saturday, 27 May 2006 04:29 (twenty years ago)

I don't mean to hijack the thread, but maybe just extend it a bit... If you had to rate the big 4(not including the Temple of the Dog effort which I might have to give first place), what is your order of favourite to least? I think mine is:

Soundgarden
Pearl Jam
Alice In Chains
Nirvana

Although back in the early nineties I probably would have switched the order of the last two, and that may be because I overplayed Nirvana, so it's tough to say. Like I said earlier, I liked them all quite a bit.

shorty (shorty), Saturday, 27 May 2006 05:46 (twenty years ago)

Nirvana
Alice In Chains
Pearl Jam
Soundgarden

AaronHz (AaronHz), Saturday, 27 May 2006 05:52 (twenty years ago)

Soundgarden
Nirvana
Mudhoney
Screaming Trees
Alice in Chains
Pearl Jam
Tad

... that was the way i saw it at the time

Stormy Davis (diamond), Saturday, 27 May 2006 05:54 (twenty years ago)

Skin Yard was probably next

Stormy Davis (diamond), Saturday, 27 May 2006 05:55 (twenty years ago)

Nirvana
Pearl Jam
Soundgarden
Alice In Chains

Although Superunknown is a better album than any of them, not counting Nevermind.

kornrulez6969 (TCBeing), Saturday, 27 May 2006 13:18 (twenty years ago)

I think I liked AIC best of the grunge bands at the time cos they were the most metal. Now I think Nirvana were definately better and Soundgarden were probably better. Better than Pearl Jam, though.

chap who would dare to be a nerd, not a geek (chap), Saturday, 27 May 2006 13:42 (twenty years ago)

four years pass...

Alice In Chains

SlammanGrande, Wednesday, 25 August 2010 11:25 (fifteen years ago)

I love classic Nirvana (Bleach, Incesticide, Nevermind, et al), but Alice in Chains will always hold a special place in my heart. In high school, when I was really starting to get into 'heavier' music, they were my gateway.

from the unfairly overlooked Facelift (hey, it's a fun album!), to Dirt, it contained the dark sound that matched my personality in high school while also retaining mainstream catchiness on the singles. Truthfully, I'd say the only album of theirs I truly am not a huge fan of is the self-titled recording.

I also have not heard the newest one with the new singer. To me, it's a little like seeing an old girlfriend with a new boyfriend -- I'm sure the guy is talented and all, and the band may sound great together, but to me I can't quit associating the band with Layne Staley. Not to knock the contributions of anybody else, especially Jerry Cantrell, but Layne's passionate singing was what endeared me to the band the most. Cantrell's songwriting played a large part as well, but Layne's soaring vocals on "Rain When I Die" are kind of the example I like to give of what I love the most about AiC.

One day I'll give the new album a listen to though.

funky brewster (San Te), Wednesday, 25 August 2010 11:38 (fifteen years ago)

I guarantee Layne Staley did not have a 3-4 inch cock unless you are saying when it was flacid. I can't really prove anything because he is dead.

Stevie is a bit lame, if you hate fun (stevie), Wednesday, 25 August 2010 11:51 (fifteen years ago)

"Lithium" is by no means diatonic

Yeah, that's got to be the weirdest criticism of Nirvana I can imagine.

EveningStar (Sund4r), Wednesday, 25 August 2010 12:36 (fifteen years ago)

I think that's referring to the first line of the original post.

Chewshabadoo, Wednesday, 25 August 2010 13:04 (fifteen years ago)

No, I was agreeing with Curtis that it was bizarre for dave q to criticize Nirvana on those grounds. Modal mixture was pretty much a defining element of Nirvana's style - and that's on the poppier songs!

EveningStar (Sund4r), Wednesday, 25 August 2010 18:49 (fifteen years ago)

I think the only thing that would enhance the immensely grisly and necro-fetishistic vibes of the songs would be the knowledge that Layne Staley is ultimately replaceable.

ranked #12 amongst 'false metallers' (Drugs A. Money), Wednesday, 25 August 2010 21:35 (fifteen years ago)

Nirvana and I don't like metal

you doesn't hasta call me johnson (CaptainLorax), Wednesday, 25 August 2010 21:36 (fifteen years ago)

wouldn't consider either of these bands metal

funky brewster (San Te), Wednesday, 25 August 2010 21:37 (fifteen years ago)

nirvana and i share a secret crush

a dystopian society awaits if we continue on this path. (contenderizer), Wednesday, 25 August 2010 21:37 (fifteen years ago)

sorry to be confusing. I don't consider alice in chains metal either. (I don't like metal that sounds like metal rather than hard rock)

you doesn't hasta call me johnson (CaptainLorax), Wednesday, 25 August 2010 21:39 (fifteen years ago)

I'm just dropping non sequiturs, ignore me

you doesn't hasta call me johnson (CaptainLorax), Wednesday, 25 August 2010 21:42 (fifteen years ago)

dropping non sequiturs...LIL WAYNE

funky brewster (San Te), Wednesday, 25 August 2010 21:42 (fifteen years ago)

I'm not sure what the question is asking.

billstevejim, Thursday, 26 August 2010 04:11 (fifteen years ago)

it is asking what kind of party you would play alice in chains at, and why you are not at another party

a dystopian society awaits if we continue on this path. (contenderizer), Thursday, 26 August 2010 04:14 (fifteen years ago)

90s night partys sound like fun

you doesn't hasta call me johnson (CaptainLorax), Thursday, 26 August 2010 04:16 (fifteen years ago)

My favorite Alice In Chains songs are by no means "party music." Or rather, that would be like playing "Stairway To Heaven" at a party... I would rather hear "Get Low."

I suppose Incesticide is a good party album.. The "Turnaround," "Molly's Lips," "Son Of A Gun" trilogy would be some good fun.

billstevejim, Thursday, 26 August 2010 04:21 (fifteen years ago)

^^^ good party

plus then you take it off and play some vaselines until they make you play something else

a dystopian society awaits if we continue on this path. (contenderizer), Thursday, 26 August 2010 04:22 (fifteen years ago)

Or Devo!

billstevejim, Thursday, 26 August 2010 04:28 (fifteen years ago)

always devo

a dystopian society awaits if we continue on this path. (contenderizer), Thursday, 26 August 2010 04:30 (fifteen years ago)

Nirvanna man, they just have those lyrics that flow with everything. They made the most influential lyricz i have ever heard. Plus their lead singer died which makes their music so classic!

duffy665, Thursday, 26 August 2010 07:35 (fifteen years ago)

AiC's lead singer died too

funky brewster (San Te), Thursday, 26 August 2010 11:21 (fifteen years ago)

Plus their lead singer died which makes their music so classic!

billstevejim, Saturday, 28 August 2010 00:08 (fifteen years ago)

Nirvana's singer died first so that means they were more raw and did it first. True originals.

Hinklepicker, Saturday, 28 August 2010 07:55 (fifteen years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.