― Anthony (Anthony F), Tuesday, 24 June 2003 01:31 (twenty-two years ago)
I heartily recommend the Oxford History of World Cinema book if you want a good overview of the entire art historically from pretty much every angle.
What else? I'm certain that some of the Cahiers du Cinema have been collected and translated. There's Eisenstein's two books, as well. Stanley Cavell does some clever, though sometimes controversial, work analyzing films. Oh, and can't forget Andre Bazin's "What Is Cinema?"
Michael Ondaatje did a really good book on Walter Murch if you're interested in editing.
I'm gonna think up some more in the meantime, most likely.
― Girolamo Savonarola, Tuesday, 24 June 2003 21:02 (twenty-two years ago)
― Justyn Dillingham (Justyn Dillingham), Wednesday, 25 June 2003 06:30 (twenty-two years ago)
Felt like a little too much cheerleading, not enough critcism and information.
― miloauckerman (miloauckerman), Thursday, 26 June 2003 21:09 (twenty-two years ago)
― Girolamo Savonarola, Thursday, 26 June 2003 23:15 (twenty-two years ago)
mustmustmust.
Also the Projections series is good if you can find them
― jm (jtm), Friday, 27 June 2003 00:23 (twenty-two years ago)
OK, yeah, true. That's what mine were from actually.
― miloauckerman (miloauckerman), Friday, 27 June 2003 01:43 (twenty-two years ago)
― Justyn Dillingham (Justyn Dillingham), Friday, 27 June 2003 07:59 (twenty-two years ago)
However, if criticism and/or theory are to be included, I have to submit that everyone who reads film theory will one day come across Manny Farber's Negative Space and will come to fall in love with his criticism (if not necessarily his tastes, though I personally never liked Hawks until I read Farber's insistent defenses on his behalf).
― Eric H. (Eric H.), Friday, 27 June 2003 12:36 (twenty-two years ago)
― Josh Timmermann (Josh Timmermann), Friday, 4 July 2003 21:57 (twenty-two years ago)