And 'Positivity' was so utterly, utterly pish it almost made me cry...
But I went out and bought 'A New Morning' today in part because I saw them live 3 weeks ago and they played some stuff from it and I thought it sounded, well, quite good actually. I'm listening to it as we speak and my opinions are still being formed but I'm quite mixed about it. Some of it is really pants ('Positivity', 'Lonely Girls') and some of it seems to really stand out ('Lost in TV' and 'Untitled... Morning'). The rest I'm not too sure about as of now, with 'Obsessions' having quite a catchy pop tune but some really dodgy lyrics and 'Streetlife' being much the same. I think they should have binned anything co-written or even involving the unwelcome spectre of Neil 'I'm a knob' Codling a long time ago though seeing as he's responsible for a lot of what made Suede crap.
Anyone else gone out and indulged in any Anderson-related hi jinks today?
― Calum Robert, Monday, 30 September 2002 14:49 (twenty-three years ago)
― weasel diesel (K1l14n), Monday, 30 September 2002 21:10 (twenty-three years ago)
― Eyeball Kicks (Eyeball Kicks), Monday, 30 September 2002 21:11 (twenty-three years ago)
if u want/need, like i still do, 2 indulge in'what if' fantasies re: the original line-up's reformationcheck this sunday's 'ndependent on sunday'interview.
― piscesboy, Monday, 30 September 2002 22:28 (twenty-three years ago)
In saying that I really liked 'Coming Up' and they were still capable of producing heart rendering loveliness ('By the Sea', 'The Chemistry Between Us' and flip sides such as 'Another No One' and 'This Time').
'Head Music' was pathetic, and the new album is decidedly so-so, though 'Lost in TV' and 'Oceans' are really mind blowing.
Maybe the problem is that Suede never really had the chance to evolve as a band as almost every album the line up changes (i.e. Anderson/ Butler to Anderson/Oakes to Anderson/Codling to Anderson/Lee to Anderson/One man and his dog).
Please tell me more about the 'Independent on Sunday' interview. Pleeeease! I still live in hope that they'll go back to being that awesome 4 piece...
― Calum Robert, Monday, 30 September 2002 23:16 (twenty-three years ago)
― Charlie (Charlie), Monday, 30 September 2002 23:23 (twenty-three years ago)
― lynskey, Monday, 30 September 2002 23:30 (twenty-three years ago)
If the choice is the Music as 'something new,' say, I'll stick with old. ;-)
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Tuesday, 1 October 2002 00:41 (twenty-three years ago)
― bham, Tuesday, 1 October 2002 08:40 (twenty-three years ago)
No.
(I think that says it all, really).
― James, Tuesday, 1 October 2002 10:44 (twenty-three years ago)
― piscesboy, Tuesday, 1 October 2002 10:58 (twenty-three years ago)
Ha ha! The Music are fucking awful. I once described them as a horriffic cross-breed of "The Second Coming" and the Red Hot Chilli Peppers, and I stick by that. Suede ARE much better, but then so is pretty much anyone.
"They're gone gone gone gone . . . . . . start looking for something new rather than pining for lost idols . . ."
I AM looking for, and finding, new stuff, but if a band releases something as good as Dog Man Star then I will always give their new stuff a chance. Head Music was good, but it wasn't good enough for me to say: "Oooh, I can't WAIT for their next album!". I'm still a little bit interested, though.
― weasel diesel (K1l14n), Tuesday, 1 October 2002 11:52 (twenty-three years ago)